Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 27, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Ashley Judd to NBC: Republicans Are 'Really Dumb,' Obama Has 'Flowered'
  • Bozell Column: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
  • CBS: 'Troubling Signs' For Obama, Like Bush in '92, But President 'Cannot Control' Economy
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'

ABC's Kate Snow Puzzles Over Hillary Loss With 'Fascinating' Steinem

By Scott Whitlock | June 11, 2008 | 15:18

Change font size:  A |  A
Scott Whitlock's picture

"Good Morning America" weekend anchor Kate Snow conducted a fawning interview with the "renowned," "fascinating" Gloria Steinem on Sunday's program. Leaving aside any mention of the feminist author's very liberal opinions or her controversial statements, Snow focused only on the issue of whether former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lost "because she is a woman, because the system was stacked against her as a woman, because America is the way it is for a woman?"

Sounding like a disciple of Steinem, Snow also worried about whether Clinton's failure could harm women. She fretted, "And now that she's not made it, do you think there will be any kind of backlash, then, against women or against the women's movement?" Appearing to be in awe of the feminist, Snow closed the interview by gushing, "So fascinating. We could sit here all day." Perhaps if Snow had actually spent all day with Steinem, she would have found time to wonder if some of the author's more controversial and shocking statements had actually harmed Clinton, such as in March when she derided supporters of John McCain for touting his POW experience as an asset in the presidential campaign. Steinem also told the New York Observer that "from George Washington to Jack Kennedy and PT-109 we have behaved as if killing people is a qualification for ruling people."

It's also rather odd for Snow to speculate about an anti-Hillary bias, as she has been one of the senator's biggest boosters. For instance, on January 7, 2008, she rhapsodized about seemingly ordinary campaign details, such as going door to door and talking to reporters: "No subject is too small. No issue too dense. Hillary Clinton is taking question after question from voters, from reporters." See a November 30, 2007 NewsBusters post for a round-up of some of Snow's more embarrassing pro-Clinton bias.

Ms. Steinem also turned up on Monday's "American Morning" and was lauded as a "pioneering feminist."

(Thanks to MRC intern Peter Sasso for transcribing the segment.)

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 8:11am on June 8, 2008, follows:

KATE SNOW: We're joined now by renowned feminist and author Gloria Steinem. Good morning.

GLORIA STEINEM (feminist author): Good morning.

SNOW: Thanks for being with us. 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling, she said. But she wasn't able to punch through. She wasn't able to make it all the way. So I think the question on a lot of people's minds is what does that say to our children? What does that say to young people?

STEINEM: Well, it's a huge victory. She really has permanently changed the perception of who a leader is. Um, I personally did not think that she was going to win from, from the beginning.

SNOW: Even though you supported her?

STEINEM: Yes, well, it's all the more reason to support her.

SNOW: Why didn't you think she would win, because she's a woman?

STEINEM: Well, it's never as simple as that. You know, each person is unique. Each situation is unique. But she is a woman who stands for the equality of women and all of the issues and frequently it's been a woman who stands against women who is the first one like Thatcher, you know who was a disaster for the women's movement. She really stands for change, and I think we -- there are a lot of people who look at her --a lot of men especially but not only, and feel kind of guilt. You know, I mean, therefore they're saying, maybe she's going to do to us, men are saying, what we've been doing to her or to women as a group and the same is true of race in some ways. You know, it's the guilt factor. You know, suppose black people are going to do to white people what has been going on in the past and that's a kind of sub-text all the time.

SNOW: And now that she's not made it, do you think there will be any kind of backlash, then, against women or against the women's movement?

STEINEM: No, actually I think it's really rejuvenated in many ways, both positively because she has been the example of grace under pressure. She certainly has expanded my idea of courage. I would have quit after Iowa. I mean--

SNOW: But what, do you think ultimately do you think she -- this is, I guess, the central question. Did she lose because she ran a flawed campaign or, you know, for many of the sort of political reasons that people have cited or did she lose ultimately, because, in part, because she is a woman, because the system was stacked against her as a woman, because America is the way it is for a woman?

STEINEM: Well, I would say -- yeah, I would say it's 40/60. I mean it's never one thing. It was a flawed campaign. That's true.

SNOW: 40 percent being the campaign and 60 percent being the woman?

STEINEM: Yeah, right, and, and, there are other parts of it, too. She is older in the way women are always older when they run for office or usually because they have to raise their children first. If Michelle Obama was running with two little girls, it would be much more difficult.

SNOW: We just saw her with that teary moment in New Hampshire, just one quick question. Do you think she let herself be a woman enough? Did she talk about being a woman enough or should she have actually been more forthcoming about her femininity?

STEINEM: Yeah, I think she should -- I think she should have been more forthcoming because it's just a fact of life and because you're reflecting the experience of half the country, but the forces on her to imitate a male commander in chief are profound, really profound.

SNOW: So fascinating. We could sit here all day. Gloria Steinem. Thank you so much for being with us this morning.

STEINEM: Thank you

SNOW: Bill?

Share this

About the Author

Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Gloria Steinem
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Kate Snow
  • ABC
  • Good Morning America
  • Scott Whitlock's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Am I alone here????
    9 sec ago
  • C'mon now, if you're born gay
    4 min 39 sec ago
  • Als job
    16 min ago
  • M-BS-NBC Ratings
    16 min 20 sec ago
  • Thank you Mr. Bozelll
    20 min 34 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Howard Stern Hasn't Been 'King of Prime Time'
  • All Purpose Weekend Open Thread
  • NPR Celebrates Transgender Olympics Hopeful as Hammer-Throwing 'Jackie Robinson'
  • Bashir to Facebook Co-Founder: Go 'Play with the Traffic'
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.