Matthews, Who Once Compared Tea Party to the Muslim Brotherhood, Now Admits Group 'Has a Point'
Chris Matthews, who has repeatedly denounced the "hateful" Tea Partiers and once compared them to the Muslim Brotherhood, admitted on Thursday that the conservative protesters have "a point." The admission came during an attempt to suggest that both the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street have failings. [MP3 audio here.]
The Hardball host conceded, "I may surprise some people with this, but both of the movements, right as well as left, had a point, a good point to make. Both of them. Government is spending too much money. If you mean it's spending more than people are willing to finance in taxes." Could it be that Matthews is souring on the Occupy crowd, now that there are reports of defecating on cars and rapes?
Matthews didn't directly address the crime part of the OWS protests. Instead, he chastised, "But, even as the occupiers are being pushed from their encampments, they fail to speak out in clear terms about what they want done and that is deadly. That is a deadly failure. Demonstrators need most of all to demonstrate, tell us what we need to do."
He did make sure to suggest that they are "right" in their frustration of Wall Street.
Speaking of the federal government, Matthews surprisingly allowed, "It's spending 25 percent of our economy. Taxing just 15 percent. It would seem to most people that that 25 number we spend is almost, almost as out of whack as the 15 percent in taxes."
The anchor made sure to attack the Tea Party for just being "against" things, a constant refrain.
But, on February 1, 2011, he compared the conservative group to terrorists: "So, the Muslim Brotherhood has a parallel role here with the Tea Party, they're the ones who keep you honest and decide whether you've stayed too long?"
On May 16, 2011, Matthews frothed that the Tea Party were "haters," doing so ten times in under two minutes.
So, his new tone is apparently an attempt at a "plague on both your houses" critique. Of course, one side is constantly threatening violence, dealing with rapes and public defecation and one side isn't.
A transcript of the November 17 segment, which aired at 5:57pm EST, follows:
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with this: We're looking now at what appears to be the exasperation of the country's most alive political movements. The Tea Party and Occupy Wall street. Exasperation. It's when a felt need, a passion even fails to be satisfied. It's when you want something and can't get it. Like in the song. Can't get no- can't get no- satisfaction. But, I'm speaking here with dead seriousness about forces that appear to be deadly serious. The one on the right that gained tremendous and proven force the summer before last and then in the fall elections a year ago and the Occupy Wall Street movement that has replicated itself across the country. One movement, the Tea Party, stands today as totally, are you listening to this, incapable, incompetent I would say in selecting a leader, someone fit to run for president. They ain't got one. No, no, no. They ain't got one. They looked at Trump, yes Trump, and Bachmann, Perry, and Cain and they're dallying with Newt. Not a real leader in sit. In fact, if you look across the months to the summer of last year they never have and that tells you something about the negativity of their cause.
They are against and that is not enough to lead this country. The Occupy Wall Street movement has had a different failure. In some way worse, in some way not. They can't come up with a clear voice, a clear statement that put the focus where it belongs. Wall Street. Well, that's where they've been right. They've been in sync with the country on where to go. They put the blame on Wall Street. More to the point, to the clout Wall Street has in our government down in Washington.
But, even as the occupiers are being pushed from their encampments, they fail to speak out in clear terms about what they want done and that is deadly. That is a deadly failure. Demonstrators need most of all to demonstrate, tell us what we need to do. I may surprise some people with this, but both of the movements, right as well as left, had a point, a good point to make. Both of them. Government is spending too much money. If you mean it's spending more than people are willing to finance in taxes. It's spending 25 percent of our economy. Taxing just 15 percent. It would seem to most people that that 25 number we spend is almost, almost as out of whack as the 15 percent in taxes. Occupy certainly has a great point to make. Both parties rely too much on Wall Street for their money and he who pays the piper, calls the tune. But exasperation isn't enough to fix our problems. That's what politicians are supposed to do. We've got an election coming up to force that one, to force them to do what we want them to do- lead us.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Matthews is still a bleeding
Submitted by helomech on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 7:50pm.
Matthews is still a bleeding heart liberal Obama lover-don't forget that!
Nobody watches Matthews. One would think he'd just go away.
Submitted by acaiguana on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 8:00pm.
On the other hand, as he flounders and struggles to find his voice:
Matthew's Brain: "I know I've got some point here, what could it be, what could it be?"
Matthew's Mouth: "And so, the tea party is a radical and ignorant bunch of brain dead scientific hating religious idiots.....(blah blah blah) - <spittle>"
Matthew's Brain: "God, I hope I can find a point here somewhere!"
That about covers the whole issue.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
How've the boys been doing?
Submitted by nixon on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 8:11pm.
How've the boys been doing?
The boyz are a bit frustrated. I promised Costa Rica and ...
Submitted by acaiguana on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 8:20pm.
They are going to stay in Mexico. But we moved the ranch to Puerto Escondido and they have to share a pool for the near future.
Ah, life as an Iguana.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
My first thought..
Submitted by zenman1661 on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 8:20pm.
was I don't recall anyone part of the OWS crowd complaining about excessive Gov't spending, so on this Matthews is FOS as usual. My second thought was that if he is showing any agreement with the Tea Party means I may have to quit on principal.
I think you're right
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 9:37am.
Now that the OWS movement is winding down, Matthews may be trying to understand what it was all about in the first place, and lacking any good answers, has decided to like it to the more influential Tea Party.
Just as he has interpreted the JFK years rather poorly, he continues to get current events wrong.
compare and contrast
Submitted by Franksam on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 9:08pm.
At this point, Matthews is trying to make the OWS'ers look good by saying that they do share some opinions with the TEA-******s, as he and his friends like to call their odd-bedfellows. Or is this just part of the "Unhate" campaign?
Mathews has a point...
Submitted by Dave the mailman on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 9:22pm.
...but if he wears a hat, no one will notice.
Say what?!
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 9:47pm.
MATTHEWS: ". . . I may surprise some people with this, but both of the movements, right as well as left, had a point, a good point to make. Both of them. Government is spending too much money."
Wait a minute! In all the coverage of OWS demonstrations across the country, I neither saw a sign or heard a voice claim that government is spending too much money. There were many OWSers demanding that Big Government spend MORE money -- free health care; forgiveness of all student loans; free university education; jobs on demand; etc.
Once again, Matthews doesn't have even the faintest grasp of reality.
It's the only way Matthews
Submitted by NC Cop on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 9:52pm.
It's the only way Matthews could actually admit that the Tea Party was right. He had to, in his mind, convince himself that the left is actually complaining about it as well.
That, and the fact that the Tea Party is characterized by . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 9:41am.
. . . several things that make it more positive than OWS's performance.
1. Tea Parties didn't clash with police. They were very orderly.
2. Similarly, the Tea Parties didn't trash the place.
3. There were no significant reports of crime at the Tea Parties.
4. And perhaps most importantly, the Tea Parties have had an impact on elections disproportionate to their numbers.
What BS
Submitted by oldfart on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 10:25pm.
That is the same has saying to someone:
"What a nice shirt - but I would not be caught dead in it. It would be more useful as a dish rag."
Great news that politicians like Pelosi fully embraced
Submitted by krendler on Thu, 11/17/2011 - 10:46pm.
Great news that politicians like Pelosi fully embraced OWS from the beginning. What a great campaign ad: Liberal politicians heaping praise on the OWS crowd as images are shown of property damage and clashes (daily) with police.
These, of course, are the same politicians that smeared the Tea Party as racist for doing nothing other than urging fiscal restraint by the government. Absolutely sickening.
Do Not Trust Matthews, He Will Relaps Without His Meds
Submitted by Avitar on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 12:38am.
For people who haven't looked he is trying to confuse that the OWS look like the Tea Party and the Tea Party demonstrations looked anything like the fleabag demonstrations.
Wow, 15 trillion dollars
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 1:18am.
Wow, 15 trillion dollars later Matthews finally starts to wonder if maybe the Federal government is spending itself out of control. Don't worry, by morning he will completely forget he had this thought and will go right back to advocating unconstitutional government entitlement programs to nowhere.
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James MadisonThe half-wit is half-right....
Submitted by TheAngryConservative on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 1:48am.
Yes Chris....welcome to the party....this country is spending too much money....but our country's willingness to fund the spending is not the issue. You have it stuck in your mind that we could tax the rich enough to pay for the welfare state....problem is, even if you flat-out confiscated all of the income taxes of the rich, you would not even come close to eliminating the deficit for THIS year, let alone any others.
The only way we get our debt in line is if we encourage growth (i.e. consumer spending) and cut government spending for wasteful programs. Believe there's been several studies (at least one by the GAO) that looked at HHS and other government agencies and found a s**t-ton of waste. To me, all I have to say is file that under the "no s**t Sherlock" section.
Matthews is a Obama sycophant who tries to act like he's remotely coherent when it comes to his half-a$$ed ideas. I mean, damn, how can you say "tingle up your leg" and call yourself a legit political analyst.
Say it with me Chris....you dolt....it is not the government's job to take care of the prolonged day-to-day needs of an able-bodied American....and spending all that money enabling said lazy people is NOT HELPING!! (it's subsidizing it...which makes it increase...exponentially)
We have, I fear, confused power with greatness. ~ Stewart Udall
Prissy the elite jerk-***
Submitted by east tennessee john on Fri, 11/18/2011 - 11:08am.
Did anyone besides me see Chrissy and Frank go after Newt? Has anyone read or had read to them at msdnc "Reckless Endangerment", an historical narrative about the housing boom, its funding anf the crash of 2008? Barney is way too modest, which is unusual in itself, about his participation on the legislative end. He didn't mention the donations his mopther's groups received from Fannie & Freddie, the job he arranged for his then partner, not the one running a gay escort service or the one dealing drugs, but the one who got the Fannie job because he wanted him to. Nor did Barney mention the 2003 Credit Act or the 2005 legistlation to limit the GSE's investments, which were defeated and BO voted against the 2005 proposal, but Newt,acting as a private citizen was attacked. Now, I don't know what Newt did, if anything, but another demoncratic smear with the levekl of actual evidence equal to the Cain allegations. It's these e;litist social darwinist "progressives" that have gotten us in this mess. Arrogant CSers that they are.