Jake Tapper Concedes Media's Bias on Obama Medal of Honor Gaffe, Double Standard on Bachmann
By Scott Whitlock | July 05, 2011 | 15:44
ABC White House correspondent Jake Tapper appeared on the June 27 edition of Dennis Miller's radio show and conceded to a media blackout of Barack Obama's Medal of Honor gaffe. (The President confused a living recipient with the deceased Jared Monti who died in combat.)
Tapper admitted that the President made "a big uncomfortable mistake." He added, "And I don't think that that got the same kind of coverage as, you know, when Sarah Palin got Paul Revere's ride-" Tapper's right. His own network, ABC, as well as CBS and NBC have skipped the Monti story.
Tapper was away when the Medal of Honor story initially broke, but he, thus far, has since ignored it, although he did cover it online (while still on vacation). Additionally, while the journalist had generic criticism for "the media," he certainly didn't take ABC specifically to task.
[MP3 audio here]
Miller critiqued, "Well, you guys gotta work that out in house. But, I will tell you, you're not- the herd's not fooling anybody out here."
Tapper at one point seemed on the verge of admitting the media liberal bias. He allowed, "But the question is, okay, and removing the ideological bias, and I don't- do not generally disagree that there is-" Unfortunately, Miller interrupted him.
The White House correspondent (see file photo at right) attempted to shift the issue to one of sexism, suggesting that Hillary Clinton dealt with much harsher criticism than Obama. However, Good Morning America, where Tapper frequently appears, fawned over both.
On the January 18, 2007 edition of that show, Clare Shipman summed up the Democratic battle as one between Clinton's "hot factor" and Obama's "fluid poetry."
An August 29, 2007, a Media Research Center study found Tapper to be wrong on this larger point of anti-Hillary bias. The MRC's Rich Noyes wrote:
The top Democratic candidates received much more favorable coverage than their GOP counterparts, with Senator Clinton cast as "unbeatable" and Illinois Senator Barack Obama tagged as a "rock star." The most prominent Republican, Arizona Senator John McCain, was portrayed as a loser because of his support for staying the course in Iraq.
A transcript of Tapper's June 27 appearance on Dennis Miller can be found below:
[Tapper moving off a question about Chris Wallace and the "flake" comment.]
JAKE TAPPER: I do think that there is a question, and we were talking about this in our newsroom earlier today, I think there is a question about whether we are tougher, we meaning the media writ large, the Borg, that we are tougher on women candidates than we are on men, because I have to say, you know, anytime Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann, you know, misplaces an adjective-
DENNIS MILLER: Sure.
TAPPER: -we know about it and we cover it in the media. And, you know, this thing that the President did, and, obviously it was a mistake and he didn't mean to, but last week when he misidentified- he's given two Medals of Honor. And he was at the 10th Mountain at Fort Drum and he mistakenly said that he had given one to Sargent First Class Jared Monti when actually Monti was the one of the two Medals of Honor he's given that was given posthumously. Monti died in Gowardesh, northeast Afghanistan in 2006. That's a big, uncomfortable mistake.
MILLER: Huge. Yeah, yeah.
TAPPER: And I don't think that that got the same kind of coverage as, you know, when Sarah Palin got Paul Revere's ride-
MILLER: Well, it's not even an "I don't think" and "we have to ask the question," Jake, you're in a herd up there. You're one of the guys on the fringes of that herd who has to play with the herd, but is also an individual. So, I admire you for that. But, you know the answer to these in your inner sanctum-sanctorum. Nobody's going to say it up there, but of course they're tougher on women. And they're even tougher on Republican women. And most of them are predisposed to be liberal and it's obvious all of us. And they're playing some in-house game where they go, "no, no." But, listen, we're on to the whole thing.
TAPPER: But, they were tougher- I'm not disagreeing with anything- or agreeing- with anything they just said. But, I think they were also tougher- the media was also tougher on Hillary Clinton than they were on Barack Obama or John Edwards, who, by the way, you know, was up to no good. I don't know if you read the papers.
MILLER: Yeah. Well, you guys gotta work that out in house. But, I will tell you, you're not- the herd's not fooling anybody out here. You guys can do what you want with it. Either steer into one lane and just say, "Yeah! We're liberal. This is what we do. Shut up." Not you. But a bunch of them. Or just say, "No, no. We are completely jaded" and apologize for it. We're onto it! We see it.
TAPPER: But the question is, okay, and removing the ideological bias, and I don't- do not generally disagree that there is-
MILLER: Yeah, it's about 85 to 90 percent of the reporters.
TAPPER: I don't know what it is.
MILLER: Yeah, I do.
TAPPER: But, in any case, why is it do you think it is that people were tougher on- and I'm not disagreeing with the idea that people- but there's no reason why the Medal of Honor mistake should have gotten less attention than Michele Bachmann-
MILLER: Because liberals don't like individual members of the disenfranchised class to save themselves. That's their raison d'etre.
TAPPER: But, why tougher on Hillary Clinton than Barack Obama during the primaries in 2008? Why that? Was it being fed up with the Clintons?
MILLER: Mmmm. Yeah, I guess he was the new thing, right?
TAPPER: I also think- if you look back at some of the coverage back then, some of it was fairly sexist against Hillary Clinton.
MILLER: Yeah, but it's easier to be perceived sexist than to be perceived racist. You know that. There's a grievance chart over there and everybody knows that the biggest dime you can get dropped on you is an accusation of racism. For God's sake, Bill Clinton went from being the first black president, coming out of South Carolina when he got pissed off and questioned something, to have the race card dime dropped on him. So, it can happen to anyone at anytime. Would you rather have them say you're sexist or racist?
- Scott Whitlock's blog
- Login to post comments




















Comments
Tapper and oreily are alike
Submitted by okie-pastor on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 4:18pm.
Jake Tapper and Bill Oreily are alike in that they lean left (tapper) and right (oreily) but try to report down the middle but let their biases slip occasionally (or frequently lol)
fair comparison
Submitted by right of way on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 5:11pm.
jake and bill play both sides and are not completly biased one way or another and call each side out.. the only drawback of driving down the middle of the road? there is a good chance of getting run into.
The media didn't block
Submitted by jessieH on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 4:24pm.
The media didn't block anything. With all their effort to hide obama's gaffe, it went viral, thanks to the internet. Tapper leans a little to the right, me thinks!
Yeah Tapper is auditioning for a gig with Fox News!
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 4:32pm.
He says things to keep his liberal bosses happy but he is adamant about the truth for the most part.
All the news that's fit to omit (part 635....)
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 4:58pm.
OK, maybe they didn't block it, BUT THEY SURE AS HELL DIDN'T REPORT IT.
Tapper is one of the more listenable of the mouth pieces, but that is not saying a hell of a lot.
Colmes and others deny ANY bias and cherry pick one thing that was reported and that means "Both sides get the same scrutiny".
Yup, just like the same a-holes IGNORED and STILL IGNORE Obama and his lying about the corporate jets bullshi*, when HE and the Demonrats PUT IT and VOTED FOR IT in the stimulus bill.
Damn facts and liberals don't get along too well.
Tapper "doesn't think" it got
Submitted by AngryInOhio on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 5:56pm.
Tapper "doesn't think" it got the same coverage? Please, it got NO COVERAGE Jake! I am so disappointed in Tapper, I really thought that he was different than the rest of the so called "reporters", but he isn't. He sounded more like a politician, wishy washy. He is obviously afraid of offending the left, after all, look what happened to Mark Halpern and he spoke the truth!
Jake, there is a very simple
Submitted by Question_Assumptions on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 6:42pm.
Jake, there is a very simple reason why liberal gaffes don't get the same kind of reporting that conservative gaffes have. That reason is that left-biased reporters are selling a narrative rather than the objective truth and beyond simply bias, they have an agenda to help liberals and hurt conservatives, so that's what they do.
Nailed it!
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 07/06/2011 - 12:39am.
Nailed it!
Ronald Reagan
Ok...
Submitted by retrocon on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 8:07pm.
Ok, one more time. Tapper was about to say to say that Sarah got Paul Reveres ride "wrong."
Melissa Block, NPR host, interviewing Suffolk University History Dept. Chairman Robert Allison regarding her comments about the Paul Revere ride...
BLOCK: So you think basically, on the whole, Sarah Palin got her history right.
Prof. ALLISON: Well, yeah, she did.
So... can we please make sure we call Tapper, and everyone else, on the fact that they are nitpicking Sarah!!!
Pullllease!
reference: http://www.npr.org/2011/06/06/137011636/how-accurate-were-palins-comment...
Not exactly a bastion of conservative support, either.
Tap-tap-tap ...
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 8:28pm.
Tapper will "tap-dance" around Miller's questions and try to appear to be objective but will walk a mile to criticize his collegues in the media and has said so on many occasions.
I've noticed when he appears on Miller's show, he will toss a bone or two to Dennis, who is a big admirer of Jake, but will do so carefully and with great reluctance. You can tell in his voice and the hesitancy in his delivery.
Pulling the Hillary excuse to soften the obvious attacks on conservative women is akin to the left's dragging out Timothy McVeigh whenever someone mentions the fact that Islamic extremists are mostly responsible for global terrorism.
I have always been a big fan of both but less so of Tapper these days who can ask probing questions and has journalistic insticts but is far more willing to promote the agenda than his job requires.
Tapper likes to complain about the "tone" of his critics on both sides to dismiss "inconvenient facts" but, as I believe the saying goes, conservatives get angry when you don't tell the truth, liberals get angry when you do.
I think I'm with you. I've
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 9:17pm.
I think I'm with you. I've seen Tapper do enough liberally biased work to know that he is a liberal. But credit should be given to him for at least *trying* to see things from the conservative view point and sometimes he succeeds at covering it. We're so used to being ignored by the liberal media that Tapper's work seems almost fair.
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison@deerjerkydave
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:19pm.
I've often said that any reporter who even only occasionally presents a balanced view, asks real questions and doesn't ignore issues, is elevated higher because it is the exception rather than the rule.
An example of this was when Wolf Blitzer asked those probing questions of Mexico's president about HIS immigration policies and conservatives were aghast that he was exposing what they all knew.
There's no doubt Tapper leans left but he has attempted to be somewhat fair but only to a point.
During the JournoList debacle he kept his distance and sympathized with people like Dave Weigel whom he supported as a collegue without mentioning his behavior. The media (and the betway bunch) seem to be a very chummy crowd with relationships intertwined in many many ways.
His standard reply is that it's not his place to comment on issues like that, although he seems to relish when conservatives find themselves in a pickle.
He also gets very testy when you challenge him on an issue or some fact reported (or not reported) and point out the kinds of things Miller was alluding to.
He also goes out of his way to defend the WH when it is criticized by disputing facts, to help them advance their narrative as he did in the "government shutdown" story, or make excuses for certain behavior (like explaining Obama's getting the year wrong in the UK by implying he was suffering from jet lag).
That said, he can and sometimes does push the envelope, just not hard and often enough, couching his language in soft terms like "I know it's not the President's fault but ..." and not going nearly hard enough as his collegues like George Stephanopoulos does when interrogating Republicans.
All in all very disappointing but understandable imagining having a sweet gig and being in his shoes, but that is why the media are becoming less and less relevant