Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 27, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Ashley Judd to NBC: Republicans Are 'Really Dumb,' Obama Has 'Flowered'
  • Bozell Column: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
  • CBS: 'Troubling Signs' For Obama, Like Bush in '92, But President 'Cannot Control' Economy
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'

ABC's Cokie Roberts Agrees With Sotomayor: Women Are Better

By Scott Whitlock | June 05, 2009 | 12:25

Change font size:  A |  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

Cokie Roberts appeared on Friday's "Good Morning America" and agreed with Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's 1994 comment that a wise woman would come to a better conclusion than a man. Roberts, cheered, "Of course, I would agree with her that they're better." Fellow ABC journalist Sam Donaldson empathized that if the judge made a mistake, "it was a Joe Biden problem. She blurted out the truth." [Audio available here]

Throughout two segments on the program, various reporters and guests justified Sotomayor's comments. Roberts attempted to explain away the comments, which are in addition to the now famous 2001 "wise Latina" quote. She sympathized to co-host Diane Sawyer, "You go before these big women's groups. And, Diane, I'm sure you've done it. I've certainly done it many times." With no hint of controversy, Roberts added, "And you do say things that kind of rev up the crowd and get women excited. And one of those things that you do say is that women are better than men."

Reporter Jan Crawford Greenburg in the intro piece asserted, "Experts say there's no question gender and life experiences play some part in judicial decisions. Women think of things that might not occur to a man." She then featured a clip of Women's Studies professor Phyllis Coontz casually observing, "You may reach the same outcome. But the way you get there is different. Women are more sensitive because they think about other people." Would the University of Pittsburgh instructor have found it okay to insert some other ethic or religious minority in that sentence?

After his "Joe Biden" quote, Donaldson followed up by explaining that Sotomayor would backtrack. "Because, again, when you blurt out the truth, you have to come back. It's not diplomatic and all of that," he mused.

Greenburg highlighted the nominee's meetings with Senators and noted, "She's told them she meant the comments as inspirational. And that if she's a justice, she'll follow the law, not her feelings." However, as MRC analyst Matt Balan noted in an MRC Bias Alert, this simply doesn't hold up. During a 2001 speech, Sotomayor actually seemed to celebrate judges using their personal background in making decisions:

However, to understand takes time and effort, something that not all people are willing to give. For others, their experiences limit their ability to understand the experiences of others. Other simply do not care. Hence, one must accept the proposition that a difference there will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench. Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see. My hope is that I will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which I am unfamiliar. I simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. But I accept there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage.

A transcript of the Cokie Roberts/Sam Donaldson discussion, which aired at 7:15 on June 5, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: All right. Our thanks to you, Jan. A discussion to have around the breakfast table. And so, we're bringing in our two favorites, ABC's Cokie Roberts and Sam Donaldson, for just this discussion. Okay, Cokie. She didn't say women are different in making decisions. She said better. Can she get away with that?

COKIE ROBERTS: Well, she's having to backtrack on it. Of course, I would agree with her that they're better.

DAVID MUIR: Here we go.

ROBERTS: That the truth is- the truth is that there is a difference. And is the difference better in the case of a sex discrimination case? Not only do I think it's better, I think it's more rational. Obviously, if you are a discriminating against a qualified person on the basis of sex or race, that's an irrational, prejudicial choice. And so, for judges to side with that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. But, look. You go before these big women's groups. And, Diane, I'm sure you've done it. I've certainly done it many times. And you do say things that kind of rev up the crowd and get women excited. And one of those things that you do say is that women are better than men.

SAWYER: She said it fairly often. Sam, going to bring you in here. Even Justice Ginsburg said at one point, on a strip-search case of a 13-year-old girl, of the men on the court, "They've never been a 13-year-old girl. It's a sensitive age for a girl. I don't think my colleagues, some of them, quite understood." Do they understand? Can they understand? Are you standing up for your gender?

SAM DONALDSON: Women, better than men, no? Different than men? Yes. They bring a different perspective. I mean, if Judge Sotomayor had a problem with what she said, it was a Joe Biden problem. She blurted out the truth. We all bring our perspective, our backgrounds. For instance, on guns, she may take a different position than a westerner who may understand why, out west, people want guns because that's where he or she comes from. And we want this kind of diversity. Hey.

MUIR: People trying to read the tea leaves here. It's Muir here in New York. I wanted to chime in, because we can obviously debate this here. But, it's going to come down to what the Senators say. And Senator Susan Collins had a meeting with Sotomayor yesterday. She said she was concerned going in about these comments, that the judge explained them as aspirational speeches, rather than something that led to the deciding of a case. So, is that going to be enough and is she going to continue to give this answer to all these senators behind closed doors, Cokie?

DONALDSON: Well, as Cokie suggests, she's going to dance the light fantastic just a little bit. Because, again, when you blurt out the truth, you have to come back. It's not diplomatic and all of that. But, the fact remains, she will bring her life experiences just as Justice Scalia brought his. And Justice Ginsburg and Justice Marshal brought theirs. It's not that one judge is dumb and the other's smart. One can actually read the English version of the Constitution and one can't. It's that you bring different perspectives and lens' because of who you are. If we want all men in the group. We once had that. Or all women, I hope we never have that, it would be silly.

ROBERTS: Sam- Sam, I completely agree with my colleague, Sam. But the- the truth is that, of course, the court has had very few minorities and women ever. And right now, we're dealing with 36 percent of the population is white male. You'd never know that, looking at the United States Supreme Court. Or looking at the United States Congress. Or looking at most corporate boards. So, I think that this kind of diversity is absolutely essential on the court. And, you know, one of the interesting things about Sotomayor is that because she grew up in the projects, she's been a lot tougher on crime than a lot of Democrats have been in the past. And that might be an interesting life experience, as she goes through the confirmation process, as well.

SAWYER: Okay. 15 Seconds. Quick yes or no. No matter how many times she said that, not going to hurt her case? Going to hurt her case? Yes/no?

DONALDSON: No. She's going to be confirmed and I think with significant-

ROBERTS: Republicans will try to make something of it. And it won't work.

Share this

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Feminism
  • Judiciary
  • Sotomayor Nomination
  • Barack Obama
  • Cokie Roberts
  • Sam Donaldson
  • Sonia Sotomayor
  • 20/20
  • Good Morning America
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • EIGHTY???? EIGHTY-FIVE????
    5 min 42 sec ago
  • Judd
    18 min 46 sec ago
  • Am I alone here????
    24 min 4 sec ago
  • C'mon now, if you're born gay
    28 min 34 sec ago
  • Als job
    39 min 55 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Howard Stern Hasn't Been 'King of Prime Time'
  • All Purpose Weekend Open Thread
  • NPR Celebrates Transgender Olympics Hopeful as Hammer-Throwing 'Jackie Robinson'
  • Bashir to Facebook Co-Founder: Go 'Play with the Traffic'
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.