Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 08, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty
  • Even Chris Matthews Questions Obama's 'Frightening,' Birth Control Decision
  • CBS, ABC Highlight Obama 'Flip-Flop' on Super PACs; NBC Punts
  • Media Thrilled Over 8.3% Unemployment in 2012, Despondent With 5.6% in 2004
  • CBS News D.C. Station Slams Voter ID Bill in Va. As '"Jim Crow" Voting Legislation'
  • Thrice-Married NPR Snob Garrison Keillor Mocks Newt Gingrich as a 'Polygamist'
  • NBC Nightly News Finally Mentions Obama Mandate Imposition on Catholics; Still Waiting for ABC and CBS
  • Clint Eastwood: 'I Am Certainly Not Politically Affiliated With Mr. Obama'

Fox News Nails ‘60 Minutes:’ CBS Show Spent Ten Minutes on Palin, Skipped Reid’s ‘Negro’ Remark

By Scott Whitlock | January 11, 2010 | 15:32

Change font size:  A |  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn on Monday hit 60 Minutes for spending ten minutes out of a 13 minute segment highlighting negative dirt on Sarah Palin. At the same time, the news magazine ignored racially charged remarks made by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Shawn analyzed Anderson Cooper’s January 10 interview with the authors of Game Change, observing, "...Most of the CBS story was critical of Sarah Palin." [Audio available here.]

He explained, "The story did not mention Reid calling then-candidate Barack Obama light-skinned with no Negro dialect, comments for which the Senator has since apologized." This is despite the fact that authors John Heilemann and Mark Halperin broke the "Negro" story. Shawn noted the segment ran 13 minutes and three seconds. He then broke down the numbers: "That means that Sarah Palin was the focus for just over ten minutes, ten minutes and four seconds. Hillary Clinton, 90 seconds. President Obama, just under a minute."

Underlining CBS’s lopsided totals, he concluded, "Harry Reid not a minute, not a second, not a nanosecond." 60 Minutes’ explanation for all of this? Shawn observed, "We've asked a spokesman for a response. We're waiting for that response. A source, meanwhile, explained that they only had so much time for the story, and they had to focus on more important things that affect the country."

A transcript of the segment, which aired on Happening Now at 12:40pm EST, follows:

JON SCOTT: More, now, on Senator Reid's remarks and last night's 60 Minutes story on the new book that reported them. The segment on the book Game Change focused on Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton, but it did not once mention Senator Reid's remarks. Why? Senator correspondent- senior correspondent- senator correspondent as well- Eric Shawn has more on this from our New York Newsroom. Thank you, Jon.

ERIC SHAWN: If nominated, I will not run. Thank you, Jon, Well, there's a big question today, everyone's talking about this, what was not on 60 Minutes last night? You know, The venerable news magazine program aired that story on the new political book that is sparking this firestorm, but the segment totally ignored the controversial, racial comments from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that are quoted in the book. Instead, most of the CBS story was critical of Sarah Palin. The segment was about the book Game Change and included interviews with the authors that you see there. Well, it was reported by Anderson Cooper, who also hosts a news program on CNN. The story did not mention Reid calling then-candidate Barack Obama light-skinned with no Negro dialect, comments for which the Senator has since apologized. A source says the program did have access to the whole book when they did the interview, but the segment largely zeroed in on Palin and allegations about her troubled vice presidential run. In fact, we did a Fox News analysis of the segment and it shows, look at this: The whole segment ran 13 minutes and three seconds, Palin was mentioned 30 seconds into it, right in the introduction, and she's the focus of the piece for the next five minutes and 20 seconds. Hillary Clinton is then discussed for 30 seconds. President Obama, well, he gets 58 seconds. Then it's back to, guess who, Sarah Palin, for another four minutes and 44 seconds. Well, the segment does end with one more mention of Hillary Clinton, totaling one minute, So let's look at the totals here: That means that Sarah Palin was the focus for just over ten minutes, ten minutes and four seconds. Hillary Clinton, 90 seconds. President Obama, just under a minute, Harry Reid not a minute, not a second, not a nanosecond. In fact, the 60 Minutes web site offers even more clips that weren't aired, and here's some of the titles of those clips: "What About Sarah Palin?" "A terrifying VP." "Regrets over Palin?" There's no mention on the web site, that I could see, of Harry Reid. We've asked a spokesman for a response. We're waiting for that response. A source, meanwhile, explained that they only had so much time for the story, and they had to focus on more important things that affect the country. Jon?

Share this

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • 60 Minutes
  • CBS
  • Fox News Channel
  • Other FNC
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)
  • Occupy DC plans to 'occupy' conservative conference (Foundry blog/Heritage)
  • Eastwood ad was bad history (Lowry @ NRO)
  • Bob Kerrey decides to not run for U.S. Senate seat in Nebraska (The Hill)
  • Newt's ties to Fannie, Freddie deeper than suspected (Hot Air)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Bernstein envisions himself as the man who brought down...
    3 min 35 sec ago
  • batting .500
    3 min 58 sec ago
  • Presents vs Presence
    4 min 20 sec ago
  • Roker? LOL. What, was Willard Scott unavailable?
    4 min 33 sec ago
  • Amazing Stupidity
    8 min 47 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Politico: Is Nancy Pelosi A 2012 Asset, or Not?
  • CNN Demeans Republicans as Drag Queens
  • Democrat: Fox News Is 'The Enemy,' Hates 'Working Men and Women'
  • Virginia Bishops: 'We Cannot -- We Will Not -- Comply' with Obamacare
  • How Planned Parenthood Used Social Media to Crush Komen
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.