ABC's Claire Shipman Probes Voters for Racism: Is Obama 'Uppity?'

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

On Wednesday's "Good Morning America," reporter Claire Shipman used a test designed by a liberal professor to interrogate the supposedly unconscious racist views of a group of undecided voters. After taking the complicated quiz, which involved linking words with colors, Shipman grilled the men and women about whether negative advertising had changed their view of Senator Barack Obama. "Anyone here have a sense that he is arrogant," she challenged." Shipman followed up, "Anybody think he's uppity?"

The ABC correspondent, who once cooed over the "fluid poetry" of Obama, wasn't dissuaded by the instance that none of voters thought of the Democrat that way. She solemnly intoned, "But in fact, although 'ready' and 'calm' were in the top five [test results], 'uppity,' that classic southern expression drenched in racial overtones, was the number one word subconsciously associated with Barack Obama." And at no point did Shipman mention that Professor Drew Weston of Emory University, the co-designer of this test, is a liberal who bashed Senator John McCain and asserted the Republican's only chance to victory was "the low road."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Writing at the New Republic website on June 23, 2008, he attacked:

With all that stacked against him, the only road that could take McCain to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is the low road, one of the few pieces of infrastructure left in good repair by President Bush. His father paved it against Michael Dukakis....The path to success for McCain is to make the election a referendum on his opponent, by working in silent concert with 527 groups and media outlets such as Fox News to pursue character assassination, guilt by association, and, most of all, the effort to paint Obama as different, foreign, unlike "us," and dangerous (and did I mention that he's black?).

Speaking of unseen bias, do those words sound like ones coming from an objective, fair source or a person who wants to see racism everywhere? And Shipman gave no real explanation as to why viewers should buy the validity of this so-called test. She breezily explained its workings this way: "The test shows a picture of the candidates while flashing words in different colors. You have to identify the color by pressing a key. The longer it takes you to do that, the more meaning that word has for you." (During the test, she did briefly ask the group about subconscious feeling they might have over McCain's age, but mostly focused on Obama.)

Shipman followed up her questions about Obama being "uppity" and "arrogant" with video of John McCain's now-famous "celebrity" ad played. (This was the one that featured images of Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and large Obama crowds.) Over the footage, Shipman insinuated, "And that's the point, say the experts. Ads like these, suggesting arrogance, or who-does-he-think-he-is, can make a lasting impression."

She closed by adding, "But whether they [the ads] ultimately enter your decision making process is up to you. Well, the conscious you." So, in other words, it's not possible to poke fun of Obama as a celebrity or call him arrogant without being a racist?

As noted earlier, Shipman seems to have her own bias, conscious or subconscious, towards Barack Obama. On the January 18, 2007 GMA, speaking of the (then) simmering primary battle between Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton, she rhapsodized, "And the side-by-side talent show? Next to Obama's fluid poetry, Hillary Clinton's delivery can seem overly cautious." What should viewers take away about Shipman's "unconscious mind" from that particular quote?

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:43am on October 29, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: And with six more days to go until the election, you have to look back and realize what a withering, torrent of negative ads the American people have been subjected to in the past months. And most of us think, oh, they don't affect us. We tune them out. Right? We're above and beyond all of that. Well, stay tuned because senior national correspondent, Claire Shipman has a test.

CLAIRE SHIPMAN: The unconscious mind. What exactly lurks inside? Does any of this barrage of information stick? And how does it affect what you might do when you're alone in the voting booth?

PROFESSOR DREW WESTEN (Psychology, Emory University): You can be pulled in two levels by your gut. One of them is the conscious, gut-level feeling of this isn't how I should be voting, or this is how I should be voting. And another is a gut-level feeling that you're not even aware of.

SHIPMAN: Drew Weston and Joel Weinberger put these largely undecided Virginia voters through a simple, online test that measures implicit biases. Thoughts you might not have even known are in your head.

JOHN ROBILETTE (Virginia voter): I was surprised by this.

SHIPMAN: They might not have thought ads like this affected them.

VOICE [OBAMA AD]: Out of ideas. Out of touch.

SHIPMAN: Is anybody here who thinks John McCain is too old to be president?

KEITH HAGEN (Virginia voter): I think if you get through the riggers of a campaign, I think you're physically fit enough to be president.

SHIPMAN: But, according to their test results, old was one of the top five words they associated with John McCain, along with Bush, out of touch and erratic. And the buzz words about Obama?

SARAH PALIN: As someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists.

SHIPMAN: Is there anyone who thinks he has connection to terrorists?

ALL: No.

SHIPMAN: But, in fact, that word, terrorist, was one of the top three in their unconscious minds about Barack Obama.

ROBILETTE: Are you sure this is fool-proof, this test?

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: Well, I don't know how honest we're all being.

SHIPMAN: The test shows a picture of the candidates while flashing words in different colors. You have to identify the color by pressing a key. The longer it takes you to do that, the more meaning that word has for you. And words that evoke fear are especially prone to stick.

PROFESSOR JOEL WEINBERGER (Psychology, Adelphi University): We're more open to negativity. Just, our brain is. It's wired that way because we are wired to avoid threats more so than we're wired to go after positives.

SHIPMAN: It's this, the strip of prefrontal cortex, our thinking brain, that battles our unconscious brain as we make decisions. And so what about that loaded issue of race? Is it a factor in how they might vote?

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #2: No.

ROBILETTE: Absolutely not.

SHIPMAN: But- Anyone here have a sense that he is arrogant?

ALL: No.

SHIPMAN: Anybody think he's uppity?

ANDREW DARROW (Virginia voter): No.

SHIPMAN: But in fact, although 'ready' and 'calm' were in the top five, 'uppity,' that classic southern expression drenched in racial overtones, was the number one word subconsciously associated with Barack Obama. Does it surprise you guys?

ROBILETTE: I am surprised by that. I am. Because it doesn't figure into my consciousness.

SHIPMAN: And that's the point, say the experts. Ads like these [video of McCain's "celebrity" ad plays to Shipman's audio], suggesting arrogance, or who-does-he-think-he-is, can make a lasting impression. But whether they ultimately enter your decision making process is up to you. Well, the conscious you.

DARROW: It's the back of your mind, until the day you go to that poll. And it's still going to be there when you're sitting there deciding, am I going to press this button or that button?

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

SICKOFLIBS: Anybody think

SICKOFLIBS: Anybody think she's an asshole?

(That's a classic Northern expression) 

 

I have to agree SickofLibs

I grew up on the border of Mississippi and that was something my mother called her boss. In my house and everyone I knew we usually called some one Uppity. who thought there dung did not stink, or thought they were better than everyone else. Granted I've heard a few "classic southern expression drenched in racial overtones" But that is not one of them.

»→ SO Cal

I've got sisters and a brother who are uppity.  We share the same white parents.

I miss the racial reference too, but I know the left has clumped it in with their bagful of codespeak.

  • We will restore the moral standing that we had when Bill Clinton was President - Barack Obama.

"Uppity".... OMG if a conservative had said that...!!!!

I think the freakin' roof would have come off if Hannity or Coulter had used the word regarding Barry!

How is it that the lefties get to use all the 'forbidden' words and no punishment applies? Is it possible there's a double standard? No... couldn't be.  </sarc>

Important question.....

When does Claire Shipman check into rehab?

Talk about code words....and I don't care if she was just asking if anyone in the audience thought that!

Was her next question How many of you think of the N word when you see him or hear him?

example

What a fine example Barack is. They used to say crime dosn't pay, they lied. It certainly pays big time. Now the kids can say if you lie enough, cheat enough, be devious enough and stuff the ballot boxes enough you can have anything you want. What a Country.

There's a song by Good

There's a song by Good Charlotte called "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous".....

One verse says:

You know if you are famous and you kill your wife

There's no such thing as 25 to life

As long as you got the cash to pay for Cocharan!

And you know if you were caught and you were smokin' crack

McDonalds wouldn't even want to take you back

But you could always run for Mayor of D.C!

Unexpected wisdom from unexpected places....

I can't believe people are

I can't believe people are quoting Good Charlotte.  My head hurts...

AZ

IF your head hurts stop trying to think.

You're hilarious

You're hilarious

coco can be a funny guy,

coco can be a funny guy, but this time I think he's serious. And I agree with him.

Is Obama A Racist?

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

You are also hilarious.

You are also hilarious.

I can't believe people are

I can't believe people are quoting Good Charlotte.

Why??  A good line is a good line.

And there's nothing wrong with a little GC now and then!

As I said, wisdom sometimes comes from unexpected places.

Tell me they didn't hit the nail on the head!

I just don't like their

I just don't like their music.  It's nothing against you.

dup

dup

Hey, mb!  I love that song

Hey, mb!  I love that song and it fits so well.  Now I'm going to be singing it for the next hour.

Dear Claire -

Your eyes only!

Dear Claire... I have a

Dear Claire...

I have a question for you... Is Obama A Racist?

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Drew Weston's So-Called "Test"

Does anybody know whether Professor Weston's "test" has been published anywhere in a peer-reviewed psychological journal? According to Shipman, "The test shows a picture of the candidates while flashing words in
different colors. You have to identify the color by pressing a key. The
longer it takes you to do that, the more meaning that word has for you." It would appear that each color, which may or may not be tied to a particular word, has its corresponding key; if this is the case, the "test" is nothing more than a measure of the time it takes for the subject to respond to a particular color (a simple reaction time study).  If the subject is reacting only to the color, how does this relate to the word set and whichever face is flashed? Talk about confounding variables! Something tells me the results of this "test" do not reach statistical significance.

 

Lamb Chop

Well, he's actually written a book on the brain and emotion ("The Political Brain"). Basically, he states that when emotion and reason collides, emotion wins.

http://www.amazon.com/Political-Brain-Emotion-Deciding-Nation/dp/1586485733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1225306114&sr=8-1

As far as how peer reviewed his test is, I'm not sure.

Scott:

Of course he's written a book. Said book becomes the required text for his course in Fauxpsychology 101, available at the Student Union Book Store for a mere $75.00 (sorry, no used books available). As for the collision of of emotion and reason, he probably still believes in the left brain - right brain myth. Emotion may "win" in the short term, but in the long run reason always wins.

Rat-runner

 

I wonder if it would be possible to get the liberal professor...

I wonder if it would be possible to get the liberal professor who designed the test Claire used to locate unconscious racists to develop a Claire Shipman Pandering Depravity Index used to measure the time required for light to enter one ear of a MSM member, and exiting the other ear. There has to be some correlation between the light speed and the lack of something going on in there.

Correlation? Of course there...

is a correlation. It's the undeniable fact that while light does pass through the cranial vacuum of an MSM member, it does not dissipate, nor reflect, scatter, or otherwise cast said light on the interior portion of their brain. It merely enters and exits, thereby guaranteeing that the light has not been there long enough for any UV quality of the light to break apart the appalling stench and stagnation of their thought processes. It is quite simple to explain, and completely self-evident.

I just knew there had to be some bright NB participant...

I just knew there had to be some bright NB participant who could provide an insightful answer--it was the vacuum and lack of contact time all along. Thanks!

A stupid test

It's an invalid argument. Some words carry racial baggage. It's just a fact of life. But being aware of the racial baggage doen't mean that you secretly approve of that baggage. That's what these "researchers" are concluding, and it's illogical. The test subjects hesitated at those words precisely because they recognized that the words carried baggage. And so, when the subjects were trying to avoid offense, these idiot researchers were concluding that it proved racism. They were concluding the opposite of what the subjects were trying to do.

Let's try a different test. Let me say four words, and see how you respond to them about Barack Obama. Imagine a photo of Barack Obama in front of you as these words flash below his picture

  • apple
  • lettuce
  • watermelon
  • milk

If you're a normal white adult, you may have taken an extra split second's pause when you saw watermelon. Why? Because you know that watermelon is part of a racial stereotype ... and as a white person, you now take an extra pause about certain words because you don't want to offend blacks. Here you were trying to avoid something racist, but these researchers would have said that it was proving your racism.

This isn't science, and these aren't experts.

I would have to agree....

WHOLEHEARTEDLY!...sorry for the caps...felt this way for years.

 The only people to bring

 The only people to bring up race and whether someone is uppity or not has been liberals. They have done it consistantly.  In the primaries, now in the general.

Every single time race has brought up in this election you can bet your ass it's a liberal bringing it up.  Do they feel that guilty?   Is that the only way they can get a white to vote for Obami is by guilt?  Good luck with that crap.  What in the world are they going to do when Obami loses?  Here's a clue, liberals:  Guilt is not working.  Naming everyone a racist that questions, or doubts Obami, or knows that he is wrong isn't working. And threats of public discord are not working either.   In fact, it's finally having the opposite effect.  So in that regard, I suggest you keep it up.  Maybe someday you'll get the message.

I don't know about anyone else....

but I think Obama's fate was sealed when that so-called professor from NY made the idiotic statement that (paraphrased) anyone that did not vote for Obama was racist, even blacks, Asians, any and all were racists, and that the whites that DID vote for him were still racist but they were "good" racists. I guess if you play by their rules then you can be classified as a "good little white person". And I never heard a word about Obama renouncing him or refuting his statement....

Obama's wife see's things

Obama's wife see's things differently...

‘There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.’

Is Obama A Racist?

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Obama Is Arrogant

It is quite arrogant for a person with no real accomplishments and no genuine candor about himself, his life, his associations, and his allies to be taken seriously as a major political party candidate for POTUS.

We should not be having to rely on a few industrious individuals to dig out the facts behind his associations on 2 major foundations (CAC, Woods). We should not be left to wonder what he did and who he associated with (and why, too) while in college and later law school. We should not be in the dark about his associations with his spiritual adviser, a Muslim professor with ties to a terrorist group or about an interview he gave that appears to show his contempt for the Constitution of the United States and the values of our founding fathers spelled out within it. 

--

Ignorance, our most costly commodity - paraphrased from Rush Limbaugh

He's not uppity.  He's

He's not uppity.  He's just a plain arrogant, elitist jackass.

The best part was when she

The best part was when she showed the McCain's "Obama Celebrity" video and said that ads like that which sought to portray Obama as "arrogant or who does he think he is", contribute to the SUB CONCIOUS idea that he's "uppity". An ad. Not Obama on every t.v. station in the world belittling small town AMERICA and describing them as "DESPERATELY CLINGING TO GUN'S AND RELIGION"! Nooooo. It was the ad!  I see, said the blind man. 

reaction times

--She solemnly intoned, "But in fact, although 'ready' and 'calm' were in the top five [test results], 'uppity,' that classic southern expression drenched in racial overtones, was the number one word subconsciously associated with Barack Obama."--

If I understand it correctly, the way the test worked is like this--the longer a person takes to respond to a word or a statement, theoretically the more meaningful (or by extensions, approving) the person is of it.

But it doesn't seem to factor in other variables. For example, shock. As in "Are they really using the racist-loaded word 'uppity' in this test? I can't believe that!!" And so people do not react as quickly, possibly because they cannot believe what they are reading or hearing.

This test seems far too subjective.