GMA's Chris Cuomo Brags: 'We're Not a Great Entertainment Show'

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

"Good Morning America" news anchor Chris Cuomo gave an interview to the TV Newser podcast "Morning Media Menu" on Wednesday in which he touted the seriousness of the ABC program and later vaguely broached the subject of the issues journalists leave out of stories. But first, he bragged, "I think a fair criticism of 'Good Morning America' would be that we're not a great entertainment show. You know what I mean?" Cuomo (see file photo above) added that the show's hosts and talent really "think as reporters first" and that "there's so much pressure in the morning to be entertaining, given the time, give what is going on with people's lives."

"But, that's just not where our hearts and our heads are," he concluded. Of course, it should be pointed out that "Good Morning America" is the program that devoted almost its entire second hour last Friday to a U2 rock concert and also features a weekly segment on the latest events to occur on "Dancing With the Stars." To be fair, the subject that prompted Cuomo's comments was GMA's ongoing "Big" sweeps series. Each day this week, one of the program's anchors has traveled to different countries, many of which have featured informative segments about the lives of the people there, (such as Robin Roberts in Mumbai, India on Tuesday.) However, GMA certainly has its share of frivolous, mindless story segments.

While talking with podcast hosts Steve Krakauer and Glynnis Macnicol, Cuomo also expressed his new found interest in Twitter. He asserted that he really does read the comments people leave on his page and offered this interesting tidbit: "Because, I think I may develop something...I'm thinking of developing a dialogue about what was not said in our stories." After referencing a GMA segment on AIG and its operations in London, he added, "You know, there is a lot of implication that we don't discuss in our stories, that I would be happy to discuss on Twitter. So, I'm going to use it."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Cuomo expressed an interest in feedback on what viewers think GMA is leaving out. If NewsBusters readers are so inclined, his Twitter page can be found here. I'm sure the news anchor for the ABC program would appreciate respectful "tweets" whenever he leaves out the conservative perspective in a story.

In a previous "Media Morning Menu" podcast, Cuomo's ABC colleague Terry Moran gushed over the President. He enthused, "I like to say that, in some ways, Barack Obama is the first President since George Washington to be taking a step down into the Oval Office."

A partial transcript of the March 11 podcast interview can be found below.

Morning Media Menu podcast

[Discussing GMA's recent sweeps trip to various countries, including India.]

STEVE KRAKAUER: Obviously there is, you know, different trips that morning shows do. There's sweeps going on or something. But, you know, you always want to see the value that comes from it and the reporting that comes from it. And that definitely seems that in all of these trips, there's various segments on a lot of different reporting that's going on from there.

CHRIS CUOMO: Yeah, I think so. I think a fair criticism of "Good Morning America" would be that we're not a great entertainment show. You know what I mean? We really think as reporters first and, you know, often there's so much pressure in the morning to be entertaining, given the time, give what is going on with people's lives. But, that's just not where our hearts and our heads are. You know? Like, you tell about the Dubai, I want to talk about the economy. You know, I don't necessarily think to go sand dune-ing, you know, in the first instance. So, it's a natural that each of the days is going to have a lot of information in it, because that's what comes naturally to us. But, at the same time, it's really entertaining.

...

CHRIS CUOMO: But, I really encourage people to get onto Twitter if they're on it and tweet me, because I am reading them and I am going to respond to them. And I am going to, not only answer question. Because, I think I may develop something- And I'd love your guys' take on this, if you don't mind. I'm thinking of developing a dialogue about what was not said in our stories. And that's not to mean that we obfuscate, but very often- Like, let's take this AIG story in London, okay? We do this story yesterday. The guy was getting paid- Cassano- made a lot of money. Still getting paid on a consultancy. But, now there are things that are not in that story, okay? There's the whole discussion of whether or not AIG should have been price supported. There's the whole implication of, well, if it's not a catastrophe because of their counter-parties [sic], is it because the U.S. government owns 77 percent of the stock? Is that why we're keeping it up? You know, there is a lot of implication that we don't discuss in our stories, that I would be happy to discuss on Twitter. So, I'm going to use it.

GLYNNIS MACNICOL: If they- if they came back to you with some good ideas, would you think about working that into future stories, or would you spin that off into, sort of, web content only piece based on the suggestions you're getting from Twitter?

CUOMO: Great question, you know, I'd have to think about the best way to do it. The ideal answer would be both, right? You know, going along with that idea of impressions. You know, there's an easy distinction to make as a journalist. Am I going to adopt your opinion about stories, even if it seems to be consensus? No. I avoid it. I avoid it religiously. But, I will take suggestions about what is being left out, what you're not hearing about- with definite purpose, I would do that.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Good Grief America!

GMA isn't even an entertaining show. Neither, is it imformative. Maybe if the show would report the news, it may become something. 

Emerson Lake and Palmer

"Welcome back my friends

to the show that never ends.

We're so glad you could attend.

Come inside come inside.

Come inside the shows about to start,

Guaranteed to blow your head apart."

Don't remember all the words; but you get the idea. They were great in concert too from what I remember.

Not Entertaining.....AND not informative or journalistic!

Maybe if ABC wasn't so interested in hiring 'reporters' simply because of their family surname (hey, Kennedy douchebag over at Fox, I'm talking to you too!!) then they might be interested in some actual 'reporting' which might draw people to watch them.

Or, you could just keep doing episodes with animal acts and cooking tips for the idiots you believe are watching you. Not like you have to look up to your competition at NBC considering that even the illustrious Matt Lauer could get punked by Tom Cruise for being glib (and an idiot. semantical difference).

This is a juxtaposition with Rush, you see.

GMA is SERIOUS news, Rush is just an entertainer.

I may be giving Cuomo too much intellectual credit here, but that's what I see him saying whan I read this.

Seton Motley
Director of Communications
Media Research Center

Hi Seton.... I really am

Hi Seton....

I really am trying to find where the reference to Rush was, I know I am missing something here...please give me a hint...I don't watch the show at all, only what I read here on NBs.

Maybe I should click on the link you have before I speak... I know a lot of the msm says Rush is just entertainment blah blah blah...but I can't find here where he is slyly meaning Rush/

Anyway...anybody give me a clue.

"I think a fair criticism of

"I think a fair criticism of 'Good Morning America' would be that we're not a great entertainment show. You know what I mean?" 

Cuomo is right GMA is not a great entertainment show...it's the greatest show on earth, come one, come all to the greatest spectacle in journalistic abandonment in the land!

HC

When I saw that I thought Cuomo was going to be honest and say they sucked.I would of agree for once with him.

Well99

I have given up all hope on these people, but my mom enjoys watching GMA only for the ENTERTAINMENT portion of this SHOW. When it comes down to serious news she watches FNC or our local news.

 

 

HC

I am a FNC fan myself.I really dont watch to much TV except Military channel and History International.That and old movies.Fox is the best for news.The others have really lost any journalistic integrity as you pointed out earlier.

That's what I need well99

The Military Channel in HD!

HC

I wished I had HD..lol I am a history fan so I do enjoy it.

Chris Cuomo - ..and we censor the news as well..

Chris Cuomo: "You know, there is a lot of implication that we don't discuss in our stories.."

Really now?

How about having your little brother, Andrew Cuomo, current NY AG, and former Clinton era Secretary of HUD on. Hey, have him on with Barney Frank, for desert.

Have them on to answer to your great investigative news skills on issues; well, like to quote the NY Village Voice from a few months ago:

August 5th 2008   Andrew Cuomo and Fannie and Freddie - How the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history gave birth to the mortgage crisis

There are as many starting points for the mortgage meltdown as there are fears about how far it has yet to go, but one decisive point of departure is the final years of the Clinton administration, when a kid from Queens without any real banking or real-estate experience was the only man in Washington with the power to regulate the giants of home finance, the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), better known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Andrew Cuomo, the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history, made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to the country's current crisis. He took actions that—in combination with many other factors—helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without putting in place the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a sweetheart lender with sky-high loan ceilings and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of overpriced and unsupportable loans. Three to four million families are now facing foreclosure, and Cuomo is one of the reasons why.

What he did is important—not just because of what it tells us about how we got in this hole, but because of what it says about New York's attorney general, who has been trying for months to don a white hat in the subprime scandal, pursuing cases against banks, appraisers, brokers, rating agencies, and multitrillion-dollar, quasi-public Fannie and Freddie.

[..]

Go ahead, Chris, make our day! "Hey, bro. you did that?" The viewer would like to hear that discussion. The millions of Americans who took the governement up on their ponzi scheme (move over Madoff) and then lost everything, because of your brother. As Obama implied, well it felt like it was the right thing to do, "in theory," but it didn't work out too well.  

Gosh darn, I agree with the President on something.

(;~/ gary

In the Navy we have a phrase

CHRIS CUOMO: Yeah, I think so. I think a fair criticism of "Good Morning America" would be that we're not a great entertainment show. You know what I mean?

 OLD SAILOR:  That's just about a no sh%#@er!  You're a serious Rocket Doctor there Shipmate.

thats rich

They consider themselves a "news" show?!?!?! Really????

If they are a "news" show, I am the pope.

omo rich

should we kiss your ring?

 

Who are you to tell a successful and consistently interesting satirist what he should or shouldn't do in order to get across the point he's trying to make?

Geographically challenged, Mr. Whitlock? :-)

To be fair, the subject that prompted Cuomo's comments was GMA's
ongoing "Big" sweeps series. Each day this week, one of the program's
anchors has traveled to different countries, many of which have
featured informative segments about the lives of the people there,
(such as Robin Roberts in Dubai, India on Tuesday.)

Mr. Whitlock, if I'm not mistaken, Dubai and India are two different countries.  Perhaps you meant Mumbai, India?

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

GMA loves Democrats

Doesn't twitter have a 145 character minium? It's gonna be kinda hard to 'discuss' much!

 

Cuomo expressed an interest in feedback on what viewers think GMA is leaving out.

During the campaign, GMA had a 'train segment week' where hosts invited Hillary, Biden, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and John & Cindy McCain.  Each Democrat had a day on the train; Republicans John & Cindy appeared one day.

So that's four - to - one: Four Democrats to One Republican. GMA favors Democrats. It's the reason I no longer watch GMA! I watch Fox & Friends and Bill Hemmer/Megan Kelly on Fox!

oh twitter!

 

 

Scott, correct me if I'm

Scott, correct me if I'm wrong, but GOP/Conservatives are all over twitter, in a huge way lately...

so is Cuomo trying to inject himself into twitter to combat GOP/Conservatives......

He is right

rsl775

He is correct he just didn’t go far enough. He should have continued: we are not a good anything show.

Network TV

I only watch sports on network tv, or the local news (for the weather only).  I learned about all the network "leanings" a long time ago. I may be from the country, but..even usn's can figure things out at times.

Here's a story you can lead off with tomorrow...

BRISTOL & LEVI CALL IT QUITS!

I'm sure every other newscast and blog will be on fire tomorrow.

I wonder if FoxNews will have a segment on unwed mothers and the state of moral decay in this country...

 

Odd Job

Since GMA's Cuomo believes

Since GMA's Cuomo believes they are 'reporters'.. maybe tommorrow they can do a segment on:

President Obama signing the $410 Billion spending bill in secret. He signed the bill in SECRET due to the American people being angry over all the earmarks; earmarks obama campaigned against for 2 years.

And, perhaps GMA could do a feature on Obama always using his teleprompter?

Obama's tacky gifts to PM Brown.....

GMA is an entertainment

GMA is an entertainment show for liberal elitist’s. They target their food, fashion “news” and interviews segments for the rich liberal. That could be the only explanation for the show. It is ALL about ratings and the liberal mindset, they could care less about any other market. It’s the problem with most of the MSM, their target market is toward the liberal and again it’s ALL about ratings and spreading the liberal agenda.