Former top Democratic aide turned journalist George Stephanopoulos on Monday spun the upcoming November 3 congressional election in New York as a Republican "civil war." Recounting the battle between the Conservative Party nominee, a Democrat and a liberal Republican, he claimed, "But, what's most interesting here is civil war inside the Republican Party."
Stephanopoulos added, "You saw this conservative candidate just come in and swamp the Republican who was pro-choice, pro-gay rights. And what the White House is trying to do even if they lose here is exploit- is fan the flames of this civil war."
Of course, Stephanopoulos, who served in the Clinton White House and worked for Michael Dukakis’ 1988 campaign, doesn’t often talk about Democrats engaging in a "civil war," despite the unhappiness by liberals over issues such as the "public option" and President Obama’s inaction over gays in the military.
Stephanopoulos also appeared on Sunday’s GMA and played prognosticator. Discussing the two gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey and the congressional election in New York, he predicted, "I think you're likely to see a split here." (The This Week host suggested a victory by Democrats in New Jersey.) Previewing White House spin, he added, "If there is a split, I think it's a wash and we'll move on."
In fairness, on Monday, Stephanopoulos did allow this in regard to Virginia's gubernatorial race: "Independents voted heavily for President Obama in Virginia last year. They seem to be going for the Republican candidate this time and especially the President's health care plan, according to the latest polling in Virginia, is pretty unpopular right now."
UPDATE 2009-11-02 14:08: On Monday, Stephanopoulos blogged on ABCNews.com and now seems to be seeing a GOP sweep ahead.
A transcript of the November 2 segment, which aired at 7:04am, follows:
ROBIN ROBERTS: For the bottom line on another election day let's bring in chief Washington correspondent and host of This Week George Stephanopoulos.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Robin.
ROBERTS: Good to see you. President Obama, we saw him here in New Jersey on Sunday. We saw in Jake's piece making direct pleas to voters. I mean, the White House putting a lot of energy into this race.
ABC GRAPHIC: Hotly Contested Elections: Dems in Distress, GOP at War
STEPHANOPOULOS: Boy, they sure are, Robin. President Obama has gone back three times for Jon Corzine and want to do it to avoid the sweep Jake was talking about. New Jersey is their best chance for a win tomorrow night. It is a solid Democratic state even though the economy is in trouble there, the President is still personally pretty popular and they want to avoid the sweep at all costs because they're afraid that will be seen as a verdict on the President's first year and could effect this debate over health care in the Congress.
ROBERTS: Right. Tight in New Jersey but not the case in Virginia with the governor's race.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Not at all. The Republican Bob McDonnell is just swamping the Democrat Creigh Deeds. Now, a few things going on, first of all, history. Virginia always has a gubernatorial election one year after a presidential race. And going back all the way to 1977, the out-party has always won and McDonnell has also run a much better campaign than the Democrat Creigh Deeds. The White House has been complaining about Deeds’ campaign. But you can't underestimate the national implications here either. Independents voted heavily for President Obama in Virginia last year. They seem to be going for the Republican candidate this time and especially the President's health care plan, according to the latest polling in Virginia, is pretty unpopular right now.
ROBERTS: Let's talk about this other race that Jake brought up in his piece. Upstate New York, an open congressional seat. Up until this weekend it was a three-way race then the Republican drops out, throws her support behind the Democrat instead of the conservative opponent. Give us the behind the scenes. What’s going on here?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, the White House was pushing very, hard for this Republican candidate, Dede Scozzafava to back the Democrat after she dropped out of the race. Now it still might not be enough. There is a lot of anger up in district. That district has been a Republican congressional district since about the Civil War. But, what’s most interesting here is civil war inside the Republican Party. You saw this conservative candidate just come in and swamp the Republican who was pro-choice, pro-gay rights. And what the White House is trying to do even if they lose here is exploit- is fan the flames of this civil war. I asked the White House counselor Valerie Jarrett yesterday what she thought this forcing out of the Republican candidate said about where the Republican Party is right now. Take a look.
VALERIE JARRETT: Well, I think it's becoming more and more extreme and more and more marginalized. Look at the number of people who actually say they're registered- consider themselves a Republican. If that's the direction they want to go, fine.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You are likely to see the same dynamic play out in other Republican primaries for Senate and governors' races across the country right now.
ROBERTS: What are Republicans saying? We hear what Valerie Jarrett- what she feels about this race in upstate New York, but what are Republicans saying?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, some like Majority Republican leader John Boehner in the House say it's time for the republicans to close ranks, but they are worried about this split between those who are calling for a big tent Republican Party like Newt Gingrich and the conservative activists motivated by a lot of anti-government anger who say the party hasn't been pure enough so far. What Newt Gingrich told the New York Times over the weekend, if the Republican Party can't find a way to heal this divide, they will make Nancy Pelosi Speaker for life and re-elect President Obama, something Republicans are talking about trying to figure out and trying to heal right now.
ROBERTS: We’ll see what happens on Tuesday.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Maybe this is the RINOs being weeded out?
November 2, 2009 - 13:08 ET by c5thenHey George...Maybe it's not so much a civil war as it is a purge of the liberal moles who have insinuated themselves into the GOP over the last 40 or so years.
I hope so. Or else it is the birth of a new third party that will draw the core base of the GOP away and leave them fluttering around in the middle
Time will tell...
Throw 'da bums out!!!
Before it's too late.
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Civil War?
November 2, 2009 - 13:19 ET by Thinking.ManNo, more like throwing out the squatters that have been infecting the party for far too long.
I wonder how big a fool newt feels now that his "Moderate" conservative has tossed in with the democrat in NY?
Bye Bye B-Daddy, your days are numbered...
""Moderate"
November 2, 2009 - 15:52 ET by notonmywatch""Moderate" conservative"
lol! Scuzzy?! More like a libdem under a flag of convenience!
___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...
Bye to the RINO's
November 2, 2009 - 14:49 ET by Jeff in Miami BeachIt is time for the RINO's to move back to where they came from and that includes the Florida Governor Charlie Crist.
If you think medical care is expensive now wait until it is free!
He can call it war all he
November 2, 2009 - 15:09 ET by gmaniac1He can call it war all he wants but when his side loses will he claim victory for the conservatives? I sincerely doubt it.
Yes, please send Crist packing back to the other side of the political fence that he likes to ride. He has seriously screwed up my lovely state.
The War On The News Will Be Televised
November 2, 2009 - 13:28 ET by lareeThe war on the news will be televised just not on any channel anyone is watching ;)
Selling the Drama, Who’s Competing For Your Attention? Cable News War.
I added a link to Rob Bartlett’s Blog he put up everyone’s top 5 favorite books.
I can come up with 2 so far :)
Ol
November 2, 2009 - 13:38 ET by jessieHGeorge S. is partly right.It is a civil war, but not dems V. reps. It's dems & reps & the media against the people & conservatives. My money is on the people. We out number them.
Dims have been running as
November 2, 2009 - 13:48 ET by KJ_sezDims have been running as RINOs since the '96 election, as they knew they had a better chance to gain office with an (R) after their name. Booting them out of office and back to the Dims - along with "institutionalized Republicans" like McCain - should be a top priority for the RNC, instead of Newt's BS "party solidarity" line.
Fortunately, many voters are putting We the People before We the Party.
OBAMA = One Big Ass Mistake, America!
RINOs need not apply!
November 2, 2009 - 13:44 ET by tegThank you for leaving, Dede! Please take your buddy, Mr. Newt, with you on the way out to where ever you belong.
T.E.G
" VALERIE JARRETT: Well, I
November 2, 2009 - 13:52 ET by MikeB" VALERIE JARRETT: Well, I think it's becoming more and more extreme and more and more marginalized. Look at the number of people who actually say they're registered- consider themselves a Republican. If that's the direction they want to go, fine."
Yup, about 20% of the country identify themselves as Republican. But, about 40 % self identify as conservative. The reason the Republicans have been hemorraging voters is that instead of standing on conservative principle, they have been trying to be loved by the driveby media and abandoning their principles. Reagan carried 49 of the 50 states by running on and standing for conservative principles, not by trying to appeal to every voter in the country. He didn't follow the advice of the media to make the Republican tent bigger by standing for nothing. That was tried by the Republican Party in 2006 (we lost congress) and in 2008 (we lost the Whitehouse and congress). Great strategy there, guys!
Once Republicans, as a Party, start to stand for something, they will start attracting more registrants. They need to stand for conservatism, because there is already one party that stands for marxist-socialism. Give the voters a clear choice and see what the message to Washington is. Hint: remember 40% self identify as conservative, 20% as moderate, and 19% as liberal. (I believe those were the numbers.)
Last year, I voted for Palin. McCain just happened to be on the ticket ahead of her. I will not do so in the future. I will vote for the conservative candidate. If that happens to be the Republican candidate, great. If that happens to be the Libertarian or Constitutionalist, that is also great. I will no longer vote for the lesser of two evils. And, if that means the United States is no longer a world power, tough. You get the government you deserve. If you want to go slowly or quickly into obscurity and second or third world status, continue to vote for a RINO or a Democratic, respectively. "Oh, but Mike, a third party candidate can't win!" Of course they can't win if you don't vote for them. Vote the issue, not the party.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
MikeB... I'm with
November 2, 2009 - 14:39 ET by bigtimerMikeB...
I'm with you....never again will I hold my nose to vote...ever.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Third Party---
November 3, 2009 - 00:53 ET by matthewdeanMikeB:
A+
I used to think a vote for any Third Party candidate would just draw votes away from the Repub and give the Dem a win.
I learned, much to my chagrin, to vote the issues.
MD
"I may not agree with what your bumper sticker says, but I will defend to the death your right to stick it." (Unknown, but derived from Voltaire)
Agree and disagree
November 3, 2009 - 01:35 ET by Conservative VoiceAgree that we should vote the issues, in the primary...but given the election...I would of voted the same, I voted for Palin. The Republican Party has great structure, some of the braches have gone wild, and those need to be trimmed. But its way too early to cut the whole tree down.
I just don't see how we can survive another 4 years of King ZerO.
However, if they put another McCain, then the Republicans made their bed.
I won't vote for Romney in the primaries...but against Obama, I will.
Well it is a purge or a
November 2, 2009 - 14:14 ET by MidAmericaWell it is a purge or a civil war of sorts. Ever since Barry Goldwater, with his Western conservatives, challenged the Eastern moderates/liberals for control of the party there has been a struggle within the Party.
MA... Yep it is...glad of
November 2, 2009 - 14:37 ET by bigtimerMA...
Yep it is...glad of it too.
Glad Rush is talking about Crist vs Rubio as well today.
The revolt is on....RINOs and Party Big-Wigs had better really pay attention...I don't give a rats rear about the spin from the left...they can repeat all the talking points they want ad nauseum about the shape of the 'R' party...they are worried as well...and we know it.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
eerie resemblance
November 2, 2009 - 14:57 ET by konoWow. Stephanopawuss is looking more and more like Mike Dukakis every time I see him.
I'd comment on what he said; but in all candor, I don't listen to a word that this Clinton plant says.
Thanks Stephi for letting us
November 2, 2009 - 15:14 ET by eaglewingz08Thanks Stephi for letting us know what your master Rahmbo wants as the daily agenda of the WH for the lamestream media. "Civil War". Well it can't be a 'civil war' in the republican party because the so called 'republican' was actually a leftwing democrap who had not a scintilla of republican principles in her voting records or personal life. She was so far to the left that the democrap in the race ridiculed her record. She was to the left of the present occupant of the White House. I doubt you could find two percent of the republican party in accord with Dede's views, yet you could find forty percent of democraps (or more) in accord with her views. Therefore, you can't have a civil war when one of the so called warriors represents only 2 percent of the party and the other candidate's views represent more than sixty percent of his party's views.
Big Tent
November 2, 2009 - 15:42 ET by Jerry MackI am in favor of a big tent for the Republican party. One that is large enough to hold all the conservatives. A necessary and enforced rule must be: No RINOs allowed.
Jerry Mack... I Second
November 2, 2009 - 15:44 ET by bigtimerJerry Mack...
I Second that...and then some.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Jerry Mack
November 2, 2009 - 15:49 ET by MrShyBut that's hardly a "big tent"...
Where are the pro-ObamaCare people? The compassionate people who recognize that we "all need to do more" for the less fortunate? The "undocumented" immigrants? The married homosexuals? The more sensible "moderate" Republicans? The "progressive thinkers" to add more umph and pizzazz to an "out-of-touch GOP brand"??
Some tent you've got. :p
Shy, all the people in
November 2, 2009 - 17:30 ET by MikeBShy, all the people in those demographics are already registered Democrat. You tried to disenfranchise several other groups: felons, corpses, and cartoon characters. But that's okay, Shy. The Democrats make sure those groups are registered and vote - sometimes multiple times.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Yeah, It is all about the wedge issues. Ain't it.
November 2, 2009 - 15:58 ET by JWFYep. It is still 1983 and we have our choice of 3 liberal broadcast news stations or the mighty liberal newspapers. There is no internet. no google. no blogs. no newsbusters. So we only get what people like George gets to spoonfeed us.
You saw this conservative candidate just come in and swamp the Republican who was pro-choice, pro-gay rights.
Yep. That is what it comes down to every single time. Tiny Tiny Tiny wedge issues. That is all we think about. That is all that drives us. Abortion. Gay Rights. Marijuana laws. Legalizing machine guns. Equal pay for equal sex. Passing out condoms to the teenagers. Legalizing prostitution. Spanking children in the schools.
Nah. It is never about limiting government. Less regulations. Lower taxes. Limiting social entitlements. Freedom from a coercive government. Defending this country. Not destroying our economy on a political global warming scam. Nah. That is never on our mind.
I just want the candidate that will let the gays openly engage in anal sex in public parks. That is it. I will destroy my party over that George.
Idiot.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
Stephanopoulos is nothing but a propagandist
November 2, 2009 - 16:20 ET by R D Helm...and not a very good one at that.
I have democrat friends who are more conservative than Scozzafava.
These people are clueless.
-Dave
Our elected representatives have failed us.
More like PR guy pass as journalist
November 2, 2009 - 16:24 ET by TheLip"Former top Democratic aide turned journalist"... give me a break Dan Rather, Walter Cronkite these are journalist, Stephanopoulos is just a pr guy and always will be. His show (actually the one he took over) "This Week" is just PR for the democratic party.
Lip, did I read you right?
November 2, 2009 - 17:36 ET by MikeBLip, did I read you right? Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite were journalists? Cronkite lied about Tet and gave impetus to an anti-war movement when we were on the way to winning that war. Even the Vietnamese government admits to that. And Dan Rather used material that he had been warned was fraudulent to try to wreck W's chances at reelection. After he was exposed as a liar by the non-professional wannabe journalists of the blogosphere, he never admitted to what he did: he claimed the documents were "fake but accurate." Neither of these men are/were journalists, they were propagandists pure and simple.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Reporting vs psychological warfare
November 2, 2009 - 18:12 ET by MadRatThere are two things at work here. First, there's the post modern, political strategy of the "if you tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth" added to "truth is what you believe it to be". Second, there are the ideas "if you frame the argument you control the debate" and the real, scientific, psychological/sociological "a group of people will follow their stereotype". DON'T FALL FOR IT!
Intellectual liberals love pop philosophy and the current philosophical fad is post modernism. One of the important parts of post modernism is that people get in lots of fights over definitions, so if you just don't define anything we can all live happily ever after. In the Japanese movie Rashomon, all the witnesses and participants to a murder, including the ghost of the murdered man himself, tell very different stories of how he was killed. Rashomon seems to be the inspiration for the idea that the truth is what you believe to be true. If each version of the murder is equally true, then they can all be true! This leads some people to conclude if the truth is just what people believe is true and you tell a lie enough times, the lie becomes the truth. An easier way to put it is if you sling enough mud, some of it will stick. Democratic strategists believe if you say things like, "Republicans are racists", "Republicans are warmongers" or "There's a split in the Republican party" enough times, people will believe it.
The other half of this is that the Democrats want everyone talking about the end of the Republican Party. They want questions, fears and doubts. Why? If you're talking about a split in the Republican party you'll stop talking about how Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Barak Obama, Joe Biden, the health care bill, the stimulus package, the jobless rate, cash for clunkers, the mortgage bail out and too many other things to mention, have all failed. It takes the pressure off the Democrats and puts it on the Republicans. There's also the real, scientific psychological effect that people imitate their stereotypes. If you say Catholics have big families then people who are Catholic will start having bigger families. If you say people who live in The South have more dogs as pets, then Southerners will actually start getting more dogs. Democrats hope if the stereotype for the Republicans is their party is in chaos, then just by repeating it over and over, the Republicans party will actually collapse.
Recognize what the Democrats are doing is a scam and don't fall for it. Half the population of the Unites States agree that the Republican Party is better at governing America and that number is steadily growing. Ignore the lies, stand your ground and protect the country you love.
nicely stated
November 2, 2009 - 23:27 ET by lotrOf course, such tactics amount to selling out one's soul to the Father of Lies (literally and metaphorically). Did not Saul Alinsky dedicate his "treatise" to him?
Unfortunately for the delusional post modernist, there is objective truth, and furthermore, as rational creatures we can know what it is.
But I agree that one must be very careful and alert to their "methods," for they employ these dirty tactics for effect.
"Steady." -- Keith Olbermann to Chris Matthews
Didn't the Democrats already have their own civil war?
November 2, 2009 - 23:38 ET by lotrAnd lost? To my knowledge, Joe Lieberman (I) is still quite the mover and shaker, keeping company with moderate Republicans, much to the chagrin to the small-tent pop-liberal Democrat Party. Did they spin Lieberman's smack down of the New England left wingers as a referendum on how narrowminded the Democratic Party has become, not having room for moderate Democrats?
"Steady." -- Keith Olbermann to Chris Matthews
Georgie S: How long can you
November 3, 2009 - 04:35 ET by RogerCfromSDGeorgie S: How long can you keep playing an idiot tool of the Left? Liberals like you have tried desperately to proclaim the death of the GOP and Conservatism since you False Idol was elected.
Heads up, Sparky: We the People are here to stay.
That may come as a disappointment to you, but tough luck. If anyone's days are over, its fools like you.
A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.