In a 10,500 word story on the state of the Republican Party, Washington Post staff writers on Monday waited until paragraph 36 of a 37 paragraph article to highlight the overwhelming belief that the press is biased against Republicans. Jon Cohen and Dan Balz belatedly noted, "One rallying point for the GOP, though, is a broad perception among moderates, conservatives, and younger and older Republicans alike that television news is biased against the Republican Party and tilted highly in favor of Obama and Democrats." [Emphasis added.]
Additionally, the print edition of the paper featured 15 charts about what respondents thought of Republicans in Congress, what issues they saw as important and other topics. Unsurprisingly, the Post did not create a graph to highlight the fact that 74 percent of poll-takers who lean Republican think "television news" is biased in favor the Democratic Party. (It’s unclear why the poll question only surveyed the biases of television. Was the liberal paper afraid of what people might say about the Post?)
87 percent of GOP supporters found coverage of Sarah Palin to be unfair. This, too, did not warrant a chart. And considering that many people will not read all 10,000-plus words, these salient points will be missed by many.
Balz and Cohen did manage to highlight, in the second paragraph, one poll result embarrassing to President Obama:
Republicans and GOP-leaning independents are overwhelmingly negative about Obama and the Democratic Party more broadly, with nearly all dissatisfied with the administration's policies and almost half saying they are "angry" about them. About three-quarters have a more basic complaint, saying Obama does not stand for "traditional American values." More than eight in 10 say there is no chance they would support his reelection.
Once again, however, this fact did not make it into any of the numerous charts accompanying the article. Instead, both the article and the graphics focused on whether or not the Republican Party is focusing too heavily on issues such as gay marriage and abortion. Balz and Cohen wrote:
About a third of Republicans and GOP-leaners say the party is putting "too little" emphasis on same-sex marriage, but nearly as many say it is spending "too much" time on it. Here, there are big divisions by group, with younger people evenly divided between whether the party overemphasizes or underemphasizes the issue. More than four in 10 moderates say too much, with a similar proportion of the very conservative saying too little.
The complete poll results can be found here.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
NewsBusters is turning 5. Enter our free t-shirt contest to help us celebrate!
























Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Broad perception?
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 14:03 ET by jdlybrandIt's a fact Jack!
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
RE bias... NPR here in
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 14:07 ET by MaximusBraveheartRE bias... NPR here in Dallas bought up a Christian radio station 91.7 FM and is now playing music on it to replicate an old format they use to have. They continue to run 90.1 as before with "news" and their patented "fair & balanced" stories. My thought was why don't they make the SECOND station as "fair" as the first from a conservative perspective on 91.7 vs. liberal on 90.1. Say 75% of people consider NPR liberal then be sure their alternate station reads the same on the conservative side. Listenership would surely skyrocket vs. just some lame music. Can you imagine Rush, etc. with no ads? AM radio is nerve wracking with the constant ads when you want to hear talk radio. We could call it CPR (Conservative Public Radio) for America... M-B
No no no no no.
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 14:56 ET by babooMaximus, you clearly don't understand the concept of "fairness." So let me explain - I'll use a sports analogy:
Say your personal favorite football team is winning every game it plays because all the players are taking steroids and the owners are corrupt and bribe the referees. That's "fair" (in case you didn't know). After all, it's your favorite team, so it must be OK!
Now, say your corrupt, rotten-to-the-core, football team is playing a game, but it's losing. Everything that the opposing team is doing is "unfair," even if it's legal and above the board. They're using effective plays? Unfair - the evil corporations must be designing their plays. Their players are better than yours? Unfair - they need to be drug tested (your players, however, can't be - that would be unfair and racist and insulting!) Referees made a call against your team, even though you're bribing them? Well, it *must* be that the other team is bribing them *more*!
Fairness means "whatever it takes to make sure the liberal worldview is the only one people are exposed to." They're afraid of dissent and free thought.
more for babbon
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:02 ET by Myth BusterFree thought? Try this one. This very site is deliberately deceiving the viewers that they are a legitimate newsPAPER, rather than a bought and paid for RNC LIEsite.
posterized
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:08 ET by Candance MooreThat is all.
Green Fro
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 20:04 ET by miss911ninjaUnfortunately Candance there is now an Obama Chia Pet Head on the market. I KID YOU NOT! There will be Obama heads under the tree from sea to shining sea, just waiting for the lefties and their young to water his terra cotta scalp and watch his green fro sprout!
Rabid
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:12 ET by bradbenj5952Is that foam coming out of your mouth? You should try thinking for yourself at some point in your life.
Um, what is "babbon"
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:14 ET by BlondeMethinks it's some kind of liberal babble (like what I'm seeing you post here), but I could be wrong.
I hope he fails, too.
Oh, this is gonna be fun
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:20 ET by SickofLibsI hope he sticks it out. I kinda miss that other shooting-gallery-duck - Kengie.
Blonde, my guess is that it is an imaginary creature in his mind
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:23 ET by pahuberthat makes complete sense ;)
Please elaborate - what's a "babbon"
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:18 ET by SickofLibsAnd do you reaLIES that a website is not a newsPAPER? Look down - that is a KEYboard and that other thing is a COMputer.
That rolled-up paper thing on your porch is the newsPAPER.
SoL, you saw it too! before he cap't' all NEWS in one thread
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:28 ET by pahuberthen PAPER in another as if he was not sure where he knew where emphasis should be placed.
It really storks, (I let SPELLCHECK pick THIS word for me.), ME off WHEN caps cannot BE USED correctly TO emphasize :(
PAH: gonna throw him a free wordbone, so theres no hard feelings
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:33 ET by SickofLibs..."United $nakes of AmeriKKKa"
Oh great! You know he will use it too.... judging from his
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:37 ET by pahubernoted classics so far... (faux, Bush****, etc.)
Probably
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:42 ET by SickofLibsI'll be watching tomorrow when the library reopens and Babbon logs in again.
Yes, I'm afraid he's gone for the day... he's probably on some
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:46 ET by pahuberporn site by now... at least until the library closes.
Compost Pile
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 15:42 ET by miss911ninjaThis is a good example of why Michael Savage calls this newspaper "The Washington Compost."
If they were smart, they'd
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 15:56 ET by bigtimerIf they were smart, they'd worry about their own party turmoil, but they aren't, they just invest in tearing down anything that has an 'R' behind their name...which is okay with me, because so far it has backfired, and still will in '10...they are going to have to backtrack then....after they take another whipping...and I don't think it's going to be a small one either.
Hope they have stock in Kleenex.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
stock in kleenex
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 16:26 ET by jdlybrandAmen bt. In 2010 stock in Charmin will inversely go down, if you get my drift.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
bt
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 16:42 ET by Gary HallAt first glance, I'd be leaning towards agreeing with your statement, "..if they were smart .."
The reality is, they are smart. Conniving smart! This effort by the MSM (newspaper print medium, cable TV, network TV, Time and Newsweek, etc) has turned into an almost daily sub-conspiracy. The effort is to use every means possible to rip the R party to shreds - to separate and divide the various factions of the party.
Exactly what we will not see, is a similar effort dividing the D party by the MSM. Why? They are not interested in creating division withing the D party - nothing of substance will be widely investigated, nor exposed, by the MSM which would tend to make folks debate the future of the Democratic party.
Can we even imagine a mainstream newspaper, like the Washington Post, preparing an article seeking to find out how labor beating up conservative protesters, leftist anrchists destroying property at any world trade meeting, move-on.org types bitting off the finger of a conservative, ACORN dumping records (inc privacy protected information, and or the daily shrill hate spewing from the leftwing factions all over the public media could cause future problems for Democrats?
Ya think?
(;~> gary
Well you know I agree with
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 16:58 ET by bigtimerWell you know I agree with you here Gary, not just recently ACORN with the turn-about play on suing the people who exposed this, the latest tactic with the hacker/whistle-blower global warming farce is going down the same road with their propaganda, just saw Nancy Skinner on Fox blaming the person who exposed all this to use for deflection....I more or less was thinking of Bob McDonell who just won in Va. and what all WaPo tried to do to ensure his loss....that is what I meant about backfiring....and I do think it will continue, I really don't think they know the real seething anger out here in the real world.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
baboo
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 16:54 ET by Myth Buster.............or is it babboon? lol Get this joker. It's LIEsites like this one and Faux News who are ANYTHING but "fair and balanced". It's your knighted leaders like Bushit who tell the world flat out "You're either for us or against us". Like as what happened serveral times before with other Con LIEsites like Rick Scott's (fined 1.3 billion while CEO of Columbai Health Care) Patriotic Resistance, I expect the boot here from what they probably have on their Trmes of Service called "illegitimate dissent".
Examples/Myth Buster
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:08 ET by Jerry MackMB: How about some examples of For News being anything but Fair and Balanced. We are all willing to learn.
Moon Bat
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:20 ET by jdlybrandWilco Tango Foxtrot
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Another hatchling with a sanctimonious name
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:23 ET by SickofLibsYou are a true hero and fearless fighter.
Yawn.
Hatchling?
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:27 ET by BlondeLOL, I was thinking more of a roach emerging. But hatchling works too.
Sheesh, I wonder which article provoked the latest outbreak of troll rash. It's really bad today.
I hope he fails, too.
C'mon, Blonde, it's CyberMonday!
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:33 ET by SickofLibsThe egg cases split open after 17 years and we all go shopping.
If he DOES violate "The Sacred Trmes Of Service", I say boot him!
Oh yeah! Silly me.
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:36 ET by BlondeCyber Monday.
Do you think he came up with Faux News and Bushit all by his little self? I mean really, we haven't had an imaginative troll in a really long time.
We need a better class of troll, here. ©
I hope he fails, too.
No, of course he copied/pasted them
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 17:47 ET by SickofLibsI can tell, because those were some of the only words he didn't misspell.
Hardy har har!
Myth Buster is a troll mole---
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:50 ET by matthewdeanThe two occupational hazards of being a mole?
1. Trench mouth
2. Tunnel vision
In a troll mole, Trench mouth is a result of ulcerations caused by the continual spewing of crap.
The tunnel vision part results from a typically narrow-minded liberal viewpoint.
MD
"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."
Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Blonde, As you know Rush mentioned Newsbusters, today
Mon, 11/30/2009 - 18:44 ET by upcountrywaterThe Myth spewers and babbons, got side tracked tring to find, the Rush mentioned article.
That's my theory and I'm stickin to it.
Yes it is bad today.