ABC Hypes Obesity Tax: Pay More; Live Longer

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Wednesday's "Good Morning America," fill-in host Bill Weir and reporter Dan Harris touted the benefits of New York's proposed 18 percent obesity tax on soft drinks. Weir teased the segment by enthusing, "One official says making you pay more could actually save your life later." Harris repeatedly played clips from New York's state health commissioner, Dr. Richard Daines, who created a YouTube video to promote the tax.

After one such snippet, the reporter parroted, "No one likes taxes, he says. But this one, he argues, is actually good for you." At another point, Harris touted how this tax would "save" New Yorkers money and noted the nanny state advantages such extra cash would create: "But Dr. Daines insists this new tax will save people money. Not only on overall obesity-related health care costs, but he also says if everyone in a family of four drank one can less of soda a week, they would save $100 a year."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

And despite guest host Weir promising in the tease for the segment, "We'll hear from both sides," very little of that actually occurred. Harris did play a snippet of one anonymous New Yorker complaining about taxes. He then featured a single clip of Susan Neely, the president and CEO of the American Beverages Association. She complained, "The last thing we should be doing in these economic times is to put a sales tax or an aggressive tax on hard-working families."

In contrast, GMA highlighted five excerpts of Daines' YouTube video, where he argued that although the obesity tax is 18 percent, health care costs will go down as a result. (At one point, Daines suggested in a paternal tone, "With the money we save, we can buy some new jogging shoes.") Since ABC seems so taken with the idea of a tax on soda, one wonders if the network will continue to feature all those ads from Pepsi and Coke?

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:15am on December 31, follows:

7:01am tease 

BILL WEIR: Also coming up this morning, a New Year. Could it bring new taxes? A new tax on soda. One official says making you pay more could actually save your life later. And others say it's just another example of a nanny state. We'll hear from both sides.

7:15

KATE SNOW: Well, the new year will mean new taxes on a lot of things. What if they said, though, that they were going to put a tax on sugary soda? It's a controversial idea New York's health commissioner is proposing. And he's pushing the idea on YouTube. ABC's Dan Harris has more.

ABC GRAPHIC: Should Soda be Taxed? One Politician's Push

DR. RICHARD DAINES (New York State Health Commissioner): In 1970, each New Yorker drank the equivalent of about five cans of soda a week.

HARRIS: This five-minute video released this week, and called "Soda Versus Milk," is a low-budget, low-key affair, featuring one mild-mannered Mormon physician politician, with a lot of props.

DAINES: Over the course of a year, we take in about 13 more pounds of straight sugar.

HARRIS: New York State Health Commissioner Dr. Richard Daines made the video to support a proposed obesity tax. Which would put an 18 percent sales tax on sugary drinks, like soda, to help close the state's huge budget gap. The money would go towards health programs. Danes says increased soda consumption is boosting childhood obesity.

DAINES: 21,000 extra calories becomes about six pounds of fat.

HARRIS: He apparently decided to make the video after seeing a poll showing 60 percent of New Yorkers oppose an obesity tax.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I'm frustrated. I'm annoyed. They're taxing everything.

DAINES: I just thought, you know, a dry letter to the editor or something isn't the way to do it. My kids said do a YouTube.

SUSAN NEELY (President/CEO, American Beverages Association): The last thing we should be doing in these economic times is to put a sales tax or an aggressive tax on hard-working families.

HARRIS: But Dr. Daines insists this new tax will save people money. Not only on overall obesity-related health care costs, but he also says if everyone in a family of four drank one can less of soda a week, they would save $100 a year.

DAINES: With the money we save, we can buy some new jogging shoes.

HARRIS: No one likes taxes, he says. But this one, he argues, is actually good for you.

DAINES: Here's to Governor Paterson's proposal to reduce obesity. And here's to your health.

HARRIS: For "Good Morning America," Dan Harris, ABC News, New York.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If you want to tax things

If you want to tax things that are bad for you, why not tax the news?

NYT asked...

On Tara Parker-Pope's EXCELLENT health blog at the Times (something excellent and fun, take note) we were talking a few days ago about a suggestion that the incomings straighten out the national diet. Oh joy to that. One idea was that no one could buy soda or chips with food stamps. Let's hope this one shrivels before anyone gets interested in it. 

 

I'd opt for a Media bias tax !

I'd opt for a Media bias tax !

The more biased garbage that comes out, they more tax they pay!

This past years coverage of Obama, alone, could have balanced the federal budget. 

(;~> gary

News Media Costs To Balance Budget

What are the libs doing for our children?  How many public funded government resources are being employed to save them?

What difference does it make whether the focus is education, diet, health care..., what is the big picture? What do they eat 30yrs from now? Which budget will support their retirement or health care? Where will these pinheads promising everything today be? And taxes?

JDW

DAILY WAVE

Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers

The real target is the big

The real target is the big beverage companies. The media don't give a rat's a$$ about your health. That's why they swayed the story from health to personal cost savings. 

but he also says if everyone in a family of four drank one can less of soda a week, they would save $100 a year.

Funny he didn't say one less can of non-diet soda.

I thought taxing cigarettes up the whazzoo was going to bring boat loads of money for medical costs and make people more healthy. That turned out well.

 

 

The noble Democrats,

Here in the People's Republic of Maryland, increased the tax on cigarettes by 1 dollar per pack. Guess what now most buy their cigarettes in Virginia, W. Virginia, PA, and Delaware where it it up to 50 per cent cheaper. It is not like this is a large state with borders 100's of miles away any place in this state is at most 30-45 minutes from a border. But I am sure the legislators felt good about doing their part in the fight against evil tobacco.
 

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

Not only beverages but fast

Not only beverages but fast food.  We've already seen McDonalds have to fight a lawsuit and some Harvard types are starting to hype the phrase "toxic food environment."

We can see where this is going, can't we?

NYC is already starting to regulate food content in restaurants.  Where will it end?

You know what?  People have the right to make their own choices, even bad ones. 

If they're going to claim that higher medical costs affect everyone, so they have a right to regulate, they might want to think twice, because someone might mention the health risks of homosexual behavior.

Bladder cancer costs?

 

 OK, Dr. Richard Daines:

Who pays for the treatment for increased incidence of bladder cancer when artificial sweetners are substituted for corn syrup?!

Please visit my Home Page at http://users.snip.ne...

You are right

The artificial sweeteners used in the diet sodas are far worse than that of sugar. At what point does our government just take all of our freedoms away and tell us what to do? It is getting rediculous.

No kidding.  The

No kidding. 

The government mandated flame-proofing children's pajamas then found out the chemical they were using was a carcinogenic.

Then they mandated airbags, and found out they could kill kids.

They still haven't mastered the law of unintended consequences. But their intentions are good, and that's what counts, right?

"Here's to Governor Paterson's proposal to reduce obesity"

Other bad things Paterson is going to save New Yorkers from by taxing the crap out of:

iPod downloads, health & life insurance, movie tickets, taxi rides, massages, cable TV, clothing, fishing, haircuts, sporting events, car registration and gasoline. And that's just the short list.

Paterson is my nomination as the new poster boy for outta-control, tax drunk Democrats. 

Its a contest. Who is more

Its a contest. Who is more retarded the MSM or Patterson? The utter idioticy of the whole idea makes me go into convulsions. What is better, having no tax money from people buying regular sodas or a few fat happy people spending their money to support the communist government of New York. Is there anyway we can arrange for the prisoners in Gitmo to be released in Pattersons back yard?

MSM or Paterson?

I think it's a matter of who is the more dangerous retard, and that would have to be Paterson.

The commonly accepted guesstimate of what his insane tax scheme will cost the average family of four is $3,875 per year. He's effing crazy.

The worst obesity

I see is the size of the government.

Excellent

Excellent point.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

This jerk Daines

 will not post disagreeing comments. Commie.

 

 Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!

Bill Weir is the

Bill Weir is the quintessential empty suit fill-in moron.  He used to be the substitute sports guy on KABC-Los Angeles (behind Rob Fukasaki...and if you're only 2nd banana to that gasbag, you know that you have no talent).  Of course he would fall for this bit of socialist propaganda...geez, I've never heard the "pennies a day", the "longer life" or the "cost of health care" scam arguments before.  These obnoxious nanny state pinkos need to be cut off at the knees before they do some real damage to the country.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

The TV segment

is too nauseating to comment on.  But on the central idea of the tax....what if you bought a packet of Koolaid that you have to add the sugar to?  Taxable?  Anything at all with sugar or fat?  If not, why not?  The poster above was on to something, I think.  Someone has a vendetta against the Coke or Pepsi corporation. 

I would like to think that this list of 88 will do Paterson in. 

Let's be consistent here, if

Let's be consistent here, if we are going to educate SOME children with proceeds from EVERONE'S real estate taxes, wouldn't it naturally follow that we ALL should pay the tax for the obese!

Why not a tax on skis,

Why not a tax on skis, snowboards, and hiking equipment to fund all the rescues? How would these nanny nags of the REI set like their "healthy" lifestyles taxed? 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

The Socialist/Libs/Dems

Don't want to tax to make government bigger but as a back-door method of controlling human behavior and things they don't like. Tax on cigarettes, saturated fat, sugar, ammunition, gasoline and anything they deem "dangerous" or anti-social are fair game. They are also very adept at using lawsuits in the political cause. These taxes and lawsuits are punitive in nature and are not structured for reasonableness but to punish the behavior they don't like.

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

This is a hoax right...there

This is a hoax right...there cannot possibly be a site called "despair.com" I'm not falling for it!

Mandrake

It is called despair.com but should be called cynical.com some of the posters and despairware (that's what they call the clothing) are pretty right on even funny to an old cynic like me:) 

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

What about a Media Tax?

What about a media dishonesty tax. Dan Rather would have put millions into the tax system. And the way the mainstream media is today,  there would be no more hunger in the US as there would be plenty of money for the government top give out.

And what about a media biased tax?..now we're talking!

 

 

Safe? Who said anything about safe? ‘Course He isn’t safe, but He’s good.

-C S Lewis (The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe)

NY is a Socialist/Fascist Nightmare of Big Government

First the trans-fat ban now a Soda tax? Socialist/Fascist Democrats cannot comprehend what reducing government spending is. The solution is just that simple.

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution

Wow. Not only patriotic, as

Wow. Not only patriotic, as Joe Biden says, but good for us, and a money-saver to boot!

HARRIS: But Dr. Daines insists this new tax will save people money.
Not only on overall obesity-related health care costs, but he also says
if everyone in a family of four drank one can less of soda a week, they
would save $100 a year. 

Hey, Dr. Daines, we don't drink soda in my family.  Never have. 

So I'm not going to save anything! Where's MY $100???? 

After all, if people who don't pay taxes get tax rebates......

If people are still dumb

If people are still dumb enough to eat fast food and drink soda(regular or diet) then they should be taxed.

JJ4 Oh really...says you

JJ4

Oh really...says you and your other leftist buddies.

It is not your business...mind your own.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I'm not a lefist. With all

I'm not a lefist. With all we know about sugar, trans fats, sodium why do people still eat that junk?

jesse the lefty....

 what do you know about sugar, trans fats, sodium?  THEY TASTE GOOD?!!  and, even if they are sometimes not the "healthiest" options for sustenance why should their consumption be taxed? that is just dumb leftist thinking.  who are you to profit off what i do when you think i shouldn't?  get outta my space, man!   remember...eggs are bad for you...oops they're not.  coffee is bad for you....opps, wrong again.  do you need a longer list?  someone here has it for you.

"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason"  Ben Franklin

Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left

JJ4... Glad to see you

JJ4...

Glad to see you came back and answered.

Have a Happy fat-free New Year...all on your own!

We don't need no stinking paws taking and taxing others for our own decisions whatever they may be.

When is enough enough for you on the left?

Btw...here is what is going to be coming next down the road, the left thinks of everything, they leave no stone unturned when it comes to complete control of our lives, power and other peoples hard earned money...talk about tracking us all down...and this will be coming to pass.

 "America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

None of your business,

None of your business, jackass.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

Thats ridiculous JJIV

With what we know about diseases. Why have sex before marriage with someone you hardly know?.

Why not a birth control pill tax?

edit

btw I don't believe in a birth contol pill tax I was only making an example out of your  comment. I believe people should have the freedom to choose what they put in their bodies and with most liberals that covers a broad spectrum.

He had my vote

Children don't have the

Children don't have the freedom,they eat what their parents give them. If it takes a tax to stop parents from feeding kids McDonalds and candy disguised as breakfast cereal, then I'm all for it.

Children belong to their parents, not to the government.

And when they have reached the age of the majority, they belong to themselves, not the government.

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon.
Them that ain’t get out of the way.”

But by then, a lot of damage

But by then, a lot of damage has already been done.

damage done

You mean like those kids in Waco, TX?
Yeah, the gubmint sure did a great thing for those kids. Gubmint intervention, the next big thing in child rearing. Whoopee.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Dayem, that freedom thang

Dayem, that freedom thang is a real bitch, ain't it.  :-)

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon.
Them that ain’t get out of the way.”

JJ4... It is not up to

JJ4...

It is not up to the freakin' govt. you must be a complete socialist.

Period.

Wake the hell up, you want complete control of when you can use the toilet, how much water you use to flush, how many squares you use...heck, did you even click on the link I have above to you, you will be monitored...it may not matter to people in the cities but this is next on down the road, they can say this will exclude rural areas, yeah right, if you believe one thing the congress-critters say you are dreaming.

What is wrong with people...

Oh hell...never mind.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

bigtimer

Excellent point,  Jessie here wants the government dictate to  us  what we can eat and drink.

I don't believe all Dems are like this, but if he speaks for the majority, then we are in trouble the next 4 years.

He had my vote

hey jay-jay-eye-vee

 really.....stfu.  when i take my kids to the store & say "get what you want", they run right to the apples and celery because they have been taught what healthy foods are....yeah, right.  get off your "sin tax" podium...it just makes you look dumber.  last time, who the hell are you to tell anyone what to do, and to tax them when you determine they are consuming a product you have a hair up your butt about?  go away.

"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason"  Ben Franklin

Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left

Once again, none of your

Once again, none of your business.  Stay the hell out of everyone else's.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

so JJ eye-vee

 i promised myself i wouldn't call anyone stupid or idiot today....so i'll use your word....dumb.  but i doubt you were planning to stick around and back up your "dumbness".

"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason"  Ben Franklin

Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left

Yeah pb...he's just another

Yeah pb...he's just another drive-by troll, from what I've seen of his positively stimulating posts...I hesitated to even comment knowing he never responds from what I've ever seen, but what the heck...it's sort of slow here now, may as well see if we can get something out of him.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

That's the beauty of living

That's the beauty of living in a free country. People have the right (or should have the right) to comsume whatever types of food they like.

It is not up to the government to attempt to manipulate what people decide to eat through taxes, or by any other means. Government's sole constitutional responsibility is to see to it that my rights as a citizen are protected, period, not to interfere with those rights.

My body belongs to me, not the government.

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon.
Them that ain’t get out of the way.”

Taxes have huge ripple effects

Do these idiots ever consider how many people make a living from soda ("pop" here in Iowa) in some manner, and the economic impact of making soda more expensive?  They don't seem to realize that pretty much anything in economics has a ripple effect far beyond the intended goal.

Perhaps if people had more direct responsibility for health care costs rather than leaving it to insurance or the government, they'd be more motivated to take care of themselves.

Welcome to the era of unity, you racist!

let's just call this what it is

It's a way to get more of our money into the government's coffers.  They taxed cigarettes out the wazoo and people still smoke.  The government says nicotine is a drug, but they won't make it illegal like other drugs.  Why?  Because of the billions of dollars in cigarette taxes that are brought in each year.  The argument, however, is that raising taxes sky-high on a pack of cigarettes will discourage people from smoking.  Hardly.

This is simply the second verse of the same song.  People won't stop drinking sodas because they cost a little more.  People will continue to drink them because they enjoy them, and the giver-ment will have more of our money to spend on its pet projects like bridges to nowhere and Senator Bigmouth Blowhard's Treatment Center for the Clinically Sane in East Bumblefart, Masachusetts. 

You know government is out

You know government is out of control when taxes become just another form of the old Protection Racket.   So the MSM talking heads are rationalizing why you should be greatful for paying your Protection Payments.  This whole idea that government should micromanage the average person's lifestyle is outrageous.  

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.