In a story about what private school President-elect Barack Obama will send his children to, "Good Morning America" reporter Claire Shipman on Wednesday mostly glossed over the obvious point that the Democrat likely won't be putting his daughters through the D.C. public educational system and also ignored his opposition to vouchers. Instead, she fawned that "the D.C. social world is obsessed with where these new, coolest kids on the block will wind up."
The only mention of public schools came when Shipman asserted, "Whenever there's a new first family with young children, the question always comes up, public or private? And with Washington, D.C. schools still struggling, it can be an especially difficult decision." She then played a clip of Washington Post reporter Jay Matthews explaining the woeful state of D.C.'s public schools. But, nowhere in the piece did Shipman mention the contradiction between Obama's opposition to school choice programs that allow low income students to use vouchers to attend private institutions and the fact that the President-elect and his wife have no intention to send their children to some of those very same schools in Washington.
Cybercast News Service editor-in-chief Terry Jeffrey wrote about the apparent hypocrisy in a November 12, 2008 column on the Townhall website:
In October, in the last presidential debate, Obama specifically attacked McCain's support for the school-choice program in Washington, D.C., which gives 1,900 lower-income students a voucher worth up to $7,500 to attend the private school of their choice -- and which McCain wanted to expand to include more students.
...
When Michelle Obama visited Washington this week, she toured only two prospective schools for her daughters: Sidwell Friends, where lower-school tuition is $28,442; and Georgetown Day, where tuition is $27,445 for grades 1-5.
In the 2008 campaign, Obama was endorsed by the National Education Association and other liberal teachers unions. And yet in her report, Shipman simply reiterated a history of what past presidents have done with their children, giving Obama a complete free pass on the issue of vouchers.
A transcript of the November 12 segment, which aired at 7:17am, follows:
DIANE SAWYER: And according to People magazine, friends of the Obamas say that the number one job for Michelle Obama is finding the right school for her girls. Everyone can respect how difficult it is. Imagine how much more difficult by being in the spotlight of the White House. Here's GMA senior national correspondent Claire Shipman.
CLAIRE SHIPMAN: Michelle Obama has already looked at a few D.C. schools. And aides say she'll look at many more. She knows that a good fit for Malia and Sasha will make all the difference in the enormous upheaval they're about to experience.
LISA CAPUTO (Former press secretary, Clinton White House): As the first family, you going to want to work with the school that the children attend to ensure that the school protects the children's privacy.
SHIPMAN: Jackie Kennedy was so focused on that issue, she chose to bring the school to her young children.
SALLY QUINN (Washington Post): Jackie Kennedy had a little nursery school in the White House. And my God, you would think it was the A-list party- A-list of the city.
SHIPMAN: President and Mrs. Ford's youngest child, Susan, spent her high school years in Washington. And invited her entire senior class to the White House for prom where she and her date showed everyone- remember this- how to do that popular '70s dance, known as "The Bump." Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter sent their 9-year-old daughter Amy to public school. Who can forget how she arrived for her first day with a Snoopy book bag and a throng of photographers in tow? The Clintons opted to send 13-year-old Chelsea to the highly competitive private Sidwell Friends school. Whenever there's a new first family with young children, the question always comes up, public or private? And with Washington, D.C. schools still struggling, it can be an especially difficult decision.
JAY MATTHEWS (Education reporter, Washington Post): In terms of achievement rate, dropout rates, test scores, they're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
SHIPMAN: The Obama girls now attend the prestigious and private University of Chicago Lab School. And if they do go private here, there are excellent and expensive options. The Maret School, where several Obama advisors send their children, might be appealing with its small size and single campus. Georgetown Day School is also popular for the children of top Obama advisors. And Sidwell Friends is not only Chelsea's alma mater, but the school Joe Biden's grandchildren attend. Malia and Sasha would, of course, be a feather in any school's cap. So, while the political world focuses on the parlor game of cabinet appointments, the D.C. social world is obsessed with where these new, coolest kids on the block will wind up. For "Good morning America," Claire Shipman, Washington.
SAWYER: And quite a block that is they're on.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Exciting memories of past Democratic 1st families.
November 12, 2008 - 16:59 ET by Gary HallWhatever.
Of course, the shrill excitement from the press, is only here when it's a Democrat "..see us come running, microphone in our outstretched arms - fighting for position - ready to relive our exciting memories of past Democrat First Families."
(;~/ gary
Based on what you hear about DC schools
November 12, 2008 - 18:57 ET by katiejaneI don't blame the Obamas for sending their young daughters to a private school. But at least the fawning throngs should reconize the irony of the choice based on his position on school vouchers and choice for people who don't have the money to do the same.
Vouchers
November 13, 2008 - 09:46 ET by MichiganManWith a voucher of $7500, a poor family would still have to come up with $20000+ to send their kids to the private schools mentioned in the article. In this case, the vouchers would not really help. I don't know many poor families who have a spare $20000 for each child to go to school. I don't consider myself poor and there is no way I could come up with that kind of money to send my children to elementary school, voucher or not.
I may be wrong but I've
November 13, 2008 - 09:56 ET by gatorfanaticI may be wrong but I've heard that the DC School District uses vouchers. Would Obama use them? Hmm...
Nary a word is ever
November 12, 2008 - 17:14 ET by bigtimerNary a word is ever mentioned about how these politicians vote when it comes to school choice...and the leftist hypocrisy moves on...always a never-ending wonderment...the do as I say not as I do crowd.
...you just have to wonder just how many in the leftist msm have sent their kids to public schools, in the past and the present.
Pure sheer madness.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
My husband is correct
November 12, 2008 - 17:19 ET by moderncommentaries83Obama's form of politics harkens to socialism and communism but he, and the rest of the left, are actually a newer political movement: elitism.
Found, naturally, in the do as I say, not as I do attitudes they posses, and the fact that it's okay for them to be wealthy, but a punishable offense for people who, you know, work hard and make jobs.
You see, they can be trusted
November 12, 2008 - 17:22 ET by GrannyGrump42You see, they can be trusted to give their kids full socialist indoctrination, so it's okay of they choose another school. But the Masses -- why, they might send their kids to (gasp!) CATHOLIC SCHOOL! Or -- a school that teaches things like personal responsibility! Then how can they grow up to be good little socialists?
GG... Yep, good little
November 12, 2008 - 17:38 ET by bigtimerGG...
Yep, good little uneducated socialists to-boot.
I call the cradle to grave lemmings....which of course is and has been the plan of the left for decades and decades now, coming to fruition in mass now.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Michelle Antoinette: "Let
November 12, 2008 - 17:51 ET by SickofLibsMichelle Antoinette: "Let them eat Obama cake.
Us, our children are going to private school."
Private schools for them
November 12, 2008 - 18:14 ET by iveseenitallOf course, Barry and Michelle won't ever send their darlings to a "public" school. Oh, Phew! You see, "Everyone is equal, but some are "more equal" than others". Lying, two bit, "liberal" hypocrites. The shrewd s.o.b.'s conned their way to the top, and now their "stuff" has magically stopped stinking. I wonder if they ever look in the mirror.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Oh, C'mon...
November 12, 2008 - 18:19 ET by Lamb-chopLet's be realistic about this: Whatever school the President's children attend, the security problem alone will completely disrupt the entire institution. Public schools are not equipped to deal with it, and building a wall around one and populating it with security cameras, secret service agents, etc. would essentially turn it into a private school, anyway.
the more things change..
November 12, 2008 - 18:29 ET by TN MomThe obama's will choose a private school.
It's just so funny because it's a slap-in-your-face to the NEA who supported him...and you know, obama ran his campaign on 'CHANGE'.
Notice Shipman says And
November 12, 2008 - 20:03 ET by motherbeltNotice Shipman says And if they do go private here, there are excellent and expensive options.
IF??????
Like there's a snowball's chance in hell of them going public.
What a joke!
PS: the NEA couldn't care less where he sends his daughters; all they care about is whether he will push for more money for their salaries and benefits.
Oh yeah, God forbid the NEA
November 13, 2008 - 08:15 ET by JasonCOh yeah, God forbid the NEA lobby for its own interests just like any other interest group in the country. I guess since they're part of the socialist education machine, public school teachers ought to just be grateful they don't get shipped to the gulag when they need a sick day. And those 3-month summer vacations where they just sit on their asses sipping daiquiris...total ingrates.
This so-called hypocrisy, as many a poster has already called it, is nothing. If the Obama children were put in a public school, the level of security needed at that school would effectively overwhelm it. So why not put them in a school that, you know, is specifically geared toward extra security?
Seriously, the predictable bitching about this holds precisely as much water as the irritating liberal complaint that Jenna and Barbara Bush should have gone to Iraq. It is quite literally the exact same complaint. Way to act like liberals.
"The family values response, unless it is combined with a radical
renunciation of all aspects of modern society, is not an authentic
alternative."
Now hang on a second. We
November 13, 2008 - 10:02 ET by TexasteacherNow hang on a second. We still have professional responsibilities during the summer months and most teachers teach summer school. I prefer not to see students during the summer so I work as an electrician. Not all teachers are lazy and sleep in all summer.
However, I do totally agree with your assessment of the unions. I wouldn't join a union for anything. I am a member of the state music educators association, but I have to be in order to send kids to compete for all-state. That and the convention is where I get most of my professional development classes.
The unions around where I teach are really pushy about trying to get us to join, but when something comes up that they could really help with, they always side with the district administration.
Hey TexTeach, I'm also a
November 13, 2008 - 10:22 ET by JasonCHey TexTeach,
I'm also a teacher, and so are both of my parents. I was being totally sarcastic there, mocking the typical reaction of people - often parents - who think teaching is easy and cushy. Sorry if I caused offense, that was precisely the opposite of what I intended.
"The family values response, unless it is combined with a radical
renunciation of all aspects of modern society, is not an authentic
alternative."
My bad. The guys I work
November 19, 2008 - 12:28 ET by TexasteacherMy bad.
The guys I work with at my summer job always give me a hard time saying teaching is easy. Until I tell them stories. The response is always the same: F*** That!
Blacks are not good enough for Obama
November 12, 2008 - 18:26 ET by Lame CherryYou do not see any black appointments to major transition offices. Sam Nunn at Defense and Warren Christopher at State.
No blacks on the economic team.
Last I looked no blacks on the Obama Secret Service Team.
No blacks in Obama's finacial situation banking.
No black schools in the past or future for the DC Obama children.
I do not see this as a school voucher problem, but a black problem for Obama as he segregates his children from black people and allows them only to be around white people.
I frankly can not wait until more blogger are picking this up, until the faux media in Greta and Hannity start speaking of the AFROPHOBIA of Obama in making this an issue blacks will have to deal with.
I don't like Obama, because he is a sinful Marxist liar who is a 10 year old trapped in an abandonment psychopathy. People like this do not belong near Treasury printing presses nor nuclear buttons.
I though am incensed as an American over the shoddy treatment Obama is giving blacks. Jesse Jackson whether one likes him or not for the intel operative he has been, has proven his worth for an Administration position and is being shoved out the door.
Congress has qualified financial, diplomatic and heroic blacks and Obama has passed them over like shanty negroes.
When you win elections or steal them, the people who help you steal them deserve in Affirmative Action places in power. 2/3rds of these positions belong to minorities of some type and except for a token woman, a hatchet man in Emanuel and I did see an Italian sun tanned light guy too on the stage, but it has all been white.
If blacks will not even stand up now and demand at least 7 key posts without marching on Washington DC, why was this election even an issue?
No million man marches for positions, just a mob of black people thinking the world has changed while they sit in poverty, sit in prison and think come Obmanuary 20th they can all be Oprah.
No wonder blacks vote in mobs for Democrats and Democrats show them no respect as I haven't even seen one black right winger come out and ask about the Obama literal White House.
George Bush has more blacks and hispanics around him than Barack Obama.
.........and Condi Rice is crying over Obama's achievement?
Obama has slammed the door on the black world and is not about to allow his children near any other black children without Jack n Jill pedigree.
agtG
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The future head of the Dept. of Education.
November 12, 2008 - 18:37 ET by mizflame98Maybe William Ayers can recommend a fine school for the little darlings.
“I've spoken to all of them that are living. I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances"
B.H. Obama
miz... Pow! Right in the
November 12, 2008 - 18:43 ET by bigtimermiz...
Pow! Right in the Kisser!
That was a Bulls-Eye!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
:-D
November 12, 2008 - 18:50 ET by mizflame98“I've spoken to all of them that are living. I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances"
B.H. Obama
mizflame... I appreciate
November 12, 2008 - 18:50 ET by Clear thinkermizflame...
I appreciate your humor, but the very thought should terrify people!
Soldiers Dissed By Obama Liberals
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
I don't think...
November 12, 2008 - 18:59 ET by mizflame98Obama wouldn't be able to get away with appointing Ayers to the Dept. Of Ed. There are some things that America won't stomach. Now, I know that the Obama's wouldn't even consider sending their kids to a school that teaches the same rhetoric Ayer's is trying to push on our children. That sort of education produces sheep and the Obama's would want their little girls to grow up to be the sheep herders holding the clippers & cleaver.
“I've spoken to all of them that are living. I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances" B.H. Obama
mizflame... I slightly
November 12, 2008 - 19:13 ET by Clear thinkermizflame...
I slightly disagree. Ayers would produce sheep, but they would have rabies. Keep in mind what his favorite saying is...…”We can’t have education without revolution. We have tried peace education for 1,900 years and it has failed. Let us try revolution and see what it will do now.”
Soldiers Dissed By Obama Liberals
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
As I said, the
November 12, 2008 - 22:10 ET by mizflame98As I said, the Obama's daughter will not be bred as sheep but as the butchers of said sheep.
“I've spoken to all of them that are living. I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances" B.H. Obama
He already has. He has
November 12, 2008 - 19:59 ET by jdhawkHe already has. He has published a book entitled, "Teaching for Social Justice: A Democracy and Education Reader."
Here is what one person said of this book, "William Ayers has written extensively on educating children and youth. Ayers advocates, in this collection of essays by a variety of very, very, liberal writers, that a teacher has many roles ranging from teaching, arbitrating, counseling, and most importantly, a commitment to social engineering. Per Ayers, at a young age students should be made aware of communal-based values, and that students have an awareness and proclivity for engagement with institutions. Ayers believes that that a primary responsibility of teachers is to instill within students an obligation to confront institutions which do not adhere to communal-based values."
Still think this is funny?
The dimocrats (there is nothing dim about them, actually) have this planned out and in case you haven't noticed, you, meaning conservatives, are not invited in any respect whatsoever.
Get used to it. They are in charge like they haven't been since Jimmy Carter's time.
Just because he wrote a
November 12, 2008 - 22:11 ET by mizflame98Just because he wrote a dumb-ass book that doesn't make him the head of the Dept. of Education.
“I've spoken to all of them that are living. I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances" B.H. Obama
I thought it rather amusing
November 12, 2008 - 18:54 ET by Karlawhen they interviewed some kids from Sidwell
Friends and the kids they spoke with there were not that keen on the new 1st kids coming to school with them. Leave it to the Quakers. People always underestimate their education value but my Dad went to Friends Select in Philly and I went to Friends Schools in Haddonfield and Morrestown NJ and you cannot beat their education/it does not come cheap but you are worlds ahead of other kids your age.
Of course we never ran for office under the guise of knowing what Main Street needed either and that is what it boils down to when will folk realize he is no more attuned to Main St than the folks he so rails against.
my first thought
November 12, 2008 - 23:10 ET by mom_roxThe interview I saw was with some boys at Sidwell who said they were not keen on the idea. My guess is that most boys would say that having Sasha and Malia attend their school is not worth the hassle.
On the flip side, I would imagine that most of the girls would be very eager to have them attend - higher possibility of being a friend of the First Daughters - and then, maybe, just maybe, might even get an invitation to a White House sleepover.
The Axis of Taxes: Obama, Pelosi and Reid (source unknown)
on purpose?
November 12, 2008 - 19:09 ET by TN MomClaire Shipman seems to have left out the Bush daughters!!! All presidential kids metioned were Dems.
How do people watch GMA's bias so early in the morning?
To make a liberal-type statement
November 12, 2008 - 19:22 ET by exLibI would say that since Obama does not support vouchers he MUST be forced to have his kids attend public school, PERIOD.
School Recommendation
November 12, 2008 - 19:22 ET by Lamb-chopI recommend the Woldingham School for Girls in Surrey. Perfect for an elite snob like Michelle Obama. Great feeder school for Oxford. Website here: http://www.woldingha...
Elitist
November 12, 2008 - 20:49 ET by northoneWhat? Public schools aren't good enough for the elitist Barry & Michelle? How long before we hear Michelle saying, "Let them eat cake!"
The money shot quote of the piece...
November 12, 2008 - 21:06 ET by Nortonalec"And with Washington, D.C. schools still struggling, it can be an especially difficult decision." " I am quite sure it is NOT a difficult decision. I bet Michelle is losing sleep over this one!
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever."~David St. Hubbins
coolest kids on the
November 12, 2008 - 22:15 ET by TN Momcoolest kids on the block
...with the meanest mommy!
(couldn't resist!)..did anyone see MO at the White House...she always looks really angry, maybe she picked that up from 20 years of sermons from Rev Wright?
A few years ago, I had a preacher who was really angry and it came through the pulpit. Every Sunday, he would chide us, yet never lifted us up. I ignored it for 2 years until, one Sunday he made a nasty comment; I noticed the look on my kid's faces so I left. There is NO way I would ever subject my children to 5 min. of Rev Wright!!
hypocracy
November 12, 2008 - 22:43 ET by brerolThe mere fact the Obamas are considering a private school for their children shows once again the hypocracy of the left in the school choice debate. The left will send their children to the school of their choice if they can afford it. But those of us who cannot afford a private school education are left with NO choice but to send our children to some second rate public school. I will not critisize the Obamas for sending their two daughters to a private school. If indeed they do. The Obamas would simply be making their choice in the best interest of their children. But it would be a fresh breath of air if the left would give the same opportunities to all families the same opportunities they enjoy themselves. And don't hold your breath waiting for the media to explain this double standards of the school choice debate.
Kids in a fishbowl
November 13, 2008 - 00:34 ET by nkviking75Instead, she fawned that "the D.C. social world is obsessed with where these new, coolest kids on the block will wind up." That's easy. Counseling. Young kids growing up in a fishbowl watched intensely by Obama syncophants for up to eight years are pretty likely to be messed up by the experience.
Welcome to the era of unity, you racist!