While members of the media are often pleased when Republicans fight amongst themselves, it's apparently not so fun to see Democrats do the same thing. On Friday's "Good Morning America," George Stephanopoulos appeared and pleaded for calm in the increasingly contentious battle between Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. The ABC journalist and former top aide to Bill Clinton proclaimed, "Well, the bottom line is that it's time for a time-out."
Later in the piece, as though refereeing a fight, he declared, "I think there's going to have to be a pulling back from this kind of rhetoric." Co-host Robin Roberts shared that assessment. Earlier, she lamented, "You're just watching this and you're shaking your head a little bit...I mean, it just seems like it's getting a little bit out of hand."
In a tease for the segment, Roberts asserted, "It's not good for either side." Fellow co-host Chris Cuomo concurred and added, "It doesn't seem good...And even more troubling for the Democrats, are they paving the way for a Republican victory?"
Stephanopoulos did, at one point, question the oddity of Clinton's assertion that Obama is acting like Ken Starr. He noted, "What the Obama campaign will say is when you bring up Ken Starr, you're not only hurting Barack Obama, but you're hurting yourself. I mean, why do Democrats want to go back to those days in the 1990s?" Of course, it should be pointed out that Stephanopoulos was in the Clinton White House through the President's reelection, just prior to when the vicious attacks on Starr were being launched.
And while the GMA hosts and guests mentioned that the squabbling between the two Democratic contenders could be good for the GOP, the general tone seemed to be that the fighting is bad and it needs to be stopped. No consideration was given to the idea that many conservatives and Republicans don't want the verbal sniping to stop and, in fact, would like to see it continue for as long as possible.
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:13am on March 7, follows:
7:01am tease
ROBIN ROBERTS: I don't have to tell you that the race for '08 continues to intensify. You have Senator Obama demanding that Senator Clinton release her tax returns. And then one of her advisors fires back by accusing him of imitating Ken Starr.
CHRIS CUOMO: And then, not to be outdone, one of his advisers-- One of her advisors says-- No, one of his advisors says that she's a monster. Right?
ROBERTS: It's not good for either side.
CUOMO: It doesn't seem good. And the big question becomes, who is this helping? Who is this hurting? And even more troubling for the Democrats, are they paving the way for a Republican victory?
7:13am
ROBIN ROBERTS: For the bottom line on all the latest Democratic strategy, we're joined by chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos and, of course, the host of "This Week."
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Hey, Robin.
ROBERTS: Hey. You're just watching this and you're shaking your head a little bit. Ken Starr. Monster. All this. I mean, it just seems like it's getting a little bit out of hand.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, the bottom line is that it's time for a time-out. These guys have been going at it for, what, 18 months. Their nerves are frayed. They're exhausted and they're making mistakes. I think you're seeing that. They're going over the line. Now, the Clinton campaign will say what Samantha Power said is part of a pattern. What the Obama campaign will say is when you bring up Ken Starr, you're not only hurting Barack Obama, but you're hurting yourself. I mean, why do Democrats want to go back to those days in the 1990s? So, I think-- I think there's going to have to be a pulling back from this kind of rhetoric. But, these issues that are being raised are going to be raised right up through Pennsylvania, which is April 22.
ROBERTS: And still a long way to go. And Senator Obama has-- He talked to Charlie Gibson yesterday and kind of indicated he may be willing to fight back a little bit. Take a look.
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: We're going to have to make sure that we're not just letting a bunch of charges go unanswered. You know, if Senator Clinton wants, for example, to talk about issues of transparency and vetting, than I think it's important for her to release her tax returns as I have, and as many presidential candidates in the past have.
STEPHANOPOULOS: He was stunned over the last three days going into Texas and Ohio by that barrage, those kitchen sink attacks that came after him. He's saying now we're going to fight fire with fire. He's going to push for this release of tax returns. I would expect that the Obama campaign is also going to play off an article in USA Today this morning, which says that some of the records from the Clinton White House are not going to be released as well. They'll be focusing on that. But what Barack Obama has to worry about most are his attacks on his national security experience that are now coming from both Senator Clinton and John McCain. This is what people are paying attention to. If they don't think he's a credible commander in chief, they won't elect him.
ROBERTS: Also, what people are talking about again, again and again, Florida and Michigan. What to do about Florida and Michigan and Senator Clinton made a statement yesterday, she said I would not accept a caucus. I think that would be a great disservice to the two million people who turned out and voted. I think that they want their votes counted. She wants Florida seated. We had Howard Dean here yesterday talking about that goes against the rules that are set right now.
STEPHANOPOULOS: This is turning into a huge controversy that has to be dealt with by the Democratic Party right now. You can't not count Florida and Michigan. So, officials in the state are thinking about, how do we have a do-over vote? The problem is-- I talked to the state party chairman in Florida yesterday. I talked to Michigan officials yesterday. They're not going to agree to anything that first isn't agreed to by both candidates. And until both candidates figure out a way, along with the parties to pay for it, those are very big hurdles.
ROBERTS: I'm sure you'll continue to discuss this with Howard Dean.
STEPHANOPOULOS: On Sunday morning.
ROBERTS: On Sunday on your program "This Week." George, thanks very much.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
And the MSM prize (call it
March 7, 2008 - 13:24 ET by motherbeltAnd the MSM prize (call it a "Steffie") of unending adulation will go whichever of them is first to get to a microphone and make a speech saying "We need to stop all this rhetoric and the "politics of personal destruction" and focus on the problems we all face...high gas prices, the housing market, affordable health care....(you fill in the rest...)
Whoever does that will get about $100,000 worth of "in-kind" contribution as air time
Thank You Rush
March 7, 2008 - 13:26 ET by m36b1Well, this is what was hoped for by some Republicans crossing over in the Texas primaries: some serious Dem-on-Dem bloodletting, hair-pulling, and scratching of eyes. Bully-bully. What a tragedy to Snuffalugulus, Cuomo, and the MSM politburo.
Sweet.
What is this ?
March 7, 2008 - 13:27 ET by JayTeeA MSM Democratic Coaching Team ?
You dont' do this Advisory Role crap on TV and still maintain the Title of ABC Journalists....you become a Democratic Operative waiting to be introduced by a Journalists doing a polictical news story.
Once again, Stephan stepped over the line.
"Become?" a Dem
March 7, 2008 - 13:42 ET by mattm"Become?" a Dem operative. Clintonopolous has ALWAYS been a Dem operative, specifically a Clinton operative. He didn't "step over the line" he has always been on that side of the line and he has NEVER been a journalist.
I wonder how many people out there don't know that Steffie was part of Clinton's administration. Just like Chris Matthews who wrote speeches for Carter, and Bill Moyers who campaigned for Lyndon B. Johnson.
When Republicans go into the media, they maintain their status as a GOP pundit, and rarely if ever try to pass themselves off as objective journalists.
Dems don't do this. They portray themselves as objective journalists so they can hoodwink the masses, reporting as news the propaganda of the Democratic Party and of Liberalism in general.
Steffie is the posterboy for this particular brand of deception.
This is nothing new, Jay
March 7, 2008 - 13:45 ET by motherbeltThis is nothing new, Jay Tee. This has been going on at least since 1994, when the Dems lost control of the Congress, and the MSM started having on-air "strategy sessions" (disguised as "political panel talk shows), focused on what they needed to do to win it back. Notice how in '06 when power changed hands, no such brainstorming occurred.
I know from whence he came..
March 7, 2008 - 14:04 ET by JayTeeI was incredulous that he's out of the Closet, so blantantly out of the Clinton Closet. He's a Flaming Dem.
Stephan on ABC ... is like Bill Clinton posing as a Catholic Priest in a Confession both.
He's treating us like Fools, and will probably find some MSM gazing fools that still think he and his ilk are impartial news reporting types.
Do not want the stuff out again
March 7, 2008 - 21:15 ET by docbLittle Steffie just does not want any of the clintons stuff coming out. He does not want to be forced to report on Norman Hsu, filegate, Peter Paul or the dishwashers and busboys in chinatown. Or the NAFTA flip by clinton or the canadian link to Bills latest paramour or their tax returns or her logs as 1st lady or no security clearance or NSC mtgs or travels without portfolio.
He is still afraid of the clinton retribution --as are many many people.
"You're just watching this
March 7, 2008 - 13:28 ET by Chris Norman"You're just watching this and you're shaking your head a little bit..."
Oh, Robin, if they were Republicans, you'd be loving it.
Oh Georgie Porgie...let the
March 7, 2008 - 13:34 ET by bigtimerOh Georgie Porgie...let the children play, there will be plenty of time ahead for a time out period.
Keep it in the family
March 7, 2008 - 13:43 ET by Mica the MagnificentGeorge, Chris and Robin are experiencing the same feelings you or I would get watching family members argue with each other in front of the entire wedding party.
"Time out! Please! You'll make the entire family look stupid!"
He's conservative! . . not that there's anything wrong with that! - When liberals begin saying this, we'll know we're beginning to get through to them.
"not that there's anything
March 7, 2008 - 14:06 ET by RESTLESS 1"not that there's anything wrong with that!"
Funny you should say that. I was watching "apprentice" last night, when Piers kissed Trace on the cheek in the boardroom. I commented on the pink tie Piers was wearing to my wife with the qualifier "not that there's anything wrong with that". Then it occurred to me that if you need the qualifier, something is wrong with that. I mean, can you imagine the fire and brimstone if the words "so and so is Black, not that there's anything wrong with that"?
Sorry to go off topic. Carry on.
RESTLESS... Still off
March 7, 2008 - 14:13 ET by Clear thinkerRESTLESS...
Still off topic for a moment. My wife does the same thing all the time. I then tell her that there is nothing wrong with what she said in the first place, especially if she was communicating the truth about how she felt.
PC has been a nightmare for this country, and I for one hate it.
"Abstain from McCain"
Yeah, PC sucks
March 7, 2008 - 14:25 ET by RESTLESS 1I was talking along the lines of "Seinfeld", when every time someone would mention homosexuality, they would add the qualifier. If the qualifier is needed, then there IS something wrong with that.
Dear Georgie
March 7, 2008 - 13:51 ET by stratmanDear Georgie Staphylococcus:
You're reaping what you have sown. The Democrat Party is just performing as they have been, only on an intra-party level for a change. Like Popeye said, "I y'am what I y'am", and so it goes for your beloved Party of rabblerousers, provocateurs and politics of destruction. The disgust is all yours to own, the shame all yours as well.
Maybe you all will get a clue as to the disgusting level your Party has sunken to in the last two decades. Doubtful, but maybe some will.
RRAM Tough!
Time Out
March 7, 2008 - 13:54 ET by CobraManThat’s it, I’ve had it with both of you. This is a Time Out!
I want Clinton and Obama to stand in opposite corners and think about what they did. When you two can learn to play fair together, then we'll let you both go outside and make new friends. Until then, no more debates and no more campaigning. Are you listening to me?
Hmmm
March 7, 2008 - 13:57 ET by RESTLESS 1I keep looking back at the transcript, but I see no mention of how Republicans should call a "timeout" amidst all of the squabbling over the McCain nomination.
However, I am sitting back and enjoying the show from the dem side. I've never so eagerly awaited a political convention. As they would say in UFC, "Let's get it on!!!".
I agree!
March 7, 2008 - 15:57 ET by heldmywNo timeout for Dems!
Give 'em some incendiary information about each other, encourage potty-mouth name calling, line up the mud buckets.
Hell! Throw a couple of dull knives into the ring (don't want it to be over too quick).
By the time the convention arrives, they'll be too bloody, exhausted, broke and out of ammunition, while the winner (survivor) of the convention has every wart, hair, pecadillo, and slander available for our use!
The general election is going to be rather a foregone conclusion, I fear.
The reaction is a lot
March 7, 2008 - 13:58 ET by Chris NormanThe reaction is a lot different when the media is sympathetic to a receiver of the Clintons' warfare, huh?
Can we all get
March 7, 2008 - 14:01 ET by Dan The Man 2Can we all get along?
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Hey, Dan!
March 7, 2008 - 14:07 ET by Mica the MagnificentRodney's been in and out of prison so many times since he made that remark that he must get a dozen or so cards each Valentine's day by now.
Ya think?
STEPHANOPOULOS: ... You
March 7, 2008 - 14:59 ET by MassConservativeSTEPHANOPOULOS: ... You can't not count Florida and Michigan. So, officials in the state are thinking about, how do we have a do-over vote? ... They're not going to agree to anything that first isn't agreed to by both candidates.
- Point #1: Why bother getting agreement from the candidates. You ALREADY had agreements from the candidates, state parties, and voters on what the rules were going into those primaries. If agreements mattered these guys would be Republicans.
STEPHANOPOULOS: ...And until both candidates figure out a way, along with the parties to pay for it, those are very big hurdles.
Point #2 - Let's see Obama raised $55 mil in February alone, Clinton $35 mil. A "redo" in Florida is estimated at $10 mil. If these guys truly cared a rat's behind about "disenfranchised" voters it would seem to me the answer is looking at them right in the face. Then again seeing their response to whether the surge in Iraq is working we know that none of these people have a real knack of grasping the obvious.
At the end of the day Clinton doesn't want a "redo" because she is likely to "lose based on his momentum or "win" by smaller margins than the 1st go round that she cannot dent his lead.
Obama is in a tougher position because he certainly doesn't want them to count but it is likely political suicide to not count them when it comes time for the fsll contest.
"There are scandals that need to be addressed. Republicans address them, Democrats re-elect them." - Tom Delay
Clinton-Obama 'Time-Out'? No way. I want a total blow out.
March 7, 2008 - 23:06 ET by R D HelmI'm talking riot police, tear gas, batons, tasers, cuffs and the whole shebang at the dem convention.
I have plenty of popcorn on hand.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!