Stephanopoulos Spins Clinton Cayman Connection: Nothing to See Here

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

On Thursday's "Good Morning America," investigative reporter Brian Ross provided a refreshingly thorough look into the failure of Bill and Hillary Clinton to release their tax records and to the fact that, despite Hillary Clinton's railing against how the wealthy misuse the tax code, the power couple have investments in off shore locations such as the Cayman Islands.

Unsurprisingly, "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos, a former top Clinton operative, appeared after the segment to perform his old duty of defending his ex-employers. As though he was back on the podium talking to the White House press corps, Stephanopoulos first acknowledged that this could be a "distraction" for Hillary Clinton's campaign. He then went into defense mode and regurgitated that the Democratic presidential candidate doesn't think this is "going to be a bombshell." Without providing any specifics, he spun, "...The bottom line will show that the Clintons did pay their fair share of taxes. They didn't try to evade taxation in any way and that they also gave a fair amount to charity." Of course, no one, certainly not Ross in his report, had mentioned charitable giving. Apparently, Stephanopoulos just felt the need to mention something positive.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Ross's piece was fairly hard-hitting in its analysis of the Clintons failure to release their tax records. The investigative journalist noted, "On the campaign trail, Senator Clinton has promised to end tax breaks for the rich." He then went on to describe Bill Clinton's holdings in an investment fund registered in the Cayman Islands. The political power couple, who have made over $50 million since leaving the White House, have pledged to make their tax records public in the next few weeks. According to Ross, this will "answer a lot of questions about how they made so much and whether they paid their taxes like average Americans or the like the super rich they have become."

Tax attorney Jack Blum was even more harsh. He derided Bill Clinton's association with Los Angeles billionaire Ron Burkle and the $20 million payout he will receive for simply advising Burkle's investment funds. According to Blum, the former commander in chief is "selling the presidency." Blum fumed, "It's also attracting rich investors who think, 'Well, I'll get close to Bill Clinton if I buy into that fund.' He's selling his charm and ability to get other people to buy in."

So, while ABC and Brian Ross should be commended for actually providing an in depth look into the Clintons and their Cayman Island holdings, (NBC and CBS have done no such investigation), no one should be surprised by Stephanopoulos's quick defense of his old boss.

Ross, it should be pointed out, also investigated Senator Barack Obama and the controversial comments made by his former preacher, Jeremiah Wright.

A transcript of the April 3 segment, which aired at 7:11am, follows:

7:01am tease

ROBIN ROBERTS: And it is-- Don't have to tell you. It's tax time. Everybody, even the politicians. So, the Clintons have made millions since leaving the White House, what will their tax records show? Brian Ross is here with his investigation.

7:11am

CHRIS CUOMO: Now to the race for '08. Senator Barack Obama released his tax returns months ago and has been pressing Senator Hillary Clinton to do the same. Hers would be joint returns, of course, with former President Clinton. The Clintons are expected to release them sometimes in the coming days, but is there something behind the delay? What might we see in those returns? ABC's chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross is here and he's been looking at that. Good morning, Brian.

ABC GRAPHIC: Tax Time for Clintons: What's Known About Their Millions?

BRIAN ROSS: Good morning, Chris. The delay has raised lots of questions. From reports Senator Clinton has already filed, we know she and her husband have made well over $50 million since they left the White House. But it could be a lot more. And the tax returns expected any day now will answer a lot of questions about how they made so much and whether they paid their taxes like average Americans or the like the super rich they have become. On the campaign trail, Senator Clinton has promised to end tax breaks for the rich.

SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: We are going to scrub down that tax code, so that the middle class gets the tax breaks, not the wealthy and well connected.

ROSS: And among the wealthy's favorite legal but controversial tax breaks, setting up investments and accounts offshore in secretive places like the Cayman Islands. And an examination of the records Clinton has filed, reveals her husband is a partner in an investment fund, Yucaipa Global Partnership, registered in the Cayman Islands.

JACK BLUM (tax attorney, Baker Hostetler): No average person has interests and funds in the Cayman Islands. This is all of the above average, non-tax paying super rich.

ROSS: The former president's Cayman Island investment is part of his dealings with a close friend, Los Angeles billionaire Ron Burkle. According to the Wall Street Journal, Clinton is also expected to receive a payout of around $20 million for his role as an adviser to Burkle's investment funds.

BLUM: He's selling the presidency. It's also attracting rich investors who think, well, I'll get close to Bill Clinton if I buy into that fund. He's selling his charm and ability to get other people to buy in.

ROSS: Clinton has also been paid millions as a consultant to a company run by another close friend, Indian American businessman Vinod Gupta. Shareholders in Gupta's data collection agency have complained that Gupta used company resources to ingratiate himself with Clinton and other personal friends, including the use of the company's private jet. Gupta has said it was a legitimate business expense to hire Clinton. In addition to his consultant deals, the former president made tens of millions of dollars giving speeches around the world. $150,000 for this appearance in Dubai, and as much as $450,000 for a speech in London. A new accounting by ABC News found that as of June last year, Clinton had earned $47 million in speaking fees since leaving the White House. A spokesman for the Clinton campaign says the former president and his wife pay full U.S. taxes at the ordinary income tax rate, meaning they get no special tax breaks because the Cayman investment fund off shore doesn't not give them one, they say. But with taxes, the devil is in the details and the proof of what they really pay will come when the Clintons finally make public their tax returns, sometime they say before April 15.

CUOMO: You make a good point there, Brian. We get it. They have a lot of money. But why would you have offshore accounts?

ROSS: They say it's to attract foreign investors who don't have to pay U.S. taxes, but the tax experts we talk to say whenever you go off shore, it immediately raises questions and it's been one of the issues Senator Clinton has raised during the campaign. So, these tax returns will raise a lot of questions that reign very large right now.

7:14am

ROBIN ROBERTS: Now for the bottom line, we turn to host of ABC's chief Washington correspondent and host of "This Week" George Stephanopoulos. And let's pick it up here, George. Tax time and with the delay from the Clintons with their tax return, is there a concern within her campaign about this impending release?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Robin, I think they know it's going to be a distraction. People are going to be really interested in how President Clinton and Senator Clinton made all this money, what they did with it, how much they gave to charity. But I think they also believe this is not going to be a bombshell, that the bottom line will show that the Clintons did pay their fair share of taxes. They didn't try to evade taxation in any way and that they also gave a fair amount to charity.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yet everytime Halliburton is in the news,

Dick Cheney is somehow involved even though he's been disconnected from them for eight years now.  Also, there's the Clinton theory on taxes which is taxes are good for me but bad for themselves.

It's gotten to the point...

...that I actually EXPECT this kind of rubbish from Stephie-in-the-tank. He doesn't even have to appear any more, a decent 'Stephanopoulos generic lie generator' could replace him.

I mean, raise your hand if you DON'T think that there will be some, ah, 'questionable' items in the Clinton tax returns... That everything will be completely unassailable, clean and aboveboard.

I can hear them now. "It depends on what your definition of clean is..."

 

Note to Stepandropolus:

Attorney fees are not considered "Charitable Donations" under the current Tax Code.

Stephanopoulos has been lying

Stephanopoulos has been lying for the Clintons for 15 years now, both on and off the record. He is pathetic.

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

Another plausible reason

Another plausible reason they don't want to show their tax records would be they would have to show the sources of their income: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/clintons-multi-million-dollar-communist-uranium-deal 

With the help of his good buddy Clinton, Vancouver mining mogul Frank Giustra secured tens of millions of dollars worth of uranium to fuel nuclear reactors worldwide. The thank you note included a $31.3 million donation to the William J. Clinton Foundation as well as a future pledge of $100 million.

A charity btw, that does not adhere to standard accounting rules.

Nor should we forget their involvement with the Oil for Food scandal: http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/003217.php

Somewhere along the line, a quid pro quo occured otherwise why would they pardon Marc Rich? "So when Bill Clinton allowed Marc Rich to go free -- coincidentally just after his wife, Denise Rich, donated $450,000 to Clinton's presidential-library fund -- he set loose one of the conduits that helped Saddam steal $21 billion from his own people and funnel it to his military and, probably, Islamist terrorists."

Isn't it just amazing two people of such modest influence can rake in literally millions of dollars into non-profits from which they draw a salary???  Just like Al Gore with his Carbon Credit company...  It seems that quid pro quo is somehow nullified when your the well paid Chairman of a Charity or Non Profit.  One degree of separation.  Noel, remember what I told you about PUR and the UN??? 

It makes me wonder if Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have similar cushy well paid positions at equally superficial entities.

 Lord Sidious / Darth Vader 2008  Long Live the Empire!  Come to the Dark Side, it is your Destiny.

Experience Has Shown Us

We can always count on Stupidanopoulus to provide a hard-hitting assessment of any situation involving the Clintons.  Again, when it comes to the Clintons, you have to follow the money, whether it be from China, India, Canada, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Dubai, etc. etc.  Anyone who thinks this couple is not in the tank for outside interests, has either been drugged or has their head deep in the sand.  Two things we can look forward to: the release of the tax returns and Mrs. Clinton taking questions on them.  Oh, and lets see if any in the MSM suggest her and hubby are part of the super rich. 

He mentioned it because to

He mentioned it because to anyone with a brain, when they look at Obama's tax returns they are a national disgrace.  He is giving less than 5% average to charity since 2000.   How can someone who claims to care about the poor get away with that?

 

Hillary will point it out even if stupid republicans won't take it on.  I was absolutely dumbfounded by his lack of charitable giving. 

 

In one year he made $200,000.00 and gave to charity less than $1,500.00.