ABC's Diane Sawyer Presses on Guns; Skips Story of Right-wing Violence

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

"Good Morning America" co-host Diane Sawyer interviewed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on Thursday and skipped any mention of a controversial report by the agency warning of right-wing extremist activity and disgruntled returning war veterans. In separate interviews, both the CBS "Early Show" and NBC's "Today" discussed the hot-topic issue with the top government official. Instead, Sawyer pressed Napolitano with incorrect numbers about gun violence and Mexico. "95 percent of the guns used were out of the United States. What is the U.S. going to do to stop the guns from getting there," she asked.

In fact, the number of guns traced to the U.S. is only about 17 percent. (MRC intern Mike Sargent wrote about this on April 2.) Even the Homeland Security secretary seemed to be uncomfortable with the statistic. Before answering the question, Napolitano prefaced, "And I won't quibble about numbers. That's not the point." On the issue of terrorism, the GMA host posed this not-exactly pressing question: "Do you see, in your reports that you're now reading in great detail, do you see an increase in the threat to the U.S. homeland? Or do you have them on the run?"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

In fairness, Sawyer did cite conservative criticism by Dick Cheney and ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich. She observed, "On the issue of terrorism, as you know, the former Vice President, Dick Cheney, has said that President Obama 'is making some choices that, in my mind, will, in fact, raise the risk to the American people of another attack.'" The journalist added, "Is the U.S. less safe now than it was under President Bush? Is it safer?"

A transcript of the April 16 segment, which aired at 7:07am, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: And when President Obama meets with Mexican officials today, the new person in charge of guaranteeing that the U.S. homeland is safe and secure, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, will be at his side. We had a chance to speak with her. And she's been in the line of fire recently, from former administration officials, including the former vice president. On the issue of terrorism, as you know, the former Vice President, Dick Cheney, has said that President Obama "is making some choices that, in my mind, will, in fact, raise the risk to the American people of another attack." And Newt Gingrich, former House speaker, said "the U.S. is running greater risks of getting attacked than we were under President Bush." Is the U.S. less safe now than it was under President Bush? Is it safer?

JANET NAPOLITANO (U.S. Homeland Security Secretary): You know, the former vice president is just wrong. And, you know, we don't need Guantanamo, which is really what he's talking about, to be safe as a country, or as safe as we can be, in a world where there's an ever-changing threat environment. Indeed, places like Guantanamo have been used by groups like al Qaeda to recruit other members. And so, the President, the vice president, the cabinet members, such as myself, we spend our waking hours, really working through what is needed to be done to protect the American people.

SAWYER: Do you see, in your reports that you're now reading in great detail, do you see an increase in the threat to the U.S. homeland? Or do you have them on the run?

NAPOLITANO: Terrorism- it's very easy to quantify in that sense. It's not as if you get up and today, you're on a scale of three on a scale of ten or eight out of ten. You have to constantly be preparing against the known, but also trying to conceive of the unknown, to try to get ahead of the terrorists, as it were. And terrorism can take many, many different forms. And so, that's what I meant when I said earlier in this interview, we're constantly thinking and working on what can be done to reduce risks to the American people. We can never eliminate it. Let me be very clear about that. We can never eliminate all risk to terrorism, but what can we do to reduce it and be prepared for it? Excuse me?

SAWYER: But do you see an increase- But do you see an increase in the threat?

NAPOLITANO: Again, that's an impossible question to answer. I think you have to assume it's at least a constant threat.

SAWYER: Want to turn to the visit today, and the news of the day and your trip to Mexico with the President. Two big issues as we know, the violence and also the immigration issue. On the violence issue, 6,500 people were killed in drug violence in 2008 alone. 95 percent of the guns used were out of the United States. What is the U.S. going to do to stop the guns from getting there?

NAPOLITANO: Well, we're doing a number of things. And I won't quibble about numbers. That's not the point. The point is that a number of the weapons going into Mexico are coming from the United States. So, we have moved agents, resources. We actually have dogs that are trained to sniff guns. We've moved them to do southbound checks, as well as continuing and enhancing the northbound work that we're doing. Northbound to protect against illegal drugs, illegal immigrants. Southbound, to check against cash and guns going to fuel this very violent drug war in Mexico.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

what to do?

What is the US to do to keep guns from getting there? PUT UP THE STUPID FENCE. ENFORCE OUR BORDERS. KICK ALL ILLEGALS OUT.

Don't need a PhD to figure that one out, Diane...

THE RADICALS MEAN IT !!!

 THE RADICALS MEAN IT!!!

Here
we go again, the radical lefty Homeland Security head puts out this
biased unfounded slam mainly on conservatives and many news folks are
saying things like…”she didn’t really mean it” and “she could not have
meant that”, “Obama was not aware” and such. This has got to stop!

The modern liberal is an angry radical secular socialist with no
respect for truth. Know that first. She means every word of the
document. She has a past record indicating that sympathy…hence no
retraction or apology. She sincerely believes this is true despite a
lack of evidence.
The same goes for Reid, Pelosi, Obama, Frank, Schumer, et al.
These people, as I have posted before, are TRUE BELIEVERS, not “confused misread moderates” about issues.
Its getting tiresome hearing Fox News and others appear aghast time
after time when the record of strident radical secular socialism
indicates these radicals are speaking from their hearts. The rest of us
tend to be shocked by the depth of their brazen hatred of all things
conservative or moral or church or family or individual oriented or
freedom orientated or logical or via research of the historical facts.

These national TRUE BELIEVERS have learned nothing from the old Soviet Union or Castro or Carter for that matter.
They buy votes with your taxes and crave power. Nothing more. Truth is
always optional. The media changes their diapers. Learn this now.
They are not kidding…stop believing these dangerous radicals are unintentionally saying and doing these outrageous things.
The radical modern socialist democrats have a lot more “shockers” planned for us…so get your mind right….they mean it.

Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)

Reelman... Ditto

Reelman...

Ditto that...

Damned right they do...and like you say...far more to come.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

95 percent of the guns used were out of the United States.

The first (inaccurate) report only said 90%. So the number inflation has already started. How soon before it becomes 627%? What's the over/under on this?

17% was the accurate number.

 

"DumbAssity of Dope"

The Build them up Playbook page

skipped any mention of a controversial report by the agency warning of right-wing extremist activity and disgruntled returning war veterans

This is called -- build them up. Diane has just begun -- the other networks will move in quickly. One of theirs has just taken a hit -- the MSM must (a) ignore the hit, and (b) present Janet in the best possible light -- make her indispensible, as it were, in the minds of their viewers. By the time the anger and real information filters in showing how despictable Janet really is, the MSM viewers will be softened up enough to really question the actual truth, thereby limiting the damage to their favored daughter.

This is just the opposite of how they treat a conservative, BTW -- called Tear them Down. There, the MSM sieze on a phrase, a slip of the toungue, or some 30-year-old item and build it up. Report on it each day. Invent new sides. Interview "experts" -- all for the purpose of destroying the credibility of the conservative, so the MSM viewers will, again, question the truth when it filters in.

___________________________________ 

The challenge is to follow a consistent plan despite inconsistent prices - Sarah Palin, State of the State of Alaska speech

Has anyone ever seen Diane

Has anyone ever seen Diane Sawyer and Andrea Mitchell in the same place at the same time?

Just wondering......

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

The Mummy was just on MSNBC

The Mummy was just on MSNBC speaking w/ Calderon, beating to death the fact that those Blackhawks we promised poor Mexico STILL didn't arrive.

Meanwhile, druglords are driving around Mexican border towns in garden variety SUVs with huge 50 mm's mounted to the roof and they won't do a thing about it.

Ban "assault weapons" in the US but give a bunch of $6 million Blackhawks to the Mexicans. Wait till the druglords capture the first Blackhawk - just a matter of time.

Secure the Border to Stop Smuggling

If Mexico has a problem with smuggling on their border, maybe they should consider securing it.  Just a suggestion. Hey, what do I know.

Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.

Yea, seems pretty logical

Guess only us simpletons think that way?

 

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

95%?

Not good enough, Sawyer - make it 102%. 

Sawyer should be blowing into a breathalyzer first before they make her mike live.

Doesn't she read anything or have assistants who do? It's virtually impossible to be this stupid when sober. 

Napolitano drew first blood calling me a threat to N.S. soooo...

She looks like a shitsu that had been sadistically bred w/ a skunk.

There!

 

Janet the moron

So Napolitano  "apologizes" to the military. Did she even question the other "criteria" for survailence on the rest of us, or are they still, "in play"? Just for historical record, wasn't ex-Marine Oswald a member of the right wing extreme, as a member of "The Fair Play For Cuba Committee" and ex-defector to Russia?  What would Janet, the genius, call the Winter Soldier movement of the early '70's, which her own John Kerry, who served in Vietnam, belonged to, Left extreme or right extreme.  Ignorant bitch.

 

Is it me or...

..if your name is Janet and you serve in a Presidential administration, that it is required for you to look like a man?  Is that part of the job description?

 

You can destroy the Constitution when I'm dead and gone.  Until then, back off liberal jackasses.