"Good Morning America" co-host Diane Sawyer worried on Thursday that Barack Obama backtracked "on his pledge to release pictures of U.S. soldiers allegedly torturing terror suspects," fretting that this might be a "cave-in to Dick Cheney and the political right."
Later in the show, former Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared on the program to put the best possible spin on the Obama administration's decision to appeal a court decision ordering pictures of alleged abuse released. Talking to co-host Robin Roberts, he offered talking points that could have come straight from White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
Stephanopoulos generously theorized, "So, by appealing this case right now, even if the White House doesn't win down the line, they bought themselves some time. And the President has shown he's on the side of the troops." At no point did Sawyer, who teased the segment, Roberts or Stephanopoulos talk about the pressure the political left put on Obama to release the photos. Speaking of Dick Cheney, the "This Week" anchor did allow that the former Vice President's opposition against releasing the pictures "is starting to get some traction."
Prior to the Stephanopoulos piece, reporter Jake Tapper did manage to highlight the fury on the left, mentioning "disappointed liberal activists." He also featured a quote from ACLU lawyer Amrit Singh, who complained, "It [refusal to release the photos] only confirms that the Obama administration's promise of transparency and accountability is essentially meaningless."
A transcript of the May 14 Stephanopoulos segment, which aired at 7:07am EDT, follows:
7am tease
DIANE SAWYER: Presidential reversal. President Obama backtracks on his pledge to release pictures of U.S. soldiers allegedly torturing terror suspects. Did he cave-in to Dick Cheney and the political right?
7:07am
ROBIN ROBERTS: We're going to get the bottom line now. We're joined by chief Washington correspondent and host of "This Week," George Stephanopoulos. Good to see you, George, this morning.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Robin.
ABC GRAPHIC: Obama's Photo Flap: President Faces Criticism
ROBERTS: Let's pick up on what Jake was saying. Because, just over a week ago, they had agreed to release the photos. And now, the administration is saying no. What more is behind the reversal?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, those commanders on the ground. Commanders Petraeus, McKiernan, Odierno in Iraq. All coming in and saying, if you were to do this, you are going to hurt our troops. And it's a perilous time. We're at this period now where we trying to move troops out of the cities in Iraq. The violence has gone up. We're about to face a new offensive in Afghanistan right now. Elections in Afghanistan, as well. A very dangerous time. So, by appealing this case right now, even if the White House doesn't win down the line, they bought themselves some time. And the President has shown he's on the side of the troops.
ROBERTS: Now, the timing of this, some folks are saying that he's given in a bit to former vice president Dick Cheney, who has been very vocal about the administration, not making us as safe as the previous administration. Let's take a look a bit at what Cheney said.
DICK CHENEY: Bottom line is, we successfully defended the nation for seven and a half years, against a follow-up attack to 9/11. That was a remarkable achievement. Nobody would have thought that was possible. But it was. I believe it was possible because of the policies we had in place, which they're now dismantling.
STEPHANOPOULOS: He is everywhere. There's no question about that. And Dick Cheney isn't the most popular messenger. But his argument is starting to get some traction. And you're seeing the President move more toward siding with the military on this thicket of issues. I would expect, for example, today, very likely today, the President will approve reinstituting the military commissions to try detainees coming out of Guantanamo and other prisons. That is something he criticized during the campaign. Now, it looks like he's instituting it.
ROBERTS: Of course, the President has a great deal on his plate, including Justice Souter, his retirement. And wanting to have somebody in place by the time the Senate goes on recess in August. Any short list any more names that you're hearing, George?
STEPHANOPOULOS: What we're getting now is the President would like to lay out the nominee probably in the week between Memorial Day and the first week of June, when he goes off to Europe. They're vetting a handful of candidate. Although, the White House is taking great glee, saying not all of the candidates are out there. It still looks like the top three candidates are Elaine Kagan, the solicitor general, Sonia Sotomayor, who is a federal appeals court judge in New York, Puerto Rican background, Diane Wood, another appeals court judge out of Chicago. Some of the new names being talked about right now. California Supreme Court Justice Carlos Moreno. A woman named Teresa Roseborough out of Met Life. She used to clerk for Justice Stevens. And the Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano. But, as I said, the White House is taking great glee in saying there's some secrets out there none of you know about.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Obama caving into the
May 14, 2009 - 11:53 ET by eaglewingz08Obama caving into the political right? The same political right that the same media dogs claim doesn't have any power or influence in Washington because of the Age of Obama? How could that be? It would be like Obama, the democrat wolf, caving into a republican chihuahua.
BTW, Obama could end the controversy and the court case tomorrow. All he has to do is take out his Executive Pen (you know the one that PM Gordon Smith gave him as a gift two months ago) and sign, (what do they call them thar thangs, oh yes) an EXECUTIVE ORDER, classifying those photos as sensitive/classified NATIONAL SECURITY protected documents. That would end the ACLU's right to obtain those documents under the first exemption of FOIA, and the Court would have no possibility of enforcing its Order on the Obama Administration to release them. However, Obama wants to vote 'present' his leftwing side really really wants to embarass the military, suck up to his truther base, and provide countless months of fodder in the left wing american bashing media; but his re-election narcissistic, Obama first at any cost side, looks at this and says, he can't do it, but wants to put the blame for any release on the Courts, to distract the public from who has the authority (the President) to release or secure these photos.
I will give Obama the same slight credit he deserves for making the right decision, now (what happens next week, I wouldn't predict with that cipher), to protect our national security, that I gave him on the successful freeing of the Maersk and the offing of the three pirates.
With libtard antiamericans like Mr. Obama, you have to positively reinforce any positive patriotic trends, so that they are more likely to repeat them.
A BET
May 14, 2009 - 11:53 ET by cvgbuckeyeI am here to inform you now, and the truth will leak out eventually, Defense Secretary Robert Gates threatened to resign over this and that was the last thing that Chairman Obama wanted right at this time.
A selected few in the MSM already know this but are keeping it under wraps because just the threat by Gates is as damaging to Obama as the actual act of resigning; AND THE MSM KNOWS IT! They choose, as usual, to sell their souls to protect Satan.
Fox suspects this already and they are sniffing at it's heels. It will come out in saaaaaay about 2 weeks.
Oh Scott - when Bush
May 14, 2009 - 11:54 ET by Gary HallOh Scott - when Bush caved into the Democrats, surely we remember the likes of Sawyer, Roberts and Stephanopoulos parsing it out so carefully. From 'caving in to the right' to 'he's got a lot on his plate (they love that one - the poor overworked soul), to 'being on the side of the troops' to 'he's bought some time.' Goodness - I bit my tongue again.
(;~. gary
News Media
May 14, 2009 - 12:08 ET by JDWWhat to do with the tax cuts
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
slightly off-topic to the post, but
May 14, 2009 - 12:13 ET by SickofLibsJanet freakin' Napolitano as possible Supreme Ct. Justice???
Just how tiny is Obama's pool of talent if they can even float the idea of yanking a just-appointed cabinet head... while the administration remains the most understaffed in US history?
Cheney drops a bomb
May 14, 2009 - 12:37 ET by 10ksnookerAnd the weasel holes empty ...
I would sure like to know if
May 14, 2009 - 12:40 ET by PewahI would sure like to know if Diane has a pseudonym that she uses on the Daily Kos. Her questions sound like she was posting there this morning...or simply lifted them after getting her morning news from their site.
"So, by appealing this case
May 14, 2009 - 12:41 ET by JAJT"So, by appealing this case right now, even if the White House doesn't win down the line, they bought themselves some time. And the President has shown he's on the side of the troops."----
meaning this will come out and Obama will say that he tried to stop it and couldnt do it. see how he phrases it "even if the white house doesn't win...." once the pictures come out, the media will be reminding people how Obama reversed himself and did not want this to happen, but has to follow the court of law etc.. it is possible when the pictures come out, things will be ugly and they might use this as an excuse to end the war in afghanistan and state that it has become to dangerous....
Official Talking Point
May 14, 2009 - 12:57 ET by freecitizenI have heard this same criticism word for word in 2 other places already this morning. But don't dare call it a talking point <sarc>
They are prepping for when the courts demand it then they can chalk it up as a victory over Cheney and Rush and not their beloved O.
Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.
parser extraordinaire
May 14, 2009 - 13:21 ET by SickofLibsCheney's argument is "starting to get some traction?"
That's what Steph-n-Fetchit calls Obama's complete 180°?
Incredible.
Little georgie
May 14, 2009 - 14:19 ET by Willis_Leon_JohnsonCan I hire somebody from the CIA to arrange a little get together with george, me, a board, a little water, an agent that knows what he's doing and a stenographer?
I have some questions I would like some straight answers to from mr steponallofus.
1. What did YOU know, and when did you know it?
And then let him decide to answer on any subject he desires.
http://gjresult.com
This is to be expected from the peestream media but...
May 14, 2009 - 14:20 ET by JTPI never expected to see the reaction at the democratic ground hog site. Obama is being slammed good over there. A few examples:
He's either f*****g with us or f******g with the Pugs. Either way, I don't care. Obama needs to just stand up and lead.
Lead, Follow, or Get Out of the Way!
I'm beginning to think we just voted us a real slick and smooth con artist for president. Some of his decisions lately are making me less and less enamored with this guy.
"con artist" is the term that comes to my mine more & more lately, also.
doesn't he ever get tired of "playing the middle" and never taking a real stand on anything?
All these photo ops, with hamburgers and dogs look so so "apple pie American" but it is solving NOTHING!!
I can only wish that I will eat my words, but for now I'm so overwhelmingly upset AND disappointed! And the Democrats in Congress are just as "wimpy" as they were when Repukes ruled! Very few Democrats seem to even consider "we the people" anymore. WE ARE THE FOOLS for thinking that by voting "the other way" that it was going to make a difference. I'm worn out & tired of being taken for granted, but realize these people will keep being elected time and time again!
Obama is becoming Cheney.
Our Expectations Get Lower and Lower and Lower and Lower...
You forgot, defending Domestic Spying and increasing executive power.
Do we have another EXECUTIVE BRANCH RULES president in contravention of our Constitution?
Obama Massive Fail - Torture Cover Up - So Much For Transparency We Can believe In
right now he's doing what Bush would do, but being polite about it
Obama is a better Republican than Clinton was n/t
This is an unbelievable moment. Dick Cheney's PR offensive over the last month actually worked.
This was the sort of thing I was afraid of while voting for him. I saw his presidency going one of two ways: he would be either a great president, or one who listens to his handlers. I believed he would be a great president. Now I am concerned.
------------------------------------------------------
And it went on and on and on. There sure isn't much loyalty among O'Bambi's base. Sure is fun to read though.
"Live for yourself...there's no one else more worth living for.
Begging hands and bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"- Rush--Anthem
PELOSI LIED,TERRORISTS DIED
May 14, 2009 - 15:04 ET by NortoAnyone with any grasp of conning could see that she was in deep trouble. The problem was the same person kept at her like a pit bull. Fox should bring on the body language expert-and I have no doubt OR will, soon.
As Rush said today, she is fighting for her political life and I hope she loses. No her eternal soul, though mind you..
I am confused. After
May 14, 2009 - 15:29 ET by Tom PaineI am confused. After listening to a series of mainstream media stores over the last week they would have me believe all of the following statements are true:
a) Dick Cheney is irrelevant;
b) Although Republicans hate him, Dick Cheney controls the Republican party;
c) Nobody cares about what Dick Cheney has to say; and,
d) Obama caved in because of Dick Cheney’s comments
We need more Cheney…
Yes.
May 15, 2009 - 00:15 ET by JWFGod bless Dick Cheney.
Dems Whining About CIA
May 14, 2009 - 16:09 ET by slickwillie2001Democrats Whining: CIA is out to get us!: http://www.politico.com
"Democrats charged Tuesday that the CIA has released documents about congressional briefings on harsh interrogation techniques in order to deflect attention and blame away from itself."
What someone at the CIA has to say loud and clear, is that if Congress is given a briefing and they do not protest anything they are briefed on, that amounts to an approval of what the CIA is doing or proposed. Silence cannot be evidence of innocence, but rather acquiescence. So in the hierarchy of responsibility, Congress is on top of the pyramid, not some briefer at the CIA, and not the poor slugs doing the waterboarding at the CIA. They had de facto approval from Congress for what they did.
What the CIA is really saying.
May 14, 2009 - 20:20 ET by pbthinkerI think the CIA is telling Congress that, with oversight, comes responsibility. There are channels they can go through to express their opinions about briefings. I'm sure that every congressperson knows that to be true and how to utilize the channels available. Secondly, if you disagree, that's fine, just use the processes available and we'll see what we can do. Finally, you can't just put your finger in the wind, either you agree or you don't.
I'm glad the press is finally asking the Speaker some tough questions.
Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.
I object to NB calling Steph
May 14, 2009 - 19:32 ET by gitarfanI object to NB calling Steph a journalist. He's a partisan hack masquerading as one.
Experience biting Obama on his ass
May 14, 2009 - 20:17 ET by KC MulvilleSometime during the campaign, Barack Obama explained how he intended to govern. He believed it was his job to set broad goals, and to allow the genius of Americans (i.e., somebody other than him) to carry out the plan. He pointed to JFK and his boldly setting the goal of going to the moon. Kennedy set an ambitious goal, and then NASA carried it out. That's how Obama thought he was going to govern.
He thought he could sit in the Oval Office and "announce" what he wanted, and then all the little people would figure out some way to carry it out. That's how messiahs think, I guess.
Obama's whole foreign policy, including the Guantanamo mess, has been one Obama backtrack after another. You know why? Because you can't just sit back and set broad goals. When you actually get into the Oval Office and "set broad goals," the people's first question is: but how? In this case, with the photos, Obama didn't grasp the ramifications of setting his goals.
Now, the media is trying desperately to say that Obama didn't need experience before he came. It was so easy, during the campaign, to pop off criticisms. Now he's there, and his shallowness is coming back to bite him (and us) on the ass.
You know, by the same token, we all warned how dangerous it would be to throw trillions of dollars around indiscriminately. That's going to come back and bite us on the ass, too. Three or four years from now, when inflation spirals out of control, Stephanopoulos is going to say that Obama wants to listen to his economic advisors, and maybe support a tax cut. The tax cut will have to be extraordinarily painful.
Then someone else will be talking about the "failed economic policies" of the last four years.
Okay, let me get this
May 14, 2009 - 20:41 ET by msh1973Okay, let me get this straight...Bush/Cheney out, but able to control Obama, righhhht.
tired of liberal
May 14, 2009 - 21:00 ET by stunnedtired of liberal lies
Stephanopoulos generously theorized, "So, by appealing this case right now, even if the White House doesn't win down the line, they bought themselves some time. And the President has shown he's on the side of the troops."
Right! If he was REALLY on the side of the troops he would have issued an executive order blocking releasing of the pictures and that would have ended the matter for now or required a whole new round of court cases to start anew and pushed the issue aside for years. That would have meant Barry REALLY would have had to stand up to the military hating left wing kooks in his party but we all know he doesn't have the inclination nor the guts to do that. So he just voted present again. Now with a lousy brief form his Justice Dept. and a court judgement against him he will be able to just wash his hands of the soldier's blood that will surely be spilt upon the release of the pictures and say he tried, so sorry.