David Shuster Frets Over Conservative 'Fear Mongering,' 'Wing Nuts'

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

"1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" host David Shuster on Monday worried that "conservative fear mongering" about President Barack Obama could be "seriously dangerous." A graphic for the segment hyperbolically read, "Stoking Hatred?" Shuster brought on Republican strategist Brad Blakeman and Democratic counterpart Chris Kofinis to discuss the topic. [audio available here]

In a tease for the piece, Shuster played clips of former Vice President Dick Cheney asserting that Obama has made America less safe and of Fox News host Glenn Beck. The MSNBC anchor asked, "The inflammatory rhetoric from the wing nuts, is it merely entertaining or seriously dangerous?" With a complete lack of irony, Shuster spoke of FNC's Beck and wondered, "Shouldn't there be some standards at some of these other networks? I mean, that's a problem, isn't it? There's no standards." Keep in mind, on May 14, 2008, Shuster's colleague Keith Olbermann accused then-President Bush of "murderous deceit" and told him to "shut the hell up!" Would that be an example of the "standards" that Mr. Shuster would like to see?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The cable host repeatedly lectured conservatives and Republicans for vociferously attacking President Obama. He solemnly intoned, "So, how far is too far? Isn't there a danger when the rhetoric goes off the charts?" (Again, he's on the same network as Keith Olbermann.)

This is a topic that Shuster has been obsessively focusing on for weeks. On March 5, he suggested that Republicans who don't distance themselves from Rush Limbaugh "appear unpatriotic"

A partial transcript of the segment, which aired at 6:31pm on March 16, follows:

6pm tease

DAVID SHUSTER : Later, the conservative fear mongering over President Obama.

MSNBC GRAPHIC: Stoking Hatred?

DICK CHENEY: He's making some choices that, in my mind, will, in fact, raise the risk to the American people of another attack.

GLENN BECK: We are a country that‘s headed toward socialism, totalitarianism, beyond your wildest imagination.

MIKE OZANIAN (Forbes): Madoff's scam is about $20 billion. Barack Obama's Ponzi scheme is $2 trillion.

SHUSTER: The inflammatory rhetoric from the wing nuts, is it merely entertaining or seriously dangerous?

6:31pm

DAVID SHUSTER: President Obama's approval rating stands at a healthy 61 percent, according to the latest Gallup poll. However, some conservatives have decided to ratchet up their personal attacks on the President, and the rhetoric is increasingly harsh. Here's Vice President Cheney yesterday.

JOHN KING: Do you believe the president of the United States has made Americans less safe?

CHENEY: I do. He's making some choices that, in my mind, will, in fact, raise the risk to the American people of another attack.

SHUSTER: As controversial as Cheney‘s statement was, that rhetoric was soft and cuddly compared to what was spewed out over the weekend on Fox News. On that network, President Obama was compared to Bernie Madoff, Wall Street's most hated criminal.

MIKE OZANIAN (Forbes): Madoff scam is about 20 billion. Barack Obama's Ponzi scheme is two trillion. And if you look at how they work the schemes, they're very similar. Both falsify their returns. And to pay for that, he's got to bring in a lot of other scamsters, Obama does, which in this case really are taxpayers.

SHUSTER: So, how far is too far? Isn't there a danger when the rhetoric goes off the charts? Joining us now, Democratic strategist Chris Kofinis, former communications director for John Edwards, and Republican strategist Brad Blakeman, former deputy assistant to President Bush. Welcome to you both. Brad, comparing President Obama to Bernie Madoff, you don't support that, do you?

BRAD BLAKEMAN (GOP strategist): I do not, no. I think some of these attacks have gone too far on the President. You‘re right. These are personal attacks. These are not attacks on his policy and principles. That's what we should be attacking, and we should be offering alternatives and not just attacks to be obstructionist.

SHUSTER: Chris Kofinis?

CHRIS KOFINIS (Democratic strategist): I mean, these Republican attacks by some in the party, folks like Rush Limbaugh, Michael Steele, and others, I mean, this is just a recipe to further dig a deeper hole for this party. I mean, listen, their ideas, their policies, their positions on the issues are not selling to the American people. So, the only thing they have left is to go on the attack and make it personal. What they don't understand, that is the worst strategy. It's going to make things worse for the party. It's going to further alienate the very voters they need to win over.

SHUSTER: But it‘s good for them. I mean, Rush Limbaugh, it appears his ratings are up. Glenn Beck's ratings are through the roof. Glenn Beck was suggesting that the Obama administration is heading toward concentration camps, with those FEMA camps, and he accuses the Obama administration of embracing totalitarianism. Watch this.

GLENN BECK: We are a country that is headed toward socialism, totalitarianism, beyond your wildest imagination. I wanted to debunk these FEMA camps. I'm tired of hearing about them. You know about them. I'm tired of hearing about them. I wanted to debunk them. We've now for several days done research on them. I can't debunk them.

SHUSTER: I mean, it's crazy, isn't it?

BLAKEMAN: It is. It's crazy as Jon Stewart is crazy or Bill Maher is crazy on the left.

KOFINIS: No, no.

BLAKEMAN: These guys- you have a massive deception because you want to take people away from your horrid policy. Jon Stewart started attacking Rush Limbaugh.

KOFINIS: Jon Stewart is a comedian.

BLAKEMAN: And so is Rush Limbaugh. He's an entertainer. He's an entertainer.

KOFINIS: No. Rush Limbaugh got invited to CPAC to speak in front of conservative and Republican leaders. You know, Mr. Beck is another-

BLAKEMAN: He closed the show.

KOFINIS: Mr. Beck is another voice in the Republican Party.

BLAKEMAN: Glenn Beck is not a member of the Republican Party, nor is Rush Limbaugh.

KOFINIS: He is a voice in the Republican Party. Why Republicans do not come out and condemn these individuals. Aside from you, no one else is willing to do it, because they're all terrified they‘re going to be on the next morning show.

BLAKEMAN: Why aren't you out there condemning Bill Maher-

KOFINIS: For what? For being funny?

BLAKEMAN: Well, he's not funny. He's not funny when he attacked President Bush personally. You guys didn't do that. When Jon Stewart goes on television every night and attacked-

KOFINIS: You have had Democrats come out and speak out against MoveOn and other groups.

BLAKEMAN: You guys are joined at the hip with MoveOn. General Betray Us?

KOFINIS: No, that's not true. You've had Democrats come out and criticize when they felt-

BLAKEMAN: Very few.

KOFINIS: No. You had leaders in the Democratic Party come out and willingly say this went too far. There is no one in the Republican Party at a leadership role who is willing to do that. Not Michael Steele, not Representative Cantor, not Senator Boehner- I'm sorry, Senator McConnell, not Representative Boehner, no one. They're not willing to do it. And the reason why-

BLAKEMAN: Why should we give the guys the type of credibility that you're trying to give them?

KOFINIS: It's not giving them credibility, it's speaking the truth.

SHUSTER: Brad, why is it so difficult for people to say, as you just did, that this is wrong? When Glenn Beck is out there suggesting that there's going to be totalitarianism and concentration camps, when others are make these, sort of, crazy claims, why is it so difficult for Republicans to say, let's not make it personal? Let's keep it on the policy?

BLAKEMAN: Because these people are not members of our party. They're not the leaders of our party. What, are we going to spend every day trying to apologize for entertainers?

SHUSTER: Shouldn't there be some standards at some of these other networks? I mean, that's a problem, isn't it? There's no standards.

BLAKEMAN: There should be standards at all networks. But, that's not for Mitch McConnell or Boehner to be out there policing everything that entertainers say.

KOFINIS: It's disputing, it's disagreeing. The reality is Rush Limbaugh is-

BLAKEMAN: Actions speak louder than words.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yeah, those rotten hate

Yeah, those rotten hate mongering Conservatives. Why can't they be more like the Libs and their outpouring of love and kindness to Sarah Palin and her family.

"All generalizations are false, including this one.” Mark Twain

Hypocrisy

These people are either the biggest hypocrites on the face of the earth, the biggest liars in civilzed history or totally ignorant.

I believe that they are all three.

I keep it in perspective cvgbuckeye

FNC is killing them across the board and like the little child he is, is just lashing out. Did you see the ratings Beck got for his 9-12 special? Amazing!

 

 

If Shuster along with MSNBC

If Shuster along with MSNBC had any standards at all I wouldn't be laughing so hard.  

"DumbAssity of Dope"

Who is David Shuster?

Let's remember how Shuster threw a little fit last year when Joe Scarborough (the only non-liberal on the payroll at NBC) pointed out that he was a Democrat.  Shuster literally walked off camera and tried to physically escape the conversation.

So, Shuster wants us to believe that he is not a partisan.  But he has never, ever been able to point to the  'hate mongers' on the Left.  There are no radicals on the Left in the vision of Shuster or MSNBC.  

But it is hilariously ironic that he is whining about a network having STANDARDS when they put on a lineup like the one he is on.  Maybe not calling the President a terrorist would be a good place to start - at MSNBC.  Fortunately, they got all their 'standards' back when Bush left the WH 

Ignatz

Right, the Left poured out love on Pres. Bush by calling "Chimpy McHitler", Bush, Little Bush, etc.......

I realize that when the Right gives recognition to the name calling Left, they raise their stature but these Lefty apologists are hypocritical when they call to task the voicing of different opinions.

I also take offense to the denigration of the Right Wing truth tellers; Hannity, Rush, O'reilly, Coulter, Ingraham, The Swift Boat Veterans. They are called all sorts of vile things and outright lies are told about their comments and opinions.

I'm pleased that Rush and company have turned the attacks back on the Left. I only wish that the Conservative politicians would stand up for principle and call the Left out on their lies and propaganda more often instead of acting Senatorial.

"Shouldn't there be some

"Shouldn't there be some standards at some of these other networks? I mean, that's a problem, isn't it? There's no standards"

 

I cannot believe he said that and lightning did not strike.

→ Chevy

There are depths so low even lightning cannot reach the inhabitants.


LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

I'm beginning to believe it now Cool.

Actually, I am proud to be a

Actually, I am proud to be a wing nut. Those can be kinda handy sometimes, you know?  And anyway, it is much better than being a numb nut, which is all they are anyway. Ok, I'm sorry, I just called them a name.  I will now go to the racist, bigoted, homophobe timeout corner of shame.   

I will now go to the

I will now go to the racist, bigoted, homophobe timeout corner of shame.

Welcome Cag, we here in the corner are legion and will overcome. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Oh, boo-freakin'-hoo!

Gee, suddenly these guys have PRINCIPLES? Let me say this as clearly and plainly as possible:

Rush Limbaugh is NOT a "Republican Leader."

Glenn Beck is NOT a "Republican Leader."

Criticizing the government is NOT a "Democrats-only" principle.

Not ONE Democrat condemned anything said by Bill Maher, Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann about President Bush, no matter how "personal" or "outrageous" it was. If anyone can name one Democrat politician that did, then name them, and cite the quotation. Otherwise, STFU. Yes, Shuster, this means you. 

End of story.

 

"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who

Harry Reid telling a group

Harry Reid telling a group of school children that the president is a loser, that's not hate mongering. Al Gore, screaming, 'this president betrayed us, he played on our fears', that's not hate mongering. Murtha and Reid, proclaiming that we have lost the war, that's ok. These are senators and congressmen. Don't even get us started on what their 'entertainers' have been screaming for the past 8 years; Rosie, Maher, Randi Rhodes, Sheehan, Olberman, Matthews, Shuster, Code Pink, Moveon, Kos, Huffington....

Please.

Boo Yah!!!

dittos on that rant.  Could have come out of my own mouth (of course, that would have been very weird for both of us....)

I hate to tell this

I hate to tell this freedom-hating, red diaper wearing Marxist mouthpiece for the Organizer Shyster, but what Cheney said was comparatively mild compared to what most of us conservatives are thinking.

You see, Shyster, many on our side actually took the time to delve into Obama's past, so we had a pretty good idea what to expect.

Over two months into the Organizer's "presidency," you, along with the rest of the professional totalitarian propagandists in the MSM, are as clueless as ever.

What you and your fellow ivory-tower dwellers are totally not seeing is that productive Americans are getting pretty well fed up with having their pockets picked by the non-productive. Did you think this was going to go on forever? Apparently so. 

It also appears, Shyster, that you think that we who love this country, along with its freedom, liberty, and usuall prosperity are supposed to just lay down and quietly allow this socialist fraud to take away the very things that made this country the greatest nation in all of history.

Sorry, comrade Shyster, that just isn't going to happen. The resistance to Obama's freedom-destroying agenda is now growing steadily, and will continue to do so as more and more Americans become aware of what his true agenda really is.

The phone calls, letters and emails to those who represent us in congress are going to increase, and I am sure that public demonstrations, such as tea parties and the like, will increase right along with them.

And the best part is, there isn't one damn thing you can do about it.

-Dave

This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.

Fine words

R D you are a gentleman, a scholar and a man of fine words. 

When we take it back...

...I hope it's like those uprisings in Eastern Europe 20 years ago! I remember them well...It won't be like the attempted uprising in China.

2010: A GOP Hill

Well said, Dave! The only

Well said, Dave!

The only thing I would add is to remember that one man's hate-mongering is another's patriotic dissent.

It just depends on whose ox is being gored, doesn't it?

Ask any Bush-hater.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

motherbelt, what sh*t for brains Shyster does not understand...

...is that we who love and cherish freedom are not going to overlook those who have have aided an abetted those in government who have worked to rob us of those freedoms.

-Dave

This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.

§ Dave,,,I Want my life Controlled!!

I'm not Smart enough to do it myself.

Am I Wrong.

Ster.

My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.

RD

Exactly! I will take small satisfaction from being right on this account when my friends who voted for Obama finally realise how radical his Leftist policies and plans are. I only hope that we are not totally buried by the command and control State bureaucrats in 4 years.

I don't need any stoking of my hatred for Shyster

Kofinis, AKA Olbermann's Go-to Bitch #4: "no Republican is going to criticize Rush because they are terrified they‘re going to be on the next morning show."

Gee, was that a veiled admission? Or was he referring to one of those conservative morning shows?

And yes, Shyster, you sickening little pussy, Beck's ratings ARE thru the roof, the exact opposite of yours... is the reason why really that elusive, given your vast intellect?

Have you noticed

Have you noticed that the cable ratings are dominated by Fox commentators? This says something about who truly has the ear of the populace. All of this Sturm and Drung by Olbermann, Shuster, et. al., is an attempt at recognition which is doomed to fail like the Print Media.

"KOFINIS: No, that's not

"KOFINIS: No, that's not true. You've had Democrats come at and criticize when they felt-"

Chris Kofinis: Professional Liar 

 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

PRAVDA speaks to the

Ignorants ...

 

If it weren't for Newsbusters, would anybody know? 

This is all to be expected.

This is all to be expected. They can't stand the idea that Fox has another hit on their hands. Hehehehehehe!

Left Still Hating Palins

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

amen

I'd like to know what he meant by "other networks" - plural

Tea Parties will be handled the same way

Once the Tea Parties become big enough that even the liberal media cannot ignore them, they will be handled the same way. They will be called 'right-wing thugs' and 'hate groups' and 'fascist brownshirts'. The liberals only tolerate or acknowledge protests that support liberal causes. Anything else to them is illegitimate.

Does anyone listen to

Does anyone listen to Schuster the big mouth anyway. I would like to slap that wussy around a little and shut his fat pie hole.

Just the fact that he refers

Just the fact that he refers to them as wingnuts shows you what an impartial journalist Shuster is. Did he ever refer to CodePink as a bunch of left wing crazies? Did he ever report , "Harry Reid came out today firing poison hate filled arrows at the president"? This guys make me sick. I love it that FOX has pushed these pussies down into the mud puddle and taken their lunch money.

h8trz!

SHUSTER : GOP WINGNUTZ R TEH H8TRZ! srsly. Dem pwn. d00d. wurd.

I summarized it for anyone who doesn't want to read the whole thing.

MSNBC = Last Place

They're in last place and no one watches bathtub boy or monkey boy the drooler or rachel navratilova.....so I don't get as bent out of shape over their ridiculous bias and partisan hackery and hypocrisy.  

The arrogance and stupidity

The arrogance and stupidity of David Shyster and Chris Kofinis is well established.  But from what sewer did they manage to dig up this weak sack of crap Brad Blakeman?  So protective is he of the lame Beltway image of the institution of the Republican Party that he has to resort to accepting dishonest left-wing premises unchallenged before launching into a sad moral equivalency argument about Jon Stewart and Bill Maher.  The idea that he would put those two Marxist windbags on the same level as Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh just so he doesn't have to defend people who agree with Beck and Limbaugh is so pathetic that it suggests the Republican Party is going to have to implode before it regroups.  Yeah, the Party is just begging for more Meghan McCains and Brad Blakemans.  Weak. 

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill

fitz...  Exactly

fitz...

 Exactly right...critters like Blakeman are the problem, not the solution for the repub party...if they aren't pulled and weeded out, discared in the burn pile we are going to remain in the minority in my opinion.

Shyster should change the name of his show to:

"Shyster's Glass House @ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue".

GLENN BECK = 3 MILLION+ AFTERNOON VIEWERS

I've seen the ratings on Drudge.  Shuster and Chris Matthews aren't even high enough to make the chart and Glenn Beck has a new afternoon show that is practically getting Bill O'Reilly prime-time numbers.  MSNBC is frantic, baby.

Tex

How about Maddow? She is what is supposed to be prime time and can't get 1 million.  

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same. RWR

Maddow-Olbermann

As I recall, Olbermann was dead last on the list with under 900,000 viewers that evening and Maddow was a little above that.  Matthews, Shuster, Sanchez - didn't make the list at all.

I've seen a LOT of attack coordinated these past couple days against Glenn. 

To make things worse for MSNBC

Fox re-ran Beck's program at 11:00 pm PDT last night, opposite Maddow's rerun. That put her 1st run opposite O'Reilly and the rerun against Beck. Terrific! I hope it was the start of re-running it every night [although I wish it were a little earlier]. His regular time here is 2:00 in the afternoon, when many folks are working.

Chai

“When all government...in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided...” Thomas Jefferson

Hey Chai.... Thanks for

Hey Chai....

Thanks for the update on the replays of Beck's show, I didn't know, but I sure have been wishing Fox would do so, instead of all the repeats of BOR...I will be looking forward to trying to catch the shows at that time now if they are smart enough to keep this on their schedule.

One word....Fascist.

One word....Fascist.

Ryan

In reference to what?

To Shuster. People who want

To Shuster. People who want "standards" want to stop free speech. They are saying that they want to tell people what can be said and what cannot.

MSDNC is the place where

MSDNC is the place where leftist freak show freak David Shuster falsely alleged that "Karl Rove will in fact be indicted" and where clueless conspiracy theorist Chris Matthews alleged that Paul Wolfowitz had cooked up a conspiracy in the bowels of the Pentagon to funnel a dog collar to Pvt. Lynndie England with orders for England to place the dog collar around the neck of an Iraqi prisoner.

Someone, please change

Someone, please change Shuster's diaper. I think he's crapped himself.

Is MSNBC only populated with hysterical, hypocritical babies?

A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.

Does anyone watch this

I never heard of this guy, as I don't watch anything that starts with "c", or "m"..I don't go to movies, buy DVD's or watch shows with Hollywood types in them.

No one cares about about what these folks say..no one.

There is one big difference between...

Glenn Beck and hosts at MSNBC.  Glenn is telling the truth.  (And he has an audience.)  He is concerned where our country is headed.  He is the modern equivalent of Paul Revere and thank God he now has a forum and an audience from where and to whom, he can sound the alarm.  Jim Webster

MSNBC's David Shuster: 

MSNBC's David Shuster:  "mommy, mommy, Glen Beck and Fox News are kicking my butt"

Poor Shuster, do we think his 3 viewers will notice? 

 

Shuster/crybaby

David, David, David, Ain't it a bitch. " You Voted for him Comrade." I just love to see these A--holes cry.

We dont need no steenkeen standards! Or grammer either!

 

 

There's no standards.

Off topic, but I guess they didnt teach much English grammer in J-School. Or Schuster was absent that day. I cant stand self righteous know-it-alls who cant even speak the Republic's English properly.
"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

 

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941