MSNBC's David Shuster Once Again Railing Against 'Hypocrite' Gingrich

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

"MSNBC News Live" host David Shuster railed against conservative "hypocrite" Newt Gingrich on Monday, resurrecting a segment from his cancelled program "1600 Pennsylvania Avenue." The cable anchor slammed the former House Speaker for calling Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist on his Twitter page. Shuster noted that Gingrich supported Bush pick Sam Alito in 2006. He then played a clip of the then-nominee saying that when he has to rule on a discrimination case, Altio would think of people in his own family who have suffered bias.

Shuster derided, "Hey, Newt. When you embrace the empathy of a conservative judge, but call the empathy of a progressive judge racist, that's hypocrisy and it's wrong." Now, of course, the obvious difference is that Sotomayor didn't just acknowledge empathy, she asserted in a 2001 speech at the University of California, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life."

The stated concept of "Hypocrisy Watch" is to call out hypocritical politicians. On MSNBC, however, that usually means Republicans. An April 6, 2009 fax report by the MRC found that before Shuster's "1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" program was cancelled on April 2, the liberal anchor made conservatives/Republicans the target of "Hypocrisy Watch" 71 percent of the time. Liberals/Democrats accounted for only eight percent of those attacked. So, it's not particularly surprising that Shuster has returned to his old habits.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Shuster previously slammed Gingrich on March 24. The MSNBC host seemed perturbed that the former House Speaker had criticized Notre Dame for announcing that Obama would be the commencement speaker. Gingrich called the President's policies "anti-Catholic." Shuster could hardly contain himself on that day. Citing Gingrich's past marriages, he complained, "Mr. former Speaker, given the way you've led your life, when you lecture anybody about upholding Catholic values, that's hypocrisy, and it's wrong."

A transcript of both the June 1 "Hypocrisy Watch" and the March 24 edition follow:

6/1/09

4:47pm

DAVID SHUSTER: Tamron, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich continues his harsh criticism of President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court. And that takes us to today's "Hypocrisy Watch." First, the background. Gingrich and other conservatives are hammering Sonia Sotomayor for comments she made eight years ago about her Latina background and the empathy she says she brings to court rulings as a result of that background. Gingrich recently wrote on his Twitter page, quote, "Imagine a judicial nominee said, 'My experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman.' New racism is no better than old racism. White man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw." That's right. Gingrich says Sotomayor is a racist and should withdraw. But there have been other judges who have said they take their background and ethnic experiences into account when deciding cases. Remember Sam Alito?

SAM ALITO [during confirmation hearings, January 11, 2006]: When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender, and I do take that into account.

SHUSTER: That's right. Just as Sam Alito embraced empathy and acknowledged he would take his ethnic background into account. Did that cause outrage from Newt Gingrich? Did Gingrich accuse Alito of playing identity politics and demand that Alito withdraw? Of course not. Gingrich supported the nomination and even praised the right-leaning tilt of Alito and John Roberts.

NEWT GINGRICH: My guess is Alito along with Chief Justice Roberts will marginally move the court towards being more conservative and more cautious. But it will not, in fact, be a dramatic change because they're going to be interacting with seven other people who are already on the court.

SHUSTER: The bottom line is that Newt Gingrich and other conservatives praised Sam Alito's nomination but now they are hammering Sonia Sotomayor because she, like Alito, has acknowledged the impact of her background and ethnicity Hey, Newt. When you embrace the empathy of a conservative judge, but call the empathy of a progressive judge racist, that's hypocrisy and it's wrong.

3/24/09

6:25

DAVID SHUSTER: Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich is now criticizing President Obama's social policies. Gingrich calls them anti-Catholic. And that takes us to tonight's "Hypocrisy Watch." First, the background. Last Friday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs announced that President Obama is planning to give three graduation speeches this spring.

ROBERT GIBBS (White House press secretary): In terms of commencements, excuse me, on May the 13th, the President will give the commencement address at Arizona State University. On May 17th, the President will give the commencement address at Notre Dame. And on May 22nd, he will speak to graduates of the U.S. Naval Academy.

SHUSTER: Early this morning, on his Twitter page, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich criticized President Obama's policies and said Notre Dame had made a mistake. Here's the Gingrich Twitter. Quote, "It is sad to see Notre Dame invite President Obama to give the commencement address since his policies are so anti-Catholic values." Anti-Catholic values? Well, that's interesting, because Newt Gingrich has been divorced twice. There was Jackie, his former high school math teacher. Gingrich divorced her as she was in a hospital recovering from surgery. Then there was Marianne. Gingrich married her soon after divorcing Jackie. Years later, while still married to Marianne, Gingrich had an affair with a third woman named Callista. Gingrich divorced Marianne and is now married to Callista, wife number three. We've learned today that Gingrich is converting to Catholicism in the weeks ahead. Amazing. He isn't even Catholic yet and he's already telling Notre Dame what to do. Mr. former Speaker, given the way you've led your life, when you lecture anybody about upholding Catholic values, that's hypocrisy, and it's wrong.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If it's called "Hypocrisy

If it's called "Hypocrisy Watch", shouldn't there be real hypocrisy and shouldn't someone be watching? 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Praise from Caesar!

This smirky punk is the master of spin and hypocrisy. Every single time I see him on TV, hes lying and being a hypocrtical douche. 

Shuster is a

Shuster is a nobody...looking for a place to be a somebody.

msnbc makes him feel welcome.

The majority of people do not care.

...and I am one of them.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Shyster!

Things must be so bad for PMSNBC, that they allow this "birdbrain" an opportunity to talk.  The next time that I listen or watch him will be the first time. And they ain't ever gonna happen!

PMSNBC

It's really sad to watch these poor souls (Matthews, Shuster, Maddow) as they degrade themselves trying to out-Olbermann Olbermann.

Has there ever been such a

Has there ever been such a group of singularly unpleasant people ever assembled on one network? 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Hypocrisy and politics go

Hypocrisy and politics go together like peanut butter and jelly. Left or right.

Newt (Mr Family Values)Gingrich, cheating on his wife while bashing Clinton for the Monica affair. Classy guy

 

JJ... You're back! I've

JJ...

You're back!

I've missed your wisdom here.

Not.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Sorry, JJ IV,

Newt never uttered a word about Clinton's dalliances.

You can put that lie to bed now.

-Dave

Clinton was a perjurer

Clinton's horndoggedness was known by all and somewhat accepted. His legal problems and the impeachment were about perjury, a little more serious. Newt and in fact most any Republican criticized him on breaking the law.

Shuster & basic comprehension skills

Gingrich said "It is sad to see Notre Dame invite President Obama to give the
commencement address since his policies are so anti-Catholic values." To which Shuster responds by launching a personal attack against Newt's personal conduct (going back decades, by the way). Had Shuster cited policies that Gingrich had supported, which were "anti-Catholic", that would make sense as an example of "hypocrisy". Instead, having no such policy argument to make, Shuster the punk resorts to personal attacks against Gingrich - when personal conduct was not at all the subject of Gingrich's criticisms. Does Shuster have some fundamental problem with comprehension skills? At no point in this personal attack does Shuster make any valid point regarding any hypocrisy in Newt's statement. msnbc is a complete disgrace, and Shuster is more within his own core competence when making adolescent "ball" jokes. the guy is a disgrace.

Max Headroom is a friggin'

Max Headroom is a friggin' hologram created by Libtard programmers...what the hell does he know about human emotion anyway?

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

Well...

...at least Shuster is consistent...sticking with the thing that got him fired, waytago Davey!