"Good Morning America" host Diane Sawyer on Monday repeatedly pressed Senator John McCain to attack Rush Limbaugh's assertion that he hopes Barack Obama's liberal policies fail. After playing a selectively edited clip that implied racial overtones and left out all context of what the radio host meant, Sawyer challenged, "Are you offended by what he said?"
A few seconds earlier, editing together two separate clips of Limbaugh, the GMA host played a misleading sound bite of the conservative star: "[From January 16 on radio] I don't need 400 words. I need four. I hope he fails. [From Fox News January 21 interview.] We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds. Because his father was black. Because this is the first black president. We've got to accept this." (For more on this, see CNSNews.com)
Sawyer then challenged the former GOP presidential nominee. "So, he says he hopes the Obama presidency fails. What do you say to Rush Limbaugh," she wondered. McCain refused to take the bait and simply asserted that all Americans hope the President can get the economy moving. Not getting the answer Sawyer was looking for, the journalist followed up: "One more try here. But, do you hope the president succeeds?" The GMA host closed out the line of questioning by pressing McCain as to whether he was "offended" by Limbaugh. The Arizona senator also appeared on CBS's "The Early Show" and was asked no such question.
In contrast to the conservative radio host, Sawyer offered McCain just one question on Tom Daschle, Obama's Health and Human Services nominee. Daschle is under fire for owing three years and $140,000 of back taxes. (He's since paid them.) The ABC host simply queried, "The Senate is getting ready to consider in earnest the tax problems of former Senator Daschle who is going to be nominated for the vital issues of health care. Have his apologies satisfied you? Would you vote for him?" She certainly didn't wonder if McCain was offended by Daschle's failure to pay taxes. (Reporter Jake Tapper did cover this story in another segment, but this was the only question Sawyer offered on the subject.)
A transcript of the February 2, 2009 segment, which aired at 7:10am, follows:
DIANE SAWYER: Just a few moments ago we were joined by a major Republican player in the stimulus package and, of course, in the loyal opposition, as he says, Senator John McCain of Arizona. And good morning, Senator McCain. Great to have you with us again. And, oh, it was close last night. It was so close.
SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN: They came- yeah, I was very proud of them and very proud of the way they came back and you've got to hand it to a Pittsburgh team who pulled a rabbit out of the hat. But it was a great game and everything that everybody wanted except for victory for us Cardinals fans.
SAWYER: There's always another year. There will be another year. Well, I want to turn to the news of the day as we know. The Senate is getting ready to consider in earnest the tax problems of former Senator Daschle who is going to be nominated for the vital issues of health care. Have his apologies satisfied you? Would you vote for him?
MCCAIN: It hasn't, quote, satisfied me. I just think we need to find out more information, his relationship with Mr. Henry, what he did for the millions of dollars and why it is that he didn't report a great deal of income in taxes. But I'd like to wait and see for all the facts to come out before I make a decision. I think we'll know that in the next couple of days.
SAWYER: Turning on to the stimulus package, you have come out against the current form of the package and also have said you don't think the administration has been collaborative enough with the Republicans. Have you called the President to express to him what you think should be in that bill?
MCCAIN: Well, the President met with both House and Senate and that was- House and Senate Republicans and I think that was a very important gesture and very helpful in establishing the climate. But in the House and in the Senate, the Democrats really didn't negotiate at all with the Republicans. We have got to have a truly bipartisan approach. I think the President can and will lead in negotiations to eliminate so many billion, tens of billions of unnecessary and non-stimulative projects. They are- this is a spending bill. This is the spending projects that frankly the more liberal members of Congress who have wanted to spend for a long time. It doesn't cut payroll taxes. It doesn't cut business taxes. It doesn't have a provision for when we start reducing this deficit.
SAWYER: Another big issue in the news and out there on the internet, of course, is Rush Limbaugh who basically says that Republicans have got to take sides and here was the question that he posed. Here is the challenge he posed.
RUSH LIMBAUGH: [From radio] I don't need 400 words. I need four. I hope he fails. [From Fox News interview.] We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds. Because his father was black. Because this is the first black president. We've got to accept this.
SAWYER: So he says he hopes the Obama presidency fails. What do you say to Rush Limbaugh?
MCCAIN: I hope that all of us as Americans can succeed in getting a package that will get this economy going, put millions of people back into jobs again and that we can all work together to do so without betraying our fundamental principles of our Republican Party, which is lower taxes, spending under control, fiscal responsibility and a high regard for the taxpayers' dollars.
SAWYER: One more try here. But, do you hope the president succeeds?
MCCAIN: I hope we all succeed working together. That's what the American people want us to do and if the President gets the credit for it, fine. I'll give it to him. What I want to do is work to get this country back on its feet again. This is terrible, Diane. I don't have to tell you or anybody watching how tough this situation is. That's when we have to act together.
SAWYER: Are you offended by what he said?
MCCAIN: Oh, listen, I think the important thing for us to do right now is to sit down and work together. Mr. Limbaugh is entitled to his opinion. I respect it as I do many other commentators on the issues of the day.
SAWYER: And before we let you go, can't help but note it is great to have you back with us. I just wonder now looking back at the campaign, what's the last thought you had about the race for the presidency?
MCCAIN: That I was proud of the campaign we ran. I lost to a very good candidate and I wish him every success because we need leadership now that the American people can get behind and two wars, tough economy And I'm proud of the campaign we ran and I'm sure we made many mistakes, Diane. But I'm proud of the people that supported us and the way we conducted the campaign and I'm honored and humbled to have had the opportunity to compete for the presidency of the greatest nation in the world.
SAWYER: Thank you, Senator McCain. Come often.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
→ John McCain
February 2, 2009 - 13:08 ET by Cool ArrowI hate it when these politicians refuse to answer outright questions.
If McCain is confused about the question, couldn't he just ask Sawyer "Do I hope he fails at what"?
Heck, I hope the President succeeds in a few areas. I hope he fails in others.
I certainly wanted Bush to fail with his amnesty push. I wanted Bush to fail with his $700b bailout.
These are two issues I hope Obama fails at also.
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country - Khalil Gibran
Sawyer is not only
February 2, 2009 - 16:07 ET by motherbeltSawyer is not only annoying, she is shameless. She changed the question.
The first time she asked "Are you offended by what he [Limbaugh] said?"
The second time she said: So he says he hopes the Obama presidency fails. What do you say to Rush Limbaugh?
Then, after two questions about Limbaugh, she then switches to "One more try here. But, do you hope (switching the accusation to McCain) the president succeeds?"
She makes it seem like she kept asking McCain if HE wanted Obama to fail, but that he wouldn't answer her.
Sawyer's behavior continues to be shameful...
February 2, 2009 - 13:13 ET by ThalpySawyer's behavior continues to be shameful, but what should we expect: it isn't the news, it's the desired answer. Just as all of them "supported the troops, but not the war," Limbaugh supports the office of President, but not the socialist agenda Obama promised us. Diane Sawyer doesn't care what the truth is, and never has.
Simple homogenized news for simple homogenized minds
February 2, 2009 - 13:31 ET by allanfViewers of Good Morning America are likely to swallow this pablum whole. Why? If they were sophisticated enough to see through Diane's legerdemain, she would long ago have earned their oppobrium. They would no longer be viewers.
It leads me wonder just how sophisticated this sixty something woman who carries herself like a teenager is. The newsbusters story Courtroom Explodes in Laughter After ABC’s Sawyer Touts Fairness ... may shed some light. Apparently she is less sophisticated than the average juror in New York County.
Did Diane ever ask Obama..
February 2, 2009 - 13:13 ET by Sergeant ROCK.. if he was 'offended' by what Jeremiah Wright said?? Or was she too busy stuffing envelopes for the Obama campaign?
Bolton/KEYES 2012
Here is a thought
February 2, 2009 - 13:14 ET by well99How about spending time informing people of all the pork in the stimulas.They would drather thru creative editing slam Rush.Journalism is dead.
She should have asked
February 2, 2009 - 13:17 ET by nwahs"Should Championship Wrestling be an Olympic sport?" Its about as newsworthy.
Pro Wrestling
February 2, 2009 - 13:18 ET by Sergeant ROCKNah.. she's saving that for Obama.
Bolton/KEYES 2012
Watching old Diane, she
February 2, 2009 - 13:20 ET by celatorWatching old Diane, she looked like she was about to ask McCain, "On a more serious note, do you think I'm pretty?"
For liberal Democrats and the Old Media, everything is crisis, chaos, calamity and catastrophe. That justifies stealing your property and liberties.
63 going on 16
February 2, 2009 - 13:35 ET by allanfYou hit the nail on the head with Diane. She has the mannerisms and approach of a teenage girl. Perhaps she is still back in 1963 when she won the America's Junior Miss title?
No Surprise
February 2, 2009 - 13:36 ET by cruiserDuh, get a clue. For the last few weeks Obama, the Dems. and their supporters in the main stream media have been laying the ground work for the "Fairness Doctrine". It's coming back, but it won't be called that. These people practice "1984" double speak. When they get finished everyone will think it's great that our freedom to listen to what we want has disappeared. It's the 1930's all over again.
Outside of dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. ----- Groucho Marx
cruiser... Bingo...you're
February 2, 2009 - 15:12 ET by bigtimercruiser...
Bingo...you're right on the mark.
I also answered a lot the same way you did over on Mark Finelsteins new blog, he has a blog post about this also....Finkelblog to any of you who don't know...go check it out, post a comment or tow if you enjoyed all of his blog posts here over the years as I have.
McCain shows why he was such a dud
February 2, 2009 - 14:03 ET by political mavenWhy can't these "geniuses" answer, a simple question ?"Dianne, Rush said he wants his liberal policies to fail, I agree" (of course Mac is practically a lib himself, so he wouldn;t say it, even if he were smart enough to)
How about this Dianne, though, knowing exactly what she was doing, knowing the context, but not including it....
Hey, Dianne, if you are reading this......have you no shame?
It's ok to hate Limbaugh, but for god's sake, can't you be a little teeny bit of an honest journalist???
Rush Limbaugh notes that
February 2, 2009 - 13:47 ET by Jack BauerRush Limbaugh notes that the Left (Democrats, liberals, socialists) are obsessed with two things
SEX and RACE
I think we can add a third obsession; SEX, RACE and LIMBAUGH
They really are CRAZY. Is this the crime now. Not agreeing with Obama?
McCain is continuing to impress me
February 2, 2009 - 13:45 ET by Dee BunkPre election he would have tore into Rush. I'm hoping like many of us he's had an Epiphany about how unfair and misleading the media are. Once you see how they lie and distort, many of your opinions start changing.
McCain handled this interview very well, he was great on Fox News Sunday, He voted against Geithner and voted for overturning PresBo's Federal abortion funding and hopefully he will vote against Daschle and the Stimulus Porkulus.
I'm hoping we have a permanent convert in McCain.
Sawyer needs to go back to
February 2, 2009 - 13:51 ET by SickofLibsSawyer needs to go back to the Stephanopoulos Institute of Ventriloquism and repeat that McCain course.
Everyone should know by now that FIVE TIMES is the magic number you need to repeat something to get McCain to parrot it back to you.
SOL
February 2, 2009 - 23:29 ET by thebutlerdiditI think it only used to take 3 times for McCain to agree with you, but I didn't know it was up to 5. He is getting almost Conservativey. LOL. I love how he is wishy-washy through the interview, then he says we elected this great fellow and I hope he succeeds. Uh, that was the answer Diane was looking for, Juan. Except you didn't bash Bush, or Rush. I like how she referred to him as the "loyal opposition." I just can't help but wonder who he has been loyal to, and who he has opposed.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
The dance of the dead.
February 2, 2009 - 13:53 ET by buddycThe dance of the dead. Isn't Sawyer married to Paul Volker? My bad, that is Andrea Mitchell married to Alan Greenspan.
NO amount of plastic surgery will repair either's face and the brain virtually died at least a decade ago. But they keep on dancing to the liberal tunes.
Correction
February 2, 2009 - 14:08 ET by mizuno68Not getting the answer Sawyer was looking for, the journalist followed up:
You forgot to put "journalist" in quotes, since she ceased to be one some time ago.
I'm offended...
February 2, 2009 - 14:08 ET by jdlybrandnewsisblues
I'm offended by Diane Sawyer, Matt Lauer. Charlie Gibson, Brian Williams, and Katie Couric. That's why I don't watch them anymore.
Why does Obama need a pet? He already has an endless array of lapdogs in the media!
me too
February 2, 2009 - 14:30 ET by rockyracoonTo say that these people you mentioned jdlybrand are patheticly biased is an understatement I can't remember the last time I sat through an entire network newscast, It's been over ten years.
I, in no way would want you to be confused at what I'm saying---
February 2, 2009 - 14:37 ET by Roscoe MendagoWhat happened to "yes/no" answers to questions? McCain could have answered Sawyer with a lot less effort and enhanced his position with clarity. Rush doesn't want socialism to succeed, nor should McCain. If Obama's leftist policies succeed it's a failure for America, the pork stimulus will not work as it is. What would have been wrong with McCain answering Saywer's question by simply saying, "no, what Rush said, in context, is how I feel".
Politicians are collectively genius's of obfuscation, it seems the more they talk the less it's understood.
Yes/no, how refreshing it would be....
With all due respect
February 2, 2009 - 14:56 ET by jdubyaI like John McCain. He is my senator. I do not agree with him all the time, but I did vote for him for his current office and for president.
I did not vote for Bill Clinton, nor did I want to see him fail.
I did not vote for Barack Obama, nor do I want to see him fail.
We should not want to collectively watch any of our leaders fail. It does not do the US good abroad. What we want to watch fail, are the miserable scoundrels in Congress. People like Pelosi and Reid. We want to watch them attain the highest accolades of failure. We want to watch them get the boot, like their predecessors they replaced in '06. We will watch them get the boot in '10 when this crap sandwich dries, catches afflame, and begins to burn their careers back towards the shriveled shells they encase themselves with.
I did not vote for Barack
February 2, 2009 - 17:03 ET by Dan The Man 2I did not vote for Barack Obama, nor do I want to see him fail
You should really understand the exchange and what Rush said verses what teh media wants you to believe he meant. I do want Obama to fail at executing everyone of his socialist policies startuing with teh pork on the table now. I want teh American public to see his failures and understand why tehy failed, why socialism and communism will always fail unless supported by a cowering elctorate or no electorate at all.
uke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
→ It's crazy
February 2, 2009 - 17:06 ET by Cool ArrowWould I like to see Obama succeed in his stated goal of redistributing the wealth?
No. I would like to see Obama fail at achieving this goal.
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country - Khalil Gibran
Of course, and Rush could have said in a less inflammatory way
February 2, 2009 - 18:37 ET by nwahsRush could have got his meaning across in a less inflammatory way, but what fun is that? His forte is hyperbole, satire and parody. Don't think for a second Rush could not have stated the exact same thing in a way that was less given to sensational sound bytes.
It was crafted for publicity, not education.
Its doing exactly what it was supposed to do, and the fact that "journalists" ( from all ideologies) are swimming on the end of the line, should be more scary than funny. ITS STINK BAIT (ask a fisherman).
Yes we get it. Rush doesn't mean he wishes Obama to be a total failure, but his efforts to push through socialism is a failure. Rush wants the stimulus bill to fail but I'm sure he doesn't want Obama's attempts to keep this country secure, to fail.
This ain't rocket science.
It is hyperbole (carny barking if you will).
→ nwahs
February 2, 2009 - 18:40 ET by Cool ArrowI'm not attacking you, but adding to what you've offered
So, it was Wrong for Japanese Americans to hope FDR would fail at putting them into concentration camps and redistributing their personal wealth among white Americans?
Were they being treasonous in hoping they could remain among the public at large?
Rush was specific with his explanation, but the MSM made sure there wasn't much else than those four words.
I submit the MSM was the entity delving heavily into hyperbole.
“Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce
our laws to the letter. ” Sen. Tom Daschle, 05/07/98
There's nothing wrong with hoping wrong fails
February 2, 2009 - 18:50 ET by nwahsObviously, there's nothing wrong with hoping things you perceive as bad for the country, fail. Some people honestly believe Gitmo is bad for the US, and they hope it fails. There's nothing treasonous or unpatriotic about that ( perhaps misguided).
Wishing a whole Presidency, an entire 4 years in America, is a total failure could be legitimately argued as unpatriotic, especially in the first month of the new regime. After some track record of changing America, perhaps someone could mean that and NOT be unpatriotic?
But the point here is Rush simply meant he hopes policies conservatives feel are bad for the country, fail. He crafted it in a manner that he would have to explain or nuance it. He wanted the publicity and he got it.
Rush doesn't need 'publicity'
February 2, 2009 - 19:01 ET by Sergeant ROCKOn that point, you'd be wrong. He's the most successful personality on radio. He's a great communicator who's delivery is entertaining due to his wit. Of course, he could adopt the liberal model of 'doom and gloom'. But unlike liberals, he won't follow a model that's demonstrated to be an abject failure.
Bolton/KEYES 2012
BTW
February 2, 2009 - 20:42 ET by nwahsI love your sig :)
Jdubya
February 2, 2009 - 23:43 ET by thebutlerdiditWith all due respect, why in the world should we give a rat's rear about what people abroad think of us? Do you actually believe that by changing Presidents or policies they are suddenly going to love us, around the world? If that was true, then they wouldn't have burned pics of Obama in Afghanistan and Palestine a few weeks back, and this last week in Paris. I work with people around the world. I speak to foreigners, daily. Most of them never hated us before, certainly not to the degree the media played it, and most do not care now. It is not a big deal to them. Of course there will always be some, especially in the European countries, but they shouldn't worry or cast stones in our direction, as they have plenty of problems and failures of their own to deal with. And yes, of course I hope the biggest takeover of government in history fails. It is utter bs and the American people are too stupid to know any better. So, the rest of us have to suffer for the apathetic people we share this country with. So, yes, FAIL on Socialism.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
McCain did just fine
February 2, 2009 - 15:28 ET by slickwillie2001I dislike McCain as much as any conservative, but in this case I see some undue criticism here. McCain handled the questions relatively well, better than I would have expected. You can't expect anyone, let alone McCain, to give a blanket endorsement to Limbaugh, with context or without.
Yep...McC was smart for
February 2, 2009 - 15:36 ET by bigtimerYep...McC was smart for once.
Long time coming too.
BT - don't you think McCain has been pretty good?
February 2, 2009 - 17:47 ET by Dee BunkI've been really pleasantly surprised. I'm cautiously optimistic that it will continue.
I liked his Fox News Sunday interview with Wallace and his voting against Geithner.
There is no politician I agree with on everything so I won't get mad for an errant vote here and there as long as he doesn't go around demonizing the Republican position.
willie, Right. And Michael
February 2, 2009 - 15:57 ET by Chris Normanwillie,
Right. And Michael Steele shouldn't be expected to embrace anything and everything Rush has said or may yet say - anymore than Rush should (or would) embrace and endorse everything the Republicans have done or may do. The Wile E. Coyotes libs in the media think they're laying (yet) another "ingenious" trap.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Chris - I thought Steele handled himself pretty well also
February 2, 2009 - 17:50 ET by Dee Bunkon Fox News Sunday.
He clearly clarified for those who tried to take something else from his previous words that the conservative positions are not what need to be changed, just how they are portrayed.
this is the comment that angers me the most
February 2, 2009 - 15:57 ET by silent conservativeSAWYER: And before we let you go, can't help but note it is great to have you back with us.
we destroyed you for the past year( how dare you run for president)but now that you're no longer a threat, you can be our friend again. They will start to use the term maverick again, just wait.
Yeah, that "with us" was a
February 2, 2009 - 16:10 ET by motherbeltYeah, that "with us" was a loaded term, wasn't it?
IMO she meant on our side....since McCain hasn't gone anywhere and was available for interviews all along.
Sawyer is a media whore.... so what else is new?
February 2, 2009 - 16:29 ET by yobobbybABC tries to shape opinion just like the others, and she is no better nor any worse than the other networks. Real news? Not on the American Bullsh*t Channel. The trouble here is McCain is weak and Rush is on an announced vacation. McCain has become the go to guy for these attacks because he is weak and they know that he won't defend or explain adequately, and that he'll dance around the issues. Crikey! I'd pull my hair out if I had any.
Wonder how many times Diane
February 2, 2009 - 16:35 ET by ckc1227Wonder how many times Diane has asked President Obama is offended by the nonsense and hate that comes out of the Daily Kos?
Oh...wait...seeing as how President Obama and every other democrat candidate at that time(except Biden I think) attended the Daily Kos convention, I guess that's not a question you'd want to ask, is it Diane?
sawyer
February 2, 2009 - 16:46 ET by east tennessee johnSo Rush has become their straw man as a focal point to gin up support for the already failing Sgt. Schultz administration. He wants our god to fail, so do I you pompous bitch.
Can't stand her
February 2, 2009 - 17:16 ET by mvfreemanSawyer's constant plaintive emoting (captured perfectly in the screen cap) is a ridiculously tired schtick.
Way to sound impartial there Diane.
One more reason I don't watch any of those shows.
i'M OFFENEDED BY JOHN McCain's PRESIDENTIAL RUN
February 2, 2009 - 17:39 ET by JIMMY1660SENATOR McCain IS TOO NICE!!!HIS CAMPAIGN WAS WEAK AT BEST.TELLING A STORY, AS RUSH DOES DAILY, WITH FACTS TO GIVE CREDABILITY TO THAT STORY.FOR CHRIST SAKE, THE NYT'S HAD OP-ED FOLKS MAKING STORES UP. RUSH HAS NEVER SAID ANYTHING THAT DID NOT HAVE FACTS TO SUPPORT HIS STORY.
55+ MILLION FOLKS VOTED FOR SEN. McCain DO NOT GIVE ME THE CRAP ABOUT WE ARE MOVING LEFT.WISHFUL THINKING. ONCE BHO IS FOUND OUT TO BE THE COMMUNIST WE ALL KNEW HE WAS/IS, THINGS WILL CHANGE.
allow me to Love America
Doesn't Everyone Hope Socialism Fails?
February 2, 2009 - 18:03 ET by The Smokin FrogWhat is so bad about hoping his socialist policies fail anyway? For eight years these leftists haters have been calling for the death of George Bush. Apparently that was just fine. I don't want anything to happen to Obama, and neither does any other Conservative. That degree of hate seems to be reserved for the ones who know the greater good. But for sure I hope and pray we are spared from any more socialism.
It's All Dirty Politics
Smokin Frog...
February 2, 2009 - 18:15 ET by JerI don't want anything to happen to Obama, and neither does any other Conservative.
Better just speak for yourself, since the second part of your assertion is contradicted by sentiments expressed by at least a few of your fellow conservatives right here at NewsBusters.
Jer
Jer
February 2, 2009 - 19:30 ET by well99That maybe so but I havent seen any Obama death watches.Like Huff had for Tony Snow.Wishing Chaney died from Kos Kids.If someone posted that garbage on here about Obama then I am sure NB would delete it and other posters would raise hell.I may dislike Obama's policies but I wish no harm to him.Now Franks and Dodd I hope get adjoining cells.
→ EWWW
February 2, 2009 - 19:33 ET by Cool ArrowHey Chris, is that a shiv in your pocket or are you glad to see me?
“Make no mistake, tax cheaters cheat us all, and the IRS should enforce
our laws to the letter. ” Sen. Tom Daschle, 05/07/98
lol
February 3, 2009 - 14:53 ET by well99I wish they would have that conversation.That would mean they were where they belong.
Nice to see that McCain
February 2, 2009 - 18:41 ET by R D HelmNice to see that McCain didn't actually cave.
For once.
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
Kind of what I said over on
February 2, 2009 - 18:45 ET by bigtimerKind of what I said over on FinkelBlog this morning too Dave.
ABC: Your Fake News Source
February 2, 2009 - 21:51 ET by TN MomA few seconds earlier, editing together two separate clips of Limbaugh, the GMA host played a misleading sound bite of the conservative star
It is an outrage that ABC can just splice together comments and get away with it! Wow! I bet the good people of Louisville, KY are disapointed in Sawyer.
ABC News
February 2, 2009 - 22:24 ET by blazermaniacWhy can't Sawyer and the rest of the MSM get their facts right. Rush has stated over and over again that he wants Obama's policies to fail. Of course, the idiots in the MSM, don't report the news, they just listen to what they want to listen to. You can't get a decent interview from CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS or PMSNBC at anytime.