Twice in Less Than 24 Hours, Chris Matthews Compares Republicans to 'Terrorists'
Two times in less than 24 hours, MSNBC's Chris Matthews smeared Republicans who oppose raising the debt limit as "terrorists." On Tuesday, after liberal guest Joan Walsh compared the GOP position to "hostage taking," the Hardball anchor derided, "I agree. It's terrorism."
On Wednesday, while talking with left-wing blogger Ezra Klein, Matthews engaged in extreme hyperbole again, excoriating, "I was talking about the old days. I've never seen either political party play terrorist with disregard."
It's perhaps worth remembering that MSNBC analyst Mark Halperin was suspended last week for calling the Democratic President a slang term for a penis. [See video below. MP3 audio here.]
Also on Tuesday, Matthews compared the "scary" GOP to a violent Islamic group: "Well, the GOP has become the Wahhabis of American government, willing to risk bringing down the whole country in the service of their anti-tax ideology."
The MRC recently complied the worst examples of MSNBC's 15 years of liberal hate.
A transcript of the two exchanges can be found below:
07/05/11
5:28
JOAN WALSH: They're paying the lowest taxes in 50 years, more than 50 years. More than my lifetime and they are still complaining. And some aren't complaining. There are some good business people know this game of chicken, in particular, is deadly and it's wrong and hostagetaking. And you shouldn't negotiate with hostage-takers.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: I agree with you. I agree with you. I agree. It's terrorism.
07/06/11
Hardball
5:08pm
MATTHEWS: You know, it's interesting. I was talking about the old days. I've never seen either political party play terrorist with disregard. The debt ceiling, the limit, it has always been sacrosanct. Party leaders like John Boehner or Tip O'Neill or Newt Gingrich, even, people who recognize leadership and responsibility get the job done. Here he is the, the debt ceiling was raised seven times during the Bush years starting in June of 2002. It was raised every year except for 2005. And in 2008 it was increased twice. It's always gotten the job done, Ezra. The Republican Party today is not the Republican Party of even a couple years ago. It seems to me, it's overrun, now, by people who are abolitionists. They are willing to abolish government and willing to bring it down if they have to. And they don't give a darn, or damn, about the consequences.
EZRA KLEIN: It's definitely a different Republican Party. But, the thing that keeps coming to my mind is they really haven't thought it through. The federal government pays 80 million checks in a month. 80 million. We go through the debt ceiling, and according to the bipartisan Policy Center, 45 percent of our debts, our obligations will not be able to be paid. Who is it exactly who will make the decisions of which obligations they are? If it's the Treasury Department, and they've never had to do this before, you're looking at the Republican Party, a small government, anti-executive branch Republican Party making the largest transfer of power, possibly in all memory. It's a staggering change in the way we run or finances as a country.
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
You gotit TR.
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:05pm.
Tingles the Racer says: "The Republican Party today is not the Republican Party of even a couple years ago." Yep, for once I agree with TR! Learn to live with it , cry about it, cussem, callem names. But they are now running the HR. Betcha miss all those Rinos eh TR. I sure as **** do not.
So they started with calling
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:12pm.
So they started with calling us Hitlers, then racists, now it's terrorists. What next? Devils? (Naw that would mean believing in God and the Bible.) Unless it's the Hollywood version of devils, which are a fictional depiction of reality.
Terrorists? Noooo - How about "freedom fighers?"
Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:17pm.
To coin the left's adversity to calling real terrorists, terrorists; how about we just call the GOP's speaking out for the majority of the American people, what they are -- freedom fighters.
Fighting for our freedoms.
(;~> gary
Ya' know, if it weren't for Newsbusters, I'd never know a word
Submitted by nonncom on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:26pm.
that 'ol tingles mutters....LOL....does anybody really watch that nitwit?......and if they do, surely they watch merely for the comedic value.....they couldn't possibly take this sissy seriously....
Is there anything Chrissie
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:50pm.
Is there anything Chrissie and the liberals won't call terrorism?
Oh, yeah....actual terrorism. That's called "man-caused disasters."
MSNBC
Submitted by Merlotonly634 on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 1:24pm.
Seeing that MSNBC ratings are in the toilet I would think the brass would dump him and the Madcow thing. People just don't like anti American psychos.Where's the uproar from the stockholders? It appears that the brass are more concerned with their idiology's than they are with their ratings because if they weren't they would get rid of these dolts. It boggles my mind to hear the garbage these people drivel.
Matthews
Submitted by jessieH on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 4:55pm.
Come on Matthews, tell us how you really feel. You are running out of insults. If anyone watced your show, I'd be a little worried.
From the point of view of a
Submitted by robert108 on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 5:04pm.
From the point of view of a tax and spend greedy Dem, it is terrifying to contemplate that the heroin of our tax money might be cut off. It was a Freudian slip.
Gee, whatever happened to the MSM civility police?
Submitted by lsudolemite on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 5:19pm.
Anybody? Bueller?
bingo
Submitted by sawing batta on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 8:19am.
Where is Debbie Waserman Schultz? Barack Obama? Both DEMANDED "civility" in our political speech.
bookmark this story and send it to MSLSD when the next tragic event happens
so are we
Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 6:25pm.
racist, sexist, nativist, homophobic terrorists or just plain terrorists?
You know what I like about Tingles F. Baby
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 7:18pm.
you know where he stands on things no matter how warped they may be.
So we're terrorists huh? Well I hope everything we do terrorizes you so bad that you never rest easy TFB!
The difference is that our ideas scare you like the Al Crazies and Tallywackers scare you with their force. I see the connection now, liberal cowardice. But as Colonel Nathan Jessep said in "A Few Good Men"... "is there any other kind?"
terrorism
Submitted by Demonhunter on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 7:52pm.
"I've never seen either political party play terrorist with disregard. The debt ceiling, the limit, it has always been sacrosanct."
Not when Obama and leftist Democrats spoke against raising the debt limit when we had combat troops on foreign soil? You have a short memory, or lack an objective viewpoint Tingles.
Tingles says it, Joan Walsh,
Submitted by ant on Thu, 07/07/2011 - 9:50pm.
Tingles says it, Joan Walsh, Newsweak's Tina Brown... all referring to the GOP as 'terrorists' recently. My guess is they took a poll and found the words associated with terrorists were viewed 'negatively', and hence, we have them labeling conservatives with it. No doubt, the words they use from now till the elections will have been researched, x-rayed, and discussed for maxim impact. They underestimate the American people.(the ones that aren't dyed-in-the-wool libtards, anyway.)
Yeah yeah
Submitted by StarAZ on Fri, 07/08/2011 - 11:53am.
Republicans--blood-slathered jaws, C4 belts, never fly commercial...what else ya got?