On Friday's "Good Morning America," former top Clinton aide George Stephanopoulos attacked criticism of Barack Obama as comparable to "the experience of the Michael Dukakis Democratic campaign in 1988, of John Kerry's campaign in 2004." In an apparent dig at the Swift Boat veterans and their criticism of John Kerry, the ex-Democratic official-turned journalist maligned, "In both those cases, the Democratic candidates were attacked by unfair and untrue charges but failed to respond and lost the election." Stephanopoulos, who worked on the Dukakis campaign, didn't mention what "unfair and untrue" changes he was referring to regarding the '88 election.
Both the Stephanopoulos segment and a previous piece by ABC reporter Jake Tapper discussed attacks and "unflattering and untrue" criticism of both Barack and Michelle Obama. Tapper observed that the candidate's wife has made some "controversial comments." However, the GMA reporter, and later Stephanopoulos and news anchor Chris Cuomo, failed to mention what those statements might be. To be fair, Tapper has previously highlighted Mrs. Obama's utterance that, with the 2008 campaign, "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country." But it would have been helpful to have played the clip on Friday's segment. After all, is there not a difference between internet smears that the Illinois senator is a secret Muslim and criticism of actual statements made on the campaign trail?
Blurring the lines, Cuomo began the first segment by lamenting, "Despite pledges for the campaign to be about issues, personal attacks are popping up on the internet." Tapper's piece stated that the Tennessee Republican Party ran "a web ad against [Michelle Obama]." He didn't mention it, but that ad brought up the "proud of my country" comments. Now, contrast that statement, which was most definitely uttered by Mrs. Obama, with the ABC graphic that appeared during the piece: "Stopping the Smear Campaign: Obama Campaign Fights Rumors." It seems as though ABC is attempting to lump together all critiques on the Obamas as "rumors" and smears.
A transcript of the June 13 segments, which aired at 7:13am, follows:
CHRIS CUOMO: And now to the race to '08. Despite pledges for the campaign to be about issues, personal attacks are popping up on the internet. The presumptive Democratic nominee is taking unprecedented action this morning trying to squash rumors about his faith, his background, even his wife Michelle. Jake Tapper has more for us this morning from Chicago. Good morning, Jake.
ABC GRAPHIC: Stopping the Smear Campaign: Obama Campaign Fights Rumors
JAKE TAPPER: Good morning, Chris. Well, Senator Barack Obama has vanquished the powerful Clinton-Democratic machine but has not yet been able to beat back those persistent and untrue rumors about him and his wife. So, he has taken the unusual step of launching a new website called Fightthesmears.com. Barack Obama knows there are some unflattering and untrue e-mails about him circulating.
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: All I want to say is, let me know if you see this guy named Barack Obama because he sounds pretty scary.
TAPPER: His new website aims to website to correct the record, as with the rumor that Michelle Obama says "whitey" on a tape. The truth, the website declares, no such tape exists.
ROBERT GIBBS (Communications director, Obama campaign): Without a website to let people know the truth, rumor becomes the truth on the internet.
TAPPER: A recent poll showed that one in ten Americans think Obama's a Muslim, which he is not. But the rumor has been circulating for more than a year. Initially, Obama did not want to dignify the rumors with a response.
DREW WESTEN (Author, The Political Brain): I would have gone after them the day they first showed up on the internet.
TAPPER: Psychiatry professor Drew Weston said that was bad strategy, since our brains are wired to take in immediate impressions, even if false.
WESTEN: The reality is, that if you don't respond to an attack, just from the point of view of how our brains work, what you're allowing the other side to do is to shape the associations people have to the candidates in their minds..
TAPPER: The tipping point for Obama dealt with his wife Michelle, whose sometimes controversial comments have made her a lightning rod for criticism. Last week Obama became irritated after a reporter asked him about the apparently non-existent "whitey" tape.
OBAMA: We've seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in e-mail. And they pump 'em out long enough until finally, you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about them.
TAPPER: Obama has been sensitive to attacks on Michelle before. After the Tennessee Republican Party ran a web ad against her, Obama told "Good Morning America" she was off limits.
OBAMA: But I also think these folks should lay off my wife. All right? Just in case they're watching.
TAPPER: Apparently Obama was fired up about the rumor issue. He confronted Senator Joe Lieberman, the independent who is backing John McCain for not doing enough to push back on the Obama-Muslim rumor when Lieberman's asked about it. Chris?
CHRIS CUOMO: All right, Jake. Thank you for that. Let's get the bottom line on all of this. For that, we go to chief Washington correspondent, host of "This Week," George Stephanopoulos. George, good morning. As always, good to have you.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Chris.
CUOMO: Let's get right to the heart of the matter here. Barack Obama doesn't like them going after his wife but is it fair game? Should he expect this?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Oh, I mean, you have to be ready for anything. But as you saw in that piece, he's ready to fight back as well, both on the web and across the media. Number one, Michelle Obama herself is going to be out there on the campaign trail. She's campaigning with Obama today at a forum in Ohio. She's going to be on "The View" next week as a guest host. So -- but the important point the Obama campaign wants to make is that whenever an unfair charge or an untrue charge is leveled, they're going to respond. They're going to hit back hard. They're colored by the experience of the Michael Dukakis Democratic campaign in 1988, of John Kerry's campaign in 2004. In both those cases, the Democratic candidates were attacked by unfair and untrue charges but failed to respond and lost the election.
CUOMO: It's interesting on this one. David Axelrod, one of Obama's advisors said there may be recoil potential going after Michelle, may work against the Republicans. Let me ask about their strategy here so far. The website. Is this going to be enough to stem these kinds of attacks? Obama's website?
STEPHANOPOULOS: It's not going to stop the attacks, but instead of creating just a campaign war room, like we've seen in the past, what the Obama campaign wants to do is basically create a virtual army with foot soldiers all across the country sending along the e-mails to counter what they consider the unfair, untrue e-mails. What you can do on this website is actually download your entire address book so that everyone you know gets the, gets the information from the Obama campaign. The insight here, Chris, is that the campaign realizes, just as George W. Bush's campaign realized in 2004, that most people get most of their political information, not just from the media, but from their friends, from their neighbors, on the internet. So, they're going to fight it e-mail by e-mail, link by link.
CUOMO: All right, George. Thank you very much. Appreciate the insight this morning.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Scott, I'm curious. Did
June 13, 2008 - 12:03 ET by ThisnThatScott, I'm curious. Did Stephanopoulos name one specific Swift Boat Veterans item that he thought was not true? And did he challange the Veterans to prove that the specific item was not true? Did Stephanopoulos provide data/evidence of the untruth?
Or, did he merely state this in a compliant MSM-setting that doesn't have the gumption, smarts, or integrity to challange his statements? Again, propoganda is rampant throughout the MSM, and you can see their tactics -- bring something up sometime later, let someone say something that's not supported with any data whatsoever, and publicize it as truth. Communists don't do this any better than the Dim party and their MSM enablers.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
ThisnThat
June 13, 2008 - 12:12 ET by Scott WhitlockHe didn't mention the Swift Boat veterans by name, which is why I said that he was apparently referring to them. But, since that was a major charge that most people think helped derail the Kerry campaign, it's unclear what other "unfair and untrue" allegations Stephanopoulos could have been referring to.
Scott,
June 13, 2008 - 12:27 ET by ThisnThat"I said that he was apparently referring to them".
I'm willing to take a bold leap here and state, unequivocally, Stephanopoulos was referring to the Swift Boat Veterans. There! You're off the hook :-)
And I love Cuomo's ending remark: "Appreciate the insight this morning". Insight? That's what this garbage is called? Talk about totally brain dead.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Swifites = Total Integrity
June 13, 2008 - 12:47 ET by Del DolemonteOn the last vessel my Dad was stationed on, he was exec officer and his CO was one of the more prominent Swifties (I am witholding his name to protect his privacy). Unlike Steffi, this guy doesn't have a dishonest bone in his body.
Steffi is nothing but a flaming jacka**.
It is hard for Kerry to
June 13, 2008 - 12:15 ET by kgIt is hard for Kerry to defend his self when there are over 200 brothers in arms that say he is a liar, a phoney and a coward and are speaking from first hand experience. But, as promised, Kerry will soon release his records. In the mean time we should accept Kerry's word like Stephanopoulos does.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
The Charges
June 13, 2008 - 12:37 ET by ShopliftURsoulKerry's three months in Vietnam equal three purple hearts, one Christmas in Cambodia, 32 hours of Kerry film footage, two lefty millionare wives, 7 hours of Congressional testimony, two sets of medals (one to throw and one to show), one grenade in a mound of rice and one failed run for the Presidency of the USA.
Anybody who has served knows Kerry is one pathetic individual.
Look out George, Jesse and Al want to speak with you!
June 13, 2008 - 12:42 ET by bioteachedI must have a sick sense of humor, because I found George's choice of words this morning to be interesting . . .
"They're going to hit back hard. They're colored by the experience of the Michael Dukakis Democratic campaign in 1988, of John Kerry's campaign in 2004. In both those cases, the Democratic candidates were attacked by unfair and untrue charges but failed to respond and lost the election."
Was this a Freudian slip??? LOL
Nope
June 13, 2008 - 12:52 ET by OldSailor88A lot of Democrats are huge racists. Just like their social programs, there's nothing Freudian about it. It's blatant, with the cover statement of, "We want to help you."
Noli habere bovis, vir!
Tapper: The tipping point
June 13, 2008 - 12:50 ET by dscottTapper: The tipping point for Obama dealt with his wife Michelle, whose sometimes controversial comments have made her a lightning rod for criticism. Last week Obama became irritated after a reporter asked him about the apparently non-existent "whitey" tape.
Why Georgie boy, thanks for confirming the veracity of the story by claiming both were false. We know what the Swiftboat Veterans said was true about Kerry and therefore the attributed comments to Michelle about what she said about "whitey" must also be true. Given that Rev. Wright said these bigoted things for 20 years in the Obamas presence, it doesn't surprise us Michelle was listening when Barack claimed he wasn't. Are you now going to try to say Rev. Wright didn't say these things??? So he's already been swiftboated??? That's what happens when you try to be tricky.
Swiftboating, it seems means telling inconvenient truths when the person in question doesn't want them told, it used to be called tattling, but Democrats are sooooo much more sophisticated these days.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Isn't most of the Swift
June 13, 2008 - 12:51 ET by balboaIsn't most of the Swift Boat stuff opinion and a case of "he said / he said"?
Sure is, Boa. All
June 13, 2008 - 12:55 ET by NL207Sure is, Boa. All eyewitnesses have their own opinions about what they saw.
NL...I believe the
June 13, 2008 - 15:17 ET by JerNL...I believe the "eyewitnesses" generally supported Kerry. The "non-eyewitness" Swiftboaters generally did not.
Jer
You're funny in a cynical
June 13, 2008 - 12:59 ET by dscottYou're funny in a cynical sort of way there bal. Of course everyone's view of the world is their "opinion" and therefore everything they observe is subjective, even first hand. So by extension there are no such thing as facts... only assertions.
Do I have the liberal psychology down correctly? <sarcasm>
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
bal your responding like a typ. lib again
June 13, 2008 - 14:59 ET by larry on LIbal, do you think T.Boone Pickens would risk $1,000,000.00 in a bet with Kerry,the terms of which are , if Kerry can prove "one" of the charges made by the swift boat vets to be false and release his records and all filmed documents of Kerry's apperances.kerry would win the bet. the world is waiting! chirp,chirp
larry...do you think Kerry
June 13, 2008 - 15:14 ET by Jerlarry...do you think Kerry would have accepted the bet [which he did] from Pickens if he couldn't prove it? Or that Pickens would crawfish and attempt to change the terms of his challenge if he weren't nervous about losing money and face?
Jer
jer ,the next response is in kerry's court
June 13, 2008 - 18:11 ET by larry on LIyou have the responsibility ass backwards,the proof is on kerry,with his track record on this subject i am betting he balks.for your edification the challange and acceptance was reported as being in writing.
larry...you may need to
June 13, 2008 - 19:19 ET by Jerlarry...you may need to edify a little further. My recollection is that Pickens made the "million dollar challenge", Kerry called his bluff, and then Pickens responded by attaching several additional conditions, thereby modifying the antecedent offer and acceptance.
Jer
jer ,the next response is in kerry's court
June 13, 2008 - 20:33 ET by larry on LIi have not seen or heard of any documentation that kerry provided to disprove of any statements made by the swift boat vets. pickens challenge stated kerry had prove only "one" incorrect fact out of all their claims and that has not happened.what pickens is asking for is a strech ,but it doesn't change the fact that kerry has to back his findings with documented proof . i think kerry will play the 'cricket' and let it lie.
Let's do a small exercise
June 13, 2008 - 13:20 ET by WingletDriverLefties like to make it seem as if Kerry lost because the Swifties lied about his service. But Kerry really lost because he refused, despite promises to the contrary, to release his military records. Those records would have shown one of four things:
1) the Swifites were lying
2) Kerry was lying
3) both were lying
4) something inconclusive
If it were either 1 or 4, Kerry would've been stupid not to release his records. If it were 2 or 3, then Kerry is a liar. Either way, Kerry is either stupid or a liar or both.
But we already know Kerry lies by his "Christmas in Cambodia" story, which makes option 2 seem to be the most likely.
Christmas in Cambodia....Sniper Fire in Bosnia
June 13, 2008 - 20:45 ET by BlondeWhatever.
Both are perfect foils for perfect fools....who both thought they could recast history in the public view to suit their own silly "recollections"....or perhaps I should say recreations.
You can fool some of the people some of the time...but when you begin by fooling yourself....well, game over.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Kerry lost because he is a nothing...
June 14, 2008 - 10:07 ET by ThalpyKerry lost because he is a nothing and even though our people are damaged, some judgement remains. Stephanopoulos remains a political hack. Perhaps some day our people will tire of his "explaining" things to us.
Similar all right!
June 13, 2008 - 15:05 ET by Chasvsyes, they are similar... similar as in they are TRUE!
John Kerry was a disgrace to the uniform he wore and his shipmates that he slandered!
Michelle Obama is a marxist like her half-wit hubby!
Wake up America, the enemy is at the door and being welcomed with open arms!
I'm still wondering when
June 13, 2008 - 16:11 ET by SchnikeysI'm still wondering when they're going to make mention of the 7-year smear campaign that's been going on against Bush.
------------------------------------------------------------
"It could be the answer to our age-old, philosophical question, 'Why are we here?' PLASTIC!"
Hey now they are
June 13, 2008 - 16:45 ET by red_dragon311Hey now they are just reporting facts.
didn't you get the memo,
it's a fact if it's somthing negative for a conservitive or republican
it's a low down, dirty, underhanded, uncuth, racist, sexist smear attack if is somthing negative about ab liberal.
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Gerald Ford
8 Years of Bush attacks, and you guys suddenly Notice ?
June 13, 2008 - 20:07 ET by JayTeeIf Obama's personal attacks that are "Poping" up are so "Similar" to Kerry's...Then I guess BHO's DONE.
Kaput. Over. History. Swift Kayaked.
Act like Bush never was attacked or made fun of...go ahead....., do you Feel Lucky Punk ? Go ahead, Make my Day...
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
The Swiftboat and POWs for the truth nailed Kerry
June 14, 2008 - 07:23 ET by ChiefE9They were honest and if your read Kerry's Vietnam War history he was a member of the anti war zealots and Hanoi Jane Fonda's partner during that period. He lied in front of Congress telling them that all of us vietnam vets did atrocities. He also went to Paris as a Navy reserve officer and negotiated with the enemy at that time, the VC from North Vietnam. After reading this you will know the Swifties and POWs for the truth were telling the truth.
I sent them money and would do that again.
Kerry and his ilk
June 14, 2008 - 08:37 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsHere is a link exposing Kerry and the other liars who smeared their fellow soldiers.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
John Kerry
June 14, 2008 - 16:55 ET by DaieI don't think Kerry losing had that much to do with the Swiftboats because a lot of it was ones words against another. I think his own words and actions after Vietnam was his undoing. They weren't made up, or soundbites taken out of context. My father is a Vietnam Veteran. To this day he still has nightmares about things he saw over there. For Kerry to imply that all soldiers were guilty of war crimes was unforgivable to a lot of people. My father and I included. If people believed the Swiftboat veterans it was because Kerry's own words and actions after the war and till this day made it easy for people to believe them.
John Kerry & Swift Boaters
June 14, 2008 - 17:09 ET by BlondeQuite right.
Kerry lied. Numerous times.
Cambodia in Christmas was just the beginning.
John Kerry was (and is) a disgrace to all of those who served in Viet Nam.
He's an asshat. Nuff said.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive