There's nothing "rosy" about the picture I painted. It's just that my picture doesn't look like yours, therefore I "idolize" a killer. A killer who never killed a single person. Nobody on this website is as conservative as I am. I was a lifelong Republican. But when I read remarks like this, I realize that the GOP has deterioriated to the level of a prison-yard riot, where there is no thoughtful discussion, much less an ability to listen. At some point, I fully expect to banned from this site, because a lot of people like you hate any opposing view. This is not what being an American is about. The charges against Ayers were dropped because there was no other evidence against him, and his crimes amounted to little more than extreme vandalism. 

The charges were dropped because of "technicalities."  I am sure it is just a coincidence that Ayers, the son of privilege from a well-connected/rich/political Chicago family was the "victim" of some sort of police/prosecutorial misconduct.  BS!!  He benefited from the power of his family and their political connections.  It takes a monumental hypocrit to defend his bombings and decry the political and social hierarchy of the "empire," and then to gladly accept the benefits of those same political and social ties.  He then continued to take advantage to obtain and maintain his cushy university position.  What a complete joke this man is.   

You REALLY need to do a little research about the Weather Underground, the organization of which Ayers was a member.

This is from the FBI itself:  "In 1976, the FBI's Chicago Field Office prepared a summary which described the activities of the Weather Underground Organization, also known as Weathermen. This organization described itself as a revolutionary organization of communist men and women."

Here's the link.

These people were not merely unhappy men and women who did nothing more that use "extreme vandalism" as a means of protest.  These people were revolutionaries who's sole purpose was to overthrow the US government using terror and violence!  How can you dismiss this so easily?

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

That's just creepy JRJ.  I'll assume you're a woman. (not that there's anything wrong with, you know . . .)

• LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
  

Shouldn't use big words that you don't really understand. Just because it's fashionable now to call people "socialists" doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. People who resort to using these kinds of "dirty words" just don't have any ideas of their own. When you retire, will you send your Social Security checks back to the government and refuse to let MediCare help pay for your medical care because you hate socialism? Anything short of that will just mean you're a hypocrite.

And you think Sarah Palin rocks!

I am a conservative who is willing to think for himself.

isle vista, berkeley, Kent State, yeah even Haight Asbury and the angels at the Stones concert.  As the Who said "this ain't no social crisis it's just you having fun" how do you think socio-paths have fun?

   “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”   -Chief Justice John Roberts

I think I have noodled out the reason why, four decades later, you remain so very bitter about this country's involvement in Vietnam, and probably Korea, too.

You, like most lefties, are at heart, communist sympathizers. You will never publicly admit this, but you betray yourselves by your actions in whom you are willing to publicly defend.

I am guessing here (not really), but I'll bet that you are one of these "utopian totalitarian" types who actually believes that the USSR was a "classless society." That, of course, is utter nonsense, as most people in that unfortunate "empire" lived in abject poverty (but, as you and your ilk see it, they were all equal, right?) Their only mission in life was to work themselves to death in support the elite few in the highest places of power. The upper classes, if you will. If they resisted in any way, they were promptly hauled off to the Gulag, to work themselves to death for the "good of the state."

You probably also believe that Marxism was created to help the average person, so that they could all "share in the prosperity." Only problem is, there is no prosperity to share, as Marxism was created specifically to put a very small number of people in ultimate power and keep them there.

Marxism was pretty easy to sell to the uneducated peasants of the world, who were more than willing to go along with it, as their knowledge of basic economics was virtually nonexistent. This, of course, was why the Stalins, Maos and the rest of the dictators of history would go after the true intellectuals in their respective countries soon after gaining power. The true intellectuals knew Marxism was a ploy, and would never work in the real world.

You steadfastly resent the fact that this country actively fought against what is essentially a form of slavery twice in the last century, both in Korea and Vietnam. You cannot quite get over the fact that the United States of America, which was founded upon principles that are diametrically opposed to Marxism in every way, actually interfered with the plans of the utopian totalitarian's efforts to bring Marxism to the masses.

The blatant support of you lefties for Fidel Castro is not only well documented, but is legendary among those of us who actually cherish true freedom, a concept that is utterly lost on you and your Marxist brethren. Even today, given the hell-hole Cuba has become, you on the left still hold that murdering bastard up as some sort of an example to be emulated. You and your ilk resent the Cuban embargo by the US, while totally ignoring the massive economic aid that has been pouring into Cuba from other countries, yet Cuba curiously remains a hell hole.

We saw this resentment manifest itself again in the in the blatant support of Mao on the part of you utopian totalitarians. Mao, who got his rocks off watching millions of his own people die, either through starvation or outright murder, was held in rather high esteem by you utopian totalitarians. His death was lamented by many of you, and I remember reading not a few writings of those of your ilk who were somewhat saddened to see the passing of such a "visionary."

We saw this resentment on the part of you utopian totalitarians yet again in the 1980's, when many on the left were castigating Ronald Reagan for his opposition to the Marxist Daniel Ortega, and to communism in general. Your opposition to Reagan had nothing to do with whether or not he had bent some obscure law, but everything to do with the fact that, once again, the United States was interfering with the progress of Marxism.

You on the left had a collective conniption when Reagan referred to the USSR as an "evil empire." Truth of the matter was, it was an evil empire, under which many millions of people had died, either through starvation or outright murder (Notice there is a pattern developing here.) Yet, in the face of that, you who were sympathetic to "the cause" fell all over yourselves praising Gorbachev, who was doing all he could to preserve the status quo. Thankfully he failed in his mission.

We saw this yet again in the 1990's, when certain Clintonistas were falling all over themselves praising murderous dictators like Kim Jong-il, who, like Stalin and Mao, had a bit of a problem in that his people were either dying of starvation or being outright murdered (there is that pattern again.)

We are seeing it yet again in the left's blatant support of Hugo Chavez, whose country, despite having a huge supply of oil in the ground, is even now approaching 3rd World status.

Your boy Bill, who you have done nothing but defend since you were first admitted here, is a big buddy of Hugo's, and is not exactly un-fond of Fidel. The organization he was once a member of, and to this day, refuses to condemn, was evil to its core.

As I see it, you support everything that Bill Ayers stands for.

So go ahead, keep right on defending this low-life POS here on the pages of NB, as all you are really managing to accomplish is putting yourself on his level.

-Dave

Did this country just elect Obama/Biden, or was it Soros/Ayers?

sir, are you a lawyer?

member of the Conservative Independant Witness Protection Program since Nov. 5, 2008

I asked in another thread, and you chickened away before answering, so I'll ask again.

Is it Hitler's finger on the trigger of a smoking gun that turns you against him, or is it the actions of his organization?

• LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
  

Inacurrate?  In a pigs eye.

You obviously do not understand what it means to be an accomplice or an accessory after the fact.  By being an unrepentant FOUNDER of the Weather Underground Organization, Ayers has associated himself directly with the criminal acts committed by that conspiracy of which he was a part.

Now, do you deny that the WUO was responsible for the police station bombing referenced here?   Ayers is one of the prime suspects in this unsolved murder.  Or do you deny the bomb factory that exploded here, killing WUO members Diana Oughton, Ted Gold and Terry Robbins, was operated by the WUO?

It appears that Ayers was in fact likely a principle to one of these murders, that of Sgt McDonnell, SFPD.  He is, by his own admission, a principle in the US Capitol bombing.  He is likely an accomplice to several of the other bombings and he is most certainly an accesory to the other murders committed by the WUO.  That makes him guilty of capital murder.  He should be executed.

All points mine.  you lose.

As Howard Cosell would say, your juvenile insults are "spitballs against a battleship." And, once again, your trip to the dusty dictionary makes my point. You don't "intimidate or coerce" empty buildings. When was the last time a terrorist "threatened" an empty building? Vandalism is an act of protest that is defined by physical damage to real property. Terrorism is creating terror through violent acts that are intended to maim and kill human beings.