Essay: The Democrats’ Fairness Doctrine Dilemma

Photo of Seton Motley.

Do they represent the people in their districts, or Nancy Pelosi?

Naccy Pelosi | NewsBusters.org
The Spin Starts Here, or Do As I Say, Not As I Do
Congressional Democrats remain silent, acquiescing in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's determination to prevent legislation to block the reimposition of the so-called Fairness Doctrine. For all their prattling about protecting civil liberties, none of them - not a single one - has so far signed the discharge petition to allow the Broadcasters' Freedom Act to be wrested from Pelosi's grip to protect our freedom of speech.

Where do they stand on the federal regulation that served for four decades to remove issues of import from the radio airwaves and left us with 24-hours a day of liberal dominance of the radio airwaves? (Ronald Reagan removed the restriction in 1987, and the rest has been Rush Limbaugh-led broadcasting history.)

These Ds have been this quiet because they are not at liberty to discuss it. What we have been witnessing is a remarkable exhibition of partisan discipline. Last summer Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a diktat that no Donkey was to talk about the Fairness Doctrine, nor meet with anyone who wanted to talk about it. All the while she was repeatedly denying any Democratic interest in its revival.

And her subordinates have all come to heel. Pelosi herself, however, went on a bender and spilled the beans to John Gizzi in Human Events.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Congressional Democrats need to remember that they are Representatives -- and just who it is they represent.

Quoth the Speaker, when asked if she would allow Congressman Mike Pence's Broadcaster Freedom Act (BFA - H.R. 2905) - the bill that would kill once and for all the Fairness Doctrine -- out of jail in committee, to which she had exiled it, she answered unhesitatingly "No."

Pelosi went on to say that in fact "the interest in my caucus is the reverse" and that New York Democratic Rep. "Louise Slaughter has been active behind this [revival of the Fairness Doctrine] for a while now." When asked if she herself supported the return of the Doctrine, she, again without hesitation, said "Yes."

Madame Speaker revealed herself to be not only virulently anti-First Amendment, but with the Rep. Slaughter disclosure regarding ongoing toil towards reinstatement less than fully affiliated with the truth.

And made an already difficult situation for Congressional Democrats even worse.

On June 11th, Congressman Pence, along with most of the Republican leadership, my boss Brent Bozell, talk radio star Laura Ingraham and many, many others, announced a multi-faceted, multi-organizational push to get the BFA out of committee and on to the floor for a vote.

With Pelosi's blockade in place, the only way for this to happen is with a discharge petition signed by 218 of Pence's fellow members. A month later, 197 are on board - and they're ALL Republicans. No Democrat has crossed up Pelosi, despite the fact that she threw them all under the bus, disobeying her own order and revealing their agenda. One with which few Americans outside the liberals inside the Washington Beltway agree.

The pressure on these holdout Donkeys continues to grow. Their constituents have let them hear it and have it, spending the last thirty days bombarding them with phone calls, emails, faxes and letters demanding that they sign the petition for Broadcaster Freedom. We here at the Media Research Center have already had more than 150,000 people sign on on our website.

Congressman Pence told me that many Democrats have approached him in the halls of the Cannon Office Building and the Capitol saying things like "My constituents are really giving it to me on the Fairness Doctrine and the BFA. Anything I can do, you let me know." To which the Congressman always replies "Great, sign the discharge petition," at which point his Donkey counterparts get flustered and skittish, then silent, and then turn and run (or at the very least walk briskly) away.

Which means that the Pelosi gag order, despite her own violation of it, is still rigidly in effect for every member of her Democratic caucus. And raises the question: just who is it that these Democrats are representing?

On this vital issue of free speech, it isn't the people who elected them. Their constituents have made their will known, loudly and in large numbers, and their cries have fallen on deaf Donkey ears. These Democrats have chosen fealty to the San Francisco Speaker over the commitment they made to the men and women who voted them into office.

Time is running out. Congressional Democrats need to remember that they are Representatives -- and just who it is they represent. Are they an army of zombies, in Washington to follow blindly the orders of Nancy Pelosi, regardless of how they conflict with the will of their people? Or are they in D.C. to be the voice of the people who put them there?

On this, their people have spoken. They want Congressman Pence's Broadcaster Freedom Act to have a full and fair up or down vote, and they have been demanding of their Representatives that they sign the discharge petition to make that happen.

It's time Congressional Democrats finally started listening.

—Seton Motley is Director of Communications for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow. A 68-yr old

Wow. A 68-yr old dominatrix.

Not one has crossed her. What a bunch of spineless worms the dems are. "I pwomise to be good, Mommy."

SOL - the irony is rampant

she's trying to get a fairness doctrine passed by silencing her own party!
The GOP better start screaming loudly for the same treatment to television and Newspapers.

Yeah Dee - and influential

Yeah Dee - and influential magazines like Tiger Beat!

And Hollywood

Can you imagine what thing would be like if they were really fair?

Fair? Ah, we can dream, but

Fair? Ah, we can dream, but it ain't gonna happen. 

The last time the H-wooders banded together with this much intensity was in 1950. 

I also wanted to comment

That this article was very well written and I loved the use of the term "holdout Donkeys" It made me chuckle.

I would have preferred

I would have preferred "holdout jackasses", but that's just me...

excellent richflanj! Lol

that would have been even better ; )

So Free I had to move up here because it was too thin

and I'm not privileged like you with the special set up. ; )

So did you sign the petition for the Fairness Doctrine? I did and I had my husband do it and I sent it to some friends.

These are JDW's comments from below

I'm just copying and pasting the three good comments that got forgotten about because of the derailing.

These are JDW's comments

Who owns the airwaves over which stations (radio, internet, TV...) are broadcast?

Stations in the top 25 markets reach 90% of the nation, the remainder
are local. National coverage means advertising, local means the
audience has a short range to hear the station. Eliminate those in the
top 25 markets and who will listen? Eliminate internet in the top
markets and who will use it? Employ the Fairness Doctrine on TV and
imagine internet and radio conservatives sharing time with Katie...

Fairness... why won't Obama debate McCain?

JDW

SAPPY NEWS

DAILY WAVE

Bigspoon65's excellent comments

I just copied and pasted these because they got lost after the derailing also

BigSpoon65

The fairness doctine will push conservative talk radio to new heights
that have never been seen before. As the demo-nazis started their
hostile take-over of talk radio, personalities such as Rush Limbaugh,
Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Mark Levin would simply be pushed to
another medium.......satellite radio. If you thought Howard Stern the
shock jock received a ridiculous deal, can you imagine what Rush
Limbaugh would get? As a member of Rush 24/7 I would gladly follow him
over to satellite radio and laugh with him as the empire he leaves
behind crumbles like Air America did under liberal programming. The
socialists in this country already control the television news media
and we have all seen and heard how their ratings stack up against Fox
News. I say bring on the fairness doctrine and ruin talk radio. It
will just be another shining example of how conservatism and capitalism
will always kick the ass of liberalism and socialism. Sirius satellite
here we come.......LOL

 

Bigspoon - this is an excellent point that I hadn't thought of

I still think the fairness doctrine is horrible, but you are right, we will find a way.

Unfortunately the way things are now even it feels like we have so little influence. I think conservatives need to get better organized in general. We don't write enough letters, make enough phone calls, or donate enough money. We all have to get more involved.

 

 

It is horrible

BigSpoon65

I don't wish for the "Fairness Doctrine" to come back as it is an assault on our 1st amendment "right to free speech".  But our rights have been under assault from the left for decades and they are winning the fight.  The road to socialism is just a slight grade so as not to alert the people that they are descending into marxism.  Sad thing is that so many Americans can't see it happening.  My comment about satellite radio was meant to give those who hadn't thought of it a glimmer of hope.  The beauty of satellite radio is that it is not regulated by the government (FCC) which is why Howard Stern had to move there.  Satellite radio is a shining example of capitalism at its finest.  If there was a market for listening to peoples flatulence they could exist on satellite radio.  Conservative talk radio would indoubtedly flourish and grow on satellite radio if it was forced to go there.  I hope it doesn't have to but regardless of what happens the conservative voice WILL NOT BE SILENCED!       

 

It worked bigspoon

you gave me a glimmer of hope.

It's really sad but glimmers are all we have anymore.

delete

double

 

Last one - these are KC's excellent comments

A cut and paste of KC's excellent comments below

In the days of the Founders, you sent representatives off to Washington
to represent the interests of your district. As we all know, the
Constitution never mentioned parties, because there weren't any. Back
then, each district was relatively homogenous. The representatives
advocated for the local industry, whatever that was. Since how the
representative was supposed to vote was obvious, the only remaining
issue was the candidates' character and skill. Even the development of
parties was originally based on the competition between a strong or
weak federal government, but people cared about that entirely based on
how it affected their local economy. But those days are long gone.

Slavery transformed politics from economic to ideological parties.
The Republicans weren't elected for their economic policies. They were
elected to preserve the union and abolish slavery. As ideology
increased, each district grew more diverse economically -- so diverse,
in fact, that the local economy no longer matters. We don't have
farming districts competing with ranching districts competing with
districts with a big factory. Every district has hundreds of businesses
in dozens of industries. Family farms are down the street from
corporate parks. The point: Locality now means nothing. The fact that I
live outside Baltimore tells absolutely nothing about me politically.
In the days of the Founders, it told everything.

The result, in terms of political philosophy, is that none of my
representatives advocate any of my interests. As a conservative in an
overwhelmingly Democratic state, I am utterly un-represented. About the
only thing they could do for me is bring home a little pork, but as a
conservative, I don't want them to even do that. The only way for me to
participate politically is to either move to a conservative state, or
to a state which could go either way. Which means the only way for me
to have any political representation is to move to Ohio. (Something
tells me that this was not the result that Madison imagined.)

Now, let's not kid each other. There's zero chance of any of that
changing in the foreseeable future. Even the Sith Lord Obama's idea of
change is for all of us to stop bickering and simply accept radical
liberalism. The existing parties have way too much control over the
political process to allow any change in it.

Shouldn't that, by itself, scare you? It scares the hell out of me.

freedom of speech maybe

freedom of speech

maybe this is something matt can champion in his new column:)

You are lucky someone deleted your comments before Matt

saw them on the other thread. Trolling should not be tolerated and deleting trollish comments or banning the posters, either way is an appropriate way to deal with it. Stick to the topics TM.

the dee-approved topics

the dee-approved topics that is:)

hope you like the new policy - I know bin Laden would love it - it's just like Sharia law:)!

Do you still have your head?

Oh sorry maybe that's the problem. ; ) We've established that you people think I'm a goddess, but even this goddess doesn't pick the topics for Newbusters. Stick to their topics, not mine no matter how much you admire me.

Also remember "Calling Out" is probably more of a no no than ever when you do it to the Mastheads and Bloggers (like on your deleted comments today and the other day). Grow up and learn to debate the topics.

you are even more of a

you are even more of a goddess 2 me now - IMHO:)

and you're right, I should not label agnostics who ban Christianity as anti-Christian - they are certainly pro-Christian by any reasonable dee-based standards

but by all means, don't get me wrong - it should still be OK to call me a troll - definitely call me a troll when I don't agree with you

He didn't ban Christianity Troll

he banned what you are doing now. Trolling - Calling out people who are not even here to defend themselves and turning every thread into a Christian - anti-Christian debate.

Just like gossip and the

Just like gossip and the tango, it takes two to derail a thread.

Stay close to that refresh button.

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

you are really gonna steam

you are really gonna steam dee's bean dude

you better agree asap

let's see - this is an NB thread frowning upon democrat attacks on free speech

yet free speech is banned on NB

which is the subject of my posts on this thread

yes, I see now - we are way off topic on this

looks like that is what you are doing DVD

stay close - sorry but I've got to go. Have fun sticking up for trolls.

Who me? By golly, Dee

Who me?

By golly, Dee might be getting it!

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

→ Refresh button

If you study hard, maybe you too can have a rewarding career as a hall monitor.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

now run and tell yo mama

now run and tell yo mama bout that

→ Thanks Truthie

I'm gonna go axe her right now - Lizzie Borden

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

If you study real hard maybe you can get some better friends

it's so cute how you've taken truthie under your wing. You three really were a team weren't you? All that previous trashing of him was just for show. Get it now.

 

Yeah Dee... I saw on and

Yeah Dee...

I saw on and off earlier where the 3 Stooges were showing their true colors...real nice show they put on.

Heck, I'm having a hard time in between what is going on at home and just trying to catch up with the blog posts here today.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Hi BT

Yeah me too -I can't even catch up now have to run. Did you see how DVD declared Trach the winner of that argument that almost everyone here knocked him down.

The WTH thread is still up about the BBC thing and everyone can see how Trach "won" there. These guys are like Obama. They mean lose when the say win and you just never know where they are coming from. They just like to cause trouble.
Truth, Trach and Cool really had me fooled the way they went at each other all the time. All part of an act I guess.

→ Sorry Sheriff

Getting kinda crowded under that bridge, isn't it?

If it's your lot in life to exclude all others your clicque has branded, that settles it, I guess.

Obviously you can't be "in" unless you agree wih all tenets of the "getalong gang".

Pablum for everyone!!  Join the getalong gang now! 

Time to engage in some very spirited agreement!

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Said the deputy who went around tag teaming to bash Catholics

and anyone else who didn't want to hear religious arguments on media bias threads. Talk about cliques.

How sad that a person actually thinks he's being unfairly excluded because he just doesn't want to get along and wants to attack people without provocation. We should embrace our attackers. Yeah - that works. That's what Obama's going to do. You should vote for him.

I missed your position on the fairness doctrine. Not as important as hassling people huh?

→ Like, duh!

I keep forgetting calling people trolls isn't "provocation" when it comes from the self appointed chosen ones.

BTW, You're just itching toget into another Catholic debate aren't you?

Sorry, I won't oblige you no matter how many times you bring it up.  (like you just did in the post I'm anwering now).

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Trolling is derailing - he derails

simple as that Mr. FIGHT CLUB

Hi Cool

just want to let you know that I am not taking anybody side in this debate. Well, actually I have my personal opinion on who is right and who is wrong , but I'm not sharing.:-)

My question to you is, a few weeks ago. I was getting into it with the usual suspects and you told me that sometimes it is not important to get in the last word .

This thread does not appear very civil and looks like neither you or your opponent want to concede the last word. I hope you do not interpret this as me breaking the rules and calling somebody out, I'm just curious why it okay for you to do it and not me .

I just would like to know the answer, nothing more. Thank you :-)

Some folks can dish it out but cannot take it

delete (My better angel

delete

(My better angel won.)

 

 

Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson

What more obnoxious than a

What more obnoxious than a troll? The one narking on him.

Let the admins catch him.

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

no - what's more obnoxious is someone sticking up for him

They have said they don't have time to read everything. I didn't report it - I just responded to his nonsense.

Im not sticking up for him

Im not sticking up for him as much as I am pointing out you respond to this "nonsense"--everytime, with the same "banning and deleting comments."

It gets just as old.

You should grow up and know that there is chance he is prodding you and let him hang himself (although he is a big boy and can take care of himself).

 

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

→ DVD

Obviously billie goats must be careful when crossing bridges.  Occupants living under them may be gruff.

baaah baaaah

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

dee's on the prowl

dee's on the prowl people

we need to "grow up and stick to the topics"

so isn't matt great! I love him and heartily approve of all of his opinions

same with dee - it's all good:)!

such invigorating debate

I'm going to hit the water cooler and agree with everyone there - be right back 

You don't have to agree with anyones opinions troll

just stick to the topics and don't call people out when they are not here to defend themselves. Especially when they are NB contributors and Mastheads.

You don't know how to debate. You have to whine and troll and call everyone bigots and completely change the topics of threads.

Matt's not here during the

Matt's not here during the day? How presumptious of me...

So how do you debate properly then? I've been watching you today and the process seems to be that I post my opinion on the thread's topic, and then you call me a whiner and a troll - and then I...

...need to apologize and agree with you? Or what...?

Thanks for the help on this!

→ Be careful

I'm warning you, TruthMonger.  You have not been chosen as one who can engage in namecalling.  So if Dee calls you a troll, remember she (obviously) has been duly authorized to do so.

Just take your lumps and move along.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Remember if Cool calls you Hall monitor or Sherrif or attacks

you for calling out a troll who tried to derail Matthews new Column thread with a bunch of B.S. and name calling of the Masthead that Cool must be duly authorized to do so He's FIGHT CLUB BOSS. Watch out. He punches hard and admits he doesn't want to get along. Just punching for the sake of punching - that's what FIGHT CLUB does.

→ I'll stop now

Equal Time, Fairness Doctrine,  it's all the same.

Somebody's asking or more pie than they are entitled to.

If I want to watch all McCain all day long I can do so.  There's that much (and more) info out there.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Bravo! Finally now that the night is almost over

you've actually addressed the point. Thank you.

I'm glad you didn't bother with another meaningless apology. I won't fall for that again. Be proud.

→ That was easy

You can't help it can you?

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

So how about those New York

So how about those New York Yankees?

→ Them Astros

I don't watch them much either. (not that there's anything wrong with it)

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Screw the Yanyees! My Cubs are going all the way this time

I say that every year - but this time it's really going to happen. No foul ball catching fan is going to ruin it for me this time ; )

Thats just perfect. You're

Thats just perfect. You're a Cubs fan too?

Well, you better hope my Cards and their misfits don't knock off the best team the North Side has had in 100 years.

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

Dxmn Yankees !

I want ♪ to be ♫ a ♪ part of ♫ it, New York, ♪ New York! ♪♫

lol Free

that was adorable. I'm done with them for tonight. Just for you. You are sooooo much more fun.

Dee

:-)

Moving on, what would you say Nancy Pelosi's problem is?

Is she just deranged, or is she merely obsessed with her marxist goals? Personally, I think she overdid it with the botox, and the extra botulism is affecting her brain. ;-)

Good one free- Botu-Brain can be her new nick name

I truly think that she is a complete power hungry control freak. It's really going to be scary next year.

Dee

Yeah,

I think you're right about her being a control freak. Thta would help explain why she want to bring back the fairness doctrine.

"Must. Control. Public. Ariwaves." ;-)

→ Way to go Free

You have just succeeded in derailing a Fairness Doctrine thread with baseball talk.

You Troll!  /sarc

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Love those black eyes

keep um coming. Be proud

Yeah that could fly for you DVD except I know you saw

his prior comments. I am letting him hang himself - you were the one who told hims to be careful so he didn't get banned. Sorry but your sticking up for this trolling is what's getting old. This is the first time I've mentioned "banning and deleting comments" Yeah - one time would get old to a troll lover. You've stuck up for him on this thread on the thread where he attacked Matthew with no provocation just before this and in the thread where he and trach attacked Matthew and WTH as well as many of us.

Sorry if you don't like troll busting. I'm not stopping for you.

DVD is a trollagree with

DVD is a troll

agree with dee, DVD - and make it quick dammit

don't make us lay down the sharia law 

Why bother posting here?

Why do you bother posting comments here if you think that this site is hypocritical in the way it treats it's members and is following some cyber version of "sharia law," as you put it, in what a member is allowed to post in the comments sections? If you don't like this site and it's members, then I suggest you stay away unless you're goal is to be antagonistic with others. Is that it, are you merely trying to be antagonistic with the posters and commenter here? If so, that would make you a troll, would it not?

you tell me - you have free

you tell me - you have free speeh here - and if that all makes sense to you - then please feel free to run with it

I "bother" posting here because as someone who has posted almost daily here since it's inception I care deeply about the site, and the cause - and I like most of the members here

and yes, my goal is to antagonize quite a bit - if you must know, it's the heart of my religion

My comment was in sarcasm,

My comment was in sarcasm, from a PM that I sent TM.  

You have called for Trach and TM to be banned ever since Trach asked you questions you couldn't answer and TM supported Trach's point on the Snow thread.

I don't mind troll busting. It happens all the time on here. But you seem to take it to the extreme with "ban and delete". You also give the impression that anyone that throws a point that you don't agree with is a troll.

 

 

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

Wrong DVD you are making up stuff

Trach was the one who couldn't answer any questions. We all answered his questions many times over. He never never answered ours. I was one of the last ones that day to call for them to be banned.

I already explained - disagreeing is fine you don't listen. Trolling is bringing up provocative unrelated topics in order to derail a thread. That is what Trach and TM did on the Westburo thread. That's what Trach did on WTH's BBC thread, that's what TM did on the Thread about Matthews column and that's what you guys are doing here.
Why don't you make some comments about the fairness Doctrine? That's what this thread is about.

First things first

I'm not wrong, or making things up. I read the thread thank you and you (along with others) got upset.

I do listen, and read, and you cast anger and distgust when people don't agree with you. Then after a couple vollies you get frustrated and start calling people trolls.

Now for your question (see I play fair). Fairness Doctrine: I disagree with it, but agree that Pelosi has a right to agree with it.

 

You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?

Real substantive there

great contribution

bullseye DVD:)

bullseye DVD:)

too bad it'll probably be deleted 

→ Bullseye TM

Not to mention calling Trach out when he's not here to defend himself.

Never mind, I get it.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

:)! now dammit let's

:)!

now dammit let's listen to dee and get off of the topic of this NB thread hypocritically frowning upon the democrat's hypocritical opposition to free speech and get back to the democrat's hypocritical opposition to free speech:(!

→ Sorrry Truthie

I can't play with you anymore.  One of the sheriffs says if I agree with you on one issue I necessarily agree with you on every issue.

I'm joining the Getalong Gang for some spirited agreement.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Oh I forgot - you are just disagreeing

That's how THE FIGHT CLUB operates. Fight for the sake of fighting and ignore what ever the topic of the thread is. I disagree with just about everyone here on at least one issue. Political issues are different than personal issues. You attack people on personal issues like their religion and you attacked Truth for his and the way he talked about it before. Sorry - try again. It's not about disagreeing on issues. Stick to the issues.

Yeah right Cool - your buddy DVD brought up Trach

Trach is a troll who got banned - that's why he can't defend himself. Try again.

→ I see

Bringing up a name is the same as calling that person a troll.

I'm catching on to your nuanced approach now.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Cool ~ Dee

Pardon my interuption,

Trach has been banned? //update - "Access Denied" on his user id so I guess so, at least temporarily//

 

 

"They're both doofuses!" --Mark Levin (speaking of Obama & McCain)

→ I saw that Free

I guess he has been.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

I wish it did not have to

I wish it did not have to come to that, but he did it to himself. 

45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm

Right Free and Clear - As others said

I think he did it on purpose. For months he had only been attacking people's religion so he probably didn't care to be here if he couldn't do that. It looks like TM was spared - then today on the thread about Matthews new column he brought it up again and called Mathew names. I called him out as a troll because he brought up religion and the thread had nothing to do with it. Then Cool jumped in to chastise me - how dare I stick up for Matthew and not want another thread derailed! A moderator was smart enough to delete his attention getting name calling and then he ran right over here and made the comment he did at the top of this thread.

Now THE FIGHT CLUB is all over me. I'm so scared.

 

THE FIGHT ClUB dude has spoken

all must listen - always fight - never get along. Make sure to fight the most with conservatives - you get more points that way. Make sure you fight about non political issues too. That gives you more points in his FIGHT CLUB. The most points are handed out when the topic has absolutely no relevance to the thread like the one where TM's comments were deleted for name calling the Masthead and bringing up religion in a thread that had nothing at all to do with it. He was the first comment and Cool came right along to back him up.

FIGHT CLUB Dominates by tag teaming and counting on people being afraid to confront them. Sorry - not afraid of you.

Cool is the new King of THE FIGHT CLUB now that his best buddy has been suspended.

→ Stop it Dee

I can show you where bt has picked up on me where you left off.  Does that make her a tagteamer too?  NO.  She has opinions too, which I do read, whether she respects me or not.

Stop with the cheerleading already.  Do you think I care how big your Getalong Gang is?

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Did I log on to Daily KOS or NewsBusters?

Any chance I can ask everyone to take a deep breath, and relax without:

  • Hearing about who started it.
  • Hearing what this is about
  • Anyo