Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

MSNBC's Chuck Todd 'Loves' the History Lesson Bill Clinton Gives, Luke Russert Fawns

By Scott Whitlock | April 02, 2012 | 16:58

A  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

Different network, same fawning coverage. MSNBC journalists Chuck Todd and Luke Russert fawned over Bill Clinton, Monday, with Todd "loving" the liberal history lesson that the former Democratic President gave on health care. 

Rather than show the interview straight through, Russert and Todd would play a clip and then marvel over Clinton's wisdom. Regarding Obamacare, the Daily Rundown anchor introduced, "Well, speaking of health care, I love the history lesson he gave you on health care. Here’s his health care answer."

Clinton proceeded to repeat standard liberal talking points about the health care bill, including historical references that others have made. After the clip, Russert enthused, "John Adams making sea men get insurance!"

Russert offered Clinton softball questions about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who the MSNBC reporter referred to as "somebody who is now the highest rated, in terms of popularity."

Earlier, the young journalist offered this softball about the Clinton Global Initiative: "You often talked about that this century was going to be the next great American century. Can this millennial generation deliver that great American century with this--these terrible unemployment numbers?"

The only question that could plausibly be interpreted as tough came when Russert noted "you were able to come back [in 1992] and you never trailed in the poll after July. Can Mitt Romney do that?"

Russert and Todd, just like Jake Tapper at ABC, just seemed unable to find tough questions for the former President.


A partial transcript of the Daily Rundown segment, which aired at 9:15am EDT on April 2, follows:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

CHUCK TODD: And our cable exclusive former president Bill Clinton weighs in on 2012 what Hillary Clinton's plans really are for 2016 and whether the comparisons to him and Mitt Romney's struggles are–work.

(Clip)

BILL CLINTON, Former President of the United States: But I never had to change anything I said in the primary. There was no etch a sketch issue for me.

9:15 AM EDT

CHUCK TODD: Former President Clinton is the only Democrat to be elected President twice since Franklin Roosevelt. And he recently sat down with out own Luke Russert to share his thoughts on the health care debate, whether his wife is really going to retire. NBC Correspondent Luke Russert with me now. So Luke, you got the interview, you sat down, what is he up to?


LUKE RUSSERT: Morning, sir. Well, he was here in Washington, D.C. for the Clinton Global Initiative University, which is an annual conference with college kid where college kids come from all across the country and the world to talk about commitments they're trying to make to further society. It’s interesting, you meet kids who come up with some projects for folks in Africa to try to make some money and you meet kids who are doing stuff about water, all sorts of things you could ever imagine that, creating jobs here in the U.S. Really, sort of structured on young people and trying to get them employed and helping out fellow brothers and sisters.

(Clip)

TODD: Here is Bill Clinton's description.

RUSSERT: You often talked about that this century was going to be the next great American century. Can this millennial generation deliver that great American century with this--these terrible unemployment numbers?

CLINTON: Well, First of all, that's not their fault. I mean, their parents' generation did that. But I think that what they can do is use their skills at social networking, use their access to the internet for crowd financing, for example, for getting substantial amounts of money in small amounts to start their own NGOs and make a living doing good. They can start their own businesses in ways that were not available to their parents and grandparents. And I believe as we come out of this
recession and hiring picks up, they’ll will be well-positioned to get the new jobs. But I also think that they will be more self-reliant and more reliant on their informal networks to actually start a small businesses and expand them. I think you’re going to see a whole new kind of sector of  entrepreneurialism spawned as a result of the Internet.

TODD: But first and foremost, we know the President is a political junkie. How closely do you --did you get the sense he is following the Republican race-

RUSSERT: I think he is following it pretty closely. And ironically enough, the only other person that had these high negative ratings in this stage in their campaign was Bill Clinton in spring of 1992. The same kind of negative ratings that Mitt Romney has.

TODD: Well that’s interesting. Here's what he said about that.

(Clip)

RUSSERT: The only person who has high a negative rating at this time in his campaign was you in spring of 1992 and you were able to come back and you never trailed in the poll after July. Can Mitt Romney do that?

CLINTON: I doubt it. I doubt it for two reasons. First of all, I believe President Obama will be reelected because people will perceive that the economy is getting better and that we are generally going in the right direction. Keep in mind the 2010 electorate is not the 2012 electorate. More people will vote in 2012 and a more diverse America will show up at the polls and people had two years of the Tea Party Congress and the polls show they didn't like it very much. So he’s,
Mr. Romney’s got to deal with people's real aversion to putting the Presidency in the White House in the hands of a party they already don't like what they are doing in Congress. I mean, I said, the House and the White House. Excuse me. Secondly, I was subject to a very well organized attack which later the Republican operatives associated with the White House admitted they had started in the primary because they thought i could win the general election. So, there was this relentless personal attack and the American people are incredibly fair and they give you another look. But I never had to change anything I said in the primary. There was Etch-a-Sketch issue for me. I have some sympathy for Governor Romney because he couldn't have been nominated defending the Massachusetts law as a good model for the nation, because of where the Republican primary had gone.

TODD: Interesting. He started to make a case of why Romney is going to get a second look 'cause all of them do. I betcha Romney believes that there’s been a coordinated attack campaign against him-

RUSSERT: Absolutely. That right there on the health care law. Saying it’s too bad he can’t run on his health care law because it's a good idea.

TODD: Well, speaking of health care, I love the history lesson he gave you on health care. Here’s his health care answer.

RUSSERT: What's your initial reaction to what you read from the Court in last week. And do you think the law will be overturned?

CLINTON: I don't know. But it was an unusually politicized discussion, I thought. Actually no one knows yet about whether how well it's going to work because it's just now being implemented. But I don't think it was unconstitutional in any way, shape, or form. Even in the 1790s, there were mandates. George Washington mandated that shipping companies insure their employees. He signed a bill mandating that able bodied citizens have firearms in their homes because they thought the British were coming again  John Adams signed a bill that mandate that
individual sea men have hospitalization insurance. I– you know–to me, it's hard to take the constitutional argument seriously. So, I think there is more politics.

RUSSERT: John Adams making sea men get insurance!

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Daily Rundown
  • MSNBC
  • ObamaCare
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

"The Oracle...

Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 5:08pm.

...Of The Oral Office."

Liberal memories are nonexistant.

  • Login to post comments

These guys are a little too

Submitted by the struggler on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 5:21pm.

These guys are a little too gay with each other.The last time this pair was featured on NB's they were giddy as school girls.

  • Login to post comments

These

Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 5:31pm.

two little libs are probably to young to realize the damage done to the respect of this country and the office of president that clinton did. They can fawn all they want but, the clinton legacy will never change no-matter what he does or says.

  • Login to post comments

Clinton & Carter

Submitted by ExTxMarine on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 5:57pm.

Both of these fools cost the US world wide respect, not to mention the internal damage, and neither will ever be able to overcome their true colors - one a womanizing, small-time socialist and the other, a complete fool that was only recently replaced as the biggest mistake to ever be elected President of the United States.

Carter is probably going to die of a heart-attack due to the heart palpitations he has every time Obama opens his mouth! Carter has been like a fart in the wind in America - staying low and out of site! Now that Obama started making him look "reasonable," Carter thinks he is relevant and can come out of hiding! Obama: the gift that just keeps giving!

I no longer "hope" for "change;" I PRAY for DELIVERANCE from our current regime!
  • Login to post comments

Crowd financing, that's his solution?

Submitted by mom_rox on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 5:50pm.

CLINTON: ... But I think that what they can do is use their skills at social networking, use their access to the internet for crowd financing, for example, for getting substantial amounts of money in small amounts to start their own NGOs and make a living doing good.

Hmmm, that reminds me of Michelle Obama - don't be a lawyer (like Barack, Bill, Hillary and me!), you need to be a social worker or a nurse.

Clinton's solution to unemployment is to have a lot of NGOs? and the money comes from ??? This is wealth transfer, not wealth creation

  • Login to post comments

If F-Chuck had a son, he'd sound like Little Luke.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 6:49pm.

.

  • Login to post comments

Slick Willie

Submitted by IrateNate on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 7:00pm.

"No Etch-a-Sketch issue for me..." says Slick Willie. Yes, that's true, Mr Clinton, you have always maintained your consistency as a womanizer. And a liar. And only the second president to be impeached. For being a liar.  I wonder why nobody ever asks you about any of this?  You will understand if I have a problem believing you, won't you?

Notice Clinton did not say the economy was getting better, but only that "the people will perceive that the economy is getting better..." Gee, I wonder if Team Obama's Ministry of Truth will get the credit it deserves for putting lies such as these out for the liberal media to spread as fact.

The latest defense of the insurance mandate is to mention the "Militia Act of 1792", in which Congress did in fact mandate that males between 18 and 45 provide their own musket or rifle, shot, and powder and serve in a state militia.  But this act only affected men, not every citizen, and was only in force for two years.

The Dems can't seriously believe this compares with Obama's mandate to purchase a "qualifying" insurance policy, when other policy choices are now and could still be available without Obamacare.  And, regardless of what Dems think, what the Supreme Court thinks is the only thing that matters here.

The "Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen" Clinton spoke of was not a requirement for seamen to have hospitalization insurance, a fact he so deftly distorts.  It was, in fact, a 20 cent per month fee, collected from each sailor aboard any ship entering a US port from a foreign port, the proceeds of which went to care for disabled sailors.

Quite a stretch from "individual hospitalization insurance", Mr Clinton, but while this may have indeed been the forerunner to our modern day health insurance policy, it only proves that those wooden legs weren't all hand made.

I don't recall Mr Clinton mentioning if he or Ms Lewinsky had any "seamen" insurance on that blue dress...Ahoy, Matey!  Thar she blows!

  • Login to post comments

Another site asked if Kagan or Sotomayor already blabbed.

Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 8:22pm.

I would not put it past either of those two buffaloes to have informed Duh One about the results of any vote taken on Friday about Obamacare, given the rhetoric that has emerged over the past few days from Democrats.

The "professor of constitutional law" seems to forget that SCOTUS routinely declares laws unconstitutional for both Republican and Democrat presidents and majorities in congress. We all know the history of his law faculty position - a "make work" job for a parasite - but the blatant ignorance of the three, co-equal branches of government is amplified to the point of delusion by the narcissist-in-chief. Add to that the idiot Senator who essentially says "we have the army", how easily he forgets that the long-standing tradition of not interfering in the court's decision-making process includes not threatening them? It is extraordinarily stupid coming on top of his disgraceful SOTU remarks and the appointment of those two lapdog spies to the court.

Sotomayor would step over her grandmother to become the first female chief justice. Kagan is just dumb enough to go along with anything her Democrat party masters say so she won't have to go work in a storefront law firm specializing in social security disability or asbestos claims.

  • Login to post comments

Considering Kagan has the ethos

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 8:35pm.

Of a Rattlesnake, cant say I would be shocked.

Obama out there intimidating the Justices dont surprise me either.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use