Former Democratic aide turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared on Wednesday’s Good Morning America to spin the loss of a Conservative Party congressional candidate in New York as a "big loss for Sarah Palin." He enthused, "A big win for the Democrats who poured it on in the final days especially Vice President Biden who came in the final day."
Stephanopoulos seemed much more animated in discussing the New York race than he did the Republican gubernatorial victories in New Jersey and Virginia. He extolled, "The bottom line, when there is a civil war inside the Republican Party, a Democrat can squeak through in a district that has not gone to the Democrats since about the Civil War."
Referencing the ramifications the GOP victories could have on the health care debate, Stephanopoulos began, "Well, I actually asked a White House official about that this morning." Could this be White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel? (Early this year, it was revealed that Stephanopoulos has daily phone conversations and strategy sessions with Emanuel.)
The This Week host did allow that the two defeats on Tuesday will give some Democrats in the Senate "pause."
In an earlier segment, reporter Jake Tapper touted similar lines. Of the White House, he repeated, "They say all along, they've said these elections were not referenda on President Obama." After co-host Robin Roberts pointed out that Barack Obama repeatedly campaigned for New Jersey's Democratic governor Jim Corzine, Tapper again explained, "Well, obviously they would have liked to have won those elections but you had a New Jersey's case a very unpopular governor..."
He then parroted, "So they don't see this as an indication of President Obama's popularity or success there." It’s true, as Tapper pointed out, that exit polls in Virginia and New Jersey say that the President wasn’t a factor in their decision. However, just like Stephanopoulos, he played up the White House’s perspective on the importance of the congressional election, but not the GOP wins.
Tapper asserted, "...The tea party crowd were complaining that the Republican nominee was insufficiently conservative and basically she was chased out and the Conservative Party nominee lost to the Democrat last night." Left out of that assessment? The fact that liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava quit the race and endorsed the Democratic nominee. Shouldn't that impact be discussed? (Host Diane Sawyer again referred to Scozzafava as a "moderate" Republican.)
A transcript of the Stephanopoulos segment, which aired at 7:03am EST on November 4, follows:
DIANE SAWYER: Let's dig in on all of this by bringing in our chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos for the bottom line. George, good morning to you.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Diane. How is it going today?
SAWYER: All right. Well, let's take a look at what happened in Virginia and New Jersey, particularly the independent vote which seems so interesting to me this morning. As we know, Senator Obama won it a year ago. But 2-1? 2-1, The independents were now going Republican. What does that mean?
STEPHANOPOULOS: In both states, Diane, this is really, really important. Independents now are the largest voter group in the country. They outnumber Democrats. They outnumber Republicans. And if you look back to the last three elections, 2006, 2008 and last night. These independents have become the predators of politics and incumbents are their prey. The number one issue out there right now, Diane, is the economy. Look at the exit polls in Virginia and New Jersey last night. 89 percent of voters said they were very- were worried about the economy in New Jersey. 84 percent said they were worried about the economy in Virginia. That's what is on independents' mind and the successful Republican candidates last night really focused on that.
SAWYER: And of course, jobs, a big issue in the campaign in Virginia but let me ask again digging in a bit on the economy, it seems it's not just concern about what's going to happen in the days ahead but concern about the deficit being built up. What does this say to the White House about, for instance, health care at this moment?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, I actually asked a White House official about that this morning. And they're going to try to push hard on their argument but that by addressing health care you are addressing the problem of the deficit in the future. Now, that's going to be a hard sell with some of these, especially moderate Democrats in the Senate who are very wary of health care right now. So, last night, the Democrats got a mixed message ago on health care. They actually picked up a vote for it with that congressional race up in New York 23, getting another Democrat in the House. Speaker Pelosi needs every Democrat she can get. But, I think the election results last night will give pause to some of the Senate Democrats who the White House needs to vote for this health care reform bill.
SAWYER: And we talked about that congressional race in upstate new York where Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh intervened. There is a statement from Sarah Palin says that says "the cause goes on. Don't get cynical." But what's the bottom line on what happened there?
STEPHANOPOULOS: The bottom line, when there is a civil war inside the Republican Party, a Democrat can squeak through in a district that has not gone to the Democrats since about the Civil War. So, this is a big surprise for the Democrats here. I think it was a big loss for Sarah Palin. A big win for the Democrats who poured it on in the final days especially Vice President Biden who came in the final day. But I know that this is- this war will now continue as Jake suggested. We'll see Senate primaries in Illinois and in Florida. But I think a lot of national Republicans will step back and say if we don't get this under control we’re going to squander a big opportunity next year.
SAWYER: Okay, George, and we've got a few other developments. I know you know about them from election night. In Maine, you probably heard about this, voters were voting on gay marriage. They decided against gay marriage, 53 to 47 percent. Down south Atlanta is now headed for a runoff in the race for mayor. The leading vote getter was a council woman who would be the first white mayor of Atlanta in a long time if she wins next month.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Rush is mocking Steffie's
November 4, 2009 - 12:56 ET by mattmRush is mocking Steffie's BS as we speak.
New Brand
November 4, 2009 - 14:19 ET by Thinking.Man"We make up the news, others just report it"
This is not unexpected, the NY23 was real debacle, but not for the reasons the Presstitutes want to convice us of.
RINO-Rose, aka Newt and Company tried desperately to get a left-of-peolosi Republican slipped by us.
The facts seem to show that 1) Hoffman damn near won with no money and nearly everything against him, including what should have been his own party 2) DuhDuh Scumbag never had a chance, 3) She and not the Dem was the major reason Hoffman lost.
The real options were to A) RINO Suppresion and win with a good conservative OR B) RINO Acension and for sure lose with a terrible-in-name-only one.
And the media Presstitutes thinks that means we should always opt for B? Oh yeah they are trying to help us, help us to defeat!
Its funny how you call him a journalist.
November 4, 2009 - 13:02 ET by bubbasterAre you saying he should be "fair & balanced"?
"Fomer DEMOCRATIC aide" turns into a "fair & balanced" journalist? I don't think George is going to win the Pulitzer anytime soon. It would be like Obama getting the Nobel!
-SARC ON-
BUBBA
It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion. -Goebbels
Georgie porgie is full of BO pie
November 4, 2009 - 13:03 ET by east tennessee johnHey George: Didn't NY-23 go for Obama by 6 points in 2008? Did Govenor Palin visit there and campaign at least 3 times; make commercials, both TV and Radio; and make robocalls for Hoffman like BO did for Corzine? NO, but the results hurt her? If your "reasoning" is true what does that mean in NJ when BO got 57% last year and Corzine, approximately 46% a dropoff of 11? Well,moron?
Whoa, yeah. That HUGE
November 4, 2009 - 13:19 ET by HockeyKidWhoa, yeah. That HUGE Biden rally in Watertown definitely made the difference--all 150 attendees (press not included). He's a real mover and shaker, that Joe.
Here's facts, Snuffleupagus: The D won by 3% of the vote over an independent. 6% of the vote still went to the official R, even though she dropped out of the race. So a conservative who was COMPLETELY UNKNOWN three weeks ago came within half of the ignorance margin of winning. You can bet if he'd had a proper campaign and an R by his name, the outcome would have been much, much different.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
I haven't heard it on tv yet,
November 4, 2009 - 13:19 ET by Paul Gbut if those 6% that still voted for Dede would have voted for Hoffman, he woulda won.
Oh George...."Civil
November 4, 2009 - 13:21 ET by stancoyleOh George...."Civil War"...your right and it will start in November 2010!!!
oh please
November 4, 2009 - 13:22 ET by Candance MooreIf Newt Gingrich and Michael Steele hadn't spent all summer calling Hoffman a "waste of a vote," and if prominent Republicans like John Boehner hadn't been pumping money to Scozzafava, maybe things would have worked out differently.
October 26, a mere 10 days ago, the GOP was running ads that attacked Hoffman.
Now suddenly we're to believe that Republicans gave him a chance but conservative candidates just don't work.
That was one of the most transparent acts of being two-faced I've ever seen.
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
November 4, 2009 - 13:32 ET by mvfreeman"Now suddenly we're to believe that Republicans gave him a chance but conservative candidates just don't work."
This wasn't a primary and Hoffman wasn't the republican candidate.
In summation then.
November 4, 2009 - 14:02 ET by KarmaThe candidate Sarah Palin endorsed came in a very, very close second and the GOP candidate got very, very trounced. This is a "big" loss for Palin?
Hi. My name is John Q. Public, but some just call me racist.
what's more ironic
November 4, 2009 - 14:11 ET by Candance MooreSince Dede dropped out and the GOP reluctantly got behind Hoffman, that means a vote for Dede was a vote for a Democrat. 6% of them "wasted their vote" by going for Dede anyway.
Holding my breath for Republicans to call them Ross Perot voters.....
I'm thinking the 6% had no
November 4, 2009 - 14:27 ET by MaximusBraveheartI'm thinking the 6% had no idea she dropped out. If they wanted Dem they would have voted so. Maybe it was old granny supporting the REPs mistakenly thinking they were the conservatives... M-B
LOL
November 4, 2009 - 14:31 ET by mvfreeman"6% of them "wasted their vote" by going for Dede anyway. "
Funny how ignorance of the law is no excuse but there are no exceptions to voting.
I would have to guess that it was republicans that voted for her.
Exhale, Candance.
November 4, 2009 - 14:36 ET by KarmaThey'll likely call them party loyalists. 6%. Wow. Management is lookin' for a bonus. Us ex-Repubs would like to hand them lead parachutes.
Hi. My name is John Q. Public, but some just call me racist.
Since Dede was the most
November 4, 2009 - 15:18 ET by ckc1227Since Dede was the most liberal candidate on the ticket, I'm not sure you can assume those votes would have gone to the Republican/Conservative candidate were she not on the ticket. Even if Hoffman got 5% of the 6%, he still loses.
→ I think you can
November 4, 2009 - 15:28 ET by Cool ArrowThere are many voters who punch "Straight Party".
Some voting arrangements allow for just such a choice.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Apparently not in New York
November 4, 2009 - 16:00 ET by mvfreemanIt's not listed as one of the states that has straight ticket voting...
http://www.ncsl.org/LegislaturesElections/ElectionsCampaigns/StraightTicketVotingStates/tabid/16597/Default.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-ticket_voting
→ Thanks mvfreeman
November 4, 2009 - 19:59 ET by Cool ArrowHence the qualifier "I think" in my post.
I thought wrong.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
It is ridiculous
November 4, 2009 - 14:23 ET by mvfreemanThat the talkling heads are trying to spin this into a referendum on Palin when she wasn't even on the ballot.
" came in a very, very close second "
I think it was a NASCAR driver who said second place is first loser.
Well they'll have another shot next year.
I'm not a NASCAR fan.
November 4, 2009 - 14:44 ET by KarmaBut I think they get points for finishing positions. Points add up.
Hi. My name is John Q. Public, but some just call me racist.
True
November 4, 2009 - 14:48 ET by mvfreemanBut elections aren't a multi-event season. It's usually a one shot deal for most candidates.
One shot deal perhaps, but
November 4, 2009 - 15:14 ET by ckc1227One shot deal perhaps, but not a one time event. There will be another election next year, giving the local GOP a chance to get it right. If they don't, they'll lose again.
Third parties don't win, so it's no surprise he lost. This one came close. Hardly an indictment of Conservatism, but it should be a warning.....third party nonsense will cost us the White House in 2012, and seats in 2010. Do all you can to get Conservatives on the main ticket.
Good point! "Do all you
November 4, 2009 - 15:59 ET by MaximusBraveheartGood point! "Do all you can to get Conservatives on the main ticket." PARTY do you HEAR us? Just say NO to RINOs ! M-B
I need more popcorn!!
November 4, 2009 - 15:08 ET by motherbelta referendum on Palin when she wasn't even on the ballot.
But neither Corzine's nor Deeds' loss had anything to do with Obama!!
ROFL!! Listening to these guys is hilarious!
I need more popcorn!! Chrissy Matthews hasn't even weighed in yet today!!
Gov. Palin
November 5, 2009 - 01:27 ET by sarge329Let's see... Gov. Palin. Governor of the largest state in the country, a state with plentiful natural and mineral resources. She was governor, which means commander-in-chief of the National Guard units of the state. Her husband is a blue-collar man. One of her children has Down's syndrome. One daughter is an unwed mother. Compare that to the current occupant of the White House and his level of experience. And she's the political lightweight, right? By the way, it was coach Vincent Lombardi who said " Coming in second means that you were the first to lose " .
No credibility
November 4, 2009 - 13:33 ET by KC MulvilleWhen I hear such obvious cheerleading, and such resistance to anything they don't like to hear, they lose what little credibility they have left.
What the dead media is telling us, without shame or apology, is that they don't care what we think. Of course, when their business is to offer us what they think, that's hardly a positive attitude to take.
Dede (R) endorsed
November 4, 2009 - 13:55 ET by deerjerkydaveDede (R) endorsed the LIBERAL DEMOCRAT candidate!
What is the point in voting for somebody who is going to be a liberal Democrat in the Republican party? And as we learned from the Bushes, McCain, Spector, etc it is poison and destructive to the party to be a liberal progressive in the party.
Reagan proved that the public wants to fall in love with patriotic conservatism. I would argue that the Bushes and the Gingrich revolution in the 90's were all riding on the coattails of Reagan. It has taken conservatives nearly three decades to realize they have been tricked by the liberals in the Republican party.
Speaking of Specter....I
November 4, 2009 - 15:10 ET by motherbeltSpeaking of Specter....I got a fund-raising thing for him in the mail today, with a quote from Obama on it...
He was a great Senator as a Republican and he's going to be an even greater Senator now that he's a Democrat!
But we need your help!
I'm sending it back with a big HAHAHA!! on it in red permanent marker!
mb... LOL... ...I'd add
November 4, 2009 - 19:57 ET by bigtimermb...
LOL...
...I'd add check's in the mail...trust me.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
NY-23
November 4, 2009 - 14:08 ET by PatConAs a point of fact, NY-23 was represented by a Democrat as recently as 1992, and since Lincoln's election, Democrats held the seat longer than Republicans.
I don't doubt it
November 4, 2009 - 14:26 ET by Thinking.ManWhere did you get your source, I would like to book mark it, thanks.
Since representatives...
November 4, 2009 - 19:51 ET by mvfreemanare up for election every two years, 1992 is not recent. It's 8 elections ago.
The seat looks to have been about evenly split between the two parties since Lincoln was president.
http://en.wikipedia....
Oh I knew these jerks would spin it like this.
November 4, 2009 - 14:17 ET by Lord Erond"A big loss for Sarah Palin?"
Sarah Palin is a private citizen you treasonous jerk
How is a blue dog democrat squeaking by the skin of his teeth thanks to the RINO spoiler siphoning votes from Hoffman a big loss for Palin?
Wasn't Hoffman supposed to be not even in it? Yet he nearly takes it to a photo finish. Doesn't sound like a victory to me. Maybe if Hoffman had the support of the Repukes to begin with, we would have a REAL conservative in office.
If the revolution starts, it starts with taking out the liberal media liars first.
"Timothy, guard what God has entrusted to you. Avoid godless, foolish discussions with those who oppose you with their so-called knowledge."
Timothy 6:20
Better candidate would have won
November 4, 2009 - 14:56 ET by ckc1227Hoffman wasn't exactly the best candidate either. A better candidate would have won the race. But for folks to argue that this is a huge loss for Conservatism is assinine. If the local GOP hadn't screwed up from the beginning, Republicans would have kept the seat. Ultimately though, the next best thing happened....the liberal lost.
NJ is one of the bluest states in the country, and they elected a Republican. Bob McDonnell made his race a referendum on Obama and his policies, and won big. Maine voters rejected gay marriage. MAINE! How the heck did that happen? And locally, my home town elected a Republican mayor for the first time since The Reconstruction.
Whatever they're saying publicly, I have no doubt they are sweating privately.l
→ I'll concede
November 4, 2009 - 14:18 ET by Cool ArrowI'll concede Sarah Palin and Fred Thompson fell short of the goal last night.
Let's admit they hoped for more. It's true, Hoffman lost.
But it's heartening that they had a positive influence in what can only be described as a fixed race. I can say "fixed" because a Democrat mole was inserted into the Republican slot.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Let's see.
November 4, 2009 - 14:23 ET by Lord ErondIndependent candidate comes in, unsupported by the GOP, virtual no name comes in and runs against a true blue dem and has a razor thin margin of loss and this is a repudiation of conservatism? If I were the dems, I'd be terrified of someone who's got their name and message out there who won't be swayed by the ignorance factor.
Obama was watching these races closely last night. And that's why I hate him because he's a damn liar.
"Timothy, guard what God has entrusted to you. Avoid godless, foolish discussions with those who oppose you with their so-called knowledge."
Timothy 6:20
→ Lord Erond
November 4, 2009 - 14:26 ET by Cool ArrowGiven the "constructive criticism" the left is offering today, I'd say they're scared too.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Cursory George!
November 4, 2009 - 15:00 ET by CrashSounds like George got the same memo as David Corn. http://www.politicsd...
H(ow)TF do these clowns cook up this non-sense?
THE FACTS:
1/ Dede was such a RINO she threw her support to the other team! How to blow 900K without really trying ... nice going Michael Steele!
2/ Owens was more conservative than Dede.
3/ Hoffman got in too late.
4/ The republican party only recieved 5% of the vote; whereas the Conservative won a whopping 45%.
5/ Owens didn't win by a landslide like Conservative Republican Bob McDonnell's 18% margin.
Now lets go back in time and look at the BOOST Palin gave the crappiest candidate ever, before he lost (McCain sucked so bad he couldn't even beat Bush) to Obama's measly "landslide" ... when compared to McDonnell.
EIGHTEEN PERCENT! Only a third world despot can get more that 59% of the vote!
EIGHTEEN PERCENT! THAT'S THE MESSAGE ... no matter how you spin it!
Former
November 4, 2009 - 14:52 ET by Redrowan2000"Former Democratic aide turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared on Wednesday’s Good Morning America "
What makes him former and what makes him a journalist?
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Red
As much as the Democrats
November 4, 2009 - 15:09 ET by fitzfongAs much as the Democrats and RINOs would like to portray this as a big victory for the Democrats and a repudiation of the tea party movement, it's most certainly not. True, the Democrats picked up a seat, but when you consider that it's a Blue Dog replacing a "moderate" who voted for cap-and-trade, it's a wash. Meanwhile, Owens may very well be the most vulnerable of all vulnerable first-term Democrats come this time next year if the Republicans learn from the Scuzzy mistake and nominate a coherent conservative in direct opposition to Owens. Sure, it would have been nice for Hoffman to win, but can't he be the Republican front runner with time to capitalize on his name recognition and the Democrat failures next year? Besides, up until Scuzzbag dropped out, Owens was favored to win this seat...so, he held off a late challenge after leading for some time. He held serve, nothing more. The worst possible outcome would have been for Scuzzbag to have won...the Party having to waste its resources to support her dead weight next year would have come at the expense of a conservative with a real chance at defeating a "Blue Dog" incumbent next year...a revisit to the Lincoln Chafee/George Allen debacle of 2006, whem if the RNC hadn't wasted so much money on that ungrateful douchebag in Rhode Island and instead channelled some of it into the Allen/Webb race, Allen would have overcome the .2 percent deficit and seen off the Melon Head.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Say What?
November 4, 2009 - 15:29 ET by NoMoreClintonsIf NY-23 was a "big loss" for Sarah then what was New Jersey for Obamao? Palin visited upstate NY, what, once? Obamao was in Jersey at least three times, all in the past several weeks. Christie still won by 5%. That must make it a "very huge loss" for Obamao. But you won't hear those words from Boy George's pie hole, or any other member of the left wing press-titute media either.
The Manchurian Candidate
November 4, 2009 - 17:28 ET by lgeubankI think Scozzafava was a Manchurian candidate -- a mole, a spy, an agent provocateur -- from the start. But what about the "leaders" who selected her to run? What were they all about?