MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell on Thursday appeared mystified as to why anyone would have a problem with New Jersey school children being led in a song praising Barack Obama. The February 2009 video contained these lyrics: "He said we must be fair today! Equal work means equal pay! Barack Hussein Obama! He said, red yellow, black or white, all are equal in his sight! Barack Hussein Obama!"
She complained to conservative columnist Tim Carney, "I mean, this is children. They're singing a song...If you can make your point again about why this is indoctrination, political indoctrination to praise your President." The MSNBC News Live guest host also dismissed, "I remember certainly in elementary school when Ronald Reagan was President and we sent him jelly beans." Carney quickly quipped "Did you sing a song praising the 1981 Kemp/Roth tax cuts? ‘Cause we sure didn't."
After Carney pointed out that the line about equal pay for equal work is a specific policy endorsement, O’Donnell attacked, "Oh, you don't believe in equal pay for equal work?" The quick-on-his-feet Carney again shot back, "I believe in equal pay. I would love to make equal pay to you ladies, but I don't."
O’Donnell later spun fair pay legislation, which was signed by Obama early in 2009, this way: "Tim, that was passed overwhelmingly, too. There were a number of Republicans that voted for that." So, if something is popular, it’s okay to encourage children to sing about it? Would O’Donnell be happy if video surfaced of teachers in the spring of 2003 leading songs about the glories of toppling Saddam Hussein? Or would she find that to be propagandistic?
Also participating in the discussion was Mike Stark, a reporter for the liberal web page FireDogLake.com. (Of course, Ms. O’Donnell didn’t mention the hard-left bent of the site.) After Stark dismissed the song controversy as nothing more than "tea baggers" getting in "high dudgeon," Carney ripped into him:
TIM CARNEY: Wait, tea baggers? Explain to the viewers what you mean by tea baggers. Do your kids watch this show? Do you want to explain to them? Why do you- You're talking about silly contretemps and you're using a vulgar term!
A transcript of the September 24 segment, which aired at 3:46pm EDT, follows:
NORAH O’DONNELL: And it is time for "making their case." And this one comes from a grammar school in New Jersey. It is video of young school children singing a song about President Obama and it is making its way around the internet. And as you watch the kids sing, out of respect for their privacy, MSNBC is not going to show the kids' faces but look closely at the lyrics of the song.
CHILDREN SINGING: He said they all must lend a hand to make the country strong again! Barack Hussein Obama. He said we must be fair today! Equal work means equal pay! Barack Hussein Obama! He said, red yellow, black or white, all are equal in his sight! Barack Hussein Obama!
O’DONNELL: Well, not long after the video showed up on several major news sites, the school sent a letter to families of the students and the letter reads, quote, "Today we became aware of a video that was placed on the internet which has been reported in the media. The activity took place during Black History Month. Our curriculum studies, honors and recognizes those who serve our country. The recording and distribution of the class activities were unauthorized." Well, is this an innocent activity during Black History Month or just judgement on the part of the teacher? Here to make the case are Mike Stark, reporter for FireDogLake.com and Tim Carney, lobbying editor and columnist for the Washington Examiner. Tim, what's wrong with this video?
TIM CARNEY: Well, our country is supposed to be- the presidency is supposed to be about a position and the powers there and not about the man. And this sort of thing where they are exalting the man, they are exalting his accomplishments that is different from, you know, different from a Black History Month story of Barack Obama making-
O’DONNELL: Tim, he’s the President of the United States.
CARNEY: He is the President of the United States. But again, praise him for how he has risen to that position from where he started. But making kids- I went to New York State public school, I suffered through some of the indoctrination, alongside a great education. But, again, making them praise his accomplishments, making them praise his equal- the equal pay for equal work law, that is something
O’DONNELL: Oh, you don't believe in equal pay for equal work?
CARNEY: I believe in equal pay. I would love to make equal pay to you ladies but I don't. And I believe that the government shouldn’t be in the business of enforcing what an employer pays an employee. That is a position that is debated in American politics. It’s a fine positions on either side, both are respectable. But to force kids to take a position on this political- this political question, that's indoctrination. That is not just praising our president or praising a man, you know, a great black man.
O’DONNELL: Mike, you want to make your case?
MIKE STARK: Yeah, this is just the latest, silly contretemp for the right-wing bloggers and talk radio hosts and tea baggers to get in high dudgeon over.
CARNEY: Wait, tea baggers? Explain to the viewers what you mean by tea baggers. Do your kids watch this show? Do you want to explain to them? Why do you- You’re talking about silly contretemps and you’re using a vulgar term!
STARK: Actually, you know what I want to do. I want to speak without being interrupted.
CARNEY: I’m sorry, you are being vulgar on national television.
O’DONNELL: Let's give- Tim, I gave you a chance. Let’s let Mike explain, okay? Go ahead, Mike.
STARK: If this- If this was directly from the White House, if this was government sponsored, I would be right there with you calling out concern for this but this wasn't. This was some teacher in some school, somewhere in this great United States of ours that taught some kids a song, listen. Let's talk about where this is coming from. This is coming from Rush Limbaugh calling Barack Obama a Nazi, the parallels to the Nazi youth movement are all over the right wing blogoshpere. It’s calling from Glenn Beck calling the President a racist. These folks lead the charge with all their little lackeys on talk radio, like Mark levin, Laura Ingraham, fired up. The bloggers get involved and it’s absolutely silly, a real news story would be the textbook controversy down in Texas where they really are trying to indoctrinate children by writing out evolution in favor of creationism, in writing civil war heroes or writing civil rights history out of the history of the United States. I've got a problem with that. This? This is marginal. It's a fake controversy. It’s just something else for right-wingers to wet the bed over.
CARNEY: Because MSNBC is right-wingers here and they’re the ones who brought us on for this. Sorry, go ahead.
O’DONNELL: No, Tim, I just wanted to get your take on that. I mean, this is children. They're singing a song. And I'm not clear myself. If you can make your point again about why this is indoctrination, political indoctrination to praise your president. I remember certainly in elementary school when Ronald Reagan was President and we sent him jelly beans. We designed all of these things about Ronald Reagan. We sent them to him. And I don't think everybody in the class ended up a Republican because of that.
CARNEY: Did you sing a song praising the 1981 Kemp/Roth tax cuts? ‘Cause we sure didn't. I mean, I know I had history teachers who were very biased. This is very biased. No- it’s policies.
O’DONNELL: I don't actually see anything about tax cuts it’s policy. I see this more nationalistic than I do political.
CARNEY: There are specific policies and specific accomplishments.
O’DONNELL: Because, it's about praising the President and making our country great again. I don't see anything as- anything about, you know, let’s give health care to everybody. Or, you know, no more tax cuts. I mean, there’s really nothing in there that’s that actually that controversial.
CARNEY: They talk about all his great accomplishments, which-That’s a reference to his policies.
O’DONNELL: Well, he’s the President of the United States. Why can't we respect our leaders, whether they're Democrat or Republican?
CARNEY: I'm great into respecting leaders. You should ask your friend Mike Stark there about respecting leaders, about how he, you know, runs off and harasses politicians on the streets. I mean, the fact is, it's great to respect leaders. It's great to praise Barack Obama. His personal story is amazing. I want every kid to know that story. But, again, praising specific policies that he passes is politicizing the classroom. And I suffered through this in New York state public schools where they made us write letters to the governor opposing tax cuts and that sort of thing. I know how it goes.
STARK: I would really like to know where in the language of that song do you see specific policies? I'm really at a loss here.
CARNEY: Again, the Lilly ledbetter Pay Act, which was lobbied for by- I cover lobbying. Look at the lobbying registration for trial lawyers.
STARK: The words Lilly Ledbetter were in there? The words trial lawyers in there? I mean, come on, man.
CARNEY: It says, "He made there be equal pay for equal work." And he did that through specific policy.
O’DONNELL: Tim, that was passed overwhelmingly, too. There were a number of Republicans that voted for that.
STARK: You don’t want little girls to hear that. Tell me what’s wrong with the-
O’DONNELL: Mark Stark- I apologize. We're out of time. This is a good discussion. I appreciate having you both on. Thanks so much.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Republicans are just mad
September 24, 2009 - 16:53 ET by Barry BondsRepublicans are just mad because no songs were written praising Bush. (I'm sure there are songs but the Right won't dig it up because it will kill their argument.)
If kids sang a song praising Bush they would have probably broken out in hives.
Mad Republicans?
September 24, 2009 - 17:08 ET by TeamcheeserRight. It's up to the right to dig up the songs about Bush (if they exist) because the lefties are too plain lazy to do their own ground work.
And I'm glad you have the ability to get into the minds of all Republicans to know why they are mad.
If any kids sang a song about Bush -- a positive song, anyway -- it would be the left that would break out in hives, not the kids. Can you imagine? They don't even want the kids to say the Pledge any more.
And for the record, Bush is out of office now. Get over it. Find some new way to criticize the right or just get on with your life.
Tc... ....or use the word
September 24, 2009 - 17:13 ET by bigtimerTc...
....or use the word 'Christmas' in any of their songs.
Or dare use the word 'God'.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
BT,
September 24, 2009 - 20:23 ET by ThisnThatBingo! Their excuse was "The activity took place during Black History Month." So, come Christmas, will they use the same excuse to sing Christmas carols? Next month is Columbus day. I want to see them teach about that (yeah, right).
These are hypocritical SOBs to the nth degree. That teach needs to be fired -- now, not tomorrow. Also notice -- they used Obama's middle name. I thought that was taboo? Oh well, the shifting sands of the left know no bounds. They are clueless, valueless, moral-less rats, as far as I'm concerned -- and they prove each and every day.
BTW, I think that's why the libs have pushed so hard to mandate kindergarten. Perfect time to begin indoctrination.
___________________________________
"Tax the rich" is a basically unstable way of governing - The NYT
This is a perfect example of
September 24, 2009 - 21:35 ET by Dan DiegoThis is a perfect example of why parents need to ask their kids "what did you do in school today?" every single day.
Black history month is in February
September 24, 2009 - 22:48 ET by ArcherBThe video was taken in June. Black History Month is in February. I don't understand why no one has brought that up.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."
--Ernesto "Che" Guevara
ah, the old "they did it first" defense
September 24, 2009 - 17:12 ET by candanceDig up some evidence or admit your making stuff up. I'm not your Google assistant.
→ candance
September 24, 2009 - 17:19 ET by Cool ArrowBeck has already exposed the songleader as Obama Harvard classmate Charisse Carney-Nunes, author of an Obama children's book.
I saw that, Cool
September 24, 2009 - 17:23 ET by candanceI can see where Mr. Steriods would think a Republican did this last time. The teachers' union is lousy with GOP hacks.
/sarc
→ Yeah
September 24, 2009 - 17:35 ET by Cool ArrowI can see those Liberals sitting back while school children sing praises,
Yeah, I can see it all now.
Beck did no such thing.
September 24, 2009 - 18:24 ET by Another Dead KennedyBeck did no such thing. Carney-Nunes was not present at the taping of the video. She merely posted it on her site while promoting her book. Or can you provide proof otherwise?
xoxo - Ted
Oh!
September 24, 2009 - 21:21 ET by pbanks7So that "rich," "corporate," "capitialist" merely "exploited children" "for PROFIT!" OFF WITH HER HEAD! <sarc off>
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.
There goes roid rage Barry
September 24, 2009 - 18:19 ET by Scuba DudeThere goes roid rage Barry again, spouting nonsense and not backing it up. Typical libtard reaction. Hey mental midget, prove that there were songs written about Pres. Bush.
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
....especially where kids
September 24, 2009 - 18:25 ET by bigtimer....especially where kids were taught to sing the praises in the classrooms.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Is this how it began
September 24, 2009 - 23:59 ET by Army Bratin Venezuela...to pick the most recently risen dictatorship.
And now Obama supports the rise of the next one in Honduras...in our name. The things he does in our name bring shame on us every damned day.
Undoing the damage this petulant child is doing will take decades.
islam is a lie and Truth is killing it.
Making the country great again
September 25, 2009 - 00:23 ET by Seabeach4348<<O’DONNELL: Because, it's about praising the President and making our country great again.>>
They want the kids to make the country great again while this miserable excuse for POTUS goes around the world apologizing, demeaning American, and making it clear to the "international community" that he's more interested in doing what they want us to do than for what's good for us!
What a jerk. Barry Hussein Obozo needs to step down now!
Making our country great
September 25, 2009 - 11:01 ET by pockets64Small note: Our country already is great.
There is nothing one person can do to make a lousy country great. That is up to the people.
BHO has made many references to "my" (BHO's) country. It's not his. It's our's.
You mean roid rage w/
September 24, 2009 - 21:44 ET by Dan DiegoYou mean roid rage w/ little itsy-bitsy berries, Barry?"
Well, that's what his girlfriend said...
I would be mad...
September 24, 2009 - 18:32 ET by Iowa Boy...even if it had been Ronald Reagan during his administration. In America, we don't worship or sing songs to our "dear leader" like they do/did in the USSR, PRC, or North Korea. As Americans, we are all equal. It is the office we hold in high esteem, not the person who occupies it.
The founders wanted to give President Washington the appellation of His Excellency. Mr. Washington immediately nixed that idea based on the ideal that he was not above any other man. He suggested the more humble, Mr. President.
Plain and simple, it's wrong no matter who holds the office.
"Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain." Official Motto of the State of Iowa
Wait -
September 24, 2009 - 21:27 ET by pbanks7Aren't these the same people who don't want "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Or the Pledge itself?
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.
Not only that...
September 25, 2009 - 09:05 ET by Sestren_NKNot to mention the national currency. "In God We Trust" says a penny in front of me. Oh, the horror of it all!
BB...please
September 24, 2009 - 18:44 ET by Kat Outta the BagIf a bunch of school kids sang a sycophantic song to George W. Bush or any other Republican president like this song, I would have been equally creeped out and concerned. It just wreaks of what goes on in communist countries and you know it.
George W. Bush! Liberty for all!
September 25, 2009 - 10:06 ET by TruthMonger"He said we must be fair today! Equal freedom means equal ways! George W. Bush! He said, American, Iraqi, you and me, all deserve their liberty! George W. Bush!"
...any thoughts, Norah?
...you did know that the IRAQI WAR RESOLUTION was passed OVERWHELMINGLY, DON'T YOU - HIGHLY EDUCATED JOURNALIST THAT YOU ARE AND SUCH?
...what, you don't believe in FREEDOM FOR EVERYBODY, NORAH...?!?!?
now what did you say again here...? lets see...
"...it's about praising the President"
"...he’s the President of the United States"
"...I mean, this is children. They're singing a song. And I'm not clear myself. If you can make your point again about why this is indoctrination, political indoctrination to praise your president?"
"...he’s the President of the United States. Why can't we respect our leaders, whether they're Democrat or Republican?"
but really what should we expect a left wing propagandist to see anything wrong with left wing propganda?
I'm sure there were plenty
September 24, 2009 - 20:53 ET by fitzfongI'm sure there were plenty of songs written praising Bush. It's just that no children were held captive having to rehearse any such songs during school hours...at my expense. You see, public school teachers are merely subjects of the thug union machine, and are thus subservient to the Alinsky-in-Chief. As a direct result, they indoctrinate their students with left wing propaganda instead of doing what they should be doing: teaching them how to read, write and do math. Perhaps if they had been doing their jobs properly rather than drilling pro-Alinsky propaganda into their heads, imbeciles like you would have learned the difference between a beneficiary and a benefactor.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Yeah, sure.
September 24, 2009 - 21:37 ET by pbanks7Yeah, sure. There were hundreds of songs in the Gov't Schools praising Bush, uh-huh, uh-huh.
the Alinsky-in-Chief. Good one!
As a direct result, they indoctrinate their students with left wing propaganda instead of doing what they should be doing: teaching them how to read, write and do math.
You left out thinking for themselves, otherwise excellent! When I was in grade school, they taught that the gummint would evolve into a hybrid between ours and the USSR's. What a catbox without clay! Or were they shaping opinion?
Love your tagline!
MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.
Folks, you can always catch up with him @ Assbook
September 24, 2009 - 21:31 ET by SickofLibsbbonds@assbook
I'll see everyone there!
really, SOL?
September 24, 2009 - 21:33 ET by candanceWe need this kind of language?
CD: huh?
September 24, 2009 - 21:47 ET by SickofLibsWhat language?
Success
September 25, 2009 - 14:43 ET by Jerry MackWe are mad because we saw a group of children being indoctrinated. It is obvious that you have successfully completed all the phases of " Obama is great " indoctrination.
I wonder what Norah O' Dumb*ss thinks about this song:
September 24, 2009 - 17:02 ET by R D Helmhttp://www.youtube.c...
-Dave
I agree with Rush. It's time for Obama to resign.
Dave --
September 24, 2009 - 17:11 ET by TeamcheeserI doubt they would even get it. Irony tends to get away from those folks...
Tc,
September 24, 2009 - 17:48 ET by R D HelmAs does their knowledge of history.
-Dave
I agree with Rush. It's time for Obama to resign.
I think Joy, Norah and
September 24, 2009 - 17:04 ET by bigtimerI think Joy, Norah and Katie Cupcake must all be kissing cousins.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Just rember BT
September 24, 2009 - 20:27 ET by RukusIt's CupKate. OK, I need to go to bed here shortly as I have to get up early.I heart your posts. : )
Gary
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -- Tom Paine
The left's continuing slide into delusion
September 24, 2009 - 17:09 ET by Thinking.ManNo it's not political at all, why singing a song about dear leader and his wonderous accomplishments is "Just Nationalistic"
Are these the same liberal rodeo clowns that think Nationalism is a 4 letter word?
Just becasue the "Song Leader" was a leftist nut job that thinks Obama is the messiah doesnt mean her intent was to brainwash the kids or use them as propoganda.
You really cant take anything a leftist says seriously anymore, they are completely dishonest.
i wish there were
September 24, 2009 - 17:12 ET by rona song about President Bush. i would love to send it to keith olberman and watch him come apart at the seams
Those kids don't even know who Obama is.
September 24, 2009 - 17:22 ET by superconThey're too young. Making those kids do that was creepy. What are they going to sing about next....? Legalizing gay marriage?
" if Republicans are able to stop Barack Obama on health care, 'it will be his Waterloo, it will break him...." -Sen. Jim DeMint
wake up nora
September 24, 2009 - 17:28 ET by charlietexasand they wonder why their ratings are in the turlit.......idiots
Inappropriate
September 24, 2009 - 17:30 ET by Mitch NJParents send their children to school to learn such things as reading, writing, arithmetic, history, science...etc. Not to sing the praises of Mao or Barack Obama which we leave to Lefty Norah O'Donnell and the Lefty MSNBC glee club.
it's creepy!
September 24, 2009 - 17:33 ET by katainkentexploitive and CREEPY. Anyone who cannot see this is obviously not a parent. My teachers had nothing but disparaging remarks for Reagan. That he liked jelly beans was probably the kindest thing I ever heard, and it certainly humanized him. This song has exactly the opposite effect. Isn't that last line from "Jesus loves the little children" or am I misremembering days as a little one in church.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
kata--
September 24, 2009 - 18:49 ET by Kat Outta the BagI'm not a parent and I find it beyond creepy. And yes, the last line is from "Jesus Loves the Little Children" which I caught immediately and frankly it made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.
ugh
September 24, 2009 - 20:32 ET by katainkentnow I hate it even more.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
Obama Bots Junior Version
September 24, 2009 - 17:37 ET by sergeant stogieFirst, it's a lame friggin' song. Second, do they know that part of it is taken from "Jesus Loves the Little Children", a song sung in, oh my God, "Christian Church"? Where's the separation of Church and State? Call the ACLU! And, that they co-opted part of the melody of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"? I'm sure the daffy blow-hair eco-groovy parents thought it was cool. Play it side-by-side with something from North Korea or Cuba and ya might not think so. Then again, THEY might.
ss... Right you are, that
September 24, 2009 - 17:43 ET by bigtimerss...
Right you are, that is what had me fuming this morning when I read this on Fox and heard the kids, the words etc.
Our country has to be saved...this is mind-bending what is happening before our very eyes at break-neck speed.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/24/elementary-school-students-reportedly-taught-songs-praising-president-obama/
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Obama loves me this I know
September 24, 2009 - 17:45 ET by Dan The Man 2Obama loves me this I know .... because the bible tells me so. Arggg hope I dont go to hell for that one.
No way the religious
September 24, 2009 - 20:27 ET by ThisnThatNo way the religious left going to substitute "Jesus" for "Obama". That's plain blasphemy.
___________________________________
"Tax the rich" is a basically unstable way of governing - The NYT
I wonder if the speech to
September 24, 2009 - 17:43 ET by Dan The Man 2I wonder if the speech to teh kids had not been changed if it would have not cumulated in some pap as this. Norah is pretty dumb or so drugged up from koolaid not to see the problem in this. Of course we saw the forerunner in the militant Obama praise video and the one sung by a private school.
But thia was in a public school, have the offenders and higher ups fallen on their swords yet?
Praises to "The One"
September 24, 2009 - 17:54 ET by President Skip 2024Am I allowed to call idiocy when I see it? Wait..I just did. This network and its advocates have driven a wedge b/t fair minded people and the "not so mentally stable' on the left. Her reporting regarding Obama's "wise assessment and not a snap to judgement" on an Afghanistan strategy was just as laughable. They will continue providing cover for this President...even at the detriment of the nation. Advocacy and journalistic protectionism is dangerous, but you can't have, in the words of the illustrious Barney Frank, "a conversation with a dining room table"...it just sits there! This is why we should watch actual "journalists" and not closet underwear bloggers who just happen to sit in front of a camera at MSLSD.
Norah O'Donnell is oblivious: affirmation is not required...
September 24, 2009 - 18:00 ET by ThalpyNorah O'Donnell is oblivious: affirmation is not required.
Thalpy... Bingo! ...that
September 24, 2009 - 18:04 ET by bigtimerThalpy...
Bingo!
...that was sweet and to the point.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Norah didn't mention the
September 24, 2009 - 18:06 ET by HypocriteHaterNorah didn't mention the lyric of the song that says "...all must lend a hand to make the country strong again". It's an obvious partisan slap at the previous administration to imply that the US was weak, and now we have Obama the savior to make us strong again. Gimme a break!
No surprise: they sing it every morning in the MSNBC newsroom...
September 24, 2009 - 18:17 ET by wnaegeleSigh!
Why does MSNBC hire such
September 24, 2009 - 18:19 ET by samhermanmdWhy does MSNBC hire such startlingly stupid reporters?
The nation's asylums were
September 24, 2009 - 18:33 ET by MightyMouthThe nation's asylums were defunded and deregulated. They had to go somewhere!
"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
Their distorted view of "fairness"
September 25, 2009 - 09:08 ET by Sestren_NKin that everyone deserves success in the field they want no matter how much they completely suck and fail at it.
The dummies are the only
September 25, 2009 - 09:15 ET by celatorThe dummies are the only ones Raum allows MSNBC to keep on staff.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
WOOOOO HOOOOOO!!!!! Got
September 24, 2009 - 18:51 ET by Scuba DudeWOOOOO HOOOOOO!!!!!
Got this when I went to check on roid rage Barry
Access denied
You are not authorized to access this page.
YYAAAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!!!
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
→ No more Rhoid?
September 24, 2009 - 18:56 ET by Cool ArrowJust as FroglegHornboy appears? HMMMM.
FroglegHornboy??? The
September 24, 2009 - 19:00 ET by Scuba DudeFroglegHornboy???
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
→ or somesuch Scuba
September 24, 2009 - 19:06 ET by Cool ArrowYou can sample his wit here.
Hey CA, I think you meant
September 24, 2009 - 19:13 ET by Scuba DudeHey CA, I think you meant half-wit or maybe witless. You know there are tons of backup ID's these libtards from KOS and HuffPo to use when they get banned. Now as someone mentioned, it would be great if NB was able to check against IP addresses.
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
CA... They always have
September 24, 2009 - 19:02 ET by bigtimerCA...
They always have back-up user names at the ready...
I was just saying to FL it was obvious he has been here before, and it is with somethings he has posted, one to me, so I know it's the same old same old.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Really? Has that jerk
September 24, 2009 - 22:16 ET by RescuedByRushReally? Has that jerk finally been cut off? Please say yes. I can take a lot of the libs on this site, but that guy took the cake. I can just see him brandishing his new sheepskin, swaggering out into the real world as if he knows it all, and unwittingly revealing his naivete to everyone he meets.
Sort of like myself - 20 years ago...
Pretty Smile, Full of KoolAid
September 24, 2009 - 19:01 ET by chuckkShe's such a pretty lady with a wonderful smile and laugh.
Having school children singing anthems of loyalty as if the President were Kim Jong-Il is nauseating enough, but to usurp a tune of worship to Jesus Christ is beyond the pale.
Perhaps Norah's class sent jellybeans to President Reagan after the assassination attempt, but I doubt she was coerced to sing "Holy Holy Holy, Lord Reagan Almighty."
Why is this national
September 24, 2009 - 19:19 ET by 24enakWhy is this national newsworthy? This was an isolated incident from a teacher that wasn't in the lesson plan. There is no indoctrination here, no executive order from Obama mandating these kids or any kids sing a song about him. If the parents of the the kids singing the song have issues with it then they should take it up with the school district.
Kids should be taken out of politics and exploiting them is wrong. Shame on drudge and many others for trying to exploit these kids for singing a harmless song.
There you have it
September 24, 2009 - 19:36 ET by ckc1227There you have it folks....indoctrination is okay as long as it doesn't come directly from the White House. Words of (non)wisdom from Mr. 24 IQ.
hey enak
September 24, 2009 - 19:36 ET by candanceIf someone produced video of school children singing "thank God George Bush is stopping Al Qaeda" I am sure you'd be the first in line to tell DKos not to complain about it.
Well yeah, it would
September 24, 2009 - 22:58 ET by 24enakWell yeah, it would be inappropriate to teach 2nd graders about Al Qaeda and terrorism. What these kids sang about wasn't political, unless you disagree with the following "He said we must be fair today! Equal work means equal pay! Barack Hussein Obama! He said, red yellow, black or white, all are equal in his sight! Barack Hussein Obama!" I don't think very many (sane) people disagrees with that. Of course I am assuming you think equal pay is just, or that you think people of different races should be equal.
If the lyrics were about hot button issues like abortion, Gitmo, torture, health care, the war then your comparison would be viable.
twisting it around to make me out a bigot
September 24, 2009 - 23:11 ET by candanceIt's all the left knows how to do.
I'm not against "equal pay for equal work."
But I am against the idea of pairing it with Obama's name and talking about how we're all equal in his sight. He's not God.
"George Bush! Puppies are cute. George Bush! Compassionate conservative. George Bush! No Child Left Behind. George Bush! Free medicine for grandma. George Bush!"
Are you for children being left behind??? Are you in favor of little old ladies dying because Medicare has no Part D???
No I didn't want to put
September 24, 2009 - 23:59 ET by 24enakNo I didn't want to put words in your mouth. I think it was a mistake on the teachers part to sing the song, their are other songs that could have been sung. But this is not a national newsworthy story.
What I strongly object to is the false outrage by the right, how drudge linked to it then other media figures pick it up for more false outrage. Just like when Obama gave a harmless speech to the school children a few weeks ago, it was no big deal, but because it involved Obama the right was outraged, there is absolutely nothing Obama could do that would please the right, except for resigning. The right screams INDOCTRINATION, INDOCTRINATION when there is no such thing going on. They say this is what was done in China, or North Korea or Iraq when it isn't even close to anything like that.
False Outrage?
September 25, 2009 - 08:15 ET by BlondeTrust me, little troll, it's REAL outrage.
As to the remainder of your so-called argument....please explain for the class how "he'll make our country strong again" isn't politics.
Okay, class, five minute break to get popcorn and beverages before 24Troll amuses us with more twist and spin dances.
I hope he fails, too.
Sorry, but you're wrong
September 24, 2009 - 23:14 ET by RescuedByRushSorry, but you're wrong about this. I pay more for minority and female candidates to work for me. This is what bugs me about the "equal pay for equal work" mantra. I get 100 resumes for every job I have, and you can bet your sweet ass that I interview every woman and every minority that applies, never mind that less than 10% of applicants fit that bill. Then, I make sure that they make a salary greater than their white male counterparts if I decide to hire them. I have to, Big Brother is watching, (EEOC).
This is what upsets righties about this theme. In many instances, the trend has gone the other way. Priority is placed on landing a female or minority employee, and, believe me, their pay being on par with their white male competitors is a huge priority.
Largely, this argument has lost its teeth. It's like George Costanza's hair -- the historic remains of a once proud society...
It should be none of the
September 24, 2009 - 23:46 ET by fitzfongIt should be none of the government's business what an employer chooses to pay an employee. In a truly free country, that issue would be resolved between employer and employee. Besides, this phony "equal pay for equal work" platitude has artificially corrupted the job market, as with considerations for maternity leave and other production-related regulations, employers actually have less incentive to hire women...and this means a lot of highly qualified women are denied opportunities that they could have gotten on their own merits if the government didn't feel the need to intrude. Businesses are not in business to create jobs and underwrite health care...they are in business to deliver on consumer demand. To the extent that they need assistance to efficiently deliver on that demand, they create jobs...and not before.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
last night I was watching TV
September 24, 2009 - 23:57 ET by candanceand they showed an episode of Family Ties on some rerun channel. It portrayed Alex pretending to support the Equal Rights Act of the early 1980s. Halfway through the show, some Republican goons began a violent protest because women were supposed to "get back in the kitchen." And plucky little Alex, Republican that he was, stood up to the right wing bullies because they were clearly too extreme.
Replace the setting with a town hall over healthcare, and it's exactly how Hollywood portrays things today. I remember turning to hubby and asking, "I was young when this supposedly happened, but do you suppose there were really mobs of dittoheads intimidating women back then?"
I took some ancient Greek
September 25, 2009 - 00:18 ET by fitzfongI took some ancient Greek literature classes in college, when I was introduced to the concept of the "stock" villain. Essentially the bad guy was the one-dimensional embodiment of the values the playwright found objectionable, and the nasty qualities of said heel were exaggerated for effect. This is almost exactly the same plot device the Hollywood crowd has employed for years. Family Ties was produced by liberals with liberal actors and typically glorified the 1960s Berkeley protestors and made the Reaganite Alex character a source of ridicule...but as he was a member of the Keaton family, he "had a soul" and did the right thing when called upon to do so...unlike the one-dimensional stock villains they used as a plot device in the episode of which you speak. It was designed to emit the response it received from you...namely, raising doubts about your beliefs and ideology because you might be seen to share similar values to a handful of non-existent thugs.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
it's so transparent, though
September 25, 2009 - 00:25 ET by candanceI spent the whole time rolling my eyes like yeah, that really happened. The "bad guys" just looked like cartoon characters. It was pathetic.
Aside from that, the characters in the show kept talking about ERA and how direly important it was. If the act didn't pass, women would be limited and kept in oppression! Yet the act never passed, and somehow we managed to survive. We even had a black woman serve as Secretary of State - under a Republican.
Libs wake up every new year with anmesia and never admit to their wild predictions.
All In The Family with
September 25, 2009 - 00:26 ET by JerAll In The Family with Archie Bunker being another variation of the theme.
Jer
Archie Bunker was not a real person?
September 25, 2009 - 00:32 ET by candanceI could have sworn he was my dad's long lost twin.
Sitting here trying to think of a liberal stereotype that Hollywood protrays in a bad light. Any ideas, Jer?
candance...I'm going to
September 25, 2009 - 00:41 ET by Jercandance...I'm going to answer that with the same words Eisenhower used when asked, near the end of his presidency, to name an important accomplishment [not sure if that was the exact phrase] by his VP, Dick Nixon.
"Give me a week and I'll try to think of one."
Jer
the closest I can think
September 25, 2009 - 00:47 ET by candanceWould be Phoebe on Friends.
Archie was less the
September 25, 2009 - 01:20 ET by fitzfongArchie was less the one-dimensional stock villain and more the "misguided" blowhard with an occasional touch of humanity...the Alex Keaton role. Even Barney Hefner was kind of a loveable scamp, all things considered. The stock villains tend to appear once and get their comeuppance by the end of the show...like the bratty kid on the Andy Griffith Show who played Opie Taylor's friend in one episode and got his bike seized and a trip to the woodshed by the time credits rolled.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
But Keaton was less of a
September 25, 2009 - 01:38 ET by JerBut Keaton was less of a 'blowhard' and not quite so 'misguided' as Bunker, or perhaps the more polished persona better masked the former's ideological "flaws". Still, even though Archie was clearly depicted as a cultural rube--almost cartoonishly so--he, and Alex, were made appealing enough often enough to sustain the characters' and the shows' popularity over several wildly successful seasons.
Jer
fitzfong
September 25, 2009 - 00:08 ET by 24enakIf that was the case then their would still be children working in factories. There should be a minimum wage for workers, otherwise the employer would hire the cheapest employee they could find, ie migrant workers or illegal aliens. And if this is your stance then I will assume that you have never said that illegal aliens are 'taking our jobs'. If the government doesn't set some standards or regulation then the employer would cut corners and take advantage to make more money while delivering less quality. And who knows what would be in our sausages and hot dogs today.
illegal aliens take our jobs
September 25, 2009 - 00:17 ET by candancebecause the government handi-caps American workers at inflated minimum wages, and then are pressured by the left to ignore illegal activity. Every time ICE busts a factory for hiring illegals, a hundred Americans line up to apply for those jobs - only for the media to start crying about poor illegal immigrants being unemployed.
This isn't the 1800s. Child labor was abolished as much because of public disgust as labor laws.
Ethical behavior starts from the inside out, not because the government legislates morality. At least that's what I'm told about abortion and gay marriage...
That is the dumbest, most
September 25, 2009 - 01:08 ET by fitzfongThat is the dumbest, most economically illiterate argument you can make. In a free society, the market determines wages, both up and down. Nobody is going to do migrant work for nothing, but there is a price at which people will do that job. If the cost to get the work done fails to provide the employer enough revenue (relative to doing nothing) to make it worth his while to get the work done in the first place (i.e. if it's not more profitable than doing nothing), then "phllllbbt...no job". If an employer is really underpaying his employees, the employees have what's called a "remedy"...go up the road and find another job at more competitive wages. If said employer continues to lose decent labor to his competitors, he faces the choice of raising wages to attract good workers or perishing because he has nothing of value to offer the labor force. Sometimes businesses are uncompetitive and must give way to more efficient businesses.
Minimum wage is a simplistic, infantile and ultimately destructive concept that actually creates the artificial market for illegal immigration. Who the hell is the government to involve itself as a 3rd Party in the setting of wages? If a job is offering $1.00 an hour and I want to work for that $1.00 an hour, what concern is it of yours whether or not I accept that job at that rate? When you set a minimum standard for what someone is allowed to pay someone else, you suppress job creation by creating artificial barriers to entry. Additionally, you establish a black market for jobs where potential employers seek to get the work they need done either by paying someone "under the table" or by hiring illegal aliens to do the work at a lower rate (the threat of deportation keeping their wage and working condition demands artificially lower). The minimum wage is a device created by ivory tower liberals who don't know the first thing about creating or sustaining jobs yet insist on injecting themselves into the reckoning...the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
As for your "cut corners" red herring, a free market polices itself. Does the FAA prevent plane crashes just because it exists? Hell, no. Plane crashes took place before, and will occur in the future...FAA or no FAA. But chances are, airlines don't want to take too many chances with their safety reputations. In the 1980s, Delta was the butt of many late night jokes because of a couple of devastating collisions. Yet Delta exists today. Why? Because they were sensitive enough to the damage to their reputation that the unwanted publicity gave to them, that they took it upon themselves to tighten their operations. If some meat-processor is considering putting inedible and/or poisonous items in their hot dogs, the threat of bad publicity and/or litigation will get them to straighten up and fly right. Government interference in the marketplace is not a good thing, as you seem to suggest...it is a counterproductive thing.
" "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Your economic treatises are
September 25, 2009 - 02:16 ET by JerYour economic treatises are consistently powerhouses of logic and reason. I can't stick around any longer tonight, but allow me to toss out a few shorthand phrases to hopefully provoke some thought.
Titanic...Life Boats...'Proactive' vs. 'Reactive' vs. 'No Regulation Whatsoever': Accidents and deaths are an inevitability for which an unfettered market will natually induce--but not force through arbitrary intervention--owners to make appropriate adjustments, i.e. more life boats.
Jer
Thanks, Jer. That's very
September 25, 2009 - 10:35 ET by fitzfongThanks, Jer. That's very nice of you to say.
In truth, some economic principles are too frequently ignored in order to accommodate the overreaching involvement of government. Accidents will happen in both free and restrictive markets...the difference is that the free market gives its players the opportunity to learn from their mistakes or for their competitors to capitalize on their failure to address deficiencies by addressing the problems themselves and exploiting the corrections for competitive advantage. Monopolies are often inefficient because they lack the threat of losing market share to competitors and they lose sight of the fact that their existence owes itself to the consistent delivery on consumer demand. As soon as a bloated monopoly falls short of what got it to where it was, it creates an opportunity for potential competitors to eat into the market share by closing the gap. So, if a company fails to be proactive, it will need to be reactive to stop the bleeding.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Pure "Cult of personality"
September 25, 2009 - 07:31 ET by BDPure "Cult of personality" pap.
24, Starts with one
September 24, 2009 - 19:48 ET by bigtimer24,
Starts with one school, spreads to many, that's why it's national news, as it should be.
People pay property taxes to support these schools...the communities have a right to know...it's Indoctrination 101, simple as that.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
It has happened in one
September 24, 2009 - 23:04 ET by 24enakIt has happened in one school, it hasn't spread to many, if not any other schools. That is why this should be a local news story, and if the parents of the students object they should take it up with the school board. I don't know if the parents of those kids have complained because they are being drowned out by the conservative media, and those kids have been exploited and politicized by the conservative media.
Delusions 101 sounds more like it.
So, all stories based on a
September 25, 2009 - 07:35 ET by BDSo, all stories based on a single incident with no possibility of spreading to other locales are relegated to local news only?
PLEASE SAY YES! THat would be fun.
"O’DONNELL: Because, it's
September 24, 2009 - 19:30 ET by ckc1227"O’DONNELL: Because, it's about praising the President and making our country great again."
Moron is a victim of her own indoctrination/propaganda, and she doesn't even know it.
Obama's Nazi Youth marching video
September 24, 2009 - 19:36 ET by RayRayif any have missed it:
http://www.youtube.c...
schoolkids marching and chanting to Obama in quasi-military garb
nice, real nice.....not
September 24, 2009 - 19:50 ET by jon_torlinReal nice of Norah to use the vulgar term "tea bagger" and then dance around it. Did she attend the same dance class as the kids, they know not what they do, but they spin around in happy happy joy joy bliss?(derived from ignorance perhaps? Gee, couldn't be!) Ok, sarcasm off.....might be overflowing a bit.
Also, I notice this wasn't mentioned on here, saw it on Fox News.com, but the superintendent of that school didn't seem to have any problem with the song or that impressionable kids were being used like this, but had a bigger problem with the video being done and made public. Anyonewho uses kids like this or as props deserve a special place in Dante's ninth circle of hell.
-Jon
Jon....
September 24, 2009 - 19:57 ET by BlondeI thank my lucky stars I have no school aged children.
Because I'd be hauled off to jail for yanking that teacher's hair out by the roots.
I am thinking of having my own personal little tax revolt...if my school system even shows one IOTA of this kind of crap, I'll not pay my taxes....and maybe I'll even run for a seat on the Board.
I AM FED UP WITH IT....I am not going to take it any more, truly. I no longer care that I am not built like a politician, but I am going to fight these asshats everywhere I can...in the grocery store, in the ballot booth, and, yeah, maybe even head on!
I hope he fails, too.
Watch out, Blonde. You
September 24, 2009 - 20:32 ET by ThisnThatWatch out, Blonde. You don't pay your taxes -- you're likely to end up in Obama's administration, somewhere.
___________________________________
"Tax the rich" is a basically unstable way of governing - The NYT
spit alert
September 24, 2009 - 20:35 ET by candanceseriously. I almost lost some water reading that.
Hee hee, TnT
September 24, 2009 - 20:36 ET by BlondeI was thinking about a local tax revolt.....to usurp the School Board morons....or the City morons, or the County morons...or the State morons....or maybe even (no not really, I have a great guy taking a serious run at my Congresscritter).
Like that!
I hope he fails, too.
"He wants to fight the
September 24, 2009 - 20:09 ET by Kevroy"He wants to fight the terrorists and keep America safe"
"George W Bush!"
"He wants to lower taxes and hear the nation pray"
"George W Bush!"
Please...they would be going bananas on the left.
Predictable response from the other side
September 25, 2009 - 09:16 ET by Sestren_NK"How dare the teachers have our young innocent children praise a war criminal who deserves to be tried for crimes against humanity and lied to his country to start an illegal war blah blah blah blah" and other crap they can make up. Everyone knows it.
Die Jugend Marchiert
September 24, 2009 - 20:20 ET by chuckkO’DONNELL: Because, it's about praising the President and making our country great again. Hmmm... tomorrow belongs to them???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ru5d0GBXKvQ
Poor Norah
September 24, 2009 - 20:23 ET by zachlindNorah O’Donnell. What a waste of valuable television time. I sort of go back and forth when describing her. The word vacancy comes to mind first, but later, when the red light comes on (the camera), I think of a deer in the headlights. But, when you really think about it, you can merge those two thoughts together and end up in the same place.
Lyrics ======== Song 1: Mm,
September 24, 2009 - 20:54 ET by DoktorFrankenLyrics
========
Song 1:
Mm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
(Okay - Right there I'm hurling and calling the Principal)
He said that all must lend a hand
To make this country strong again
(He's A POLITICIAN!!! He'll say anything!)
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said we must be fair today
Equal work means equal pay
(That's probably how his wife's no-work job's salary was doubled once he became US Senator.)
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that we must take a stand
To make sure everyone gets a chance
(Not TOO vague, eh?)
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said red, yellow, black or white
All are equal in his sight
(But we're all RACISTS to him!)
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
Yes!
(F--- NO!)
Mmm, mmm, mm
Barack Hussein Obama
Song 2:
Hello, Mr. President we honor you today!
For all your great accomplishments, we all doth say "hooray!"
(Okay, that's enough Kool-Aid, Kiddies!!)
Hooray, Mr. President! You're number one!
The first black American to lead this great nation!
(#1. He's not even half Black #2. He's nowhere near being half American!)
Hooray, Mr. President we honor your great plans
To make this country's economy number one again!
(Wonder why it's tanking, then? Taxed into a JOBLESS RECOVERY!!)
Hooray Mr. President, we're really proud of you!
And we stand for all Americans under the great Red, White, and Blue!
(Yeah, for the Americans. So, beat it, Commie!!!)
So continue ---- Mr. President we know you'll do the trick
So here's a hearty hip-hooray ----
(TRICK is the key word here. You've all been tricked)
Song 1: Mm, mmm, mm! Barack
September 24, 2009 - 21:32 ET by JerSong 1:
Mm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
(Okay - Right there I'm hurling and calling the Principal)
Can't say I agree with all of your interjections, but that was funny!
Jer
Interjections
September 25, 2009 - 17:18 ET by Sergeant ROCKOf course you don't Jerry.. you were singing along! lol
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
"Mmm, Mmm, Mmm" *facepalm*
September 25, 2009 - 09:40 ET by Sestren_NK"Mmm, Mmm, Mmm"
*facepalm* "Not indoctrination" my bunghole.
"To make this country strong again"
Wait a minute, the lefties were telling us how horrible and wrong it was to be a "strong" country and thanks to them we no longer are. And now they want to make it a strong country again? Right... "well-liked" and "strong" don't really mix together well in this world.
"To make sure everyone gets a chance"
And if recent liberal intervention means anything, this will be sure to include all kinds of criminals from murderers, rapists, child molesters, considering they always support them.
"The first black American to lead this great nation!"
And people tell me any and all criticism of him has to do with his race. I can make the argument that much of his support has to do with his race.
"To make this country's economy number one again!"
We can thank him for making it worse.
"Why can't we respect our leaders, whether they're Democrat or
September 24, 2009 - 21:16 ET by Poovey"Why can't we respect our leaders, whether they're Democrat or Republican?"
Hey Nora, Did you? A Simple NewsBusters Search will show you being just a little disrespectful.
CBS
September 24, 2009 - 21:28 ET by ProudAmerican33http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/24/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5335819.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody
CBS covered this at least in a blog, believe it or not, but look at the example of negative reaction they used:
"The video was posted at the conservative Drudge Report and reported by Fox, prompting hundreds of comments from readers such as this one: "These thugs need to be shut down! This is absurde [sic] that this is happening today in our schools. People need to rise up and crush this socializing and indoctrination of our kids."
Hundreds of posts, and they use one with a misspelling. Way to paint the opposition as a bunch of idiots.
Yeah, I think Norbamah
September 24, 2009 - 21:42 ET by RR GOPYeah, I think Norbamah should get paid exactly what the average American woman does...couldn't agree more.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
When is the light bulb
September 24, 2009 - 21:50 ET by kangarooWhen is the light bulb going to go off, with these twits, I swear/
When we were kids in oz we sang god save the Queen, but to us she was someone in a faraway land, and England owned us then so what the heck, she was the freaking Queen. still is the freaking Queen!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what is she 80
Obamma is not KING Dick, he is just a Dick, add tator if you want. This is wrong on all kinds of levels!!! He ain't the KING. And if he keeps acting like a wanna be one, off with his head I say ........ save us from the maddness,
Ask Norah
September 24, 2009 - 22:43 ET by pbthinkerI'd love to ask Norah this little question:
So Norah, when Sarah Palin gets elected, in 2012, are we going to start having our kindergartners sing about how great it is to have a woman in the White House? HOw far do we carry this and have it not be recognized for exactly what it is. It seems that no one really has a sense for what is proper and what is not these days. Apparently the liberals have neutered all the adults, in this politically correct age, to the point where there is no right or wrong, if it's done by liberals, and everything Republicans do is wrong. Hell, just look at the Massachusetts legislature!!!!!
Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.
What type of thinks does pbthinker thunk?
September 24, 2009 - 22:57 ET by 007memoWhat type of thinks does pbthinker thunk?
You think there's a chance in H that Palin will ever be President?
ROTFLMAO!
Fear her...
September 25, 2009 - 00:12 ET by Army BratShe's coming.
All libs fear her and with good reason. She is the anti-Obama as Fire is to Ice. Two opposites. One is proud of America and has faith in her people, that would be Sarah Palin. The other, Obama is ashamed of America and has zero faith in Americans to do the right thing. In his eyes her past actions were evil and need to be apologized for. He is doing his best to reduce our standing in the world in all ways including our standing in the world economy.
I know Sarah Palin. She was my Mayor before she was my Governor and soon she will be my President. I find your derisive laughter to be entertaining. I know what's coming and so do you. The defeat of Socialism/Communism...again, at the hands of a woman.
Obama is a liar and Truth is killing his Marxist agenda.
LEECH!
October 17, 2009 - 02:33 ET by R D Helm-Dave
Another Tempest in a teapot
September 24, 2009 - 22:51 ET by 007memoIf O'Donnell is a lefty I'll eat my hat. Here's a couple questions O'Donnell had for a Democratic Congressman on her 10/18/06 show. The questions are simply recycled Rove talking points:
O'DONNELL: We now have Karl Rove indicating that he is confident of a Republican victory in November, and let me show you what he told The Washington Times and what the theme is. They say that "it is useful to remind Democrats of what they said and what they do." We have this in a full screen, quote, "You have 90 percent of House Democrats voting against the terrorist surveillance program. Nearly three-quarters of Senate Democrats and 80 percent of House Democrats voting against the terrorist interrogation. Something is fundamentally flawed," says Karl Rove. Let me ask you about that, congresswoman: This White House makes the point that Democrats are weak when it comes on defense. When he cites those statistics, it helps them make a compelling argument, does it not?
O'DONNELL: Let me put you on record here, because we see Bill Clinton talking about the politics of common good and the need for that to take place. You say the Democrats have a positive agenda. Can you promise, then, that when Democrats, if they re-take the House of Representatives and the Senate, will not issue tens or hundreds of subpoenas to the White House when it comes to Katrina, Iraq, and a number of issues and essentially make the president's final two years in office a living hell, if you will, and mean that nothing gets done in Washington.
Welcome back double zero.
September 24, 2009 - 22:54 ET by Free StinkerWelcome back double zero.
Thank you for your kindness, stinker.
September 24, 2009 - 23:00 ET by 007memoThank you for your kindness, stinker.
You are welcome double
September 24, 2009 - 23:08 ET by Free StinkerYou are welcome double zero.
You are dismissed now.
LEECH!
October 17, 2009 - 02:33 ET by R D Helm-Dave
007... What does your
September 24, 2009 - 23:03 ET by bigtimer007...
What does your post have to do with the blog post and her leftist talking point blathering today?
You have that hat at the ready...or are you already munching on it?
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
I posted O'Donnell's Right WIng Talking Points, Big Timer
September 24, 2009 - 23:33 ET by 007memoI posted O'Donnell's Right Wing Talking Points, Big Timer. If those tp's aren't straight from Rove, where did ND get them from - was she thinking for herself?
So today she says it's Ok to praise the President, any President. And if you read my posting of the right wing taking points she spewed, she seems to be making quite a case calling for Democrats not to attack Bush if they regain power in the Congress.
And equal pay for equal work is not such a lefty radical idea - big deal.
But these positions somehow make her a far left winger to those who want to create a tempest in a teapot. Waaah, Waaah, Waaah!
Typical leftist
September 24, 2009 - 23:41 ET by bigtimerTypical leftist 007...
Divert the subject, look, I'm not playing word games or things from the past the Norah has said, which were talking points then, she is a bimbo to the nth degree.... this is about Indoctination 101 of our children-grandchildren...grasp that and start eating that hat.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Typical paranoid, bt
September 25, 2009 - 00:16 ET by 007memoTypical paranoid, bt.
These kids sang a harmless song about their President and instead it's "indoctrination". Why? Because they included a stupid reference about equal pay for equal work. How radical!!!
Move along folks, there's nuthin to see here.
007
September 25, 2009 - 21:49 ET by MrShy"Move along folks, there's nuthin to see here."
Yeah, "move along folks" is right, only the creepy, liberal version of it that you spew.
(yawn)
September 25, 2009 - 21:50 ET by Free Stinker(yawn)
Look man it's creepy and inappropriate!
September 25, 2009 - 21:55 ET by MightyMouth"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
Do you like your hat with
September 24, 2009 - 23:31 ET by fitzfongDo you like your hat with salt? Those are completely neutered, open-ended questions designed to create the impression that she's taking a hard line, when really she's setting up a straw man for the person she's interviewing to "knock down"...and that's assuming you're providing reliable information and not pulling it out of your ass. Who is this myterious "Democratic Congressman" (she refers to "congresswoman")? Did Ms. O'Donnell follow up or did she let her subject filibuster her way through a diversionary "answer" without challenge? In other words, quit cherry-picking and produce the transcript if you expect to maintain any credibility. And believe me, if you lived in New York like I do and had your St. Patrick's Day ruined by Norah O'Donnell as she gave President Alinsky a verbal tongue bath while hosting the parade on NBC, I doubt you'd deny her obvious left-wing ideology.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best
Next week my 3rd grade class will be singing..
September 25, 2009 - 09:33 ET by realpatriotGeorge Walker Bush! He did his best to protect the rest, but was smeared at every turn, mmmm mmm mmm
George Walker Bush! He rose up strong, when men did wrong, and was hated even more. mmm mm mmm
George Walker Bush! Elected twice disprescepted thrice. mmmm mmm mmm
Geroge Walker Bush! Took us to war, Sadam Hussein is no more. mmm mmm mmm
Sure, Norah O'Donnel would have no problems with this either.
Real
September 25, 2009 - 16:11 ET by DoktorFrankenI like what you've done there - with the truth and all.
Thanks.
Next
September 25, 2009 - 10:27 ET by jessieHNext comes the brown shirts & swastikas. All hail obama. It's freak show time in washington!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Synonymous?
September 25, 2009 - 11:07 ET by nadadhimmiLet's get this straight. Democrats are adamant no mention of Christian God, or Jesus be allowed in schools. (allah seems to be just fine though, huh?). But this song is taken directly from the spiritual song "Jesus loves the little Children". It actually replaces Jesus with Barack Hussein Obama. The left leaves NO DOUBT, they worship as God, Barack Hussein Obama. This a disgusting cult of personality just like that for Hitler, Stalin or Mao.
Indoctrination/Manipulation: Ideological Or Personality Based
September 25, 2009 - 19:12 ET by exgenicaHaving young children sing a song praising (or denouncing) a specific political PERSON by name is ideological and personality indoctrination regardless of what group instigates the activity.
It is also far different from sending any President something trivial (like jellybeans) simply because it was reported he/she likes something like a specific candy. As I recall children were sending JBs to "the President" because he liked jellybeans...NOT to "Ronald Wilson Reagan mmmm mmmm mmmm" because he was "a great man" or had "accomplished great things",etc. He just liked them!
The "jellybeans" weren't a reward or praise from the children...although personally I wish that hadn't happened either as it could all too easily have been twisted and evolved into indoctrination.
General indoctrination into national pride (such as singing a song with symbolic generally patriotic meaning) is appropriate, and indeed may be necessary to help a nation or social structure survive. But ideological or personality-specific indoctrination (such as praising a specific man and intentionally LINKED to the tune of that same symbolic song*) is extraordinarily inappropriate, and may in some cases actually cause or aggravate divisiveness in a given population.
*There are several KNOWN psychological manipulations going on when you successfully associate a person or object to a well-known and well-liked song with specific emotional and historical meaning. It leverages the increase in BRAND recognition (e.g. the Obama Brand), can artificially rehabilitate damaged images, can create artificial group gestalts, etc. It'subliminal, manipulative, and in some cases can be just plain smarmy.
Well stated, exgenica...looking forward to your denunciation
September 25, 2009 - 20:14 ET by JerHaving young children sing a song praising (or denouncing) a specific political PERSON by name is ideological and personality indoctrination regardless of what group instigates the activity.
Well stated, exgenica...I'll eagerly await your forthcoming denunciation of the following musical tribute to George W. Bush touchingly sung by about one hundred youngsters during Easter at the White House a few years ago.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/04/17/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/
Jer
Nice try, Jerry... lol
September 25, 2009 - 20:22 ET by Sergeant ROCK...with a song praising the beleaguered Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Hardly the Messiah worship nonsense that your buddy received. Give me a break.. lol. You and your weak moral equivalency nonsense..
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Oh, I agree, Sarge... The
September 25, 2009 - 20:38 ET by JerOh, I agree, Sarge...
The Obama song was indeed more egregious. But, based on exgenica's analysis, the Bush ceremony would still be objectionable. Or do you disagree with his/her assessment?
Jer
Jer
September 25, 2009 - 20:43 ET by MrShyYou're unbelievable. Really. More and more people around here are sniffing you out, and that's a good thing.
You insult our intelligence when you attempt to equate two totally unequal things. That video of kids rehearsing some grotesque, Obama-worship (read the friggin' lyrics on YT, why don't you) song -- and not the first we've seen of these sickening videos with kids and some ode-to-Obama musical -- has zilch relation to some ditty kids did post-Katrina as purely a way of lifting spirits.
Sarge is absolutely spot on. So much of what you seem to do is post stuff purely for the sake of stupid moral (or what have you) equivalency. Certainly with this one, I have no other way to deduce it.
Shy... Remove your head
September 25, 2009 - 20:46 ET by JerShy...
Remove your head from your anus, and read my response to Sarge. And I've already read the Obama lyrics three times and listened to them twice.
Your trollish sniping at me is getting really tedious. Give it a rest, please.
Jer
Jer
September 25, 2009 - 21:00 ET by MrShyThis is BS, what you dug up. When you do it, I and anyone would do NB a great disservice if we DON'T call you out on it.
Live with the consequences when you can't help but post nonsense like this. I'm not going anywhere, sorry.
MrShy...
September 25, 2009 - 21:09 ET by JerThen I will continue to call you out on your incessant trolling, sniping, flaming me behind my back, pestering others with "see, look what Jer is doing, see what I mean", and repeatedly warning me that "other NBers are catching on to me".
It's adolescent and inappropriate. But, carry on if it makes you happy.
Jer
Jer
September 25, 2009 - 21:17 ET by MrShyOkay, fair enough, but you're doing your usual thing of derailing and spiraling out into "me me me, us us us" and veering things off-topic. So, to get back on -- and to ADD to my argument -- since you used exgenica's words to base your argument:
Having young children sing a song praising (or denouncing) a specific political PERSON by name is ideological and personality indoctrination regardless of what group instigates the activity.
Guess what, Jer? A group didn't trigger the 2006 song. An EVENT did. Additionally, a very rare and tragic event. Another vital difference -- really, THE difference -- between the two.
Candance, certainly technically, can not be argued, but that's not the issue here with regards to your "argument" (that just reeks of "oh, look what I found!") based on exgenica's logic.
Shy...
September 25, 2009 - 21:32 ET by JerYou think a hundred kids decided on their own to write a song of praise to Bush, FEMA, and Congress, maybe sell lemonade so they could charter a bus to Washington and hunt Easter eggs at the White House--all without the intervention of, or arrangements made by, the schools and parents and the Bush administration?
I know even you don't believe that. And, by the way, the Obama songfest was also generated by an event--Black History Month. Now, don't say I'm arguing the circumstances were equivalent. I'm not.
Jer
Jer
September 25, 2009 - 21:44 ET by MrShyWell, read back to yourself your first post here. You certainly did everything you could to make them seem equivalent... Nevermind, I'm embedding it below:
I'll eagerly await your forthcoming denunciation of the following musical tribute to George W. Bush touchingly sung by about one hundred youngsters during Easter at the White House a few years ago.
Now you're backpeddling. Again, I see this as one big flaming opportunity.
The two circumstances (yes, IMHO -- humble as well as honest) are so far apart, I think you just wanted to score points that you found this little nugget.
EDIT: It was also in *no way* a tribute to Bush. It was a tribute to Katrina, and a song done for the Easter event, with his name mentioned once. And then you claim you've looked at both lyrics many times. Yeah, I call you certain things for a reason.
Shy, your arguments are
September 25, 2009 - 22:27 ET by JerShy, your arguments are so transparently ad hoc and inconsistent it's almost painful to read them. I've stated, what? ...three times now that I don't view the circumstances of the two cases symmetirical--and I have never said otherwise. Even if I had noted the dissimilarity in my initial post, you would still have bludgeoned me with your frequently-wielded "but Republicans do it too" club.
Do I challenge assertions and positions here? You're damn right. I'm a Democrat at a conservative website. Here's a news flash: I sometimes have views that don't comport with the conventional wisdom at NewBusters. You have bragged more than once in recent weeks how you and NB welcome opposing opinions, and encourage them. Unfortunately, your actions suggest otherwise.
Jer
Uh, Jer...
September 25, 2009 - 22:52 ET by MrShyMr. Dishonest, now feigning outrage, again, at me standing up to his dishonesty.....
"Even if I had noted the dissimilarity in my initial post..."
Now out of complete frustration you are hurling hypotheticals and assumptions. Guess what? BUT. YOU. DIDN'T. (... didn't note the dissimilarities in your initial post.... and...... so...... I initially responded in kind to what you....... initially...... posted.) And now I'm dragged down to child-level ranting with Jer. (Again.)
You're getting all riled up now, yet again, because I call you out on your b.s.. Live with it.
Or heck, in all likelihood, don't, and whine some more.
Oh Gawd....
September 25, 2009 - 22:52 ET by shawn228...you guys are worse than Roger and Sarcasmo.
"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy
Wow Shawn
September 25, 2009 - 22:55 ET by Free StinkerWow !
I remember some of those knock-down drag-outs . . .
shawn
September 25, 2009 - 22:57 ET by MrShyThanks for butting in and not letting me fix the italics mistake. Italics, everyone, should be turned off after the last "initially" to the end.
:)
And yeah, this guy annoys the heck out of me. I think I courageously (and why, I still don't even get) stand up to him, only because he's made friends around here.
He interjects a lot of hot air nonsense and needs to be treated as we treat all others here at this CONSERVATIVE blog.
Thank you,
- Vespa Shy
Is there anything I can say
September 25, 2009 - 22:58 ET by Free StinkerIs there anything I can say that will change the subject ??
Dadgummit Shy!
September 26, 2009 - 09:23 ET by RukusWhat did you do??? Everything, and I mean everything from that post on is in italics! I thought everyone was just goofin' off but I swear, the entirety of the rest of the thread is in italics. You know magic don't you?? Admit it. This is weird. Maybe I should just log off... : )
Gary
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -- Tom Paine
MrS... I didn't used to
September 25, 2009 - 22:57 ET by bigtimerMrS...
I didn't used to call him 'Last Word Jer' long ago for nothing.
You get my drift...he will twist and spin everything possible faster than a top can possibly spin out... it's just not worth it at times.
He will always have the 'Poor Put-Upon-Me' Jer attitude.
Truly useless unless you are bored and just want to play around.
Good-Luck, enjoy yourself...it can be amusing at times.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
BT!
September 25, 2009 - 23:02 ET by MrShyHe's one big, dishonest, pain in the ***. If he wants to continue to be a left-of-center guest at NB, it's not going to be a walk in the park.
And yet, if you reversed it, would ANY of us make a single friend at DKos or HuffPo? Not to mention, how many WOULDN'T call me/us names constantly until we just gave up and left? Not a whole lot. All I do is call him out. Good for me (right?) :)
And yes, part of this is boredom, I won't lie... I'm taking breaks from working on my new video, which I need to do at times. :p
Hey MrS... Do not think
September 25, 2009 - 23:09 ET by bigtimerHey MrS...
Do not think for one second I was being critical, been there done that more than once with Jer...carry on.
As far as your newest video...I'm sure looking forward to it, love your work as you well know...don't forget to let me know.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Shhhhhhhhhhhh!
September 26, 2009 - 02:47 ET by JerShhhhhhhhhhhh! l'iltimer...MasterShy....
You two hush up right now. It's quiet time. Lay your heads down on your desks like all of the other kiddies, or there will be no pop sickles for either of you after play period.
sorry folks, but I'm with Jer here
September 25, 2009 - 20:48 ET by candanceChildren should not be involved in politics. Period. It's one thing to have a choir sing Christmas carols at the White House, but those lyrics were political.
I had never seen that before today. It was inappropriate.
Thank you, candance... I
September 25, 2009 - 20:55 ET by JerThank you, candance...
I repeat. The Obama event and lyrics were definitely more objectionable, but if we accept exgenica's articulately expressed premise--and it certainly is a sustatinable one--then the ode to Bush, FEMA, and Congress should likewise be criticized.
Jer
candcance & jer
September 25, 2009 - 20:57 ET by MrShySorry, but the Bush thing is so astronomically on the other side of the scale of this sort of thing (songs with any politician- or politically-connected lyrics) that I have to point this out.
I understand your principle in the matter, Cx2, but Jer digs up one truly isolated instance -- one that was timely and connected to an event (Katrina) and sung by kids FROM that stricken area, singing basically what amounts to a short, pride-of-country hymne after a devastating natural disaster -- and tells us to now go and admonish Bush/Repubs for this.
Two entirely different things, IMO.
well Shy
September 25, 2009 - 21:09 ET by candanceDon't take this the wrong way, but I think you're letting annoyance get in the way of logic here. I don't care what the situation, you can't send kids to the White House singing about how Bush is helping them recover.
Cx2
September 25, 2009 - 21:20 ET by MrShySorry for the misspelling of your name above, btw. :p (oh well, too late now... it's on record.... yikes!)
Yes, a bit of it is that, I will admit. But really, the more I look at this -- these two songs/instances -- and Jer, and (and this is key) his specifically referencing of exgenica's rules/logic, and just knowing him, I really stand by my words and feelings on this.
Shy
September 25, 2009 - 21:26 ET by Free StinkerShy,
You always need to remember the question is always what is right, not who is right. ;-)
And speaking of what is right, that would be watching more excellent Mr.Shy Videos! :-)
Free
September 25, 2009 - 21:31 ET by MrShyThanks for the shout-out link!! :)
Yes, absolutely, but then let's get back to what I'm arguing here. I'm arguing Jer coming on here and pointing to exgenica's rules, which then gives him the opening to say "hey, look, HERE, what I found on the previous administration!"
It's just, arg.
When does your new video
September 25, 2009 - 21:33 ET by Free StinkerWhen does your new video premiere ? :-)
"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows." --Boris Epshteyn
Free
September 25, 2009 - 21:47 ET by MrShyWorking on it as we type. :) But needed a break and, lo-behold, found another Jer doozy to zap. :p
Hoping to have it done by late October... another month or so. Filming one of the lead parts tomorrow, and again Monday. It's really gonna be cool... I think..... :) Will certainly send out the invites when I throw the premiere!
Your loyal fans will be
September 25, 2009 - 21:49 ET by Free StinkerYour loyal fans will be there ! :-)
"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows." --Boris Epshteyn
Online invites I hope buddy!
September 25, 2009 - 21:52 ET by MightyMouthSend one to MM!
"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
MM
September 25, 2009 - 23:07 ET by MrShyYou bet'cha! :)
PM you here? Where are you, btw?
I'm stomping my
September 25, 2009 - 23:16 ET by bigtimerI'm stomping my foot...whadda 'bout me?
Oops...I forgot, I'm too far away.
Really wished I could be there....I mean that...I would have a blast.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
BT
September 26, 2009 - 00:39 ET by MrShyAre you SURE you wish you could be HERE? NYC? The bastion and leading light of loony leftists? :p
In Texas dude, but I need a vacation!
September 26, 2009 - 09:38 ET by MightyMouth"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
Kids should not be singing about any sitting President.
September 25, 2009 - 21:07 ET by Free StinkerYes, that looks bad.
Kids should not be singing about any sitting President.
Former presidents as a historical reference, that's Okay.
"In eighteen-fourteen I took a little trip . . . "
"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows." --Boris Epshteyn
thanks Free
September 25, 2009 - 21:10 ET by candance:)
Ditto, Free...
September 25, 2009 - 21:13 ET by JerDitto, Free...
Jer
I agree completely. No
September 25, 2009 - 21:42 ET by celatorI agree completely.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
I'm wondering if this was a
September 25, 2009 - 21:20 ET by Radical1979I'm wondering if this was a private group or a group from a school. I find it creepy either way, but if it was done using any public funds (which come from schools etc) it is most definately WRONG. However, I'm not sure why it was necessary to mention the Park Service wiped off the chair for Mrs. Bush. Would they have preferred she had a big wet spot on her dress?
Rad79
September 25, 2009 - 21:28 ET by MrShyGreat point and question, regarding a private group or a school...
But this was all tied into a natural disaster/event of that time, for that Easter gathering. Yes, Bush and FEMA are mentioned which they should not be, but I even see that NOT as creepy, but as the songwriter meaning well in injecting Bush's name out of a good gesture, being as this was on the White House lawn. And also, again, a song reflecting an historic event of that time, hence the intended mention of FEMA.
Totally doesn't creep me out, too, and I insist this is not my Bush love talking here.
Shy, and of course we
September 25, 2009 - 21:35 ET by Radical1979Shy, and of course we weren't dealing with newscasters getting tingles over Bush or crying over his election...Making the breif nod to Bush much less offensive than the continual mush we have to deal with over Obama.
Makes me feel embarrased for my crush on Bobby Sherman. Could I have been as obnoxious as the Obamites? Euw.
MrShy...
September 25, 2009 - 21:48 ET by JerYou know good and well that if a tape showed up of a hundred kids from Georgia singing the praises of Obama and FEMA in the aftermath of the recent tragic flooding of several counties near Atlanta, the collective outrage at NB would be deafening.
And you would be composing a new Shy video registering your disgust.
Jer
Jer
September 25, 2009 - 21:57 ET by MrShySo if it were:
Our country’s stood beside us
People have sent us aid.
Katrina could not stop us, our hopes will never fade.
Congress, Obama and FEMA
People across our land
Together have come to rebuild us and we join them hand-in-hand!
"...the collective outrage at NB would be deafening." ?? No, I don't think our collective outrage would be deafening.
It goes on to mention Congress, FEMA, and "people across our land"... coming together to rebuild after a natural disaster.
Once, AGAIN again, two totally different songs and circumstances surrounding them, but you came on here equating them in tone in your first post. Principles aside, which I don't argue (with the others), it's what I'm calling you out on.
Anything else?
Jer, I have to go with
September 25, 2009 - 22:17 ET by Scuba DudeJer,
I have to go with Shy on this. The song the kids were singing at the WH after Katrina cannot be compared to what happened in NJ. LOTUS was not even President for 6 weeks and you have little children singing his praises? Pardon my acronym, but WTF did he do to deserve this? Oh wait, he passed the Porkulus Bill that those same kids will be paying off when they grow up!!!! I am sure when they are adults and watching this video they'll be thinking "How dare my teacher use me like that"!!!!!!
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
Denunciation
September 25, 2009 - 22:08 ET by exgenicaNo problem. I'll repeat. When a song of praise (esp. in a political environment) indeed mentions people by name or refers to the person as an individual instead of what is considered a non-partisan office, it is ideological and/or personality indoctrination.
The "out of the mouths of babes" article lyrics you point to however, did (to a small degree) blunt the direct Bush association effect a bit by including others in the praise and by not using blatant name repetition...it wasn't ALL about Bush. But it was still indoctrination. (I also happen to believe that the greatest help came to them from people across the nation, not the federal government or any individuals in the federal government, and that in fact the feds stood in the way of a lot of help being offered by other states, individuals, and private organizations.)
As I also said, once you start doing things like that, it's too easy to keep doing it and it can easily evolve into unadulterated indoctrination to a personality.
exgenica
September 25, 2009 - 22:33 ET by JerThank you...
Now perhaps some of those lecturing me will redirect their objections to you. ;-) You appear to be more than capable of defending your position.
Jer
blech and more blech
September 26, 2009 - 00:00 ET by katainkenta visit to the white house to sing to the president about the president? That's almost as exploitive- not to mention a**-kiss'ish on the part of the teacher or whomever constructed the lyrics - and I would have never consented.
the only thing it lacks is the singular worshipfulness that it did for the "one". that made me hrack. please pardon my typos and lack of caps my left arm is in a sling this evening.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
Additional Comment re: Obama Song Lyrics
September 25, 2009 - 23:09 ET by exgenicaAdditional comment to my earlier post on the Obama song indoctrination.
One element that also concerned me was not just the repeated use of Obama's name, but the repeated combination, "Barack Hussein Obama" directly adjacent to "mmm, mmm, mmm" in the lyrics.
Associating the person's name directly with that triple "mmm" combination can create strong fundamental emotions. That can increase the "strength" of the memory and feelings experienced during the performance.
Think about all the things that happen when you or someone near you, perhaps at dinner-time, says
"mmm, mmm, mmm...this sure is good",
or the famous (and I might mention very successful ad campaign for a soup)
"Someone's chicken soup...is Mmm, mmm, good!".
Such lyrics can bring up visceral feelings of hunger being sated and a core human need being filled. I don't know if it was intentional in the Obama song, but as simple as they are those words in that order and combination, are potentially very powerful.
You might be amazed how much time and effort marketing and image/publicity teams spend on every single word, intonation, and phrase when developing a pitch for their "product". But, the payoff can be great.
Right idea, wrong person....
September 25, 2009 - 17:14 ET by Jersey DaveSo, the song they taught the kids says:
"Barack Hussein Obama! He said, red yellow, black or white, all are equal in his sight! Barack Hussein Obama!"
That song's for God. Taking it for a campaign slogan, that's pretty rare. Comparisons to the Almighty are getting into heady territory, but outright stealing of lyrics of praise?
I wonder if they'd let the kids sing about God like that in School?
Does Norah O'Donnell ever listen to herself?
September 25, 2009 - 20:14 ET by Teri10" I remember certainly in elementary school when Ronald Reagan was President and we sent him jelly beans." Does she truly believe that sending Reagan jelly beans is the equivalent of teaching children songs in praise of Obama? It's a ridiculous and pathetic attempt to make a comparison where none exists.
Obama became President in January and the video was shot in February. So, he was in office for just over a month (at the most) when these children were singing adoring songs about him.
What would happen if the
September 25, 2009 - 20:50 ET by Dan DiegoWhat would happen if the kids learned this:
'You shall have no other gods before Me.'
George Washington worked
September 25, 2009 - 21:15 ET by Radical1979George Washington worked very hard to prevent the presidency from becoming a personal office. He refused many offers and honors in order to keep the office free from the type of cult of personality obama's supporters are trying so hard to institute into the office. How sad.
Radical ...At one point
September 25, 2009 - 21:27 ET by celatorRadical ...At one point there was a movement by some to give Washington the title of King. He refused, of course, and used to opportunity to explain, once again, how offensive this would be to the type of government being created for the American people.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
cel, although Washington's
September 25, 2009 - 21:31 ET by Radical1979cel, although Washington's military skills are debated by historians, I think he gets short shrift in his contribution to the presidency and the example he set. Can you imagine if someone like Obama had been the firswwt president?
Rad...Yikes! There would be
September 25, 2009 - 21:36 ET by celatorRad...Yikes! There would be gulags in every state.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Cel and a picture of a
September 25, 2009 - 21:42 ET by Radical1979Cel and a picture of a smiling Obama in every home, sort of like in North Korea!
Rad....oh noooo! No
September 25, 2009 - 21:43 ET by celatorRad....oh noooo!
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Why do almost all the posts
September 25, 2009 - 23:16 ET by Scuba DudeWhy do almost all the posts appear italicized?
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
SD... You got
September 25, 2009 - 23:19 ET by bigtimerSD...
You got me.
Weird.
Is it a full moon?
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
It's Shy's fault
September 26, 2009 - 09:36 ET by RukusHe started it further up the thread. He has magic italic powder he threw on the thread. Kinda scary. : )
Gary
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -- Tom Paine
Open <i> in one of the
September 25, 2009 - 23:20 ET by Free StinkerOpen <i> in one of the messgaes.
old old Newsbusters bug. Of course, it's been very very rare these days . . .
"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows." --Boris Epshteyn
FS... After I sent the
September 25, 2009 - 23:23 ET by bigtimerFS...
After I sent the post above, I was going to mention the same thing you did, this has happened before, more that once or twice, but it's been a long time now...anyway, as far as I know.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Dangit Free!
September 26, 2009 - 09:40 ET by RukusI had a perfectly good Shy/magic italic powder conspiracy going and you go and ruin it! I thought you were my friend. : ( Oh well, it was fun while it lasted. : )
Gary
If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -- Tom Paine
another children's song video
September 26, 2009 - 00:27 ET by candanceGateway Pundit found video of more children singing about Obama in the classroom.
How many more times does this have to happen before lefties stop telling us it's an isolated case?
Cx2
September 26, 2009 - 00:35 ET by MrShyAnd that was, well, a small component of my argument with Jer. The BIGGER one was that the actual isolated Bush one was really a song meant for an occasion, and it unfortunately named some names relating to politicians/politics of the time. Bush was named ONCE, with "Congress" before his name, even.
It's so not intended to be any propagandized thing, IMO, that I'll almost argue that you're wrong about it being, technically, something to be equally frowned on. But I won't. You are my friend. You are co-writing my screenplay.
:)
it's good to have friends
September 26, 2009 - 00:41 ET by candanceFriends on NB can offer a certain amount of protection, if you get my drift. :p
candance
September 26, 2009 - 00:46 ET by MrShyYes. :) Still up?? About to upload a new build to YouTube.