Citing 'Diversity,' Obama Admin Sides with Leftist Grievance Group and Investigates More Accurate Arbitron Ratings System

Photo of Seton Motley.
  • Bookmark and Share

NewsBusters.org | Media Research Center
The Upside Down Ratings World of NABOB
On April 9 we wrote of an asinine assertion made about the new Arbitron radio ratings system by soon to be transferred Democratic Federal Communications Committee (FCC) Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein.  Well now President Barack Obama has put the imprimatur of his FCC and Administration on Adelstein's addled notion.

Since the inception of tracking those who listen to Guglielmo Marconi's marvelous invention, Arbitron had relied on a personal pen-and-paper diary system and the journal-keepers' honor and memory as to what they had listened and for how long they had done so.  The potential for misremembering and book-cooking was simply staggering.

So Arbitron came up with a pager-esque device called the Portable People Meter (PPM).  This gadget automatically tracks to where the radio dial is tuned, thereby virtually eliminating human error and the ability to cheat.  

Obviously, this is far more accurate way to establish who is listening to whom, right?  If you do find this to be a self-evident truth, you are not a master of the obvious, you are - according to the National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters (NABOB) - a racist bigot.

How so?  Because the ratings under the new regime revealed that the numbers for hip-hop, urban and other racial minority stations had long been incorrectly inflated (and conversely the listenership of talk radio had long been underreported).

And this, you see, is not the better results of technological advancement, this is racism.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

With these lower numbers comes lower advertising revenue, the lifeblood of the radio business.  So the bleeding must somehow be stopped, even if the reality of the situation can not.   

So President Obama is now on the case.  In the name of media "Diversity," he has ordered an FCC inquiry into the matter.  

Excerpts from the FCC's official Notice of Inquiry:

In this Notice of Inquiry ("NOI"), we seek comment on issues relating to the commercial use of a radio audience measurement device, developed by Arbitron, Inc. ("Arbitron"), known as the portable people meter, or "PPM."#

Broadcasters, media organizations, and others have raised concerns about the use of the PPM and its potential impact on audience ratings of stations that air programming targeted to minority audiences, and consequently, on the financial viability of those stations.

They claim that the current PPM methodology undercounts and misrepresents the number and loyalty of minority radio listeners. They assert that, because audience ratings affect advertising revenues, undercounting minority audiences could negatively affect the ability of these stations to compete for advertising revenues and to continue to offer local service to minority audiences.

NABOB is one of the "broadcasters, media organizations and others" who "have raised concerns about the use of the PPM."  They have, of course, quickly banded together in a new organization - the PPM Coalition (PPMC), although it was NABOB alone that got Adelstein to file his initial complaint.  And to the PPMC Obama quickly genuflected, King of Saud-style.  

This new grievance gaggle is made up of groups with names quite reminiscent of the un-diverse FCC "Diversity" Committee that convened on May 7:

  • National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters (NABOB)
  • Spanish Radio Association
  • Minority Media and Telecommunications Council
  • American Hispanic Advertising Association
  • Border Media Partners
  • Entravision Communications Corporation
  • ICBC Broadcast Holdings, Inc.
  • Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
  • Univision Communications Inc.

The PPMC is claiming that the abjectly poor, downtrodden and forgotten minorities "undercounted and misrepresented" in this new methodology only have cell phones and not land lines, and therefore are missed by the Arbitron PPM placement process. 

PPMC alleges that the PPM sample is deficient because only five to six percent of the PPM sample is comprised of cell-phone-only households, while a significant and growing percentage of young adults and Hispanics and African-Americans live in cell-phone-only households.  PPMC asserts that 19.3 percent of Hispanic households and 18.3 percent of African-American households are cell-phone-only, whereas 12.9 percent of non-Hispanic white households are cell-phone-only. 

Last time I checked, cell phones were FAR more expensive than land lines, so how this PPMC claim fits into the "abjectly poor, downtrodden and forgotten minority" narrative escapes me.

The PPMC is also claiming that ethnic minorities are less inclined to participate in PPM surveys.  This also makes very little sense.  Were ethnic minorities more likely to studiously keep an Arbitron handwritten diary than they are now to carry around an unobtrusive PPM?  Hardly likely.

That Obama's FCC has picked up and made official this pseudo-intellectual twaddle - and assigned the Agency that determines the fate of every broadcaster in America the task of its investigation - isn't very heartening to those of us still enamored with the First Amendment. 

As we've already seen in myriad other areas - federal spending, banking and auto manufacturing to name but a few - timidity is not an Obama characteristic.  If he is willing to take on this most ridiculous of claims in the name of media "Diversity," we are naturally left to think that there is nearly nothing he WON'T do to ensure that the broadcast world is remade in the manner he thinks it should be. 

Yet another Change for which we had not Hoped.

—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center and Contributing Editor for NewsBusters.org.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

When reality disagrees with

When reality disagrees with the left, the left tries to change reality.

Oh, and NABOB, I thought is incredibly ironic.

Which is why they are

Which is why they are deranged.  Reality always disagrees with them.  Their entire agenda is designed to insulate themselves from reality. 

Welfare - eliminates the reality of having to work.  Abortion - eliminates the reality of taking responsibility for the life you created. CAFE standards - eliminate the reality of energy conversion.  Affirmative Action - eliminates the reality that some people are more qualified than others.  "Progressive" Taxes - eliminate the reality that some people make more money than others.  And on and on it goes.

After years and years of denial of reality, they go insane, which makes it easy for them to believe the ridiculous things they do.

"The PPMC is also claiming

"The PPMC is also claiming that ethnic minorities are less inclined to participate in PPM surveys"

Are they saying minorities are too stupid and lazy to keep a diary of what they listen to? This is the kind of racist attitude, masquerading as "understanding" and "care", liberals get away with day in and day out. And while everybody is busy fretting over the economy, Obama and Co. are busy spinning their webs throughout government and society. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

I don't understand

if you can't afford a landline how can you afford a single thing advertisers would like you to buy, anyway.  Even in a budget as tight as ours we still opt to keep our landline ($29.99) for things like 911 emergencies and whole-household related messages.

___________________________________________ 
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past - George Orwell - 1984

We have no landline, but we

We have no landline, but we do have 5 cells on one account and do pay a hefty bill each month but save about 50 bucks a month having no land line.

wow

for your kids I assume?  Do they pay their portion?  We have a cell contract that is so old it no longer exists - $39.99 for 400 min shared between myself, the husband, and the 'as you need it' emergency phone for our eldest (16) daughter.

___________________________________________ 
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past - George Orwell - 1984

We have no landline, but we

We have no landline, but we do have 5 cells on one account and do pay a hefty bill each month but save about 50 bucks a month having no land line.

We kept our landline too,

We kept our landline too, but I had stripped every last "extra" from it: no long distance, no call waiting, nothing.

Now we have more features because of Comcast Triple Play which includes our landline phone.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

nattering NABOBs of negativism. ...

Thanks Spiro Agnew..How did you know?

Reagan VS Carter and 0bama

In Obama's World

We'll be driving cars we can't fit our families in with radios pre-programmed to Air America and the local hip hop station, not to mention the Big Brother channel for emergency announcements and mealtime instructions from our Dear Leader. 

 


I said this a couple of

I said this a couple of months ago, sell your shit, get a sailboat and sail off into the sunset, zillions of carribean beaches out there, plus others off the coast of central and south america, throw in the caymans and jamica, thats a lifetime of exploring, no worries mate

Kangaroo... You have me

Kangaroo...

You have me smiling here, we were going to do something like that about 16 years ago or so....too late now.

You enjoy and share with us though...please.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Screw the truth! Show me da

Screw the truth! Show me da MONEY!! 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

step by step,

step by step, here they come with the censorship doctrine

Where would Obama be without

Where would Obama be without the race card?

DUST

DUST

When are we going to see the

When are we going to see the bigger talk show hosts start bringing up the Savage thing? It is obvious with all the silence that they care about no one except themselves. First Savage and then who? O'Reily, Limbaugh, Beck? This needs to be made a major issue by all conservative outlets. We may not have any left soon if nothing is done.

are you talking about him

are you talking about him being 86ed from the UK

NABOB -

National Association of Barack Obama Broadcasters

National Association of Blaring Obnoxious Blowhards

National Association of Bigbrothers' Oversight Board 

Ney, Another Barack Obama Bailout

 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, You're welcome - Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)

News flash

The New Dodge Rahm line of cars will have presets on Obama radio, NPR and other approved media.  You will not need to tune your own car radio any longer.  This will help MSM ratings.  (If they start building cars again)

seven... I would be laughing

seven...

I would be laughing out loud, with the exception of how true this is what hey are aiming for via various ways..let alone tracking us all and our gas milage...it's coming.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

X

If its racists for whites to listen to talk radio

then isn't it racist to listen to crap? err rap?

It is always Racist

I am so tired of having the race card pulled everytime anything impacts someone who happens to be of a certain minority. It is racist to pull the race card. These days we should not tolerate this blatant racisit behaviour. OK just kidding but you get my point. When will the country as a whole get tired of this type of destructive tripe? We as a country are in for a long hard ride if this is the type of reasoning we can expect from this administration.

Everything is racist if it

Everything is racist if it serves the left's agenda.  Entrance exam's for college or the military are racist.  Law school and BAR exam's are racist.  Seinfeld was called racist because no black character's fit into the Jewish comedy.  Prison's are racist, drug law's are racist and now Arbitron ratings are racist.  I could write a list all day but you get the picture.

10 percent of Cell Phone Only households already monitored

Here's what the PPMC neglected to tell us: 10 percent (and not 5 percent as they allege) of Cell Phone only households are already being monitored! As a matter of fact, Arbitron just announced plans to increase the sampling of cell phone only households from 10 percent to 15 percent.

"Arbitron also plans to increase its in-tab sample target for cell-phone-only Households in PPM markets from an average of 10 percent to an average of 15 percent by the end of 2009. The step up to 15 percent averaged across all PPM markets is accelerated from 12.5 percent, which the company had announced previously." Source

So, those cell phone only households ARE being included in the sampling and Arbitron is NOT being racially biased in it's sampling techniques like the PPMC is alleging? Well, isn't that interesting!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Lets see,

1 An actual record of listenership recorded in true time.

2 A subjective, written recollection of what a person was listening to.

So which is more accurate? Don't forget to add the fudge factor to make the answer come aout the way you want it to. (To be fair) (Sarc) 

Where have I seen this before, oh yeah The Climate Models vs. actual readings.

Where is this sort of study planned for the future, oh yeah the Census count of 2010.