Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on Friday strongly challenged "Good Morning America" host Diane Sawyer about the media's lack of fairness towards the McCain/Palin presidential ticket. The exchange came after the ABC journalist followed up on negative Gingrich remarks about the Obama tax plan by asserting, "for fairness," Obama talking points on middle class tax cuts.
An irritated Gingrich refused to allow Sawyer to move on to another topic and retorted, "No, wait a second. I don't notice very often, reporters, for fairness, pointing out what Governor Palin said or pointing out what Senator McCain said." The GMA anchor, slightly taken aback, defended, "And let me just say, I do point out what Senator McCain says, Mr. Speaker. You know I do." [audio excerpt available here]
And yet, just a few minutes earlier, during a different segment, Sawyer seemed to prove Gingrich's point that the media often recite the left's talking points and attacks. She launched into an update on Joe "the plumber" Wurzelbacher, which was really a series of gratuitous attacks on the Ohio man who famously challenged Obama over his tax plan. She derided, "It turns out, even though he was arguing about taxes for plumbers who end up making $250,000 a year, it turns out that he doesn't have a plumbing license, though the company he works for does."
Continuing to pile on, she complained, "And even though he criticized Senator Obama's tax plan, he hasn't been very good at tax paying. He owes taxes. $1,200 in back taxes." Sawyer sniffed, "So, as we say, 15 minutes of fame can be tough on everybody."
The anchor even teased the update by announcing, "And also, we're going to tell you about the cruel morning after the fabulous day for Joe the plumber. It turns out people started going through the files and we'll tell you what they learned about him."
A transcript of Sawyer's interview with Gingrich, and the update on Joe the plumber, follow:
7:14am
DIANE SAWYER: And we're back to politics now with 18 days to go until the election. We love to pose things. Think about how the election could change. As we know, Senator Obama is ahead. Could Senator McCain close the gap? We're going to bring in one of the gladiators of the Republican Party, former Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich. Good morning, Mr. Speaker.
NEWT GINGRICH: Good morning.
SAWYER: Let's go back to the news of the morning. We saw John McCain so charming and funny last night. At the same time though, as we heard also from John Berman, those, what they call, robo-calls are going out, once again, with negative attacks on Bill Ayers and Senator Obama. Is this a good idea?
GINGRICH: Well, I don't think it's the most important issue. I think the country, actually, is actually worried about the economy. And Senator Obama actually gave Senator McCain, I think, the winning issue, in his conversation the other day, about spreading the wealth. I think, you ask the average American, do you want your government to focus on jobs and economics, or on spreading the wealth? Overwhelmingly, I think they distrust the idea of politicians deciding how much you're allowed to keep and politicians giving that money to their friends. I think there's a deep divide in this country on that issue. And my guess is that if McCain and Palin focus on whether or not you want politicians taking your money away to give to their cronies, such as A.C.O.R.N., for example, I think you'll find he's going to continue to close. Gallup last night had him within two points among likely voters, which is a dramatic change from a week ago. So, I would say this race is a long way from over.
SAWYER: We are seeing a lot of different polls out there. Let me bring up Karl Rove, who said, it's not cast in stone. But in order to do this, Senator McCain has got to do what he calls, thread the eye of the needle. That's how tough it's going to be. And I'll show everybody on the map what he was talking about. He says that of the states that George Bush won in 2004, John McCain has got to do this. He has got to get Nevada, Colorado, Missouri, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida. If he can do that, and If he does that, he can still afford to lose, Iowa and New Mexico. Do you think, at this point, he can make that sweep and thread the eye of the needle, given the polls that show Obama ahead in so many of those states?
GINGRICH: No. I don't think you do it that. And Karl and I have a fundamentally different view of how politics works. I think if John McCain in the next 18 days wins the argument nationally, exactly the way Harry Truman did in 1948, and if you get a four-point or five-point swing nationally, all of a sudden, a whole group of states fall his way. I think if you campaign hard enough on the issue of whether you want politicians to take away your money to share the wealth with their friends, I suspect Pennsylvania becomes vulnerable. Michigan becomes vulnerable. And you're in a different election. It's a very different model.
SAWYER: But- Let me ask you this though- You have kept saying, go back on the economy. Stay on the economy. Who is doing the negative campaigning? And why does it keep going on, if it is such a distraction?
GINGRICH: Well, look, both sides are doing a lot of negative campaigning. The fact is that Senator Obama has done an immense amount of negative campaigning in states like Virginia. I think he bought 13000 ads to Senator McCain's eight ads in the last three weeks. So, both campaigns have consultants who believe in negative advertising. I'm describing something different. The way Harry Truman came from behind. And he was so far behind that they quit polling in September. The way he came from behind, was he moved the entire country. The country's paying attention. And I can just tell you, I was in Kansas City and St. Louis yesterday. And people do not want politicians deciding how to redistribute the wealth to their cronies. People instinctively believe that when Speaker Pelosi says we're going to have to take, quote, "harsh measures," she's talking about harsh measures with the tax payer. And I think that if Senator McCain and Governor Palin spend the rest of this campaign focused on whether or not politicians ought to take money away from you and decide how much you're allowed to keep, I suspect they win the election.
SAWYER: Again, I have to point out for fairness this morning that Senator Obama's campaign says that the middle class gets three times the tax relief for the middle class than Senator McCain does. But I want to ask you about something you said back at the convention-
GINGRICH: No, wait- No, wait a second. No, wait a second. I don't notice very often, reporters, for fairness, pointing out what Governor Palin said or pointing out what Senator McCain said. The fact is, that what Senator Obama said the other night was a Freudian slip, which he shouldn't have said. And he basically said, look, we have got to spread the wealth. But, who is he talking about? The "we" here is politicians.
SAWYER: But-
GINGRICH: The fact is, the average American doesn't believe- it doesn't matter who you're raising taxes on, the average American doesn't believe that it's the right thing for America to have politicians deciding to spread the wealth to their cronies.
SAWYER: And let me just say, I do point out what Senator McCain says, Mr. Speaker. You know I do.
GINGRICH: Okay.
SAWYER: But, let me ask you about something that you said at the time of the convention. Because at that time, as we know, Governor Palin had at 58 percent favorable rating, which has now dropped, according to polls, to 32 percent. And you talked about her as the leader of the Republican Party. Let's listen.
GINGRICH [at the RNC]: I suspect this will turn out to be the stronger possible ticket that we could have fielded this year. Senator McCain has now created a national figure who's young enough, could well be a leader of this country over the next two generations.
SAWYER: We're coming down to 15 seconds. Do you still agree with that?
GINGRICH: She draws huge crowds everywhere she goes. She's a very talented person. And unlike Joe Biden, she doesn't claim to go to a restaurant that went out of business in 1986, which is what he claimed in his part of the debate. I'll stick with Governor Palin over Joe Biden.
SAWYER: All right. Mr. Speaker. Great to have you with us. And I want everybody out there to go to ABCNews.com because the Speaker has a new documentary out, called "We Have the Power," about energy at this country. Go take a look at it there.
7:02am tease
SAWYER: And also, we're going to tell you about the cruel morning after the fabulous day for Joe the plumber. It turns out people started going through the files and we'll tell you what they learned about him.
7:08
SAWYER: And right now, we're going to update you on Joe Wurzelbacher. He was also a punch line a lot last night. You know, he's the Ohio plumber and presidential debate sensation who appeared on our show yesterday morning. It turns out, even though he was arguing about taxes for plumbers who end up making $250,000 a year, it turns out that he doesn't have a plumbing license, though the company he works for does. And even though he criticized Senator Obama's tax plan, he hasn't been very good at tax paying. He owes taxes. $1,200 in back taxes. And all of that started coming out yesterday. And then suddenly, nobody was taking a call at his house. So, as we say, 15 minutes of fame can be tough on everybody.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





NEWT GINGRICH: Good morning. 














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
what a hieffer!!!
October 17, 2008 - 11:57 ET by mizflame98“Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula? I mean, they’re charging a lot of money for this stuff.”
B.H. Obama
Newt Rocks!
October 17, 2008 - 12:05 ET by MeanderingDiane Saywer does NOT point out "in fairness" anything about McCain and Palin. She must get her ability to lie when the camera is on from Obama. Newt cornered her and she reacted, it wasn't truth (though in her mind it probably was). Newt took on the idiots on the View and shut them out, now its Diane Sawyer. Next he needs to go to CBS and kick Harry Smith's stupidity!
Lie?
October 17, 2008 - 12:40 ET by allanfI'm not sure its a "lie". In Dianes simple America's Junior Miss mind, she is objective and honest. She made a New York Courtroom explode in laughter when she told the judge she was a journalist so she could be objective.
Diane is surrounded by wanna-be's and synchopants all day. Not a great environment for a reality check.
Get em Newt
October 17, 2008 - 12:07 ET by AgentAmericanGet 'em Newt. God I miss him!
Drill ANWAR
Glad to see Newt put Mr.
October 17, 2008 - 12:13 ET by fitzfongGlad to see Newt put Mr. Bill in her place. Ooooh $1200 in back taxes and working as a plumber under someone else's license...well, gee, Mr. Bill, that oughta shut him up, right? Meanwhile that fraud Al Franken is in tax default all over the country and he's fit to run for the Senate. Keith Olbermann owes in the tens of thousands in back taxes, but you don't try to diminish him. How much do you want to bet that if we scoured through Mr. Bill's files, we'd find that she and her husband owe more than $1200 in back taxes? If that's the best ammunition she's got...
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
fitz, Mr. Bill? I
October 17, 2008 - 12:27 ET by rimskyfitz,
Mr. Bill? I don't know why I'm laughing at that, it's just funny! Where's it come from?
Like many vain, aging
October 17, 2008 - 13:17 ET by fitzfongLike many vain, aging Hollywood and Beltway types (Lonnie Anderson and Nancy Pelosi, for example), Diane Sawyer has a bizarre fondness for plastic surgery. She overdoes the botox and the collagen and she ends up looking like this...
http://sylviagarza.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/mrbill.jpg
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Oh THAT Mr. Bill.. Oh
October 17, 2008 - 15:59 ET by rimskyOh THAT Mr. Bill.. Oh Nooooooooooooooooooo
Nothing that they have dug
October 17, 2008 - 12:19 ET by rimskyNothing that they have dug up on Joe Wurszelbacher changes the fact that Obama, in his response to Joe's question, said it's better to spread the wealth. Now, if McCain would just take this one Freudian slip, as Newt said, and call it what it is (elitist, leftist, nanny state socialism) over and over and over again, he might actually turn the tide.
Sawyer...you and all your
October 17, 2008 - 12:21 ET by bigtimerSawyer...you and all your ilk in the drive-by media can go straight to where the sun doesn't shine...
I would love to see all of these talking heads tax records from day one...I would love to see all their journalistic licenses...
What the leftists have tried to do to this fine man is going to back-fire. ..your search/destroy is going to be to yourselves...all of you.
Including the filthy big-wig Union members who have done their big part to a fellow working man.
We are angry out here with this BS...you don't know what you are in for.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Hey, Bigtimer, GOOD FOR
October 17, 2008 - 13:02 ET by marpelHey, Bigtimer, GOOD FOR YOU... Good remarks. Yesterday, when we started to anticipate what Joe was in for, my heart just sunk for him. He's just trying to making a dang living and keep it real. But, I knew, as soon as he became the figure-head of the economy, he was "toast". The MSM are like a bunch of jackals. Sean Hannity is right, this is the year that journalism died.
DIANE SAWYER YOU SCUMBAG!
October 17, 2008 - 12:23 ET by CarlosSTo Diane Sawyer:
How many garbage cans did your scumbag surrogates have to crawl through to get this dirt on Joe the Plumber?
BTW, I just removed ABC from the channel selections on my cable box.
Sooooo Typical
October 17, 2008 - 12:28 ET by retroconMSM school of interviewing:
If interviewing a conservative: Option 1) Challange the conservate view with the liberal talking points, run out of time if the conservative is smarter than you (typical situation); Option 2) Wait until the intelligent conservative leaves, then continue on your witchhunt of the day (McCain/Keating, Palin, Joe), or give the Obama talking point of the day ("didn't know Ayers," or Acorn, or Write, or say "Spread the wealth").
If interviewing a liberal: Option 1) PIck a conservative view that has class envy words in it, ask the question in a mocking tone, and give the liberal plenty of time to spew talking points that refute it; Option 2) Raise the liberal talking point and give the liberal an opportunity to flower it up, and, once the liberal leaves, repeat the liberal talking points over and over and over for the rest of the broadcast.
Example above: "Senator Obama's campaign says that the middle class gets three times the tax relief ... than Senator McCain does."
If interviewing an Obamaniac "Independent sources say that Senator McCain's plan will be a windfall for the same wealthy CEOs who are destroying our economy, so, did i tell you that my leg was shivering when Senator Obama gave his acceptance speech?"
The cutaway crack
October 17, 2008 - 12:51 ET by KC MulvilleThis is when the host hears a comment that goes against his prejudice, so he feels compelled to debunk it. So, he says something, almost under his breath in passing, before moving to something else. The host uses the cutaway crack to get the last word. The host always owns the last word.
It's a cheap shot, but many of them do it. Stephanopolous does it almost every week on their Roundtable. To be fair, O'Reilly does it every night. He says that he's going to give the last word, then he can't help himself and adds something else. Both Hannity and Colmes do it.
It just goes to show that the medium is the message. The host isn't trying to bring the guest to the attention of the viewers. Instead, the guest is just a prop for the host to deliver his own ideas.
Joe The Plumber
October 17, 2008 - 12:56 ET by GeneralAlAs a retired union man, I would think the plumbers union would jump on this with both feet and defend a union brother. I was a steward in a well known union and our rule was we back our brothers no matter how much we disagree. We keep our personal disagreements within the local. Apparently, that no longer applies. We have obviously seem the control of our unions handed to our communist in America. I believe the FBI needs to step up and offer this man and his family protection because it will be a cold day in hell before the Commiecrats or The Obammessiah ever step up to defend him. This is just a taste of the totalitarion state that awaits the innaugaration of Obama and the way free speech will be suppressed. I think Joe Biden and the rest of the Commiecrats are in for a supprise themselves! He is going to consolidate his power and inn the process Joe the Mouth, Nancy the Vamp, and Harry the Undertaker will be standing outside his office begging to be seen. As he rewrites the National Anthem and redesigns the American flag, perhaps Joes union brothers will regret their failure to rise to his defense!
First Joe the Plumber shuts her down, then Newt does!
October 17, 2008 - 12:57 ET by SouthJersey1953PRICELESS!!
Yesterday, Joe the Plumber shut Diane down (by blasting Nobama's spread the wealth) then this morning Newt shut her down. I have never had two more enjoyable days listening to GMA on the radio on my way to work!!!!
McCain/PALIN '08
PALIN/Jindal '12
SAWYER: And let me just
October 17, 2008 - 13:07 ET by Chris NormanSAWYER: And let me just say, I do point out what Senator McCain says, Mr. Speaker. You know I do.
GINGRICH: Okay.
I hope Gingrich's "okay" was just acknowledging that he was listening and not conceding that she was right.
I wish he would've said, "No, I don't know that Diane, because you don't and you know you don't and neither does anyone else in your mainstream media because you're all functioning as the obama campaigns spokes people".
McNotObama '08
I wish Newt would have run
October 17, 2008 - 13:06 ET by marpelI wish Newt would have run for President. I wouldn't feel I was in the Twilight Zone like I am now...
I'm trying to prepare for an Obama presidency. I'd like to think otherwise, but it just seems that McCain really doesn't want to win this election.
I think we'll be officially a socialist nation as of January 2009.
I'm trying to prepare for an Obama presidency
October 17, 2008 - 13:44 ET by CarlosSIn all your preparations for the inevitable Obama presidency, don't forget to vote for McCain/Palin..., assuming you want them in the oval office.
Part of the DEMs/MSMs strategy is to convince us that it's inevitable and we just shouldn't even bother voting.
Turning up the heat
October 17, 2008 - 13:56 ET by Mary Louise TurnerHave you noticed that as the election draws closer, the MSM (Mostly Sycophant Media) has come to rely more and more on these woeful polls? They're trying to turn up the heat as far as discouraging Republicans is concerned. They can't understand why Mr. Obama has not yet been "crowned" and why Mr. McCain won't go away, so they have gone into panic mode.
Joe
October 17, 2008 - 13:41 ET by airsupplyThe media couldn't wait to try to dig up dirt on Joe the Plumber.. how about trying to find Barack's birth certificate?
Hey Diane Sawyer
October 17, 2008 - 13:55 ET by DaBirdHey Diane Sawyer (D-ABCNews), do you have a license to broadcast over the public airwaves? Or does ABC having a braodcast license cover that for you? What an absolute non-story story this is.
Class Warfare Uncloaked!!
October 17, 2008 - 14:04 ET by oilcanThis is it folks. These past few days has finally revealed what we all knew existed. That the O, Biden, Dem Congress & MSM have been waging a war of the classes.
If you're a conservative, you are of no class and therefore, not entitled to any of the inalienable rights articulated in the US Constitution. Yes, you can excersise them, but be prepared for the rage of the masses.
The MSM have clearly shown now, they're not interested at all in a fair election. They'll work in concert with the O to take down any opposition forces, big or small.
They're now tearing into Joe Citizen, belittling him, humiliating him, marginializing him. It is so very insulting and angers me to no end. Joe Citizen is us! I am Joe Citizen and I'm mad as hell and will not take this crap any longer.
How dare they cast throw their stones and rocks at person like me, someone who dares to dream big, who wishes to expand his horizons for his family, who wants to move up in life, and, who questions authority?
O'biden have mocked us, speaking to their followers that we don't exist [as in saying, "I don't know any $250k plumbers], yet we do. We dream and we want to succeed without big gov't taking our money away in proportion to our wealth, our dreams.
The war is on and the casualties will be us, and they're mounting daily. Except the MSM won't report that, they're propogandists for the left.
Pointless waste of time to complain about MSM bias on the MSM
October 17, 2008 - 16:02 ET by Jonah JohansenAt some point conservatives and Republican politicians have to realize; that
confronting the MSM with logic or evidence of bias, changes nothing. You would
have an easier time convincing Jehovah’s Witnesses, who come to your door, to
become Muslims.
The MSM are extensions of the Democratic Party. Newt
himself once said the MSM and the Democratic Party are like the offence and defense
of the same team.
What conservatives, Republicans and Republican administration
officials need to do, is to treat the MSM as the enemy, they truly are.
Do not appear on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC! Do not give interviews to the AP,
NYT or WP. Ban the David Gregorys, the Mitchells, the Helen Thomas types
from the White House press room. Conservative talking heads need to be
part of the boycott also. Every time a Republican or a conservative
appears on a Sunday Morning Show or occupies the one conservative seat CNN and
MSNBC sometime offer; they give credence to the network, they area token, A fig
leaf the networks use to obscure their one sided agenda.
The only way it is going to penetrate the consciousness
of the naive and easily manipulated audiences of these shows, is for
people to see week after week empty
chairs where the token conservative normally sits. Stop assisting the
pretence of fairness, that having spokesmen from both sides supports.
Newsbusters made a big deal of Frum criticizing Rachel
Maddow on her show recently. What is he doing one her show in the first
place? She is a sworn enemy of
everything he supposedly believes in and holds dear and she is a lying
demagogue. What on earth did the McCain people think was going to happen
when they sent Palin to be interviewed by Gibson and Couric.
We are within 2 weeks of electing someone who since the age of
13 has been involved with self avowed Communists and Communist sympathizers;
yet, most conservatives who appear on TV
seam to worry most about coming off as negative,
confrontational, grumpy, racist, dangerous or provocative.
JJ... I could not agree
October 17, 2008 - 16:09 ET by bigtimerJJ...
I could not agree more...you are exactly right, I also have been saying as such for over three years here now...and long before that elsewhere!
If only the republicans would get a clue and listen to this advice...things would get nipped in the bud...things would have to change.
Period.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Do you notice the license comment?
October 18, 2008 - 13:55 ET by TheHistorianI have looked and looked, and cannot find if Diane is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists (the Sigma Delta Xi Foundation). Does Diane even belong to a group which might espouse to fairness?
The point is, Diane has no license to lose for malpractice. And Diane's misrepresentation of her unbiased nature should become malpractice in my opinion. Diane, you SHOULD have opinions. You SHOULD support someone for President. But to carry over your biases into your practice of journalism is MALPRACTICE, and if you do belong to the SPJ you should be summarily dismissed. I am still waiting for ONE defense of John McCain against Barack Obama out of your mouth. He has many good things going for him from experience to his not requesting or taking earmarks (compare that to Obama's requests for about $1 billion in earmarks made in the US Senate since he was elected). But you are silent, because you do not espouse the standards to which professional journalists should be held http://www.spj.org/e...
"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."
G. W. F. Hegel