Appearing on Wednesday's "Good Morning America," former top Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos assured viewers that Barack Obama can now move on from his multiple failed cabinet officials. Referring to individuals such the (now) former Health and Human Services nominee Tom Daschle, who resigned on Tuesday due to tax problems, Stephanopoulos asserted that "the good news is, even though the President was forced to apologize so many times yesterday, is that these nominees now are gone. They've chosen to withdraw. So, the President can move on."
He added, "This was running the possibility of really hurting his reformist image. He can move on from that." Of course, just three days ago, on Sunday's GMA, Stephanopoulos touted a different message. He allowed that Daschle's nomination might be slowed down, but also predicted, "I don't think it's going to imperil it, though." He also forecasted, "The key is going to be those Republicans and, of course, is this the last of the bad news for Senator Daschle? If he gets some Republican support, this is the last of the bad news, I believe he will be confirmed."
Back on November 24, 2008, Stephanopoulos enthused over the greatness of Obama's unfolding cabinet. Talking to GMA co-host Robin Roberts, he raved, "We have not seen this kind of combination of star power and brain power and political muscle this early in a cabinet in our lifetimes." (The MRC has been heavily covering the controversy, first revealed last week by Politico, that Stephanopoulos has been having daily phone conversations with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. See an MRC press release for more.)
In fairness to ABC, Wednesday's "Good Morning America" did portray the resignation of Daschle and Nancy Killefer, who had been nominated to the new Chief Performance Officer position and also had tax problems, as a "real stumble," according to co-host Roberts. The show also featured clips of everyday Americans complaining about the tax problems of Obama nominees.
"So, we wanted to let you sound off on paying taxes, playing fair and the Obama nominees who did not," Roberts explained. In a previous segment, reporter Jake Tapper lectured the President, "Lesson one, just because you're cool with the cabinet nominee's problems does not mean the American people will be."
[Thanks to MRC intern Mike Sargent for transcribing the Sunday George Stephanopoulos segment.]
A transcript of the February 4 segment, which aired at 7:03am, follows:
ROBIN ROBERTS: And as you just saw in Jake's piece, people, of course, critical of politicians who do not pay taxes, especially as tens of millions of Americans prepare to write a check to the IRS in the next few months. So, we wanted to let you sound off on paying taxes, playing fair and the Obama nominees who did not.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I want to see everybody held to the same standards that my family is held to. As a citizen of the United States, we're forced to pay our taxes on time. We file our income tax- our paperwork. We have to send our check in or they come and knock on our door.
SECOND UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I feel that if the average person who goes to work has to pay taxes, and I know how much I pay, I feel that politicians should have to pay their fair share, too.
JON STEWART: Now, Geithner is the only one who has been approved. Daschle and Killefer have withdrawn their nominations. So, let that be a lesson to the kids out there. Pay your taxes, or you'll never rise any higher than treasury secretary.
ROBERTS: And now, for the bottom line, we turn to chief Washington correspondent, and host of "This Week," George Stephanopoulos. And, George, a few chuckles here in the studio, because everyone from Jon Stewart to folks on the street, as you just heard, outraged about what they're seeing with these nominees. The first real stumble for this administration.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: That's right. And that's why the good news is, even though the President was forced to apologize so many times yesterday, is that these nominees now are gone. They've chosen to withdraw. So, the President can move on. This was running the possibility of really hurting his reformist image. He can move on from that. But there were two other questions raised by these withdrawals, especially the withdrawal of Senator Daschle yesterday. What will it do to the overall effort to reform health care this year? In many ways Senator Daschle was uniquely positioned and a uniquely powerful advocate for that cause. And number two, will these stumbles embolden the President's opponents on this economic rescue plan, the stimulus package?
ROBERTS: Well, let's talk about that. Because, this does come on the heels of him going to Capitol Hill, and trying to push tough his stimulus package. Does this bolster the Republican opposition?
STEPHANOPOULOS: It has. And the President is going to have to agree to some changes right now. There is a bipartisan group working, now on changes that would bring down the overall level of this bill. It's led by three people, really. Senator Susan Collins of Maine. Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine. Those are moderate Republicans. And Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska. White House and Senate sources tell me that the President is going to be meeting individually with each one of these senators today, to see if they can work towards some kind of agreement to take out some of the spending programs in this package, which aren't considered to give you the biggest job bang for the buck. The biggest job bang for the buck. There will still be some differences with this group. The President doesn't want to bring the package down as far as some of the senators want to go. But they're be working intensively on a compromise today.
ROBERTS: As we heard at the end of Jake Tapper's piece, the President taking on another hot-button issue, executive pay, for these- some of the bank executives. A salary cap, if you will.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Absolutely essential for the President to have any hope of getting support for his announcement, likely to come next week, of new rescue plans for some of these troubled banks. There's so much anger out there about executive pay, about the fact that a lot of the banks and insurance companies are still taking junkets, even though they're getting government money. This was an absolute precondition to getting public support for this broader rescue package, which is likely to come next week.
ROBERTS: As always, George, appreciate the bottom line. Thanks so much. Have a good day.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
→ That's funny Steffi
February 4, 2009 - 16:02 ET by Cool ArrowHere's the chronology
So, Steffi, what you're really saying is that President Obama still clings to the thought that going back on his principles was the right thing to do even though he apologized for his admitted hypocrisy.
former top Democratic aide-turned journalist
February 4, 2009 - 16:09 ET by SickofLibsI humbly request we drop the adjective 'former' when discussing GS.
How about we just use
February 4, 2009 - 16:28 ET by motherbeltHow about we just use Democratic aide/journalist ?
Shouldn't the "Journalist"
February 4, 2009 - 16:33 ET by UtherpendShouldn't the "Journalist" part be put in Parenthesis to show that he really isn't one but a mouth piece for the DNC?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you."
I dunno... that still seems
February 4, 2009 - 16:41 ET by CortillaenI dunno... that still seems kinda redundant to me.
www.daybydaycartoon.... Proving that conservative comedy is very real.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamoto Musashi
Or how about...
February 4, 2009 - 21:51 ET by needleDemocratic aide posing as journalist
Kind of wordy, but it abbreviates as: Dapaj
Thanks, Scott, for keeping in focus the highly relevant point about the open line from White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. I can see this as a subtheme for the next four years.
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
"This was running the
February 4, 2009 - 16:22 ET by motherbelt"This was running the possibility of really hurting his reformist image. He can move on from that."
Yes, George, he can move on and get back to the important business of making the world love us again.
Seeing as how neither Pakistan nor India are listening to him; he's nearly started a trade war, Ahmedinejad is now setting pre-conditions to talk to him (US troops out of Middle East, end support for Israel), and hell, he's even got the Canadians pissed at us!
How's that "remaking the country, remaking the world" thing going, Mr. President???
Don't forget that runt in
February 4, 2009 - 16:53 ET by CortillaenDon't forget that runt in N. Korea deciding to flaunt his new, US-reaching missile. Seems like dicatorial nutjobs across the globe are having a field day.
www.daybydaycartoon.... Proving that conservative comedy is very real.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamoto Musashi
Obama under siege
February 4, 2009 - 19:05 ET by GalvanicCorrect, motherbelt. American and foreign politicians understand what glassy-eyed Obama-fans never grasped: Our President is a talker but not a doer. No swooning; no leg-tingling. They'll push him around at will. Who knows? He might even make Jimmy Carter look like a success.
Hey, Chris Matthews! You said it's your job to make this President successful! You better get on the stick ASAP!
Who wrote this report?
February 4, 2009 - 16:24 ET by KC MulvilleWas this Begala? Or Emanuel? Or Carville?
You know, sometimes we don't even remember anymore ...
Clintonopolous has the
February 4, 2009 - 16:43 ET by mattmClintonopolous has the credibility of a tax evader in the treasury department....
Stephanopoulos thinks obama
February 4, 2009 - 16:49 ET by TN MomStephanopoulos thinks obama has a 'reformist image', what, like Change Comes To Washington? Time for Stephanoupoulos to make daily phone calls to the real folks and snap that bubble he has created by taking talking points from his pals Carville, Begalia, and Rham Emanuel!
*Pops Bubble*
What A Gathering of Mellon Heads
February 4, 2009 - 17:45 ET by Morgan StevensRobin Roberts used to be a scoreboard reader at ESPN, John Stewart Liebowitz, is a little wise assed Jewish kid who thinks he's funny {not} and for some reason doesn't want anybody to know his last name and George Stepannopouls is the former the failed Press Secretary from the Clinton Admistration. Why anybody would listen to these mellon heads in the first place defies comprehension. Be that as it may though, ABC should send Roberts back to ESPN to read scoreboards, because that's about all her limited intelligence will allow her to do. Liebowitz should be sent back to doing standup rotuines at some 'last chance' comedy club in LA. And as for Stephanopolus well, he shouldn't be allowed to do anything more than run a Diner on Rt. 46 in New Jersey. At least he's got the right last name for the job. Giving these three mellon heads a television forum to preach from, is akin to making stupidity a virtue.
Morgan... ROFL! ...and
February 4, 2009 - 17:55 ET by bigtimerMorgan...
ROFL!
...and we know how virtuous the talking heads think they are...now don't we?
Steph thinks just because he
February 4, 2009 - 21:29 ET by semolina_filcherSteph thinks just because he graduated from Clinton University that everytime he opens up his yap, he has credibility. I wouldn't bet any farm on this dolt, Begala, Rahm or Carville making any sense. But apparently the MSM has been paying attention for the last 17 years.
Don't you feel better now
February 4, 2009 - 22:19 ET by Clear thinkerDon't you feel better now that Stephe has our backs?
Obama Fading Fast
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Reformist image?
February 5, 2009 - 07:15 ET by RD KingAren't all of his appointments to date retreads and most if not all a criminal to some degree? Same old crowd that he campaigned against. I think the first real stumble for this administration was the swearing in. It's time to move on alright, move on with a new president and not biden or pelosi.
Multiple-failed.... huh?
February 5, 2009 - 10:16 ET by JRJ08The stretch marks in this commentary are ready to pop. What "multiple failed cabinet officials" is this guy talking about? How is a nominee's past indiscretions a failure for the president, especially if that nominee was qualified to do the job for which he or she had been nominated? Furthermore, out of all the people nominated by the president, what small percentage of nominees for these posts ended up voluntarily withdrawing their name because something surfaced which would have had nothing to do with how they might've performed in that job? Let us put the previous administration under that same microscope and see how it fares. Does the name Harriet Myers mean anything to you? How about Michael Brown? And then there's our beloved Henry Paulson, Jr. Catastrophes, all. Highly qualified people stay out of government service for this very reason.