MSNBC host David Shuster on Monday assailed independent Senator Joe Lieberman as a hypocrite for daring to compliment Barack Obama after opposing some of the President's policies. Shuster sneered, "Showering praise on the Obama administration and then opposing most of what the administration is doing, its critical policies, it's politically slick, but it's also hypocrisy and it's wrong."
He prefaced this critique by playing a clip of Lieberman asserting that Obama is off to a "very, very good start" on issues such as foreign policy. Shuster then whined that the senator "publicly opposed most of the President's most crucial policies." (These issues include Israeli settlements and not supporting a public option in the health care debate.) But, even Shuster had to concede that Lieberman "supported the budget bill, the credit card bill, S-chip."
Still, the MSNBC News Live host referenced the June 13 Bloomberg News interview Lieberman gave in which he complimented Obama. Shuster complained, "And when you try to ride that wave, when you try to convince voters that you approve of the Obama presidency, it makes some of your crucial Senate actions even more jarring."
In April, the MRC released a fax report which found that most of the targets Shuster selected for his "Hypocrisy Watch" segment were conservative or Republican. (The purported purpose of the segment is to expose hypocrisy wherever it may be found.) Apparently, disagreeing with Obama, even some of the time, is enough to make one a hypocrite.
A transcript of the June 15 segment, which aired at 4:40pm, follows:
DAVID SHUSTER: Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman has been praising President Obama and his administration these days even as Lieberman fights most of the most crucial Obama policies. And that takes us to tonight's "Hypocrisy Watch." First the background. Joe Lieberman is a former Democrat who became an independent a few years ago and successfully won re-election in Connecticut. Last fall, Lieberman campaigned for Republican presidential nominee John McCain and said Mr. Obama should not be president. But, last week in an interview that aired over the weekend on Bloomberg News, Lieberman seemed to go out of his way to praise the Obama presidency.
SENATOR JOE LIEBERMAN: I think he's been strong, particularly on foreign policy. I think President Obama is off to a very, very good start at a very difficult time in our nation's history.
SHUSTER: Off to a very good start? Well, that's interesting to hear you say that, Senator Lieberman, because you've publicly opposed most of the President's most crucial policies. You've publicly declared it's a mistake to engage in dialogue with Iran. You've taken issue with President Obama offering a time table for withdrawal of troops from Iraq, and regarding the President's speech last week in Cairo, you told Bloomberg News that President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton should not telling Israel to free settlements in the occupied territories.
LIEBERMAN: The Israelis can freeze settlements altogether today and there wouldn't be peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
SHUSTER: Oh, and when it comes to domestic policy, Senator Lieberman, even though you supported the budget bill, the credit card bill, S-chip and whatnot, you oppose President Obama's signature domestic policy, health care reform plan and a government option.
LIEBERMAN: I don't favor a public option and I don't favor a public option because I think there's plenty of competition in the private insurance market.
SHUSTER: Well, the issue here is not Senator Lieberman that you take the policy positions that you do. It's fine if you want to oppose the President on health care reform, Israeli settlements, Iraq and Iran. It's also fine if you want to support him on stimulus, the budget, credit card bill. Furthermore, most of us appreciate a vigorous, vigorous policy debate. But, you clearly seem to be trying to reach out to moderates in Connecticut who approve of the job President Obama is doing. And when you try to ride that wave, when you try to convince voters that you approve of the Obama presidency, it makes some of your crucial Senate actions even more jarring. Showering praise on the Obama administration and then opposing most of what the administration is doing, its critical policies, it's politically slick, but it's also hypocrisy and it's wrong.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Shuster -- a man that's
June 15, 2009 - 17:38 ET by ThisnThatShuster -- a man that's never practiced hypocricy. Except all day, every day. LOL.
___________________________________
Liberals constantly demand that we accept a glaring falsehood as truth; Obama's elimination of the word "terror" will make terrorist acts less terrifying
Stupid is ...
June 15, 2009 - 17:56 ET by CrashSilly boy Shuster all liberal's are hypocrites!
He's one of my senators...
June 15, 2009 - 18:43 ET by NavyBuckeyeI wrote him today opposing Obama's health care reform and condeming his administration for putting people like me on the terror alert list (veterans with guns) and this is how sorry ass Lieberman replied (copy and pasted from his email):
Dear Mr. NavyBuckey(real name swapped out for identy theft reasons...you know those darn libs):
Thank you for contacting me concerning President Obama's performance as President of the United States.
Our nation faces enormous challenges both at home and abroad. I understand that we will have differences in addressing these challenges - that is the nature of a healthy democracy. But, whether one agrees or disagrees with all of the President's policies, I strongly believe that President Obama has the best interests of our country at heart; and we who serve in Congress have a responsibility to work with the new Administration to solve problems for the people we serve.
This is a moment that we must put partisan concerns aside and come together as a nation to effectively resolve and find long-term solutions to these pressing concerns - ranging from health care reform, the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, the housing crisis, inequalities in our education system, energy costs and transitioning to clean energy programs, and national security and defense priorities, among others - in a way that benefits us all. We must take the best ideas from our nation's leaders, regardless of party affiliation, to solve these problems.
For example, we must find ways to address the rising cost of entitlements and the nation's growing debt. Both political parties are responsible for this problem, and we must come together to find solutions or else we will jeopardize our country's future fiscal health.
All too often, unfortunately, important legislation and priorities stall in Congress because unproductive partisanship, on both sides, precludes honest efforts to pass and enact meaningful laws. I will continue to work with all members of the Senate and with the Obama Administration whenever we can find common ground to address the unparalleled problems facing this generation of Americans.
Undoubtedly, we will have honest differences of opinion; but that cannot prevent us from finding solutions. The American people expect and deserve no less.
Sincerely,
Joseph I. Lieberman
UNITED STATES SENATOR
"You see Obama is going to tax those not paying taxes...those making over 97,000 dollars ayear. Once you make that much you don't pay taxes...he's going to make them pay. And I will finally get a break." -My mom who is on welfare and food st
The liberal mindset
June 15, 2009 - 19:17 ET by metaphorsbwithuWith liberals, you have to swallow everything or be vilified and sent packing. Diversity is mandatory, but only if everyone goosesteps to the same piper.
metaphorsbwithu
Liebermann's problem is
June 15, 2009 - 19:29 ET by RR GOPLiebermann's problem is that he and others are concerned as to how the government should regulate health care...not if they should.
The problem seems to be at the hospital level. If I cut my hand off with a circular saw, there's no way I can shop around.
These guys will charge you $50 for an IV tube that costs maybe $1.00 to make.
Also, a lot of these hospital directors are getting seven figure salaries.
Like utilities, the health care system has us where they want us-and they know it. Meanwhile, the AMA has really let not only their fellow physicians down, but also their patients. They're acting a lot like powerful labor unions that lose sight of the needs of their rank and file as well as the customers who ultimately insure their livelihood.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
I think Shyster is vying for Robert Goebbels Gibbs' job...
June 15, 2009 - 19:35 ET by R D Helm...when the Obamanistas finally decide to run him off.
-Dave
Obama's health care "reform" plan is to blow up the building in order to fix a leak in the roof-Herman Cain
POTUS BOOED BY AMA!
June 15, 2009 - 19:47 ET by NortoSaid he would not limit liability, no wonder. Here is the link:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98RBO9G0&show_article=1
I don't like Schuster but I
June 16, 2009 - 00:30 ET by mostlymoderateI don't like Schuster but I equally despise Lieberman. Sure, Lieberman might express a few conservative thoughts from time to time; however, I can't believe the man. He is as "political" as they come. As Sir Lawrence Wildmon once said, "he would not only sale is own mother to make a deal, he'd send her C.O.D.".
Shuster
June 16, 2009 - 10:35 ET by adamsmithShuster is Olbergoebbels light...Less insane as he probably doesn't believe the propaganda he spews like Olbergoebbels does, but he's an anti-American POS nonetheless.....