ABC’s Good Morning America on Tuesday America continued to raise questions about the arrest of Roman Polanski in Europe, spinning the case as a "31 year-old prosecutorial obsession." According to reporter Nick Watt, the film director has "been hunted since 1978."
The network correspondent observed that Polanski, who is wanted for child rape and was detained in Switzerland, "has some powerful friends." He explained, "Movie mogul Harvey Weinstein has released this statement. ‘We're calling on every filmmaker we can to help fix this terrible situation.’" Watt also featured a snippet of ex-child star Melissa Gilbert on The View: "I think [Polanski’s] tried to atone. I think the punishment at this point may be excessive." Actress Debra Winger fawned, "We stand by, awaiting his release and his next masterwork.
Now, ABC did include one clip of a critic of the filmmaker. Professor and child advocate Wendy Murphy asserted that the director should face justice and that "no matter how much you like the guy's movies, he did something really bad." Co-host Robin Roberts also asked Polanski’s agent, "What do you say to his critics, who say even though it's been three decades, that justice hasn't fully been served yet?"
At another point, however, she empathized, "I know you had a chance to talk Mr. Polanski's wife and his lawyers. What's his state of mind right now? How's he doing?" On Monday’s GMA, Sawyer deemed the arrest an "international incident." Roberts called it a an "international chess game" and Watts labeled it an "international row."
Certainly, the hosts and reporters of the ABC morning program seem to be finding more complexity and vagueness in this case of child rape than in many others. It’s odd that Sawyer would subjectively refer to the arrest as a "prosecutorial obsession." First off, Polanski was convicted of his crime. Secondly, a number of criminals have been apprehended long after their offenses. Many would call that justice.
A transcript of the September 29 segment, which aired at 7:13am EDT, follows:
7am tease
DIANE SAWYER: A 31 year-old prosecutorial obsession. How an ad on the internet led to Oscar winner Roman Polanski’s surprise arrest. As his lawyers have just filed a motion for his release. And his Hollywood agent joins us live.
7:13
SAWYER: And now, we go to the growing international debate over the arrest of Oscar-winning Director Roman Polanski. His attorneys say they will file a motion today asking for his release from a Swiss prison. And many of his Hollywood colleagues are coming to his defense as he fights extradition to California. ABC’s Nick Watt is in Zurich with the latest. Nick?
NICK WATT: Good morning, Diane. Well, Polanski's lawyers have just filed that petition demanding his release. But the judge said his decision could take a few weeks. Also this morning, we know a lot more about how this arrest went down. The Zurich Film Festival website was, in the end, Roman Polanski's downfall. Investigators in Los Angeles, noticed they were selling tickets to a Roman Polanski appearance, Sunday night. He was being given an award. Through diplomatic channels, the Swiss were asked to arrest him on arrival. And Polanski walked into the trap. He's been hunted since 1978 during visits to Canada, Germany, Brazil, Thailand and Israel. Twice, investigators thought he was headed for Britain. Twice, British cops were asked to arrest him. Twice, for whatever reason, he just didn't show up. Polanski, who admitted to having sex with a minor in 1977 before fleeing to France, has some powerful supporters. Movie mogul Harvey Weinstein has released this statement. "We're calling on every filmmaker we can, to help fix this terrible situation." Debra Winger is on the judging panel of the Zurich Film Festival.
DEBRA WINGER: We stand by, awaiting his release and his next masterwork.
WATT: And, on The View.
MELISSA GILBERT: I think he’s tried to atone. I think the punishment at this point may be excessive.
WENDY MURPHY (Child advocate): It's really hard to understand why anyone wouldn't appreciate the need for a man who has basically admitted to raping a child, shouldn't be returned to this country to face justice. No matter how much time has passed. No matter how much you like the guy's movies, he did something really bad.
WATT: Now, last year, Polanski's lawyers applied to have all of the charges against him dropped. And suggested the D.A wasn’t really trying to track him down anyway. But that might have spurred investigators into action. And might have led them to Polanski's arrest. Robin?
ROBERTS: All right, Nick. Thank you. Going to try to get more answers now. We're joined by Roman Polanski's agent, Jeff Burr who joins us live from L.A. Jeff, thank you so much for getting up and joining us.
JEFF BERG (Roman Polanski’s agent): Good morning.
ROBERTS: Good morning to you. I know you had a chance to talk Mr. Polanski's wife and his lawyers. What's his state of mind right now? How's he doing?
BERG: Well, Roman, reportedly, is in a good state of mind. He's confident. I spoke to his defense lawyer in Zurich, and also to his wife, Emmanuelle, who said that his voice was strong. And he just is looking forward to moving this forward.
ROBERTS: Mr. Polanski has never tried to hide his travels. It's well-documented, moving around Europe and other places. Has a home there in Switzerland, where he's now being held. How surprised were you at the timing o this arrest?
BERG: Well, the timing is one of many cruel ironys that Roman has experienced in his life. He was invited by the Zurich festival to receive their life achievement award. There was going to be a retrospective for the past week. He was looking forward to this event. Roman was in Switzerland all summer. His comings and goings are easily trackable. He does not live in the shadows. He travels freely throughout most of Europe and has for the last 30 years. So, the fact that he was picked up seemed to have no real prior justification behind it because the district attorney's office, according to Roman's lawyers in Los Angeles, has indicated earlier on, that they had no desire to have him extradited.
ROBERTS: You heard at the end of Nick Watt's report, that he, in essence, kind of brought this on himself. His defense asking a lot of questions. And L.A. authorities, when they were said they were really trying to get him, and bring him to justice, that they took this kind of action. You think there's any truth to that?
BERG: No, I don't. The entire narrative surrounding this situation over the last 32 years has been wrought with complications, inconsistencies, including a violation of Roman's constitutional rights 32 years ago. This case has been plagued with prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. Even in an adversary situation, the prosecutor has a right to preserve and protect Roman's rights. That didn't occur. There were ex-parte communications between the district attorney's office and the judge. The judge is no longer alive. But the situation is well-documented in a movie that came out earlier this year, about Roman, called Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired. And that's the topic of concern for all of us right now.
ROBERTS: Jeff, all that being said, and you've even said this, it was a serious crime. Even though it was 30-some years ago. What do you say to his critics, who say even though it's been three decades, that justice hasn't fully been served yet?
BERG: Roman and his attorneys, and I believe it has- Roman was incarcerated. Roman did time in a state prison. Was released. And there was an arrangement that would allow him to be freed. And the case was going to be dropped. And then, things suddenly changed. Roman got wind of that and left. But my feeling to his critics is, you have to look at a much more complex situation, surrounding this case. And that has to do with his fundamental rights.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
What do you say to his
September 29, 2009 - 12:04 ET by motherbeltWhat do you say to his critics, who say even though it's been three decades, that justice hasn't fully been served yet?
What you say is apparently : Hey, the guy was convicted, but he's managed to stay out of your clutches for 30 years; so give up already!!
I don't know why they won't just let the guy off. It's old news....isn't it time to move on?
\sarc
How Many DA's Has LA Had in Those 31 Years
September 29, 2009 - 13:13 ET by allanfThe District Attorneys are doing their job. I would not call that an obsession.
How 'bout we define who is the victim?
September 29, 2009 - 12:23 ET by QueenMum"But my feeling to his critics is, you have to look at a much more
complex situation, surrounding this case. And that has to do with his
fundamental rights."
What about the right of a young girl to grow into adulthood in a normal fashion? Polanski's intrusion forever changed this girl's view of herself. Care to delve into the complexity of the human psyche that was forever damaged by this disgusting creep, Mr. Berg and friends?
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."
—Margaret Thatcher
Oh really
September 29, 2009 - 12:24 ET by legacyrepublicanHe gave up his "fundamental rights" when he stole the child's right to her own body and raped her.
They could have had him any day
September 29, 2009 - 12:33 ET by MilfordHavenThis is merely an attempt by the powers that be to test the waters and see which way the wind is blowing regarding the obvious perverted agenda. If they really wanted him, they would have gotten him years ago.
“Roman got wind of that
September 29, 2009 - 12:40 ET by Flashman“Roman got wind of that and left.” Well that’s all right then. Anytime your sentencing might be changed you have carte blanche to ignore your parole terms and simply flee to the country. If you can avoid and the law and pop out some critically acclaimed arty films then all the better. Lucky for Polanski he’s not a member of the Catholic Clergy or Sawyer would be out getting a rope. Methinks Diane still hasn’t sobered up from her night celebrating Obama’s inauguration.
Flashman
September 29, 2009 - 13:49 ET by Scott WhitlockExcellent point. "Got wind and left" IS a bizarre way of putting it.
Isn't it interesting to
September 29, 2009 - 12:49 ET by FeynmanFanIsn't it interesting to watch liberals rally around one of their own?
"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error. To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson
Can you say Mel Reynolds????
September 29, 2009 - 13:13 ET by motherbeltCan you say Mel Reynolds????
Isn't it interesting...
September 29, 2009 - 13:39 ET by carolina09Isn't it interesting to watch liberals rally around one of their own?
Fascinating. You can really see clearly what kind of people they truly are. And they're being so careless about what they say, as if they believe their cruel opinions about the raped child could never be taken the "wrong way"! Let us give them lots of rope.
the entire coverage of this
September 29, 2009 - 13:48 ET by katainkentbasically makes me want to vomit. Polansky is more valued in their world. We are merely the unwashed to be used and thrown away.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
Rape-Rape
September 29, 2009 - 13:35 ET by ptsonSo drugging a 13 year old and committing rape vaginally and then anally is no big deal? This from the network that spent hours on toe tapping by a congressman in a rest room? Guilty plea and flee and there is no statute of limitations. As a father of a daughter, hang him high like the sick F--- he is and do it in public!
Fundamental rights to violate parole?
September 29, 2009 - 15:01 ET by CobraMan"And that has to do with his fundamental rights."
Are you seriously claiming that someone has a fundamental right to violate parole, a fundamental right to refuse to attend a court ordered appearance, and a fundamental right avoid the legal repercussions of this blatant disrespect for tht rule of law for 30 years? Are you seriously suggesting that someone who flaunted this serious violation for most of his adult life should be exonerated simple because he DID flee this country 30 years ago? So much for the rule of law. So much for the concept of Justice.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Movie about his life!?
September 29, 2009 - 15:05 ET by LSBeeneWhile I have no doubt that a movie has been made, it probably was made in the same way Hollywood "documents" every film I see.
Does the story of Roman-tic-with-13-year-olds show IN DETAIL the grooming, drugging, and raping of his victim? I'm betting not.
It's like the movies made about the "red scare" times - wherein after Project Venona was de-classified - wow, turns out most of those people WERE Communist spies after all.
Or the story of the scopes monkey-trial - presented as PROOF of an issue, when the real story never gets out.
Ya ever notice that no Hollywood movie ever shows some good person going to college and being subjected to the draconian totalitarianism of leftists?
Or the hypocrisy of the Hollywood elite as to their "say as we do" policies?
Or Nancy Pelosi's well watered vinyards as compared to the Southern California farmers experiencing drought?
A film about his life. Sheesh. Let's make a film about Mohammed's life and just ignore how he married a 6 year old, and did everything BUT sex until she was ***9*** and then had sexual relations with her.
That would be a good film.
So why didn't ABC have a
September 29, 2009 - 15:34 ET by Radical1979So why didn't ABC have a child's rights advocate on the show? Or an adult survivor of child rape to present the other side? Don't these people get how repulsive this situation is to the rest of the world? You just can't make us have any pity for this man. Put him in jail, throw away the key, and walk away.
Re liberals
September 29, 2009 - 17:04 ET by slickwillie2001Part of this is also the point that the Hollywood types just think
so damn highly of themselves. They think because he is an accomplished
director, he should get a pass. Like you put his movies on one side of
the scale and the rape on the other. They just need to get over
themselves.
I also heard on the tube yesterday that the victim in
this case came to a civil settlement with Polanski years ago, so in a
way that satisfied her. Had she not received a civil settlement, I
wonder if she would still be willing to give him a pass.
Makes you wonder
September 29, 2009 - 17:31 ET by katiejaneif we shouldn't bother going after any criminals once they flee a jusidiction. I imagine there are plenty of drug sellers and other swarmy types would be happy to find out they can get a pass if they could just hide somewhere. Of course unless you have money it's hard to hide in style somewhere.
Notice how the Lefties are
September 29, 2009 - 19:35 ET by samhermanmdNotice how the Lefties are using a documentary to "prove" prosecutorial and judicial misconduct? No agenda there....
I agree with her. Let
September 29, 2009 - 19:37 ET by RR GOPI agree with her. Let bygones be bygones. What's next, going after former presidents, their staff, and CIA agents years after the fact for getting information from terrorists who have killed and plotted to kill American citizens?
Ho ho ho...preposterous!!!
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Remember, too, that Mark
September 29, 2009 - 20:34 ET by Richard RomanoRemember, too, that Mark Foley who emailed sexually charged emails to young adult pages had the left foaming at the mouth, calling for the man's imprisonment.
Here we have a clear-cut case of a rapist who plead guilty and then fled to avoid jail time. What does the left do? They rally around this pathetic low-life.
I hope he's extradited soon and sentenced to 20 years in prison. The rich and powerful must not be allowed to evade the law.
If this were Newt Gingrich
September 30, 2009 - 10:47 ET by Guapo DiabloIf this were Newt Gingrich instead of Roman Polanski, Ms Sawyer would be just as supportive - of seeing Newt in prison.
Prosecutorial Obsession?
September 30, 2009 - 12:51 ET by AvitarFrom the day the California violated the agreed plea bargain deal prosecutorial obsession has been the rule for the last three decades. Adults have to be held responsible because somebody has to take responsibility for restricting sex for the very young. A couple of months in jail for sex with an underage girl who is left otherwise unhurt may be a light sentence but is not completely out of line. We need to remember that there are those who would execute a twelve-year-old boy for sex with a fifteen-year-old girl. The California law when Polanski plead guilty was written that way. It went to the Supreme Court and has been confirmed as saying exactly that.