Ex-Journalist Linda Douglass Returns to ABC to Shill for Obama

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

Former journalist Linda Douglass returned to ABC and appeared on "Good Morning America" Wednesday in her new role as a strategist and spokesperson for Barack Obama. Expressing no surprise or conflict that a longtime reporter would segue from recounting the news to representing a Democratic presidential candidate, GMA news anchor Chris Cuomo breezily introduced, "We're going to begin with someone representing Obama, whom we know very well here at ABC News. Linda Douglass, a former, respected journalist, a longtime ABC News family member. But now Linda is an Obama campaign strategist and spokesperson."

Wednesday's GMA featured a gaggle of journalists turned Democrats, Democrats who became journalists and also those with famous liberal families. Cuomo is the son of a former Democratic governor of New York and the brother of the current Democratic Attorney General from that state. And his segment with Douglass followed one with "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos, a former top aide to Bill Clinton. Cuomo, provided some Democratic spin of his own when he asserted that Senator John McCain, by giving a tough speech on Tuesday, did not revel in Obama's history-making moment. In a tease early in the show, he lamented, "But on the Republican side, the nominee John McCain was all business. He was not basking in history last night." While interviewing Douglass, he reiterated, "On a night that was history-making for Obama, McCain did not dwell on history."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The MRC's Brent Baker, in a May 21, 2008 NewsBusters post, summarized Douglass's years of liberal bias as a journalist. This included referring to Senator Jim Jeffords as a "moderate" and this December 23, 2000 critique of George W. Bush:

"George W. Bush's rhetoric is very inclusive. He means to be inclusive, and he's used very soft rhetoric in trying to reach out to minorities. But the fact is he's proposed no federal programs for minorities. He hasn't talked about using the federal government to broaden the safety net."

-- ABC News reporter Linda Douglass during the This Week roundtable, December 23, 2000.

So, perhaps her new job isn't so different than the old one.

(Special thanks to MRC intern Peter Sasso for transcribing the segment.)

A transcript of the June 4 segment, which aired at 7:08am, follows:

CHRIS CUOMO: This morning we have two political insiders who are close to the Clinton and Obama campaigns. We're going to begin with someone representing Obama, whom we know very well here at ABC News. Linda Douglass, a former, respected journalist, a longtime ABC News family member. But now Linda is an Obama campaign strategist and spokesperson. Linda, a pleasure to see you this morning.

LINDA DOUGLASS: Good morning. Thanks for having me

CUOMO: Alright Linda, the niceties are over. Now let me ask you this--

DOUGLASS [Linda, laughing]: Uh-oh.

CUOMO: Now last night obviously Hillary did not concede. The big question for you and your candidate this morning- is there a better chance that Obama will ask Hillary to become Vice President or that he will ask her to pull out?

DOUGLASS: [Laughs]: I -- I doubt that he's going to do either of those things right away. You know, they did talk on the phone last night. They had a very cordial conversation, he told her that he would like to get together and talk to her when she feels that it's right. You know, he's been saying all along, you know, It's up to her, when its comfortable for her. You know, he praised her lavishly in his speech last night. She ran an amazing campaign which he has been saying over and over and over again and he has nothing but the highest respect and admiration for Hillary Clinton.

CUOMO: And yet Linda, this is something that he has to deal with, right? I mean, this is, almost, you could almost see it as his first big test, going forward. How he deals with the situation last night, that Hillary did not appoint, you know -- did not endorse him as the nominee, pointed out that her 18 million people, that they needed to be heard. Do you have any other names on the list that you want to share? Could you think of another woman would who go before Hillary as vice president?

DOUGLASS: Well, [Laughs]-- There is no short list, there is no long list. There are many, many Democrats out there, many people out there in this country that he would certainly be looking at but this is a moment he just clinched the nomination. I mean he just became, this morning, the general election Democratic candidate. So this is something that's going to be worked on certainly in the next days and weeks but it certainly isn't worked on now. This is, a moment where he turns his focus to the general election campaign and John McCain and drawing the very sharp contrast that George was just talking to you about, the contrast, in you know in health care. Whether the tax cuts goes to the rich as John McCain wants, or to the middle class as Barack Obama wants, and getting out of Iraq and certainly spending our money in ways that don’t have to do with $10 billion a month in Iraq. These are the kinds of things he wants to be focusing on now.

CUOMO: And very interesting points to be made there as well. On a night that was history-making for Obama, McCain did not dwell on history. He went right at his experience. The obvious issue here, how does Obama prove that he is not anointed as McCain suggested in his speech, but that he's equipped to be president?

DOUGLASS: Well, I think he demonstrated he's equipped to be President in many ways. He has a long record already. He's been in public office for 12 years and has accomplished much, both in the Illinois State Senate and in the United States Senate. He's certainly the champion of ethics, ground breaking ethics legislation and he's been very active in leading the Senate to finding ways to try to convince President Bush to get troops out of Iraq and what he has demonstrated above all is great judgment. I mean, this is the candidate who understood before the war in Iraq that it was a war that shouldn't be authorized and shouldn't be waged and John McCain, you know, has embraced the policies of George Bush on the war, ah throughout. So this is going to be a very, very sharp contrast, and it is a debate that Senator Obama looks forward too having.

CUOMO: All right, Linda, appreciate the suggestions this morning and I look forward to talking to you going forward as well.

DOUGLASS: Thanks Chris

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

" a former respected

" a former respected journalist,"

oh, such a wonderfully clever and biting little remark!

You beat me by 2

You beat me by 2 seconds.

"Whatever Michelle Says Is The Message." –
Senator Barack Obama October 1, 2007, Chicago HQ

i did a spit take and had a

i did a spit take and had a hearty laugh when i heard the comment this morning.

Not what it seems

Hate to burst your bubble, but what Cuomo said was not disparaging to Ms. Douglass. The quote was not transcribed correctly in the blog. To be grmmatically correct it should have been "a former, respected, journalist". To be a slam at her it would have been "a formerly respected journalist".

"To be grmmatically

"To be grmmatically correct it should have been "a former, respected, journalist"."

Grammatically, your version is incorrect.  No commas are required since "former" modifies "respected journalist", which might be a backhanded insult to some, a faux pas to others, or even proper grammar to the rest based on the preconceptions of the reader/listener.  Words games are fun, but, once again, context is king.

To prevent any misunderstanding, the appropriate phrase would have been "respected former journalist".  No commas needed.

 

RRAM Tough! 

Okay

I did use too many commas. Only one was needed. But I think former modfies the single word "journalist" not the phrase "respected jounalist". Hence, the comma. By the way, grammar, like truth, is what it is. It is never "based on the preconceptions of the reader". 

Grammar no, context

Grammar no, context yes.

Transcriptions can be filled with contextual mistakes as denoted by the grammar chosen.  Inflection, body language and foreknowledge/perception of the speaker's mindset all contribute to context which accompanies grammar in order to give meaning.  If all there is is grammar, such as text in a book, then punctuation, sentence structure and word choice are paramount to convey proper meaning.

Even you have utilized preconception to determine the "correct" grammar.  Context is still king.  Grammar follows... at least in this case.

We both presume to understand the context of the words.  Grammatically, there is more than one way to convey the meaning properly.

"Former and respected journalist" would be another way of conveying your premise.  As such, the use of a comma between two coordinate adjectives ('former' and 'respected') is correct.

However, if Douglass was once respected as a journalist but lost that sentiment after spewing activism in her stories, then "former" and "respected" are non-coordinate adjectives and there is no need for a comma.

Bizarrely, Bill Clinton's "whatever is is" comes into play.  Is Douglass once respected but no longer?  Is she no longer a journalist?  There goes that darned meaning and context cropping up again.

IMO, the word order was weak.  The more appropriate choice would have been "respected, former journalist" which conveys continued respect for Douglass.

Any more camels you want threaded through the eye of a needle?

In all honesty, I took "respected journalist" as a singular phrase and that was my mistake since there seems to be so few that the two words are no longer automatically associated. (/sarc off)

Good call cheesegrater.

RRAM Tough! 

I get you

The main reason for posting in the first was not to criticize Scott's blog. It was inform the early posters that Mr. Cuomo was not making a dig at Ms. Douglass (one of his colleagues). He reserves those cracks for consevatives.

The point I was making with

The point I was making with my post was that Cuomo made a revealing slip in introducing one of his own w/o even realizing it. I actually saw the clip this morning before I read about it, and I recognized the slip when he spoke those words. Cuomo didn't, of course. That's because he is a nimrod.

Okay

I hear you.

Since I did not watch this

mister joseph: 

Since I did not watch this GMA segment, are you saying that Cuomo imbecilely insulted Douglass or slyly insulted Douglass?  My guess is it was the former unless someone scripted the comment for nepotism-kid Chris.

RRAM Tough! 

Let me introduce to you

"We're going to begin with someone representing Obama, whom we know very well here at ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN News. I introduce to you ALL OF THE FORMER, SHAMELESS, so-called journalist, a longtime MSM News family member. But now, as since the beginning of the campaign, they are all Obama campaign strategists and spokespersons."

NOW THAT'S MORE LIKE IT!

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.