![]() |
| Spreading the Word |
It has been a horrendous year for the media's credibility, and Hastings's statements only make it worse. "If (it) sounds like I had some trouble being ‘objective,' I did. Objectivity is a fallacy. In campaign reporting more than any other kind of press coverage, reporters aren't just covering a story, they're a part of it-influencing outcomes, setting expectations, framing candidates-and despite what they tell themselves, it's impossible to both be a part of the action and report on it objectively."
Hastings is utterly derisive of both former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Arizona Senator and Presidential nominee John McCain, both of whom he covered during the Republican primary. He in fact dreamed repeatedly of doing Giuliani harm as some sort of warped civic duty.
Hastings wrote "I quickly realized Rudy (Giuliani) was a maniac. I had a recurring fantasy in which I took him out during a press conference (... just something that put him out of commission for a year or so), saving America from the horror of a President Giuliani." Of McCain, Hastings said he "imagine(d) (McCain) was at one time as honorable as everyone says," but that his "views on war and foreign policy, the way he fetishized the idea of sacrifice, unnerved me a little. He seemed to have gone just a little crazy, Captain Ahab-style."
Hastings was pleased to be switched to covering the Democratic primary, but New York Senator Hillary Clinton didn't do it for him. "I thought it might be better jumping over to the Democrats; at least I wasn't appalled by their basic ideas."
This is the second news magazine staffer this year to dismiss the concept of unbiased reporting. In April, Time magazine Managing Editor Richard Stengel asserted that "the notion about objectivity is in some ways a fantasy. I don't know that there is as such a thing as objectivity."
MRC President L. Brent Bozell, III:
"The liberal ‘news' media are admitting, brazenly and openly, that they are incapable of objective reporting. Their worldview is no different from the Daily Kos fanatics and their worn-out leftist clichés.
"The liberal so-called ‘news' media are beyond a tune-up, and beyond an overhaul. They are totaled. It's time to put them on the scrap heap where they belong."
—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center and Contributing Editor for NewsBusters.org.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Go and sin more?
October 23, 2008 - 13:05 ET by acumenAlong with not knowing whether to rejoice or moan over Hasting's confession, I can't help but wonder whether the messiah will offer Hastings absolution or excommunication.
Can one even imagine the MSM NEWS if McCain was 5pts ahead ?
October 23, 2008 - 13:16 ET by JayTeeAnd if McCain was 5 pts. Ahead in the polls would it be Reported ? And is it True today ?
When you LOSE TRUST you Stop watching . . . Been there, Done that.
Statement of the Obvious
October 23, 2008 - 13:34 ET by Anchor89The American people know that the MSM is in the tank for Obama, the Press admits it, and even Saturday Night Live lampoons it. This is why their viewership and readership continues to plummit. You would think that from an instinct of self-preservation alone, these organizations would change their ways. Apparently, they are content to ride the drop all the way to the bottom the way Slim Pickins rode the bomb out of the B-52 at the end of Dr. Strangelove.
Another test for the MSM: Will ANYONE cover the latest statement from the poster boy for the Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac sub-prime mortgage collapse?
"I think at this point there needs to be a focus on an immediate increase in spending and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat . . . I believe later on there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of the money."
-- Barney Frank, October 20, 2008
Teaching the consumer
October 23, 2008 - 13:37 ET by KC MulvilleIt's hopeless to expect the biased media to change. They have a vested interest in staying biased, and people follow their interests. Instead, it's better to focus on the news consumer. If people follow their interests, as I believe, then it's in our collective interest to teach people to consume their news with judicious skepticism.
I suspect that most people already do. Of course, the problem is that the biased media won't tell us that. They only tell us that the media is the source of all truth and wisdom. Think of Katie Couric asking Sarah Palin which media outlets shaped her worldview. Couric is actively pushing the idea, or she just takes it for granted, that the media is supposed to shape worldviews. Couric's attitude? Swallow it (vulgar reference at your discretion).
The moment I see a talking head with a microphone on television, I'm imediately suspicious. In fact, my natural inclination now is to assume that the reporter is a dope. Occasionally I watch Cops. Sometimes, there's a domestic dispute, and the cop pulls up to the house. As the cop is approaching the house, there's often a neighbor who tries to be "helpful" in explaining the situation. The helpful neighbor starts telling the story as he knows it, and inevitably the cop tells him to stand "over there." You know why? Because the cop knows that this helpful neighbor is almost always wrong. Besides, why is this helpful neighbor getting involved in the first place?
"Objectivity is a fallacy" -- and that's objectively true!
October 23, 2008 - 15:10 ET by lotr"The only thing objective is that there is nothing objective."
Stupidity run amok.
And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all. -- Edgar Allan Poe
Here is a Terrific Article Regarding Honesty in the MSM
October 23, 2008 - 22:08 ET by Rush FanDrudge has a link to this terrific and honest article by newspaper columnist Orson Scott Card (a Democrat) titled: Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?. Card covers a wide range of issues that he believes have not been covered fairly or at all by the MSM. Here is a brief excerpt:
"Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper.
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate."
Card links to another excellent article by Thomas Sowell titled: Do Facts Matter? regarding the current financial crisis. Sowell writes:
"The current financial bailout crisis has propelled Barack Obama back into a substantial lead over John McCain-- which is astonishing in view of which man and which party has had the most to do with bringing on this crisis.
It raises the question: Do facts matter? Or is Obama's rhetoric and the media's spin enough to make facts irrelevant"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The liberal media continues to sacrifice ethics and fairness for the greater cause: The Election of Barack Hussein Obama to the Presidency of the United States.