Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News

An Indignant George Stephanopoulos Huffs to Santorum: 'How Can You Say' Obama Is Weak?

By Scott Whitlock | January 03, 2012 | 13:09

A  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

An indignant George Stephanopoulos on Tuesday demanded that Rick Santorum explain his harsh attacks on Barack Obama. After reading off a quote from the Republican presidential candidate and then listing the President's foreign policy accomplishments, Stephanopoulos defended, "How can you say he sided with our enemies on almost every foreign conflict?"

Santorum responded by insisting that, in the example of killing Osama bin Laden, Obama simply followed a course set by George W. Bush. Stephanopoulos sputtered, "How can you say he sided with our enemies on almost every foreign conflict?"

Repeating what will surely be Obama 2012 talking points, the former Democratic operative added, "But, Senator is that true?...Osama bin Laden was alive when President Obama took office. He's dead now."

When Stephanopoulos interviewed Santorum on June 06, 2011, he made the same complaint: "You've also argued that our enemies don't fear President Obama, but where's the evidence of that?...The al Qaeda leadership has been decimated, Osama bin Laden is dead, no significant attack against the United States has been successful. Where is that evidence?"

On Tuesday, Stephanopoulos also offered typical horse race questions, wondering if Santorum could possibly compete, post-Iowa: "And there are real questions about on whether you have the reach, the kind of organization, the kind of resources to really run a national campaign against Mitt Romney. Last time I checked, he had raised $32 million to your $1 million."

A transcript of the January 3 segment, which aired at 7:08am EST, follows:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

7am tease

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And happening right now, let the voting begin. It's down to the wire in Iowa, as the race tightens overnight. Will Mitt Romney seal the deal today or will a surging Rick Santorum score a last-minute victory? The man who could shake up the race is here live only on GMA.

7:08

STEPHANOPOULOS: And we are joined now by Rick Santorum, from Johnston, Iowa. Good morning, Senator. Good to have you this morning. And you heard all kinds of predictions in David's piece. Why don't you weigh in right now? Are you going to win tonight?

RICK SANTORUM: We're going to do well tonight. Ten days ago, we were in last place in the polls. And everyone was asking me, why don't I get out? And what's happened is the people of Iowa examined all of the candidates. That's what they do in the last two weeks. They make their decisions and they've looked at all the candidates and they're looking for the candidate they can trust. And that's why we're moving up in the polls.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And, Senator, you've done it the old-fashioned way. You camped out in Iowa. Visited all 99 counties. I think at last count, you've had something like 377 town hall meetings in Iowa. But the big question going forward, whether you win or come in second, is where do you go next? And there are real questions about on whether you have the reach, the kind of organization, the kind of resources to really run a national campaign against Mitt Romney. Last time I checked, he had raised $32 million to your $1 million.

SANTORUM: Right. No, look, we've done this- I would say, we've done this on shoe strings. But that would be insulting shoe strings. We've really done- We did it the old-fashioned way. But we've also done it in New Hampshire. I mean, I've spent more time in New Hampshire and done more events than anybody than Jon Huntsman. And the same thing in South Carolina. We've done more events in South Carolina than anybody else and we've got great teams on the ground in both those places. We're prepared to go to all three states. We're going to New Hampshire right after this, this caucus tonight. And we're going to campaign hard there. We're going to make a day trip to South Carolina. And then, we're going to forward on in South Carolina. We feel very, very good that we have the organization. And our money is coming in better than it's ever come in. And when we do well tonight, we suspect we'll have the resources to be able, not just to compete in New Hampshire. But to compete all the way through.

STEPHANOPOULOS: You're also starting to get the scrutiny that comes with doing better in the race right now. You have got Rick Perry calling you the king of earmarks. Mitt Romney, says you're a typical Washington politician from your time in the Senate. And when you look at it, you have defended earmarks, even that famous bridge to nowhere. How can you do that?

SANTORUM: Well, look at the Constitution, George. You know that. I mean, Congress appropriates money. That's what Congress is supposed to do. That's our constitutional requirement. What happened over the past three or four years, there was a huge explosion of spending, driven in large part by members of Congress being given earmarks to vote for that increased spending. When that happened, when we saw that explosion, I said, along with Jim DeMint, who, by the way, who led this charge, and was, in fact, an ear-marker himself, that there was abuse going on. It was leading to higher spending. And we have to put an end to it. You know, Rick Perry hired people to get money from the state of Texas. When you're a representative of the Congress, Ron Paul voted for earmarks. When you're a representative of Congress and in the Senate, your responsibility is to fight for your state. What happened was abuse that led to higher spending. And then, we put an end to it. And we rightfully did so.

STEPHANOPOULOS: You've been the most aggressive candidates on national security. I want to ask you about a comment you made yesterday in Iowa. You were talking about President Obama. And you said in foreign conflicts he's, quote, "sided with our enemies, on almost every single one." And I just wonder how you can defend that statement, given the fact that President Obama ordered the taking out of Osama bin Laden, all of the al Qaeda leadership. Has ramped up our presence in Afghanistan. How can you say he sided with our enemies on almost every foreign conflict?

SANTORUM: George, on every single contingency that has come up under his administration, the two things you mentioned, and are always mentioned by Obama defenders, are things that were in place when he was in office, when he came into office. They were missions that were defined. He's simply gone ahead and continued to execute those missions.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But, Senator is that true? When Osama bin Laden was alive when President Obama took office. He's dead now.

SANTORUM: Yeah. Well, that's right. But that was a mission that was already decided. policy to kill Osama bin Laden and to kill al Qaeda and to treat them as enemy combatants. The President did not change that policy. But that was not a policy or problem that came up under his watch. The ones that did come up under his watch, Iran, Egypt, Syria, Honduras, you can go down the list. Poland. The U.K., the Czechs. Ask all of them whether- Israel, whether we've been a good ally, one you could stand by. And look at the ones who have been enemies to the United States. And we have appeased and pandered. This is a President that has gotten it wrong whenever time there's been a decision to be made, whether it's in the interest of the United States, when a contingency came up under his watch, he's blown it.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you have quite a list there. We're going to have to follow up another time. One final question about Mitt Romney. What's the number one argument against him? He's your top opponent right now.

SANTORUM: The issue in this campaign will be the size and scale of government. And the biggest issue is health care. I endorsed Mitt Romney four years ago and there was one question on the debate about health care. This has been a debate about health care. The behemoth of government. The signature is Obamacare. We cannot put up a presidential candidate who is, basically, in the same place as Barack Obama on government-run health care.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Santorum, thanks for your time this morning.

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Rick Santorum
  • ABC
  • Good Morning America
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

George Coverup-olis, what a shill

Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 1:18pm.

Georgie has been shill for Dhimmeroids all his life. I suppose Santorum needed the face time. Otherwise, why the heck would you go on that moron's show?

  • Login to post comments

What do you expect from Clinton's former mouthpiece?

Submitted by pockets64 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 1:28pm.

"How can you say..."

Simple, I use my brain, open my mouth, and form the words.

  • Login to post comments

the words

Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 1:44pm.

And I'm almost positive that it was the English language that he was using, not Arabic or something else, especially with a communist background.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Get used to it....

Submitted by NavyBuckeye on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 1:57pm.

this is exactly the rebuttal from the Dems we will be hearing until this November.

"But he killed Osama Bin Laden!!!"

Jobs....don't matter "Cuz he killed Osama Bin Laden!!!"

Union partinerships..."But he killed Osama Bin Laden!!!"

Higher unemployment........"But he killed Osama Bin Laden!!!"

and so on it goes...."But he killed Osama Bin Laden!!!"

"Pffffttttttttttt"-Owen, age 8 when ever he hears Obama speaking on the TV.
  • Login to post comments

Wait until May

Submitted by Model850 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 4:28pm.

If you think it's bad now wait until May rolls around. I can see all kinds of "anniversary of bin Laden's death" stories playing out in the MSM, all as nothing more than cheerleading for their great zero.

Zero's -- and probably the MSM's -- biggest regret is that UBL wasn't knocked off in October instead of May.

  • Login to post comments

get off your knees Georgie

Submitted by Kuso Jiji on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 2:03pm.

Stephynobbypuss is not a real reporter. He is and will always be a Democratic operative posing as a journalist. This little dweeb is only relevant to other leftwing dweebs.

  • Login to post comments

"Follow up another time."

Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 2:05pm.

That's Stephanopolous-speak for "you just nailed me and I can't offer a refutation."

  • Login to post comments

Can't Stand It

Submitted by dpc1212 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 2:19pm.

I can't stand to watch republicans, especially conservatives get attacked by the Obama Media Machine. Every congressman, senator, candidate and right-leaning talking-head should call Stephanapoulos, Leslie Stahl and the thousands of others left-wing media hacks out for their liberal bias. They need to ask questions back at them as to why they are not asking tough questions of Obama and the Democrats rather than cheering for them. I want to see the media turned on and called out for what they are over and over and over.

  • Login to post comments

Gee George...

Submitted by Samaritan01 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 2:37pm.

When the primary election occurs (and Obama is kicked out of office) will that be evidence enough?? Whoever the Republicans run for office is the next president, Carter, errrr uhhhh, Obama is merely an historical hiccup!!

  • Login to post comments

You are a wimp too, Georgie.

Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 2:38pm.

You hide behind the first amendment and refuse to admit that you are nothing but a brainless Democrat shill coincidentally working as a TV talking head. I would also add that Georgie hides behind the facade of objectivity, when he would not know the meaning of the word or the concept if either smacked him across his fat head.

  • Login to post comments

Here's an excellent example of Obama being WEAK

Submitted by Conservator on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 3:03pm.

The Washington Post published the following article today:

Taliban says it will open Qatar office for talks with U.S.

The author, Ernesto Londoño, writes, "...The prospect of a negotiated end to the Afghan war seems especially appealing in a U.S.  presidential election year. Vice President Biden was quoted last month saying that “the Taliban are not our enemy, per se,” a remark that startled Afghan officials and Western diplomats in Kabul..."

If you need a reason not to vote for the weakest President in U.S. history (Obama) the above comment is all you need. Any President who put's his reelection bid above his Constitutional responsibility as Commander-in-Chief does NOT deserve another more 4 years in office. Obama has already proven that keeping campaign pledges to bring our troops home is more important than the events on the ground and the advice he has received from our military leaders in Afghanistan and Iraq.

  • Login to post comments

Stephy needs a map - strong Obama FP

Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 9:36am.

Perhaps a map would help George:

edit: had to add this one (okay two) because - well, it is too fitting:

     Obama administration has turned to Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s leading jurist, to mediate secret negotiations between the United States and the Taliban.

     Iran threatens US Navy while Obama backs down on Iranian sanctions

What would Obama do?

US 1%ers attacking Canada (that is liberal environmental one percenters)

Futenma Standoff Sours US-Japan Ties
 

Taliban groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan join forces to combat the US

Somalia propaganda from England as the body count mounts

Egyptian police and justice officials ... to crush groups involved in the pro-democracy movement.

The Wahhabi Invasion of Kashmir Valley

Turkey and Hamas join in their desire to help the 'Palestinians' and deal with the “Judaization of Jerusalem”.

How bad must it be when Nigeria declares a state of emergency?

Morocco gets new Islamist-led government

President Obama fighting for religious freedom : Christians could disappear from Iraq and Afghanistan
 

Who should watch for Human Rights in Syria - How about the guy who led the slaughter in Darfur?
 

The Taliban in Qatar

Clinton/Bush/Obama tag team - Bosnia moving toward Sharia law

etc, etc, etc...

President Obama can not be personally be blamed for any of this but to say that he is a success at Foreign Policy is a stretch.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

George S. One more Democrate with prepared talking points.

Submitted by texasredbud on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 4:23pm.

Did you notice how quickly George abandoned the defense of Obama once the 2 talking points were shot down? He ran when presented with the truth. I guess they will have to do more work on that defense at their next breakfast with the Pres.

  • Login to post comments

Stephanopoulos on a blue

Submitted by Sockpuppet Politic on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 4:49pm.

Stephanopoulos on a blue background, Santorum on a red. We already knew the score without the color-coding, ABC, but thanks for being honest.

  • Login to post comments

sockpuppet,

Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 4:52pm.

good catch!!

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Nicely done.

Submitted by Douglas J. Bender on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 11:30pm.

Great eye! It just goes to show how much they really ARE trying to control the narrative to the benefit of Democrats -- they are so conscious of every nuance, they even color-code the background. Sheeeesh.

  • Login to post comments

George and his wife cried together over the phone

Submitted by WarEagle01 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 5:28pm.

on inauguration day 2009.

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/stephanopoulos-cried-on-inaugurati...

He literally cried tears of joy after Obama became president. That's pretty much all you need to know about worthless far-Left hack and non-man George Stephanopoulos.

  • Login to post comments

An indignant George

Submitted by celator on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 5:50pm.

An indignant George Stephanopoulos? That's sorta like little Mary Jane making a scene in the store because mommy won't buy her a new doll.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

Why the Kenyan is weak . .

Submitted by 1611 LilacLady on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 6:45pm.

He was placed in OUR White House by puppet-masters, and propped up by the likes of Soros and the Bilderbergs Group. With supporting roles of fake votes and the Marxist media.

Isaiah 5:20a Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil. . .  KJV
  • Login to post comments

The picture

Submitted by bobsmom on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 6:48pm.

I got in my head, when I saw the phrase "indignant George Stephanopoulos", is that of a 6 year old girl, dressed up as a Disney Princess stomping tiny kitten heeled feet over not having the right kind of cupcake to serve at her tea party. I'm sorry, this miniature man makes me laugh when he gets himself into a state of high dudgeon. Very hard to take seriously.

  • Login to post comments

shill

Submitted by angelann1 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:08pm.

george is just another shill for nobama and the dnc !

BDK
  • Login to post comments

Like a liberal, I will call out george .....

Submitted by jmigyanka@msn.com on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:28pm.

.... a greasy midget who thinks he is a journalist.

JMigyanka
  • Login to post comments

no significant attack against the United States has been success

Submitted by Marcus Porcius on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 7:37pm.

Really George?

I'm pretty sure the victims at Fort Hood would disagree.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/06/military-growing-terrorist-ta...


"Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." G.K. Chesterton
www.theconservativereview.com
  • Login to post comments

"Is"

Submitted by Douglas J. Bender on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 9:07pm.

Stephanapoulos: "You've also argued that our enemies don't fear President Obama, but where's the evidence of that?...The al Qaeda leadership has been decimated, Osama bin Laden is dead, no significant attack against the United States has been successful. Where is that evidence?"

It's a shame Santorum didn't respond with, "It depends on what the definition of the word 'is' is."

  • Login to post comments

Let's get one thing clear

Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 9:16pm.

One thing needs to be understood about this whole thing and this is one HUGE problem I have with Santorum and why I don't want him as president:

Soetoro is NOT weak.

If he was, we wouldn't have NDAA.  If he was, we wouldn't have DADT taken out.  If he was, Health Care wouldn't have been an issue, it wouldn't have happened at all.  If he was, TSA wouldn't be out of control,along with EPA, HHS, just to name a few.   If he was, we wouldn't have this outright class warfare with him actively participating in it.  If he was, he wouldn't have lambasted the SCOTUS and others(like Ryan) in public after inviting them to "listen" to him.  If he was, Libya wouldn't have happened.  And on and on.

All these things and more that have happened in the last three years, both foreign and domestic, are not the actions of someone weak.

They are the actions of someone with the design of destroying this wonderful country.

GET THAT IN YOUR HEADS! 

He's NOT weak. 

He's NOT incompetent.

He's NOT in over his head.

He's NOT misunderstood.

I repeat: GET THAT IN YOUR HEADS FOR GOD'S SAKE!!

What he is:  HE'S A DANGER TO THIS COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE, EVEN YOU LIBERALS!

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

The argument against Obama on

Submitted by tombaker on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 10:18pm.

The argument against Obama on foreign policy is not very strong. You have the argument on Israel and not supporting them well and what he said about the PM behind his back and in front of reporters. You have the weak negotiations with Russia on missiles. But he has the Iraq pullout which most support, regardless of what McCain said on the floor of the Senate. And Obama has Bin Laden dead, which surely will silence absolute statements of his failure. Obama is weak on Iran, but not much of an alternative been put out.

Obama on foregin policy is weak on the business aspects. Ceding to China. Allowing our EPA to kill USA manufacturing. Foreign Policy is not a easy hit on Obama, when Obama is far busier destroying the internals of the USA. To this regard Steph is correct in his question back to Santorium specific on Foreign.

Dropping about 4000 dialed in JDAMs from a fleet of D52s, taking out the entire governing bodies of Iran, including clerical side, then saying OOOPS we had went off half cocked, sorry about that, won't do it again. Seriously sorry, my bad. OOOPS we really went off. ----------> My solution to Iran.

  • Login to post comments

Obama pulling out of Iraq with haste is NOT...

Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 11:16pm.

what most American's support. What they support is a gradual draw down that allows what we've fought for in Iraq to count for something after we're gone.

What Obama has done by withdrawing so quickly can be likened to declaring yourself the victor as you're carried off the field with a quarter left to play and you're down by 10!

The man is an incompetent Demoron.

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge

  • Login to post comments

Iraq withdrawl

Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 11:21pm.

More like snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory. Typical democrat move.

He'll do the same thing in Afghanistan. It's recently come to light that General Petraeus almost resigned over Obama's handling of things.....THAT says it all (only it would have put a real explanation point on it had he actually resigned, which I wondered about at the time....but like a typical West Pointer he saluted and said "yes sir").

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Obama's Foreign Policy

Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 01/04/2012 - 8:41am.

Selling the policies as a failure is true only because very few know what is going on and we have a media that is going to make sure that it stays that way. 

Of the stories I listed above, how many have received any real air time.  The Canadian story is Obama's rich friends on the environmental front stopping evil oil for profit companies - this isn't even covered.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

I am pleasently encouraged that Santorum is doing well...

Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 01/03/2012 - 11:10pm.

in Iowa. Finally a Conservative is beginning to receive traction.

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use