ABC, CBS Pound Romney on Business Background; CNN Downplays New Hampshire Win
Mitt Romney appeared on all six network and cable morning shows on Wednesday and endured repeated liberal attacks about whether he'll be able to "defend" his business background, and even an assertion that a 16 point New Hampshire win was "not a victory." [UPDATED: See video below. MP3 audio here.]
The Republican presidential candidate showed up on CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News and MSNBC. However, it was CNN's Soledad O'Brien who offered the most transparently partisan attack. Citing DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, O'Brien parroted that this "was not a victory." The "Starting Point" anchor admitted that Wasserman-Schultz's job was to "spin," but continued, "But doesn't she have a point [that]... this is a place [New Hampshire] where you have lived, and that number, while very good, is not 60 percent, or 70 percent?"
Of course, Hillary Clinton won New Hampshire by a mere three points in 2008. The reporters on CNN failed to spin that result as "not a victory."
Additionally, there were six people running in the 2012 race, making it hard to acquire 70 percent. (Oddly, O'Brien did push back when she actually interviewed Wasserman-Schultz, questioning the logic.)
O'Brien made clear that Bain would be something the media wouldn't let go of. She proclaimed, "But I get the sense that it's not a conversation that's going to go away." O'Brien continued "that this conversation keeps coming back. You haven't really been able to clear the Bain Capital conversation off the table."
CBS and ABC both hit Romney about his comment that he'd like the ability to fire health insurers who provide bad service. On "CBS This Morning," Charlie Rose previewed these talking points, insisting that Democrats will say "that...you were a destructive force in terms of companies. Will they be able to make that stick, and can you defend that, not only in the primaries, but also, in the general election?"
Rose pressed, "Do you regret the firing comment because of the way it was interpreted by some?" Rose's co-host, Bob Schieffer, was one of those misinterpreting the comment.
George Stephanopoulos, a former Democratic operative, highlighted Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich's use of the class warfare argument. (Perry referred to Romney as a "vulture capitalist.")
The "Good Morning America" host speculated, "But, are you worried that argument might get more traction in South Carolina, where unemployment, as you know, is much higher than in either Iowa or New Hampshire?"
Stephanopoulos, like Rose, fixated on the "firing" comment. He quoted from a Joe Biden speech, slamming Romney for only caring about "investors, the venture capital guys." After citing the Vice President, the host wondered, "How are you going to answer that argument?"
Stephanopoulos also tried to sweep aside an issue for the President. After Romney compared the bankruptcy restructuring of General Motors to his work at Bain, the anchor pounced, "It sounds like, though, you concede now that the American auto industry is doing better today than it was?"
By contrast, "Today's" Matt Lauer actually asked a few questions from the right. Unlike Stephanopoulos, he questioned the conservative credentials of candidates, such as Perry and Gingrich: "Do you think that some of your opponents have unwittingly turned their backs on the conservative principles that have put them in this position in the first place by attacking the free enterprise system?"
Lauer reiterated, "So they're turning their back
on core Republican principles simply for their own political ambition?"
The anchors of MSNBC's "Morning Joe made similar points. Willie Geist sympathized, "They've sort of made a caricature out of you as the boss who comes in and fires people."
Joe Scarborough said of Perry's "vulture capitalist" line: "I mean, it sounds like it comes from a sign yanked out of an Occupy Wall Street rally."
Back on "Today," however, Lauer also berated Romney's speech from Tuesday night in which he called for a President who doesn't divide people "with the bitter politics of envy."
The host quizzed, "Do you suggest that anyone who questions the policies and practices of Wall Street and financial institutions, anyone who has questions about the distribution of wealth and power in this country is envious? Is it about jealousy or is it about fairness?"
FNC's "Fox and Friends" hosts pushed Romney to be more aggressive. Gretchen Carlson cajolled, "Now that [your time at Bain] is under attack, a lot of critics are saying you need to come out front and be more aggressive in defending your time at Bain capital. Will you do that?"
Brian Kilmeade noted the improving economy and wondered, "...Are you concerned that the economy won't be a major issue and your main reason for running will be taken from you?"
A transcript of just the Bain Capital and "firing" questions from Romney's January 11th interviews can be found below:
GMA
7:05
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: As you know, Governor, your tenure at Bain Capital became a target over the last few days. Newt Gingrich and his allies taking you on. They're already advertising in South Carolina. Rick Perry compared you to a vulture. In your speech last night, we heard you call them desperate. But, are you worried that argument might get more traction in South Carolina where unemployment, as you know, is much higher than in either Iowa or New Hampshire?
...
STEPHANOPOULOS: In your speech last night, you also took direct aim at President Obama. And Vice President Biden gave his own speech to New Hampshire Democrats last night where he took direct aim right back at you. He talked at your tenure at Bain again and this is a quote from Vice President Biden, who's talking about you. He says "He thinks it's more important for the stockholders, share holders and the investors, the venture capital guys to do well than for the employees to be part of the bargain." How are you going to answer that argument?
Today
7:01
MATT LAUER: While those other candidates have not united around one candidate, they have seemed to unite around a way to attack you, Governor, and that is that they are going after your record as a businessman, as a venture capitalist, your time as CEO of Bain Capital. And they're using these words like predator, raider and vulture.
Here's what you said in your speech last night, you said that some, quote, "desperate Republicans," end quote, were attacking the notion of success itself. You said, quote, "This is such a mistake for our party and our nation, the country already has a leader who divides us with the bitter politics of envy." Do you think that some of your opponents have unwittingly turned their backs on the conservative principles that have put them in this position in the first place by attacking the free enterprise system?
...
LAUER: So they're turning their back on core Republican principles simply for their own political ambition?
...
LAUER: Let me, though, ask you about the choice of words last night when you said that, "we already have a leader who divides us with the bitter politics of envy." I'm curious about the word envy. Do you suggest that anyone who questions the policies and practices of Wall Street and financial institutions, anyone who has questions about the distribution of wealth and power in this country is envious? Is it about jealousy or is it about fairness?
...
LAUER: Yeah, but envy? Is it-
MITT ROMNEY: And the American people, I believe, in the final analysis, will reject it.
LAUER: Are there no fair questions about the distribution of wealth without it being seen as envy, though?
CBS This Morning
07:07 am EST
CHARLIE ROSE: Clearly, you know that the outlines of what they want to say about your tenure at Bain Capital are clear, that you were not a- you were a destructive force in terms of companies. Will they be able to make that stick, and can you defend that, not only in the primaries, but also, in the general election?
...
ROSE: Do you regret the firing comment because of the way it was interpreted by some?
...
ROSE: But as you move to South Carolina, what do you expect in terms of the rising intensity of the attacks?
Fox and Friends
7:04
BRIAN KILMEADE: Governor, I know it must be especially gratifying because you were so crestfallen when you lost to John McCain last time around and never got on your feet again in New Hampshire [sic]. It's a different story now. But as you head to South Carolina, something else is guaranteed. That your days at Bain Capital and your approach to business is going to be questioned and it's going to be looked to be defined. How do you feel- I know last night you mentioned that you're disappointed Republicans are bringing it up. But, regardless, how do you feel about defending your days at Bain?
...
GRETCHEN CARLSON: But your campaign and you yourself must have been stunned that these attacks came out now. Not only from your Republican colleagues but, but, but attacks in general because your strong point in running for president has been people believe you can fix the economy and you have this massive private business experience to be able to do that. Now that that is under attack, a lot of critics are saying you need to come out front and be more aggressive in defending your time at Bain capital. Will you do that?
Morning Joe
7:16
WILLIE GEIST: Governor Romney, it's Willie Geist, congratulations on your win last night. It has become abundantly clear from Newt Gingrich to Rick Perry, and also out of Chicago, if you do go on to become the nominee, there line of attack against you is going to go right to what you did as the head of Bain Capital. They've sort of made a caricature out of you as the boss who comes in and fires people. What is your best specific answer to that criticism about what you did exactly at Bain?....
JOE SCARBOROUGH: What do say to Rick Perry, a guy that has been casting himself as a conservative's conservative in this campaign and over the past ten years in Texas, what do you not only say to Rick Perry but also to Rick Perry supporters, his contributors, when Governor Perry goes out and attacks you as being a quote, "vulture capitalist"? That – I mean, it sounds like it comes from a sign yanked out of an Occupy Wall Street rally.
Starting Point
7:32
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: Let's talk a little bit about Bain Capital, and I know that's a question you've been answering a lot. But I get the sense that it's not a conversation that's going to go away. I want to play a little bit of what Rick Perry – who came in with one percent of the vote – so maybe he's not considered a big competitor for you, but this is what he said about you yesterday.
(Video Clip)
RICK PERRY: There is a real difference between a venture capitalist and a vulture capitalist. And venture capitalists are good, they go in, they inject their capital, they create jobs. Bain Capital, on the other hand it appears to me, were vulture capitalists all too often. And I don't get confused for a minute that Barack Obama and his team wouldn't attack Mitt Romney on that during a general election if he makes it that way. So if nothing else, we're doing Mitt a favor by exposing him early on so that he can either figure out how to defend that, or more importantly, and better from my perspective, he's not the nominee to begin with.
(End Video Clip)
O'BRIEN: Wow, there's a lot to talk about right there. Okay, so he calls you a vulture capitalist, and it's true that this conversation keeps coming back. You haven't really been able to clear the Bain Capital conversation off the table. So one, are you a vulture capitalist, is this going to be a big challenge for you to confront that kind of label from Governor Perry, and two, he says that I'm doing him a favor by bringing it up now. Is that true?
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Please don't shut up Little
Submitted by ricklail on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:21pm.
Please don't shut up Little Debs of the Wasserman crime family spin. She is the gift that keeps on giving just like Biteme.
I guess these dopes could
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:10pm.
I guess these dopes could have gone after Boy Barry's 'business' background - except that it was any type of 'business' except the usual one. And I guess they could go after Boy Barry about the amount of people who have been fired, laid off, or unemployed - and the amount of businesses that have gone under, or down-sized, or are barely squeaking by - as a result of HIS 'business' agenda..........................................but they won't.
Soledad is so cute...
Submitted by KyWriter on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:41pm.
...especially with her foot in her mouth.
The Media appear to be sporadic, but have a specific strategy
Submitted by gopcongress on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:55pm.
The Media appear to be schizophrenic in the GOP primary stage. However, it can be attributed to one thing: They WANT, and have an absolutely vital INTEREST, in Romney being the GOP nominee.
The bottom line is that the Left understands EXACTLY what we all know: that if we had a principled, conservative / libertarian candidate as the GOP nominee, he/she would win in a large amount. It is when a RINO is on the ticket that the dems have a chance.
The biggest lie so far is the mantra that "a real conservative will lose because he will tick off the moderates." That lie is demonstrably false, as virtually every presidential election since '76 has shown. The list:
1976: Ford, RINO....LOST
1980: Reagan, conservative... WON BIG
1984: Reagan, conservative... WON IN LANDSLIDE
1988: HW Bush, RINO... WON on coattails and promise to continue Reagan's policies
1992: HW Bush, RINO... LOST after moving to the left during his tenure
1996: Dole, RINO... LOST
2000: W Bush, Hybrid RINO/conservative... BARELY WON
2004: W Bush, Hybrid RINO/conservative... WON by small amount
2008: McCain, RINO... LOST
So this tells us that anytime we had a candidate who had some level of conservatism, he / she wins. If we had a candidate who is not a conservative, he / she loses, and loses DECISIVELY. Reagan, the ONLY conservative we've had for president since before WWI, is the ONLY GOP candidate who has won decisively.
So that, in a nutshell, is why the Media have gone on a accelerated campaign to destroy conservatives like Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, and as of late, Rick Santorum. That is why they try to destroy perceived conservatives like Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry.
Finally, look for a media-generated campaign to get Ron Paul to run 3rd party. They know that even RINO Romney can easily beat Obama in a head-to-head contest. But throw Ron Paul into the mix, and he splits the non-Obama vote. allowing Obama to win with as little as 37% of popular vote.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
Well, George...
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 3:15pm.
If you are wanting to see victories with 60% or 70% majorities, you are just going to have to wait for the general election in November. Right now the conservatives and the independants are all fractured and separated trying to pick their favorite. Once the nominee is decided, they will all come together along with a minority of the democrats who realize what a HUGE mistake they made in 2008.
the big game in Las Vagas will not be trying to pick the winner, but laying the odds on whether Obama gets more than 200 electoral college delegates.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Hmmm, how does that compare to Obama?
Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 3:58pm.
Well, we all know that Obama has no experience in the private sector, but what about his advisers? Take his many Chiefs of Staff as an example: (According to Wikipedia)
Rahm Emmanuel: Was the managing director for the investment banking firm of Wasserstein Perella, where he made $16.2 million in his two-and-a-half-years as a banker. He was also on the board of Freddie Mac, where, during his time, was plagued with scandals involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities.
Pete Rouse: Only CoS for 2 1/2 months; has no business/private sector experience. Obama kindred-spirit, apparently; likewise unworthy of the job to which he was assigned.
Bill Daley: Well, lets see... vice chairman (1989–1990) and then president and chief operating officer (1990–1993) of Amalgamated Bank of Chicago. He was on the board of Fannie Mae 1993-1997. In May 2004, Daley was made the Midwest Chairman of JPMorgan Chase, following its acquisition of Bank One Corporation, to oversee its operations from Chicago.
Jack Lew: In June 2006, Lew was named chief operating officer of Citigroup's Alternative Investments unit, a proprietary trading group. The unit he oversaw invested in a hedge fund "that bet on the housing market to collapse."
Now, I don't begrudge these guys their careers or their success; I say congrats, and this is what is possible in America that isn't possible in Venezuela. But for he media and lefty pundits to continue to turn a blind eye to Obama and his anti-business message knowing full well the number of BANKERS that have advised him since day one in his political career, is just disingenuous. I mean, who's more of a capitalist than Warren Buffet? Disgusting propagandizing.
bob, you're forgetting that
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 4:09pm.
bob, you're forgetting that business background for a Democrat is plus; for a Republican, it's proof that they're one of the "fat cats" who make their money on the backs of the poor.
*distinctions