Bizarre: ABC Hypes Sex Games of 'Polyamorous' Family Who Only Dates Their Own 'Species'
According to the journalists at "Good Morning America," the day after a social conservative triumphed in Iowa was the right time to aggressively promote a "modern" family consisting of a woman who has sex with two men while raising a child, a bizarre threesome whose rule is to only date inside their "species."
Yes, the same program that enthusiastically devoted 64 minutes to a "pregnant man," that thrilled over an environmentalist who shunned toilet paper, that hyped another man who lived in his own filth, has a new love. Reporter Abbie Boudreau uncritically explained that these three people are "looking for lots of different people to love." She gushed, "Really, these days a modern family, just like ABC's hit comedy, can be anything you make it."
In the 8am hour of GMA, reporter Jake Tapper was allowed only two minutes to discuss the results in Iowa.
However, five minutes were devoted to more important topics like the complicated sexual adventures of Jaiya Ma, John Hanauer and Ian Ferguson. (Is this how ABC plans on catching the "Today" show in the ratings?)
Offering almost no criticism of this relationship, Boudreau informed, "Jaiya is juggling two separate and committed relationships under one roof."
Despite the fact that Ma, Hanauer and Ferguson are raising a two-year-old child, the correspondent touted, "In the world of polyamory, where the more, the merrier, all are free to date outside of the household."
Regarding the child, Eamon, Boudreau defended, "But for now, they say [Eamon is] happy and well-adjusted and calls John his protector and Ian his dad."
The reporter closed by explaining one of the "rules" of the family: "Dating within their species. That's not a term I came up with. That's one of their terms and it means dating other people that are polyamorous."
George Stephanopoulos, a supposed serious journalist, laughed and responded, "I guess I'm part of a different species." He introduced the segment by extolling, "But now to a real-life modern family that makes our favorite show seem a little old-fashioned."
The family was previously promoted on "The Joy Behar" program.
In 2009, Newsweek insisted that polyamory is the act of "engaging in loving, intimate relationships with more than one person – based upon the knowledge and consent of everyone involved."
A transcript of the January 4 segment, which aired at 8:15am EST, follows:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: But now to a real-life modern family that makes our favorite show seem a little old-fashioned. They're not a couple but a throuple [sic]. There you see them right there. One mom- [Laughing off camera.] I'm glad I could get a laugh out of Josh for that. That's right, three, throuple. One mom, two dads and a baby. They tell me it's not as rare as you might think. And ABC's Abbie Boudreau joins us live from Los Angeles to tell us how it all works. Take it away, Abbie.
ABC GRAPHIC: Her "Big Love": 1 Woman, 2 Men and a Baby: How They Make It Work
ABBIE BOUDREAU: Good morning, George. Some people have given up trying to find that one, true love, that one soul mate. So, instead, they're looking for lots of different people to love. Lots of different people to love trying to find true happiness. Really, these days a modern family, just like ABC's hit comedy, can be anything you make it. And for Jaiya and John Hanauer, their expanding modern family may take some explaining. They are polyamorous. Of course, you've heard of polygamy, where one man marries multiple women like in HBO's "Big Love."
[Clip from "Big Love.]
BILL PAXTON: Marries always changes and evolves.
BOUDREAU: And TLC's "Sister Wives." But polyamory doesn't require marriage. And in this case, it's one woman with two male partners. So, you stopped searching for the soul mate.
JAIYA MA: I have the one. I can have the one and the one and the one.
BOUDREAU: At home, they act like any normal family. Playing with their two and a half-year-old son, Eamon, before bedtime. But they're far from typical. Jaiya is juggling two separate and committed relationships under one roof. Are you in love with both of these men?
MA: Yes.
BOUDREAU: The same kind of love? Different kind of love?
MA: I think it's a different kind of love.
BOUDREAU: She and Ian Ferguson are Aiman's biological parents. They've been together for four years and share a more romantic connection.
MA: My relationship with Ian is, like, off the charts. Like, love, passion. We have it all.
BOUDREAU: And her ten-year relationship with John.
MA: I like the shoe analogy. He is my comfortable, amazing pair that I know will not give me blisters and, you know, I know them.
JOHN HANAUER : They got the analogy.
BOUDREAU: John does most of the chores And quit his job to become Eamon's primary caretaker, while the other man in the house pays the bills. In the world of polyamory, where the more, the merrier, all are free to date outside of the household.
MA: The fun thing about being polyamorous is that when we need a jolt and we want a little bit of a new relationship energy, maybe we find, bring another person in. And the magic is, I have new relationship energy with Ian. I'm high on all these chemicals. And I come home to John, I'm like-
BOUDREAU: No longer an old shoe at that point.
MA: No longer an old shoe.
HANAUER: Get tossed up a little bit.
BOUDREAU: But later, he admits he does get jealous at times.
HANAUER: It can be tough. Especially if, like I said before, that little voice and low self-esteem comes up. Or that, like, social voice of, that's your girlfriend.
BOUDREAU: Some people watching this might think, these people have no self-control and this is all about sex.
MA: It's not like we've slept with hundreds of people and it's this crazy sexual thing.
BOUDREAU: If you're wondering about their sleeping arrangement, they each have separate rooms. Even a planned schedule for intimacy.
MA: But, I actually like scheduling it because I can look forward to it.
BOUDREAU: Polyamory is a growing phenomenon. Researchers say they are roughly a half million polyamorous households in the U.S. But, experts say being poly is not for most people.
LESLIE SEPPINNI (PsyD, Licensed marriage/family therapist): The primary issue with polyamorous relationships is jealousy. Jealousy and possessiveness. And that's very human nature. And it's hard to fight.
IAN FERGUSON: There's concern for Eamon and how he perceives this. Or a little how people might perceive or judge him.
BOUDREAU: But for now, they say he's happy and well-adjusted. And calls John his protector and Ian, his dad.
MA: Eamon, who's this?
EAMON: Dad!
BOUDREAU: And soon, their ever-growing family may get bigger. Ian is now dating someone new. And Jayia is always open for romance.
MA: Is one enough? Two or three or five.
BOUDREAU: Even John is considering dusting off his old shoes and stepping out to find love. A modern family in truly modern times. For "Good Morning America," Abbie Boudreau, ABC News, los Angeles. George, There are some- George, there are some rules in this relationship. Practicing safe sex is a big one.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Good rule.
BOUDREAU: And also, dating within their species. Dating within their species. That's not a term I came up with. That's one of their terms and it means dating other people that are polyamorous.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I guess I'm part of a different species. [laughs] Abbie, thanks very much.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
we told you so
Submitted by MidAmerica on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 6:16pm.
We said when the Gay marriage thing lost it's impact they would move on to other 'alternative' lifestyles like polygamous marriage. Bestiality is not far behind. The ultimate goal is not Gay marriage or polygamous marriage but the destruction of marriage itself. Liberals absolutely hate anything that defines normal people. Liberals are elitist misfits who cannot reconcile themselves to the fact that we neither need them nor want them.
Actually
Submitted by BBallleaper on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:01pm.
it's societal entropy as a result of liberalism in all its manifestations.
MidAmerica, You hit the nail
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:49pm.
MidAmerica,
You hit the nail on the head.
For years Liberals have claimed that arguing that after gay marriage would come acceptance of polygamy and any other type of "marriage" was a silly slippery slope argument not worth paying attention to. NB has this type of Liberals.
No way, Liberal tell us, would polygamy, incestual "marriages" or any other type of "marriages" would follow if gay marriage was accepted.
Hmmm...i wonder what they have to say now.
Think a couple steps further
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:35pm.
They will change the legal definition of "consenting" and "adult" so that truly, anything goes after that.
Tugboat
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:49pm.
Cajun and DocSam have been warning us for about a year that some of trying to take/alter pedophilia from the Diagnostic Statistical Manual.
After polyamory
Submitted by rusino on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 8:12am.
I agree with you. After all don't the necrophiliacs have rights to love and interact with the dead? One day we will see the doors of our local morgue thrown open to those who prefer to kiss the lifeless!
Liberals just love using
Submitted by Restless Legs on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 6:18pm.
Liberals just love using nice-sounding names ("polyamorous??") for immoral activities. It makes them feel so open-minded and tolerant. However, they are quick to close their minds and show intolerance toward anything moral and decent. That's why you see no attempt from the reporter at discussing how this relationship might be perverted or immoral or just plain disgusting. They say we can't pass judgment. But they will certainly pass judgment on anyone who criticizes this "lifestyle."
Love? No, they aren't looking for people to love
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 6:37pm.
They are looking for people to have sex with. It's very different.
This is not a committed family, it's people who are supposed to be adults behaving like teenagers, doing things that feel good. When they bring a person into the house to sleep with how do they this stranger won't harm the child, or one of them?
The fall of almost every society occurs when the family unit is no longer sacred.
Very well said. Adults acting
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:44pm.
Very well said. Adults acting like teenagers and now glorified and celebrated by a major network.
Rome is burning and the barbarians are knocking at the gates...
Amazing how the end of all civilizations come about the same way, over sexed societies who accept any all sexual behavior.
You're right, Rad
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:11pm.
Normally, I wouldn't care what these three idiots do with each other or any others within their 'species,' as long as it doesn't involve children.
But there is a young child in the house, and in addition to the kid's safety, I'm concerned about the kid's psyche. Can this child possibly develop into an adult capable of normal relationships?
Gal
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:23pm.
We can only pray that there is some adult in the child's life who will introduce him to God and the child will learn what a relationship is all about.
I see the current generation of teens and young adults and fear for society because they don't seem to value sex as the end result of a loving committed relationship sanctified by God. Instead it's a game to see how many people they can have sex with and how many ways, which leads to disease and suffering for the children.
That's right, Rad
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:41am.
She gushed, "Really, these days a modern family, just like ABC's hit comedy, can be anything you make it."
And it's absurd declarations like this by the MSMers that reinforce the idea on the impressionable young. Note how this is all portrayed as "fun."
The MSM elites residing above the public -- both physcially and figuratively -- in their Upper West Side dwellings first sell promiscuity and perversion for the profit, then celebrate the very deviant behavior that mimics what they've created and broadcast. For too many people -- especially the young -- it sends them a message that this behavior is not only acceptable, but preferred. If you're not engaged in this kind of "fun," you're not hip, so dive in.
To make matters worse, when the MSM's hip new mores generate social carnage, they never acknowledge their own responsibility for it. Rather, they broadcast it as more 'reality TV,' holding up the dysfunctional human beings for (a) sympathy (news story) or (b) ridicule (reality TV).
When I was growing up in the '60s and early '70s, I scoffed at the criticism from gray-beards in the media that TV was becoming a vast wasteland. I have since come to appreciate what they were saying, and I agree. But now, it's worse than I could've imagined even 10 years ago.
Charlie Manson was ahead of his time.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 6:46pm.
I predict the two "men" will leave her and get married in the near future.
No
Submitted by loxmyth on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:19am.
The next step will be the demand that the three of them should be allowed to get married. Not just polygamy, she marries both men, and the two guys marry each other, and anyone else they bring in marries each of these three.
Inside their own "species"? WHAT?
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:24pm.
One of the main benefits of monogamy is that you do not get sexually transmitted diseases if your partner is faithful. Another benefit is your life commitment to your partner for better or worse, and that includes passing on temptations as they arise. That is a matter of maturity and intellect, not simply living life by one's gonads. Liberals are so obsessed with their gonads that I am not surprised by how devolved they have become over the years. "Polyamory" is degeneracy at its worst.
Hypergonadism with attachment
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 8:43pm.
Hypergonadism with attachment disorder.
[sarc/off]
The child is at higher risk for becoming a societal outlier and engaging in health risk behaviors due to aberrant parent models.
Good one, Strat!
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 9:49pm.
I was thinking more of a combination of sexual addiction with OCD and a chaser of maladjustment (unspecified).
Perhaps my wife is closer to the mark with "filthy pigs". Of course, neither of could code for that.
Found the codes drsam*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:19pm.
ABC
NBC
MSNBC
CBS
CNN
pick one
Caj....you owe me a new monitor!
Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 11:39pm.
Just spewed my glass of Cabernet all over it after that!! LOL!!!!!!!!!
Glad I finished my hot
Submitted by stratman on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 1:43am.
Glad I finished my hot chocolate already! Both cajun and drsam's wife are spot on.
You know what they say: Man Smart, Woman Smarter.
*EDIT*
Probable ICD9 codes would be related to FOS, with a primary diagnosis of 560.32 Fecal Impaction resulting in a secondary diagnosis of 569.87 Vomiting of Fecal Matter as noted when they speak.
Dr and drsam*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:20pm.
Codes are not always accessible so I thought "filthy pigs" was most accurate description. Say hi to mssam for me.
This thread, the recent attacks on Tim Tebow, the Huffnpuff thread, all add to the previous discussions that many of us have been touting for months now. These are just examples of co-ordinated media hype for those "incremental steps" slowly being instituted for the destruction of a moral organized society.
When the revelations about Obama's infidelities are apparent, the media can always go back to these articles and say" so what?" That is, unless the stories are about anyone whose name ends with R.
Just curious, drsam....
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 12:48am.
"...That is a matter of maturity and intellect, not simply living life by one's gonads. Liberals are so obsessed with their gonads that I am not surprised by how devolved they have become over the years...."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2012/01/04/bizarre-abc-hypes...
By "devolved", do you mean "liberals" or "gonads"? In other words, is the above a moral or anatomical observation?
Jer
Moral observation, Jer.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:31am.
There is nothing with being sexually free, but as an attorney you know that human behavior is inconsistent to say the least. A major purpose of monogamy is the control of sexually transmitted diseases, management of the emotions that often follow and property and settlement rights or so I was taught in basic sociology back so many years.
What I find devolved about polyamorists is their sense that monogamy somehow represents a throwback when in fact it does not. Looking at ancient cultures from Egypt forward, monogamy was asserted primarily to to assure property and settlement rights and for political purposes. It also assured that there would be no STDs transmitted and was the first effective application of medical epidemiology to what we call "burn out" a rampant infectious agent by simply starving the pathogen of hosts.
Our entire religious, moral and legal foundations are built upon monogamy as is our health system to a large extent. Polyamory takes us back to more animalistic behaviors which are incongruent with those foundations.
The gonads, obviously, are not devolved. But then again, I haven't looked.
Clint Eastwood as "Dirty Harry"...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:28pm.
...once mentioned in one of his movies, "a sex act with a poodle dog and a shetland pony", guess he was ahead of his time...
Isn't this simply known as
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:41pm.
Isn't this simply known as "swinging" or something? In the past this was something people were ashamed to talk about and now it is celebrated in a major network. The destruction of the family union in full display.
Western culture is in full decline, Rome is burning and few seem to realize it and even less seem to care.
May God show us Mercy when it all falls apart!
It is coming people and I honestly believe it is coming a lot sooner than we think. (Shoot, I have been listening to too much Glen Beck...grrrr. I promised I would no longer listen to him, but it is about the only good thing in the morning as I drive my kids to school and then to work)
Everyone remembers this?
Submitted by David Kramer on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:47pm.
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm
Yeah, it was just a lie, just like the McCarthy hearings. These freaks have an agenda and it is to destroy the country.
pedophilia, zoophilia, scatology, and then what?
Submitted by MacWell on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 7:50pm.
These so-called people want no barriers whatsoever. They want to do anything they wish without shame. The problem isn't with society, it's with God. Even though they claim not to believe in God, He is still trying to talk to their hearts. These people will NEVER be happy, will NEVER be content no matter what kind of perversity they practice because their hearts are so blackened by their perverted desires.
Regardless, they cannot be allowed to continue to push their agenda on our children. We the people MUST find a way to tale back our school systems and purge this gay agenda.
Well, one option is to
Submitted by Darks Shadow Show on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 8:20pm.
Well, one option is to attempt a similar infiltration as David Kramer above showed the Communists have been using. Of course, conservatives aren't so deceptive and it would take too long. What we need is to utilize the tools of modern technology, especially the Internet, to spread the truth while we still can.
New probe for the bottom
Submitted by lsheldon on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 8:19pm.
Excuse me while I figure out how to lock out ABC. ESPN is also ABC, right?
And who owns ABC again?
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 8:50pm.
Oh, Disney.
Right.
Walt would be so proud...
--Mike
But since Romney is Mormon . .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 9:08pm.
But since Romney is a Mormon and a conservative, polygamy would not be so celebrated by ABC if it involved Mormon's, correct?
Imagine -
"A Mormon man and 2 women engaged in a polyamorous sexual relationship. Isn't this sweet, George?"
And what's this acceptance of "dating only their own species?"
And imagine this:
"And George, they do have their rules, this couple of three are wonderful Tea Party members, and when a Latino member of MoveOn.org showed up wanting to share in the sparks, they, in keeping with their species, said no-thank you. Goodness George, chivalry is alive and well."
What - no dogs or sheep allowed? Intolerant bigots.
Imagine the outrage, had they said "their own race, or culture?
(;~/ gary
Wow
Submitted by Eric the Fred on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 9:52pm.
These people are insane.
Oh, and the swingers are pretty nutty too.
very sad
Submitted by shawn. on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 10:31pm.
None of my business what these folks do behind closed doors but it must affect the kid
Of course it affects the kid.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:21pm.
When a child sees one of those males (and no, I'm not calling them "men," since they aren't) as "protector" and one as "dad," when those roles cannot be bifurcated, you've scarred that child for life.
--Mike
i agree
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:20pm.
Enjoy life and have fun, but don't expose your kids to this.
Polyamorous is the new Liberamorous.
Submitted by big.league.slider on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 11:58pm.
When I hear "polyamorous", I immediately picture Bill Clinton, JFK, or Ted Kennedy.
Sadly, I doubt that any of these progressives are also "polyemployed" or "polytaxpayers".
This article illustrates the narcissism
Submitted by bfrank on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 12:09am.
of the ‘free love’ movement. The ‘anything goes’ crowd has raised their ugly heads and shows again how these ‘progressive’ adults are willing to do anything for a ‘free nookie’ with anyone, anywhere, anytime without regard to anyone including their own children. Odds are this child will be sexually abused by someone within the periphery of migrating oversexed perverts that surround this home. Gee, I wonder if this woman will want to go back to farm life where the adults can sample the goats, sheep and horses when the urge beckons?
Cuckold anyone?
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 12:49am.
Cuckold anyone? Own species? What no goats?
I'm waiting for the Obama
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 12:10pm.
I'm waiting for the Obama speech,.."At some point I think you've had enough lovers..." It's not fair! Some people have two or three mates while others have none....redistribution!!
Liberals
Submitted by misterbee241 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 12:42pm.
No perversion or immoral act out of bounds for them.