Morning Shows Give a Combined Three and a Half Minutes to Historic Gun Ruling

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

Kate Snow, ABC Good Morning America, 6/27/08Despite the "historic" nature of Thursday's Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment is an individual right, all three morning shows virtually ignored the decision, devoting a combined total of three minutes and 33 seconds to the story. And between CBS's "Early Show," NBC's "Today" and ABC's "Good Morning America," that's out of eight hours of programming.

In fact, the three and a half minutes of story time does not even equal the over four minutes that Wednesday's "Early Show" alone gave to the critically important subject of how to Feng Shui your house for pets. On Friday, however, the CBS program could only find a mere 30 seconds for the most definitive gun ruling the Supreme Court has ever made. And while "Good Morning America" spent almost three minutes on Madonna and whether or not she's getting divorced, the show only allowed 93 seconds of air time for the D.C. gun case. Similarly, the "Today" show devoted 90 seconds to the topic, despite admitting that it was "the most important ruling ever on gun rights." Now, what could the cause for all this be? Could it have something to do with the fact that presidential candidate Barack Obama has repeatedly flip-flopped about his position on the case? Or maybe it's because Democrats in general don't seem eager to see gun control become a major issue in the 2008 presidential race and liberals in the media are helpfully playing along.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Finally, although GMA reporter Dan Harris did acknowledge in his report the position of gun owners, he tried to offer what could be a hopeful spin: "Gun control advocates are confident their side will win out, but they worry that their hands will be tied in the meantime, in the fight against urban violence."

A transcript of the limited June 27 coverage from the morning shows can be found below:

GMA

7:13am

93 seconds

KATE SNOW: The Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that Americans have a constitutional right to own guns is already triggering a flood of lawsuits. Advocates of gun rights are now vowing to challenge every limit on gun owners rights and big city mayors are vowing to fight back. Our Dan Harris explains.

DAN HARRIS: This morning in San Francisco, the first in an expected avalanche of legal challenges to gun laws as a result of the Supreme Court ruling. A lawsuit against the city which bans handguns in public housing.

CHUCK MICHEL (California Rifle and Pistol Association): And in the process deprives them of the right to choose to own a firearm to defend themselves or their families.

HARRIS: Chicago and several surrounding suburbs are also bracing for similar challenges. They have laws that are similar to the one the Supreme Court overturned. Chicago's mayor is not happy.

MAYOR RICHARD DALEY (D-Chicago, Illinois): Why don't we do away with the court system and go back to the old west? You have a gun and I have a gun and we'll settle in the streets.

HARRIS: Across the country a whole range of gun regulations could now come under attack from rules requiring mandatory trigger locks to bans on assault weapons. Gun control advocates are confident their side will win out, but they worry that their hands will be tied in the meantime, in the fight against urban violence.

ROBYN THOMAS (Exec Dir, Legal Community Against Violence): We have a great concern that resources will have to be spent defending good laws that are already on the books.

HARRIS: The Supreme Court may have answered one big question about guns in America, but now other questions will soon emerge in a courthouse near you. For "Good Morning America," Dan Harris, ABC News.

Today

7:09

90 seconds

NATALIE MORALES: Thursday's Supreme Court ruling striking down Washington, DC's handgun ban is having recoil effect in other cities around the U.S. More now from NBC's justice correspondent Pete Williams.

PETE WILLIAMS: Just a few hours after the most important ruling ever on gun rights, pro-gun groups went to court to challenge Chicago's hand gun ban. An angry mayor defended the ban and called the Supreme Court's ruling frightening.

CHICAGO MAYOR RICHARD DALEY: Do you think your next door neighbor should have an oozy, and AK-47, any type of a gun? Do you really believe that? Good luck.

WILLIAMS: The Court said the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individuals, not just members of militias striking down Washington, DC's ban on handguns, the Court said they're well suited for self-defense, especially at home where the five-member majority said the "need for defense of self, family and property is most acute."

WAYNE LAPIERRE, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION: It's vindication for Americans all over this country that always knew it was their freedom worth protecting.

WILLIAMS: The NRA said it would challenge gun restrictions in San Francisco and might take on licensing requirements in New York City where the mayor said his city's background checks will hold up.

NEW YORK MAYOR MICHAEL BLOOMBERG: You have a right under the Second Amendment, we've always believed, to hold, to have a pistol or to have a rifle. What you don't have a right to do is to hold one if you are a criminal.

WILLIAMS: The court said cities can still put restrictions on gun ownership but exactly which ones will keep court battles going for years to come. Pete Williams, NBC News, at the Supreme Court.

The Early Show

7:08AM

30 seconds

RUSS MITCHELL: That Supreme Court ruling that Americans have a right to own guns is still a hot topic of discussion this morning. Yesterday the justices shut down a Washington, D.C. gun ban. Chicago has one that's very similar. And the ruling angered Chicago Mayor Richard Daley.

RICHARD DALEY: The Supreme Court and Congress has no obligation to keep our country safe. It falls on the backs of mayors and your local officials.

MITCHELL: Within hours of the ruling gun rights advocates filed suit to overturn Chicago's law. The National Rifle Association plans to file a similar complaint against San Francisco.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No Surprise Here Except that....

I'm surprised they even mentioned it at all.  This is another example of how the media invests their ideology for or against an issue and when it doesn't go their way, they ignore it.  It's been happening for over a decade now and has recenty (ie Iraq) come to an unprecedented level where fairness in journalism has gone well out the window.

Nothng to see here...

...move along, move along.

We'll let you know when there is any "real" news that is important; based on our perception of your "need to know".

Don't worry yourself with unimportant SCOTUS rulings that furrther reinforce the 2nd ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. We'll let you know when Roe vs. Wade or the Gitmo detainess are back "under attack".

"Feng Shui your house for pets"

is very important. The Constitution not so much..

My dog was gun shy so I left an assortment of guns lying around his favoutrite places to sleep. (no kids and removed when I left).

After a few weeks he was never afraid to look at or hear them again. Feng Shui works!!

 

 

The 2ND Amendment exists to secure the rest

Mr. Whitlock and

Mr. Whitlock and Newsbusters,

  If you did not catch the advertisement produced for the anti-Second Amendment lobby last night by the very, very dumb leftist at CBS named Bill Whitaker, then you should.  In Whitaker's ad, Whitaker, of course, focused on how the "gun lobby" and "opponents of gun regulation" oppose the agenda of Whitaker and other leftists.  Even for CBS, that was a sight to see.

My local news station gave

My local news station gave it all of eleven words of coverage.  Eleven words.

It’s frightening to

It’s frightening to consider how many who will be voting this year get most if not all their news from the alphabet networks.  Sadly, the younger crowd gets their news from the likes of John Stewart and MTV. Compound this bias and misinformation with the number of young people who, because they have dropped out of high school, are unable to digest the complexities of many of the important issues of our time. To quote Thomas Jefferson: “An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic.”

----------------------------------------------------------------


Which political party is invested in our defeat in Iraq?