WaPo Provides Context-Free Coverage of the Israel-Gaza Conflict

Photo of Seton Motley.

NewsBusters.org | Media Research Center
Failing to Grace the WaPo Front Page
The Washington Post has certainly taken a timeworn media tack in it's coverage of the latest instance of Israel stubbornly insisting on continuing to exist.  That being: keep nearly all mentions of the prolonged and incessant attacks of Israel by the Palestinians off the front page and to an absolute minimum, then deliver maximum coverage of the Israelis' response. 

A response that Israel on Christmas Day openly announced was to come were the rocket bombardments from the Gaza Strip not halted.  This called shot gave the Post two (additional) days to provide a description of the nearly daily asaults Israel has faced from Gaza since they ceded the territory to the Palestinians in September 2005 (and that have been stepped up even further in the last month plus).  To provide some sort of context for why the Israelis were planning what they have now begun.

But rarely if ever does the Post find these Palestinian attacks worthy of any coverage at all, let alone the stuff of front page placement.  It didn't this time either.  No mention -- of Israel's warning or why they had issued it -- made the Post's front page at all on either day.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Israel's promised retaliation, however, did make the Post's front page for two straight days (thus far).  In fact, on both days there were full-color four-column above-the-fold below-the-masthead photographs of the damage done, accompanying the Post's de riguer woe-are-the-Palestinians stories.

For the dedicated Middle East and Washington Post observer, this is merely another example of the anti-Israel slant that the paper has long held.  For the casual WaPo reader -- a far more numerous lot -- the damage done to their perception of the circumstances in the Holy Land by this feat of journalistic malpractice is pronounced and lasting.

To see and read nothing -- NOTHING -- on the front pages of the Post of the years-long Palestinian attacks from Gaza in the days immediately preceding their gigantic coverage of Israel's response makes the latter seem capricious and unjustified.  Which it is anything but, but is just how the Post apparently wishes it to appear to be.

—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center and Contributing Editor for NewsBusters.org.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Personally

Personally i got sick of the propoganda spewed from newspapers  years ago, and this is just another instance of it.

Yes, this is not bias.

  It is open malpractice. Arab apologists. Pure & simple.

   And I've checked. 

   And I've checked.  There is nothing in the paper about it being my birthday today.  Well I don't care.  They can be birthday deniers if they want but I'm going out for some seared, carbon emitting animal flesh.  Preferably of the bovine variety.

Happy Birthday MidAmerica!

Happy Birthday MidAmerica!

Yes MA...I ditto sheryl

Yes MA...I ditto sheryl here....and may you have many, many more!

I hope you had a great evening to-boot!

Btw...that was a good way to let us know it was your birthday too. ;-)

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Happy birthday MA. Mine is

Happy birthday MA. Mine is only 2 days after yours. At this age the only thing that birthdays are good for is to happy that you lived to be a year older.

I'm in a hurry...I see

I'm in a hurry...

I see nothing, know nothing, report nothing is exactly how O hopes the rest of his adoring base contines on with any conflict after he is anointed...again.

We are losing power here, snow is so bad here....later all...this is third post I've tried to send, it is rather condensed now.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Do they get any props for

Do they get any props for not using the phrase cycle of violence ?

The Left and their

MSM minions have been anti-Israel, pro palestine for quite some time. Now with the annointing of the one, possibly?/probably? a muslim sympathizer, Israel may feel that they have lost their main ally, and with the the possible perception on the Palestinian side that Obama is on their side more attacks are/will ensue.

Even if Obama pushes a more neutral stance this would change the power  structure in the region. Feeling isolated and alone in the world would probably push the Israeli's into a siege mentality and they do have a history of pre-emptive strikes. Once they get wind of Iran girding up to nuke them in their perceived weakness war will be unleashed in the region. As an aside I cannot understand the continuing support of the Democrat/Liberal Party by American Jews as the support of Palestine over Israel is almost a plank in the Dem Party. The Republicans have seemingly given overwhelming support to Israel but I am sure we are considered the anti-semitic ones.

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

ahussser... Not a word of

ahussser...

Not a word of your post do I have a disagreement with, for the life of me, I do not understand the dem/leftist party getting the majority of the Jewish vote here either.

The way some people vote year after year is beyond me as they get older, you would at least think somewhat wiser.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

  Normal 0 MicrosoftIntern

 

Normal
0

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}

I too do not understand why the majority of Jewish voters go to the
Democrats.  Democrats now a days are quick to condemn Israel
and ignore the attacks that Hamas and other terrorist organizations commit against
Israel.

Haven't the Republicans been steadfast friends and defenders of Israel?

Scuba,

I have to ask. What is this:

"Normal
0

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}"?

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

→ Hard to figure

I can't see it either. 

There is a blindness to the spirit of Neville Chamberlain that again leads. 

It's infuriating to see Stockholm Syndrome manifesting itself even among the very generation that saw piles of emaciated Jewish corpsesin mass graves.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Superglue

My chiropractor is a 50 year old Jewish woman (whose sister LIVES in Israel) and she voted for Obama.
I haven't asked her why because we've been good friends for 10 years and I don't want to say anything that might change that.
She is a highly intelligent woman, speaks 6 languages, is conversant in world affairs, and is a stark raving liberal.
I don't get it. Dem brainwashing sticks like superglue.
We gotta get us some of that.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

That conundrum is on the

That conundrum is on the same level as why blacks continue to vote Democrat.

For instance, 75% of black parents want school vouchers, and yet they continue to vote for Democrats who tell them to just sit tight, they will get the public schools fixed (while they send their own kids to private schools).

Go figure.

Motherbelt

I find it maddening when the party formed on an anti-slavery platform, who freed blacks from slavery, is painted with the racist brush. But the party that enslaved them and continued to keep them down well into the 1960's (and beyond if you count keeping them down through victimology and government handouts) they give their undying unthinking loyalty. 

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

This may give some

This may give some context... Warning: It's a sad read... Waving Goodbye To America

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Ct... A sad read

Ct...

A sad read indeed...unfortunately so very true.

The author is a great writer...this is the second or third time I have read his work, he is rich the way he puts pen to paper.

Thank you for this...I encourage others to take a minute to read it...comment too.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Written by Peter Hitchens,

Written by Peter Hitchens, a conservative.  Brother of Christopher Hitchens, not a conservative.   

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Republicans Got the Civil Rights Act Passed

Here is a version that makes it seem that the hero democrats convinced the evil Republicans to go along:

Passage of the act was not easy. House opposition bottled up the bill in the House Rules Committee. In the Senate, opponents attempted to talk the bill to death in a filibuster. In early 1964, House supporters overcame the Rules Committee obstacle by threatening to send the bill to the floor without committee approval. The Senate filibuster was overcome through the floor leadership of Senator Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, the considerable support of President Lyndon Johnson, and the efforts of Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen of Illinois, who convinced Republicans to support the bill.

Here is what I have found to be a more accurate version (which you may never have heard before):

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Senator Al Gore, Sr. And after he became president, John F. Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Attorney General Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King...

...Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860's, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon‘s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation‘s first goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs...

...Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.
 
Critics of Republican Senator Barry Goldwater who ran for president against Democrat President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.
 
Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater, also ignore the fact that President Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on January 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only thirty five words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Viet Nam War, President Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Like chooselife3x said:  "Dem brainwashing sticks like superglue.
We gotta get us some of that."

 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Choselife, I hope I can

Choselife, I hope I can offer an explanation as to your Obama-voting Jewish friend.

1. Voting patterns:  Those of us who believe that Israel is more right than wrong in the current conflict are appreciative that Republcans are supporting Israel - and for very sound reasons too.  We would like to believe that support of Israel is based on ethics and geo-political strategy rather than hopes of a quid pro quo.  Yet there are those Republicans who complain that the Jews should be more grateful.  But the future of Israel is not the only issue at hand and there are Democrats who also support Israel. 

2.  It's a cultural thing. Secular gentiles often underestimate how much their world view has been colored by the prevailing Christian culture in this country, and many gentiles, especially those who don't associate with Jews on a regular basis, tend to think of us just like them, except we don't believe in Jesus (although I do).  Partly this is a result of the "Judeo-Christian meme"
which was propogated for political reasons and leads to misunderstandings about both religions.  Although Christianity has its roots in Judaism and both share similar texts, they developed in very different directions.  So if Republicans presume to know about what Jews believe and care about, they may come away short-changed.

3.  Judaism is the original social justice religion.  Jews stand out as the one ethnic group in America which keeps voting liberal as it grows more prosperous. Jews have made up a large percentage of the labor and socialist movements of the early 20th century, and their children became "Red-diaper babies": libertarians, feminists, ACLU members, experimental artists and their patrons. In the Jewish world 2 degrees of separation is more common than 6, so most "conservative" Republican-voting Jews have family affiliated with these groups and attitudes, and many are proud of their activism if not their exact views.

Indeed, Jews are very conscious and proud of the social justice part of our heritage, i.e., compassionate rules of war, tithing, respecting other religions, intellectual debate, raising children to value study, mandating pleasurable sex as a wife's right, and speaking truth to power.  

For some Jews  it is the only thing about our heritage they are proud of and they apply it to working for causes that are not necessarily in the best interest of Jews, but again, most of us who disagree with them will concede that the activism itself is "very Jewish".

4.  Republicans need to appeal to the Jews' desire to pursue justice and make the world a better place, rather than protect the status quo.  So, for example, if Republicans argue for free markets, it should be because free markets work best to make the world a fair and better place.

Republicans need to convince the Jews that they will maintain a separation of
religion and state. Many of us have personal memories of being forced
to pray Christian prayers and sing Christian songs in school, or
getting beaten up or ostracized for not doing so.  On the other hand, the former would get extremely upset when we were absent from school for our "Hebe Holidays"

There are extremely large swathes of the Republican religious right who still think we are "Christ-killers" and heathens and want to convert us, and then usher in the next millenium. When missionaries ring our doorbells, we don't think "Liberal".  We don't trust that "faith-based initiatives" will be impartial.  Many of us feel very strongly culturally Jewish without any desire to express our identity through religious activities. 

5.  In  conclusion,  Jews will vote for whichever group aligns with our deepest desires for a just compassionate society as well as lasting security for individual rights (including freedom of worship, assembly, conscience, speech, etc., which in turn will guarantee our survival as a distinct ethno-religious group). Is this part of the Republican agenda? You decide.

Speaking only for myself, I vote conservative.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

Trix

WOW. Thank you, that was awesome. I'm bookmarking that, I'll need to read it a couple more times to savor all the implications.
I've often wanted to talk to Cindy (my chiro, is that a WASP name or what!) but was concerned it might alter our relationship. She is a wonderful person and very dear to me.
Alright, I'm gonna go read that again.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

BT-Closer to home

We have just elected a big nothing in the experience department and his mettle will be tested immediately on taking office. India/Pakistan, Russia rattling their sabers attempting to get back to the glory days of the USSR, Israel, Palestine, Iran and Iraq all could become flashpoints for a major conflagration. Personally I don't have much faith that these foreign policy issues, as important and dangerous they may become, will be handled well, but the runocrats will love the inaction, dissembling and temporising and excuse making which will be centerstage. We then can focus on more important matters like his chiseled pecs.  

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

ahusser... I'm throwing

ahusser...

I'm throwing China in the mix you have above too.

I love your phrase runocrats...

Priceless.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

BT

I forgot about China. Since they have all of our money and I have read for the first time they are venturing forth on the high seas with their navy which they havent done since the 1500's to quash pirates around the Horn of Africa. I think they will be rattling their sabers too. They may like our money more than jingoism because they have been very quiet over the Taiwan question since they blew some missiles their way in some wargames practice (wink wink) several years ago. PS I like the term runocrats too. It sums up their strategy when faced with an armed threat. Their party's flag should be made from yellow and red cloth.

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

This is nothing new. Their

This is nothing new. Their anti-Israeli playbook is open for all to see.

→ Sarah Palin/John Bolton '12

Either one of them can field a 3:00 am phone call.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

CA

Got any links on Bolton handy? I'd love to read up on him.
(When I typed CA the spell check prompted *CAhoneys*! Thought you'd get a chuckle out of that)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

→ You'd know him choselife

He's the Walrus-looking guy who used to be Ambassador to the UN.

Truly an American and truly a friend of Israel.

He's not your run-of-the-mill John Kerry

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Just got dome listening to

Cool....

Just got done listening to Bolton...like I wished long ago and have posted... Bolton for Prez! 

We will never be lucky enough to get someone like this great man is for a leader.

As a small aside what people like Voinovich and Chafee (sp) did to him was beyond disbelief, let alone infuriating, long story, but he never did get his permanent appt.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Thanks, I bookmarked that

Now THAT is one HELL of a resume. And libs try to call BIDEN a foreign policy expert. Ugh. Past pathetic.
One thing Bolton isn't is a politician though. He'll need to ride shotgun for someone charismatic like Palin or Jindal.
Here's hoping.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

You Guys

Just had a thought.... Imagine a VP debate between BIDEN and BOLTON.
Yeah, did your head explode too?!! ROFLMAO!!!!! Biden would cry, I guarantee you. D@mn, I'd give good money to see that!

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Me too cl3x... He's been

Me too cl3x...

He's been the man for me long ago...as for a debate, nobody could hold a candle to him on either side of the aisle with maybe the exception of Cheney as far as I am concerned...that is exactly why he will never be chosen to be on any ticket.

They both say it exactly like it is, no matter the subject... they are both conservatives, we can't have that.

I have also posted Cheney/Bolton before too...hehehee...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

BT

They are both 'real men' in the old-fashioned sense if you know what I mean. The kind that wouldn't stoop to campaign. They don't kiss babies and gladhand 'cause they're too busy kickin' @ss.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Why Bolton Should but Won't Run for High Office

Because he is a real man.  Because he tells it like it is and the media and the political classes cannot handle that.  Because he makes liberals heads explode- example.   Colmes (BTW a Jewish Liberal) asks Bolton if he would bomb or take military action against Iran and Bolton replies (paraphrasing) "I would have done it already".  LOL!  Colmes nearly was apoplectic worrying about the possible escalation of mideast tensions if Israel or the U.S. were to make such a move.  No concern,though, about other islamofascists getting nukes, which Bolton pointed out but Colmes ignored.  Bolton, like Rush, would never make it in an election.

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Exactly right

Exactly right nofate....

Colmes always manages to escape reality when convenient. I saw this too..

You know, I knew Bolton would say that, he has said it before, I was glad long ago when he came out and just laid his cards on the table, including what he sees as the Bush administration not doing something about this long ago ect...PCness, Condi, upcoming elections... who knows anymore.

I won't go into all of this, but I know you understand exactly where I am coming from.

If we had Bolton as Pres. this whole situation regarding Iran, Syria, Lebanon (of course Hezbollah, Hamas) would have been taken care of long ago...and Israel wouldn't be in the shape it is at the moment either.

Plus we wouldn't have had the mess we did with Iran doing all the destruction they did while we were in Iraq fighting, let alone, who knows what decisions he would have made regarding getting Osama if he is still alive that is regarding the problems with Pakistan/Afghanistan ect.

Russia would have had to take a step far back, Chavez would pay attention, China would bide their time (lol) ect...

Oh well...it is what it is...and I am rambling on too much.

The O will take care of it all ....his magic wand will do wonders.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Ban Politicians From Politics

Hey, BT.  I think that they ought to ban politicians from running for the presidency, the house or the senate.  Then we could get some real citizens to solve some problems.  'Course I wish Israel and the Palestinians would all just join hands and sing "Love, Love, Love".  That could happen, right? 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Which begs the question...

where are all the Hollywood Jews? I hear over and over again how it is the Jewish influence that runs this country- in Washington, in Hollywood, on Wall Street- you name it. Yet, they all seem to vote with the anti-semetics in the press. How is this possible? Even if being Jewish in America isn't the same as Jewish in Israel, the MSM doesn't separate the two. I just don't get it...

This is like the third comment I've posted here today where I'm just shaking my head in wonderment... 

Anti Israeli media

This has been going on for a very long time. I remember coverage similar to this from many previous conflict eruptions going back decades.

of course

This is a well-worn tactic used by the MSM to make Israel out the bad guy every single time.

They wax verbose about the damage inside Palestine, giving us images of "crumbling" homes and "terrified" mourners and "thick black smoke" filling the sky. They give personal stories of every citizen accidentally killed and every hospital staffer who has to work overtime.

Oh, and by the way, some little rockets flew into Israel and hit a couple buildings. A few people died but we don't know their names.

 

I'm a typical white person.