ABC’s Jonathan Karl on Friday attacked wasteful government spending of stimulus money, even going to the John Murtha Airport in Western Pennsylvania, which he derided as a "ghost town." Providing some refreshing journalistic skepticism about the Obama legislation, Karl described the airport as a "monument to powerful Democratic Congressman John Murtha."
The House member’s portrait could be seen in the background as Karl reported for Good Morning America on the $17 million that the tiny airport has received. (Politico puts the total number at $150 million.) The reporter conducted a tour of the empty, quiet building: "When we visited Murtha Airport earlier this year, the place looked like a ghost town. We have rented a car. But the Hertz counter is as deserted as the rest of the airport." (Karl also traveled to other small town airports that recieved money.)
Although the ABC congressional correspondent did point out the fact that Murtha is a Democrat, it would have been nice if he more specifically mentioned that the airport's three flights a day all go only to Washington.
Still, Karl did contribute this blunt analysis as he concluded his report:
JONATHAN KARL: Just yesterday, the Senate had a chance to strip money from the Murtha Airport. It was an amendment offered by Republican Jim DeMint that would have ended the $1.4 million in annual subsidies that that airport gets for its flights to Washington, D.C. But the amendment, Diane and Robin, was rejected by a vote of 43 to 53. So, thanks to your tax dollars, the Murtha Airport lives on.
ABC should be given kudos for highlighting stimulus waste. And this isn’t the first time Karl has done such a report. On July 10, 2009, he pointed out how much money the government was spending to create road signs informing Americans of spending-related projects. Hopefully, Karl and ABC will continue these segments.
A transcript of the September 18 segment, which aired at 7:15am EDT, follows:
ROBIN ROBERTS: Now, a look at where the $787 billion in government stimulus money is going. We've been trying to keep track of it for you. And you're not going to like this. Some itty-bitty airports are getting federal dollars by the planeload. Our senior congressional correspondent Jonathan Karl has more on that.
ABC GRAPHIC: Follow the Stimulus Money: Should We Fund a Resort’s Airport?
JONATHAN KARL: Welcome to the Greenbrier Valley Airport, gateway to the posh Greenbrier Valley resort. A place where the rooms start at 500 bucks a night. The airport is about to get more than $2 million of stimulus funds to spruce up the terminal building. There are only two commercial flights a day, like this one, at the Greenbrier Airport. And on average, those planes only have three to nine passengers. And on this flight, the airport workers load a single piece of luggage. There are two pilots and two passengers. Your tax dollars keep this airport in business. In addition to the stimulus money, the federal government subsidizes commercial flights here to the tune of about $562 per passenger. Locals say the money is well spent.
LYNN SWANN (Director of Public The most important thing we can have is an easier way for guests to get to the Greenbrier. That doesn't benefit just the Greenbrier. It benefits the entire region.
KARL: In Alaska, millions of tax dollars are going to airports that make the Greenbrier look like O’Hare. ABC News visited Ouzinkie Airport, which just hit the stimulus jackpot with $15 million. That's $100,000 for each of the town's 150 residents. Even though there's another airport just 30 minutes away.
WILLIAM DELGADO (resident): That’s an awful lot of money for just a little village. I don’t know how it happened, but it happened.
KARL: It happened after the state applied to the FAA for its piece of the stimulus pie. Several other tiny Alaska airports got money as well.
CHRISTINE KLEIN (Dep. Commissioner of Aviation, Alaska DOT & PF): Our rural citizens have the same needs as our urban citizens. And we are not the- in a position to judge which are more important.
KARL: But critics call them airports to nowhere. The most famous is the John Murtha Airport in western Pennsylvania, a monument to powerful Democratic Congressman John Murtha. It has received more that $17 million in federal money over several years. When we visited Murtha Airport earlier this year, the place looked like a ghost town. We have rented a car. But the Hertz counter is as deserted as the rest of the airport. So, we placed a call. And we are told that a Hertz representative will be coming from downtown Johnstown to give us the key for our vehicle, which we believe is parked out in the parking lot. We eventually got our car. And Murtha Airport picked up another $800,000 in stimulus money. Just yesterday, the Senate had a chance to strip money from the Murtha Airport. It was an amendment offered by Republican Jim DeMint that would have ended the $1.4 million in annual subsidies that that airport gets for its flights to Washington, D.C. But the amendment, Diane and Robin, was rejected by a vote of 43 to 53. So, thanks to your tax dollars, the Murtha Airport lives on.
DIANE SAWYER: You had a lonely trip out there, Jon. All those airports. It really is eye-opening. Thank you so much.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





JONATHAN KARL: Welcome to the Greenbrier Valley Airport, gateway to the posh Greenbrier Valley resort. A place where the rooms start at 500 bucks a night. The airport is about to get more than $2 million of stimulus funds to spruce up the terminal building. There are only two commercial flights a day, like this one, at the Greenbrier Airport. And on average, those planes only have three to nine passengers. And on this flight, the airport workers load a single piece of luggage. There are two pilots and two passengers. Your tax dollars keep this airport in business. In addition to the stimulus money, the federal government subsidizes commercial flights here to the tune of about $562 per passenger. Locals say the money is well spent.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Just more reasons
September 18, 2009 - 10:53 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonFor ACCOUNTABILITY for congress criminals.
Every dime murtha has should be confiscated and RETURNED TO THE TAXPAYERS IT WAS STOLEN FROM.
http://gjresult.com
Murtha? Hmmm - where have I heard THAT name?
September 18, 2009 - 17:51 ET by goldenthroatKARL: "But critics call them airports to nowhere. The most famous is the John Murtha Airport in western Pennsylvania, a monument to powerful Democratic Congressman John Murtha."
Gee, could this be the same congressman John Murtha - ex-marine John Murtha - who criticizes and launches into unfounded accusations against our military? The same John Murtha who has become a political liability to his constituents in western PA? The free-spending John Murtha who doesn't give a rip about wasted taxpayer monies?
Nah - surely you jest!
"Inferior people should not be employed." - Firesign Theatre
DeMint on MIA
September 18, 2009 - 11:15 ET by slickwillie2001On the failed attempt to block funding for Murtha International, with disgust Jim DeMint tweeted: "if we can't stop this, we can't stop anything."
If this was all the waste Jonathan Karl could find...
September 18, 2009 - 11:21 ET by R D Helm..in that hideous payoff to dem constituencies, he didn't look very hard.
-Dave
I agree with Rush. It's time for Obama to resign.
Yeah...seems there is a
September 18, 2009 - 17:59 ET by bigtimerYeah...seems there is a huge investigation that has been going on and on and on....
Media remain mum.
'Go Green...Recycle Congress'
Murtha airport
September 18, 2009 - 11:34 ET by Pha PhaFunny, I watched FOX report this in May.
better late than never I guess.
They had to verify the name /sarc on
September 19, 2009 - 18:14 ET by legacyrepublicanYou ought to cut them some slack. After all, they had to research the name. Murtha is such a common name that they could have easily accused the wrong congressman of funding the airport.
Five months longer than Fox just shows the care that ABC takes.
Just look at the confusion over Joe Wilson and you will know what I mean.
Fox was clearly too rash in getting this story out before they vetted the name. /sarc off
DIANE SAWYER: You had a
September 18, 2009 - 11:56 ET by BKeyserAs the soon-to-be Gibson replacement closes her eyes and goes back to sleep. And that wisp sound you heard was this report going in Diane's right ear, and out the left.
It is your contention that
September 18, 2009 - 11:59 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonSome things can escape a black hole?
(sarc off)
Does she have a 'right' ear? I thought they were both left ears....?
http://gjresult.com
Willis~~
September 18, 2009 - 12:02 ET by BKeyserActually, I'm not sure about the "right" ear, but I figured it would certainly be dismissed by the "left" !
I figured a 'right' ear
September 18, 2009 - 12:31 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonMAY allow an intelligent thought to intrude.
That hasn't happened yet, so she must have two left ears for all the 'schultz' that filled her head.
http://gjresult.com
Airports need to be funded
September 18, 2009 - 12:39 ET by niner-four-whiskeyI'm a conservative, registered Republican, a pilot and I own and operate 2 aircraft.
These stories are as absolutely slanted and incorrect as everything else on the drive-by media.
There are over 14,000 airports in the USA, only a few hundred of which handle any scheduled airline service.
While most of the public only knows of the 30 major hubs and couple of hundred medium sized city airports, the rest of the airport system provides the infra-structure that makes it possible for:
1. Firefighting
2. Air ambulance
3. Emergency services
4. Overnight freight and mail services
5. Timely medical lab tests for people who live in small and medium cities.
6. Parts delivery to keep things like pipelines and power lines running.
7. Delivery of manufacturing components to and from factories all over the place to keep JIT (just in time) factories running.
8. Business flights of all descriptions to outlying areas.
9. Medical and mercy flights (I fly volunteer missions for Angel Flight West).
10. Personal flying and travel.
11. Flight training, because 60% of the airline pilots today, did NOT learn to fly in the military!
I can't speak to the budget of Murtha airport in particular, I just don't know the actuals of that one.
However, if we start shutting down the little "ghost town" airports that don't get commercial service, that's like chopping down power and phone lines to small cities, or ripping up Interstates because they aren't seeing bumper-to-bumper traffic for 4 hours a day.
If we shutdown all the little airports, it will no longer be possible to fly anything smaller than a 737 from one end of the country to the other. That's just stupid.
If that happens, forget about getting your FedEx, UPS or USPS overnight and 2-day packages, unless it happens to ship from and is delivered to, a major metropolitan area.
Speaking of major metro areas - some people don't understand why there are "little airports" when there are big ones nearby. The reason is that by shunting some of the light traffic away from the big city airports, the little airports serve as relievers for the big ones. That means your cancelled checks, the parts for your production machinery, the blood test that your doctor's office took this afternoon, are probably going in and out of the reliever, NOT the "big" airport.
Aviation in general, pays its own way. There are taxes on aviation fuel and there are passenger taxes on commercial (part 121) flights that you pay on your ticket. These pay for air traffic control and radar services, airport and runway improvement
There is a move afoot by the airlines to shift their cost burdens to everyone else by pushing "user fees". In other words, they want to pay by the plane load, rather than tag the passengers a few bucks a seat. While this makes some sense, the problem is that 90% of the ATC structure and FAA budget is specifically there to support the airlines.
For instance, when I fly my plane, most of the time, I don't file or need to file a flight plan, or even talk to anyone on the radio, at all.
Contrast that with a scheduled airline flight, where every flight is filed, and under IFR control with ATC from wheel's up until it pulls up to the gate.
More details on Airport the media misses...
September 18, 2009 - 12:54 ET by IckUnfortunately this is a REALLY misleading report. There certainly is “waste” in this example…. but note that the whole report is completely devoid of ANY factual information that even remotely justifies the expenses. Strange that the report is 100% attack…. with no real reporting otherwise. Sigh. One might think that there is no reason whatsoever for the airport or spending. Alas, our media again fails to give us the whole story. Are you surprised that you get half the story hyped up to anger and keep you watching their news? I am not.
Here were my comments to another person on this same topic from about three months ago. Since this is located near where I live I know a bit more about the situation. Please forward as you see fit.
My conversation from 24 June 2009.......... Clearly there is a lot of excess spending here, however, everything is not completely disclosed in these reports. I have yet to see a complete report from a news organization on this airport issue. I would love to see one. 1. There is a helo base right adjacent to this airport. I can't speak to exactly how that ties in, but I do know that this airport is part of the national defense network. 2. There is a rather large concentration of government military contractors about 1 mile from this airport. Nobody outside the facilities knows exactly what goes on in those buildings... there are some press releases of what they do…. but one of the contractors is Lockheed Martin. The airport is tied into this "arrangement". Not that we see strange experimental aircraft or something, but obviously there are some conditions that were laid out for these defense contractors that happened behind the scenes. I don't think that those defense contractors would be located here if the airport didn't have a "qualified" runway. Surely there is excessive spending here, but everything is not quite what it seems either... and a lot of it is not supposed to be talked about. I know some of the people that work there, and they won't tell you what brand of paper they use in the copier everything is so hush-hush. Top clearance is required to even enter the buildings.
My conversation from 25 June 2009
TWO articles appeared in our local paper TODAY about exactly what goes on in these buildings adjacent to the airport. How about that for timing? The day after we talk about it and our local paper discusses the other side of this issue that the media ignores.
Looks like two things they are working on include a remote cannon AND the new Presidential helo. Do you remember the presidential helo discussion from the past election debates? Sounds like the presidential helo is going to be de-funded but that is another topic for another time.
Thanks!
September 18, 2009 - 13:12 ET by Kekela WardGreat post on small airports. They do serve a great function. It's entertaining to listen to ATC radio communications where I live, as our major airport (HNL) serves commercial, military and general aviation all at once. Yesterday, I heard the tower talking to a Cessna who was taxiing out to a runway to take off. The tower managed to mention the different types of aviation using the airport at the same time with this broadcast..
"Honolulu tower to Cessna ___, follow the flight of 4 F-15s, caution jet blast, hold short of runway 8 left, heavy 767 on 4 mile final".
Having general and commercial aviation using the same airport has the possibility of disaster occuring, but we have been lucky so far.
Oh, and thanks so much for flying missions with Angel Flight West. A great organization. Our wing doesn't fly many missions here, but every now and then....
Sam: "I hurt somebody's feelings once"
All that is well and good.
September 18, 2009 - 14:01 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonThis story is not about funding for small airports.
It IS ABOUT the over funding for a little used airport in a corrupt politicians district solely to purchase votes to keep him in office.
I too fly in and out of small, local airports, and seldom are the amenities at this airport found in 99% of the other small fields across the nation.
Now, WHY were you trying to deflect from the intent of the report and redirect the readers attention away from murthas corrupt vote buying wth OUR TAXES?
http://gjresult.com
The airport sees, according
September 18, 2009 - 16:53 ET by niner-four-whiskeyThe airport sees, according to the FAA statistics for 2008, 153 operations per day. The airport itself says they handle in excess of 40,000 operations per year. (153/day = 55,000 a year).
The video, is a typical appeal-to-emotion, fact-free, hit-piece that passes for journalism from today's drive by media. This is the same kind of fake press that got Obama elected.
You guys are actively participating in it by not thinking critically.
In just a smidge over 2 minutes, you guys are CONVINCED that this entire airport exists only for 3 commercial flights a day.
Wow, how wrong can you be?
Why not do the simplest of research on your own. Or do you demand that your brain be entirely spoon-fed crap from the TeeVee?
Geez, why not, say, figure out who owns and operates the airport and see what they say?
http://www.flyjohnstownairport.com/about/index.htm
Some highlights:
Quote: A recent study by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Aviation calculated the annual economic benefits stemming from the airport result in over 1200 jobs, an annual payroll of $23 million and an annual economic output over $217 million.
The opportunity for growth remains high with the availability of land and infrastructure to support business and industry development throughout the airport proper.
he airport extended and concrete reinforced its main runway to accommodate heavy civilian and military aircraft,
built a new commercial aviation complex, was the catalyst for major upgrades to sewage and water service, and became the home to nine National Guard and Reserve Units, which include a new air traffic control tower and radar systems that service commercial and military aircraft
A National Guard Joint Use Aviation Center was constructed for the US Army Reserve and National Guard, this is a 113,000 square foot hangar and houses 24-30 helicopters and fixed wing aircraft. The facility is used for pilot training and helicopter maintenance.
The development has attracted several National Guard and Reserve Unites to relocate to the airport. In 1997, the 258th Air Traffic Control Squadron from State College relocated to the Johnstown Airport. The Pennsylvania Air National Guard (PANG) provides air traffic control services and trains military personnel who work as air traffic controllers.
During 2001, the United States Marine Corps constructed a $14 million helicopter hangar and Reserve Training Center. Several other military projects such as an Army Maintenance Support Center and a Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs Maintenance Support Center are either under construction or planned for construction over the next two years.
Since 1990, the airport has undergone $160 million in improvements that include the Airport Improvement Program and military, commercial and infrastructure projects. Graft waste? Maybe? None of you guys know a damn thing, if all you have to go on is that report.
Why not ask the Pennsylvania department of aviation for their airport master plan? It's a public record, complete with budgets. Hell, I betcha you could even download most of it for free, just by looking in the secretly hidden Pennsylvania Department of Transportation website.
http://www.dot.state.pa.us/Internet/Bureaus/pdBOA.nsf
BTW: Murtha is an ass.
But you CANNOT possibly know the whole story, or even a quarter or a tenth or even one-per-cent of the story, based on a single two minute hit piece by the drive-by-media.
If that is all the critical thought you are capable of, then you DESERVE to be ruled by Obama and Pelosi.
And you based your assumptions of ignorance on what?
September 18, 2009 - 18:56 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonHave any proof that I don't have a clue?
Is there any other airports that could have used the same amount of money and put it to better use?
Could 10 of the smaller airports used the same amount of money and improved the conditions for a lot more travelers/users?
Have you ever been to a dirt strip? Grass?
Ever resupply a position in the desert? jungle?
You are right, I do not know that whole story of that airport, and to add insult to injury I could care less about this airport.
I know small, cash strapped counties that do the best they can with a lot less because they don't have a powerful person in the federal government that can steal from everybody else to buy votes.
Your last statement was somewhat on the rude side and probably thrown out there in order to stifle discussion. how pelosi of you.
http://gjresult.com
I was purposefully harsh
September 18, 2009 - 20:35 ET by niner-four-whiskeyI was purposefully harsh because I want to challenge critical thinking.
Look the press in this country sucks big time. They literally make stories up or just slice dice complete garbage like this one.
Mostly, they lean to the left. Sometimes, they put on out that us righties agree with.
Just because I find the story agreeable, doesn't mean it should be accepted as complete fact without challenge.
This particular story, as many are, was short on facts and long on appeals to emotion. I don't like Murtha, not one bit.
Notice how the reporter left out ALL the pertinent facts about the joint military/civilian use, who runs the tower (military) or that the airport has 3 scheduled flights a day, but over 150 operations a day. The reporter also left out that the airline subsidy comes from the Essential Air program, which itself was a product of airline de-regulation. There are scores of airports which get this subsidy and the Murtha airport is not even the top recipient either.
As usual, crap reporting, appeal to emotion, and a lack on the part of the reader/viewer/listener to critically examine it from a factual basis.
If we, the right, cannot judge the media critically, especially if it emotionally appeals to us, then we deserve the likes of Pelosi and Obama. We are no better than those idiots.
Niner-four-whiskey, good
September 19, 2009 - 20:11 ET by IckNiner-four-whiskey, good comments. Agreed, if we can't critically review a report that would tend to "support" an assessment that agrees with most of our values, then how can we criticize the left-leaning propoganda and claim that we are "common sense" thinkers? We cannot unless we examine reports like this with the same wary eye.
So basically, Murtha Airport
September 18, 2009 - 14:08 ET by Jack BauerSo basically, Murtha Airport is just like Murtha's head?
Vast, empty and pointless.
Jack, On top of that...
September 18, 2009 - 14:29 ET by goldenthroatMurtha always has this expression on his face like he's been baptized in bad vineger!
"Who am us, anyway?" - Firesign Theatre
ha yeah! Like he just
September 18, 2009 - 14:34 ET by Jack Bauerha yeah! Like he just stepped in a dog turd in his bare feet.
Now that is a district in need of
September 18, 2009 - 14:45 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonA lot more really big dogs!
http://gjresult.com
WLJ, About that big dog...
September 18, 2009 - 17:53 ET by goldenthroatI have a neighbor two doors up the street from me that has a Great Dane about the size of a horse!
I'll talk to the owners - maybe I can arrange something...
"Who am us, anyway?" - Firesign Theatre
JONATHAN KARL next to leave ABC for FOX.
September 18, 2009 - 15:50 ET by AvitarWith Disney's ABC unit on the decline getting some good work on the old resume is important.
Why wonder?
September 18, 2009 - 18:49 ET by Unsane...and people wonder why we have a budget deficit, and a national debt the size that it is.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Guess the older bodies
September 19, 2009 - 07:20 ET by RR GOPGuess the older bodies under the Obamahound have rotted away so there's more room for others now.
Hm.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
RR
September 19, 2009 - 07:30 ET by FeynmanFanThe Obamahound. Good one! LMAO!
"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error. To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson