ABC's Chris Cuomo Actually Grills Nancy Pelosi on Accountability

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

"Good Morning America" news anchor Chris Cuomo conducted a surprisingly tough interview with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday, grilling her on the lack of accountability for how 2008's financial bailout money has been spent. He told the powerful Democrat, "...I think there are a few issues that unite Americans like this. Don't waste our money, especially right now."

Regarding the news that Congress doesn't know how much of the $350 billion T.A.R.P has been spent, Cuomo challenged, "Why didn't savvy lawmakers like yourself, like Barney Frank, say, 'We're not going to just release this money with no strings. We'll build it in the law. We'll build in accountability?' Why didn't you do that?"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

When the Speaker of the House attempted to pass blame off to President Bush, the ABC journalist retorted, "Are you saying that you can promise the American people, that going forward, with your president and your party, things will be different? That they will know where the money is?" During a discussion of the possible distribution of the second $350 billion funds, Pelosi again blamed Bush. Regarding that money, Cuomo proclaimed, "I guess the way to say it, this will be on Obama's account. Not on Bush's account, how this money is spent."

After Cuomo called for no more pointing at the administration and saying, "Well, they screwed up T.A.R.P.," a unrepentant Pelosi attacked back, "Well, they did. But they did." The GMA news anchor closed out the discussion by again instructing, "Now, it's you. It really is you by any other definition."

Cuomo did offer some softball questions for the liberal congresswoman. On the topic of a children's health care program, he blandly wondered, "With everything that's going on, this is a very important first step for you. You want this high on the agenda. Why?" The network host followed up with the equally uninteresting query: "So, what is the message that you're hoping to send by bringing this up early? And I guess, with your hopes, getting passage, with a President Obama?" But, overall, Cuomo should be commended for pressing the House Speaker on accountability.

A transcript of the January 14 segment, which aired at 7:15, follows:

CHRIS CUOMO: We have an exclusive interview for you this morning, Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. About to enter a new era with a Democrat in the White House. The big issue, of course, is the economy and the problem the government has had managing the use of your tax dollars. What went wrong with the first $350 billion? What will be different going forward? That's where we started with the speaker in her Capitol Hill office. Why didn't savvy lawmakers like yourself, like Barney Frank, say, 'We're not going to just release this money with no strings. We'll build it in the law. We'll build in accountability?' Why didn't you do that?

HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Well, we did build it in, by having an oversight committee and an inspector general. But that- the next thing we could do was to go down to Pennsylvania Avenue with a set of handcuffs and say to them you're no longer allowed to enforce this law because you're not doing it right. Instead, we had an election. And we changed the country. And now we have a new president.

CUOMO: But, Congress passed the law.

PELOSI: Right. We passed the law. The President-

CUOMO: You could have put in the conditions. There were other things in there.

PELOSI: We did put in the conditions. We did put in conditions.

CUOMO: But now you know in retrospect they aren't enough, right?

PELOSI: Well, you don't expect somebody to give somebody tens of billions of dollars and say, don't tell me how you're going to spend it. There was a purpose for the money, but they did not insist upon it.

CUOMO: I mean, I think there are a few issues that unite Americans like this. Don't waste our money, especially right now. And a situation you all have to deal with the new president is, you have Citibank, Morgan Stanley thinking about merging. It just gets slipped out in the news that they're reserving $2 to $3 billion, for retention payments. We both know that word means one thing. Bonuses.

PELOSI: Bonuses. Well, let me say this: There's nobody more disappointed than how the Bush administration executed the T.A.R.P. law, than the members of Congress who sent the bill to them. And so, yes. When people see bonuses under any name, whatever they want to call them, they're fighting words for the members.

CUOMO: Haven't heard anybody complaining about the Citigroup/Morgan Stanley, $3 billion in retention payments. Barney Frank, he's no shrinking violet. Haven't heard him come out about this. You know, where's the outrage?

PELOSI: Well, the- You talk anecdotally about one thing or another. There's tremendous outrage about CEO compensation in general.

CUOMO: Are you saying that you can promise the American people, that going forward, with your president and your party, things will be different? That they will know where the money is?

PELOSI: Things will be different because we will have a president who will enforce the law. And, again, with the light of transparency that will be built into any new- if there is to be anymore T.A.R.P. funding.

CUOMO: Well, he's asking for $350 billion.

PELOSI: President Bush has sent over the request. He sent it over yesterday.

CUOMO: For Obama. It's not that it's being asked for by Bush. He wants it. He asked for it.

PELOSI: No, no. The official request has been made by President Bush.

CUOMO: Because he's the president.

PELOSI: That's right.

CUOMO: But, he's asking for it because President-elect Obama wants it.

PELOSI: Well, he's asking for it because he wants President Obama to be identified with it. But we're comfortable with that because President Obama will enforced the law in a completely different way.

CUOMO: This money- I guess the way to say it, this will be on Obama's account. Not on Bush's account, how this money is spent.

PELOSI: Absolutely.

CUOMO: And the responsibility is on the Democrats, because there will be no more just pointing at the administration and saying, 'Well, they screwed up T.A.R.P.' 'Well, they got us in this mess.'

PELOSI: Well, they did. But they did.

CUOMO: Now, it's you. It really is you by any other definition.

PELOSI: And you will see a difference.

CUOMO: Pelosi could not be more confident about better days to come under President-elect Obama, an administration whose first legislative achievement won't deal with the economy, but health care. A program the speaker and President Bush were at odds over. This state child health insurance program. With everything that's going on, this is a very important first step for you. You want this high on the agenda. Why?

PELOSI: Over 11 million children will have access to health care cause of this legislation. In the previous administration, President Bush said we couldn't afford it. It would cost 40 days in Iraq to insure over 10 million children for one year. Certainly, we can afford it.

CUOMO: So, what is the message that you're hoping to send by bringing this up early? And I guess, with your hopes, getting passage, with a President Obama?

PELOSI: Well, that a new day has dawned. President Bush objected. President Obama supports it. And supports providing health care for our children. It's a shared value that we have in a bipartisan way in the Congress. And now, with the president of the United States.

CUOMO: Thank you very much for taking the time to do the interview.

PELOSI: My pleasure.

CUOMO: Appreciate the opportunity.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Pelosi is a ":$t#!

'President' Obama supports health care for children.
You mean the ones who DON'T get flushed out of their mother's wombs and thrown into dirty linen closets to die? How magnanimous of that son of a b!tch.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

CL3x

Girl, are you not feeling the hopeychangey love, today? What's wrong with you? Don't you know that FINALLY the pols will be doing the right thing? And they will be giving all those little children, the ones that don't get flushed, a wonderful opportunity for HEALTH CARE. Now, I just want someone to show me kids that are low-income that DON'T already have health care? In every state, Medicaid pays 100% of all doctor's bills, each state has a cute lil name for it. Here in JawJa we call it "Peach Kids." In Alabama it is called "All Kids." Pretty much says it all now, doesn't it? This is sooo much bs, I want to rip Nancy a new one.

 

Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke

I'll tell y'all something about gov health care

There are clinics here in NC just for kids on Medicaid. A few years ago there was a big scandal about a local dental clinic. They were putting METAL CAPS on little kid's BABY teeth. 4 and 5 year olds. And I'm not talking about one or two teeth, I'm talking about 10 at a time. They would tell the parent to stay in the waiting room, strap that poor little kid to a papoose board and cap ALL his teeth. After a bunch of parents complained to the local news about it they FINALLY did a story on it. An investigation discovered that none of those children needed ANY of that treatment. It was fraud to get as much money from Medicaid as they could. They got paid for each cap, so they capped like it was 1999.

Several dozen children were tortured before it was stopped. They screamed until they passed out. They did it to the really small kids so they didn't have the vocabulary to tell their parents what happened to them. The mother they interviewed said what really tipped her off was that her son had cried so hard he burst blood vessels in his face.
Government health care is a moneymaker for dishonest people. That's it.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl3x

I think that is horribly disgusting!!! I agree that this stuff is beyond unconscionable. However, there are some really good doctors and clinics, too. Most doctors rotate through the state health care facilities, and they are not bad. Do I like that we have Medicaid? NO!! But we do, so why do we need anything else? That's the part I can't get. Ideally, we one day will be rid of Medicaid. And until we do, we will continue to have people like you described, most won't be that evil, they will just be padding bills here and there that we taxpayers will have to pay. As if that wasn't evil enough...............BTW, I will help you beat this guy's rear, if you want to take him on. Kiddie harmers can feel the wrath of my car tires! ; )

 

Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke

TBDI

Get this, it was a WOMAN! Heavyset, with a crewcut. Manimal had the gall to do TV ads for the place. It better hope I never meet it in a dark alley.
Anybody who ties kids to a board and inflicts pain on them deserves the same treatment.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

It amazes me

It amazes me that considering what the Democrats have done to this country in the short time they took over the majority of the senate they still have the audacity to place the blame elsewhere.  I look at Pelosi and Harry Reid and it makes me sick thinking about the responsibility these people have, when i wouln't trust them running a hot dog stand. 

Yep.  You almost expect

Yep.  You almost expect Pelosi to come out with something like, "Don't blame me, I'm not the Speaker of the House!"  What's more, if she did that in an interview with any of the "MSM" talking heads, they would nod sagely and agree with her deep philosophical implication.

Kudos to Cuomo for asking some relevant questions.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

CUOMO: And the

CUOMO: And the responsibility is on the Democrats, because there will be no more just pointing at the administration and saying, 'Well, they screwed up T.A.R.P.' 'Well, they got us in this mess.'

PELOSI: Well, they did. But they did.

 

Same old broken record. I am not sure that she knows how to answer a question without looking for an R to blame it on. Thank goodness for all those San Francisco values she brought to the House. I guess one of them was placing the blame on someone else.

Dingy Harry

Even Camille Paglia has nothing nice to say about the idiot Harry Reid:

Harry Reid is a cadaverous horse's ass of mammoth proportions. How in the world did that whiny, sniveling incompetent end up as Senate majority leader? Give him the hook!

(From Noel's earlier post).

 

Tanks Blonde

I must have missed that the first time around. Next time someone poses the, "what's wrong with Harry Reid - I like Harry Reid.." crapola to me (and there's plenty of of that mouth rot around here in LA) I'll know exactly what to say! (;~> g

Now that the Libzis are

Now that the Libzis are solidly in power, the Goebbelses of the psuedo-media feel safe to engage in the scrutiny they avoided before the election(s)....

This is merely a trick to appear objective...when the 2010 electioncycle begins, they'll be right back to their leftist propaganda.  Count on it.

Pelosi must be the only

Pelosi must be the only person in the world who actually believes what she says. 

"Well, if you give a person a check, you don't expect them to actually go out and cash it, do you?!"

To think that Uhbama will do anything differently with TARP (other than perhaps recipients of the cash) is pure naivete.  This purported transparency will go the way of his birth certificate and college records.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

HK

Unfortunately, it's not naivete, it's just pure audacity and EVIL! She can try to pass it off on Bush, but as Cuomo said, soon it will all be on them, and the Republicans will roll over every which way they want. You can take that to the bank. When the Conservatives say they want O to succeed, when they agree to let people like Hillary and Geither in, when you have Bush offering to give emergency money for O's inauguration, then you can bet that we will be in the weeds a long time. Until we do away will the willy nillies, and take control of our own party, and quit letting Dems define who we are, then we will never be in control again. Sad, but true.

 

Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke

The buck ALWAYS stops at Bush, and will forever

Pelosi is lower than the nastiest piece of dog crap I ever had to scrape out of my sneaker treads.

"But they did it." WHO TF is the architect of this monstrosity? Bush?

So no accountability, no enforcement, instead "we had an election?" I thought the election was well underway for a few years before this abomination called a bailout. So 'the people' made the decision NOT to enforce any oversight by electing Obama, and let you and Frank and Reid and the rest of the Dem scumbags off the hook? No logic and a massive display of cowardice.

Tremendous outrage about CEO compensation? Nice deflection, but inconsequential compared to how Pelosi & Co. are digging us in deeper every day, by trillions, with little or no accountability or concern for the impact on future generations. The majority of Americans were soundly against it, but F-us, Pelosi & Co. know better and we had nothing to say about it.

How can run-of-the-mill Democrats listen to her whining, nonstop BS excuses and honestly look at themselves in the mirror? The party of cowards and finger-pointers.

If any American city gets

If any American city gets hit by the Islamofacists, even in the years 2011 and 2012, the only relief to the misery would be watching Nancy twist herself into "Pretzel Pelosi" trying to blame it entirely on GWB. 

Chris Cuomo - grill your bro, Andrew - Start there.

Ref: "Andrew Cuomo is the elder son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo and the older brother of ABC News journalist Chris Cuomo," and is in the running for the NY Senatorial slot to replace Hillary Clinton - if Caroline Kennedy doesn't get it.

PELOSI: Well, they did. But they did.

Chris Cuomo could have responded to Pelosi with:

 Cuomo: Well, Ms. Speaker, the "they" is my brother. Between him (and the Frank's who defended him) and the Fed - we really don't need to look much further, do we?

Chris should understand all too well who is one of the major causes of the current real estate/mortgage/credit crisis: Andrew Cuomo, former HUD Secretary for Bill Clinton.

From the lefty liberal NY rag mag, the "Village Voice:"
Andrew Cuomo and Fannie and Freddie --  How the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history gave birth to the mortgage crisis (my bold):

August 05, 2008 -- There are as many starting points for the mortgage meltdown as there are fears about how far it has yet to go, but one decisive point of departure is the final years of the Clinton administration, when a kid from Queens without any real banking or real-estate experience was the only man in Washington with the power to regulate the giants of home finance, the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), better known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Andrew Cuomo, the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history, made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to the country's current crisis. He took actions that—in combination with many other factors—helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without putting in place the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a sweetheart lender with sky-high loan ceilings and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of overpriced and unsupportable loans.

 

Three to four million families are now facing foreclosure, and Cuomo is one of the reasons why.

 

What he did is important—not just because of what it tells us about how we got in this hole, but because of what it says about New York's attorney general, who has been trying for months to don a white hat in the subprime scandal, pursuing cases against banks, appraisers, brokers, rating agencies, and multitrillion-dollar, quasi-public Fannie and Freddie..

 

Reference: NOV. 2000 -- HUD ANNOUNCES NEW REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE $2.4 TRILLION IN MORTGAGES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR 28.1 MILLION FAMILIES

San Fran Nan

Well with rules changes Comrade Pelosi and her minions rammed through the House, if I were a Republican rep, on every major vote, all ready predetermined by the new rules, I'd go back to my district and voice any complaints or introduce andy alternatives to the proposed bill, rather than just sit there and be steamrolled by the new "liberalized democratic" process.  These authoritarians are in control and must, somehow, be made or held accountable.

Vacuous

newsisblues

It is astounding how vacuous this woman is. I think the botox has hit her brain. Still not sure what the heck is wrong with Bawney. How long are we going to let these IDIOTS get away with this? Is it W's fault these people have no morals?

Re; vacuous

You couldn't be more right. The woman is an idiot and has been skating by so long on B.S. that she thinks she can lard over anyone with manure and they will be fooled. Very likely she has a severely overinflated idea of how far the gift of glibness will take her (and probably mistakes that gift for superior intellect).

Now that W will not be around to kick anymore, it will be interesting to see her trying to ride that talking point to (hopefully) an increasing chorus of 'but wait a minute, Nancy--George is back in Crawford, so now it's all on you.' The gift of glib is not going to help her explain around her ineptitude forever.