Leftist 'Media Reform' Outfit Free Press and Their Marxist Co-Founder Robert McChesney

Photo of Seton Motley.
  • Bookmark and Share

NewsBusters.org | Media Research Center
Robert McChesney, Enemy of Free Speech

The broader public is finally being introduced to Leftist "media reform" outfit Free Press and its co-founder, avowed Marxist Robert McChesney. (I appeared on the October 7, 2009 edition of the Glenn Beck television show to discuss one and all.)

Founded in 2002, McChesney's Free Press seeks to transform the media landscape - on radio, television and the internet - via (amongst other ways) sweeping rules changes at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Changes that would dramatically decrease private ownership of the means of news and information delivery, with the federal government assuming an ever greater replacement role.

One intended effect of this shift away from free market media to government-owned media is to diminish what Free Press sees as the inherently right-wing slant of the news that results from corporate ownership. (Have they watched NBC, ABC or CBS - ever?). And in their warped view of the media landscape, conservative and Christian talk radio (which is not news but self-identified opinion) is the most egregious example of this alleged corporatist taint.

Free Press has spent the last seven years developing policy prescriptions and working with like-minded policy and public officials that would make this hoped-for transformational change a reality. And their allies are now in place and in power - at the FCC and in the White House.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

With current FCC Chief Diversity Officer ("Diversity Czar") Mark Lloyd and the Center for American Progress, Free Press co-authored the 2007 report The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio, which called for the FCC to enforce broad new definitions of the media diversity and localism broadcast license requirements. These changes were intended (as per Lloyd's own words) to force conservative and Christian talk show hosts off the air, to be replaced by those of a Leftist bent.

Free Press worked with then-presidential candidate Barack Obama to develop his communications policies. And they are currently leading the charge in favor of "(inter)net neutrality," for which the FCC on October 22 filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - the first step in an FCC rules change. (On November 14, 2007, then-candidate Obama said "I will take a back seat to no one in my commitment to net neutrality.")

President Obama's FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski hired Free Press Press Secretary Jen Howard to serve in that capacity for the FCC. (It should also be noted that Marxist 9-11 "Truther" Van Jones - who was President Obama's "Green Jobs Czar" until his multi-layered, anti-American and paranoid past came to light, forcing him to resign - was a Free Press Board member until 2008.)

The connections between Free Press and the current Administration are many.

Then there is McChesney. He is (shocking) a college professor - the Research Professor in the Institute of Communications Research and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science for the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.

McChesney is the former editor (2000-2004) and current board member of Monthly Review, which he himself describes as "one of the most important Marxist publications in the world, let alone the United States." He has written several books, including such titles as Corporate Media and the Threat to Democracy (with Edward S. Herman) and Our Media, Not Theirs: The Democratic Struggle Against Corporate Media (with Free Press co-founder John Nichols).

Notice the anti-capitalistic trend developing here?

McChesney and Nichols penned a piece for last Friday's Washington Post calling for the government to subsidize journalism. Again, seeking to diminish private media ownership. Again, seeking to expand the government's media stake. It isn't just for PBS and NPR anymore.

Publications salivating at the prospect of government coin should consider the fate of the banks and car manufacturers who danced for the government dime, and now are unable to extricate themselves from the ever-expanding role their federal paymasters are playing in their day-to-day operations. And those were just loans.

It is an even more frightening prospect for news outlets to be beholden to the government they are supposed to be covering - and holding accountable. You think we've already seen the Obama-era media converted from watchdogs to lapdogs? Just wait until they're on his payroll.

The First Amendment's freedom of the press would die the moment the first government check cleared.

Next: Marxist Free Press Co-Founder McChesney In His Own Anti-Free Speech, Anti-Capitalism, Pro-Chavez Words

—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center and Contributing Editor for NewsBusters.org.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

leftists?

Eccles. 10:2     "A wise mans heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him towards the left" 

this nice man-

should go hunting with the former VP

if you do not like America as she is leave.

BHO-  THE PROGRESSIVE PIRATE

 

 

 

The threat to public communication is not from the left

It's from the center. And I don't mean the political center. I mean, from centralized power.

Consider this scene from A Man for All Seasons:

William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law! 
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? 
William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that! 

Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!  

Roper wants to level the laws and exercise the authority of the Church--the centralized power in the play. The laws in England are like the decentralized nature of our sovereign states, of the autonomy of free-market companies, of the distinction between the state and the market.

Now, consider this unintended consequence: What will happen when Republicans and conservatives get in power? Will they use the power to control media to force or push a conservative agenda? How will Dems and Libs react to that, which is nothing more than using their own tool against them?

Get government out of business!  

"Golly, doncha know that

"Golly, doncha know that all corporations are conservate?"

This passes for acceptable logic in the mind of our so-called 'elites'.  This old canard is beyond tiresome - it's ignorant and just plain juvenile. 

Forget the democratic voter registration, campaign contributions, and endorsements the owners and managers of so many corporations show.  They're conservative because...because...well....just 'cuz.  

Seton... Thank you for

Seton...

Thank you for keeping us all to up-to-date on this most important issue....it is spooky the speed for control this administration is going in...I keep up with this myself as much as possible.

This does not get enough attention...which the leftist enemies within count on...people won't miss anything until it is either gone, completely controlled, or costs to much and affects their personal life....(gas prices are a good example, all of a sudden the majority were screaming Drill Baby Drill...which some of us have been doing for years) anyway...Chavez style is exactly the direction the O-Team is desiring.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart