"Good Morning America" co-host Chris Cuomo presented a decidedly one-sided segment on Monday about the "gender discrimination" expressed by a private religious school in Kansas that refused to allow a female basketball referee the chance to call a boy's varsity game. Cuomo announced, "many" think that "religious belief does not give the school the right to discriminate."
The ABC host offered almost no consideration to the argument, made by St. Mary's Academy, that men are best equipped to guide boys and prepare them for future life endeavors. (The referee in question, Michelle Campbell, asserted that she was not allowed to call the game because the school believes women shouldn't have authority over men.) Instead, he offered loaded questions to Campbell, who appeared on the show: "Gender discrimination is not something new. We know about it. But were you surprised that something this obvious still confronted you today....Were you surprised?"
And although Cuomo acknowledged that St. Mary's Academy is a private school, he appeared fixated on whether the institution has the "right" to make such choices. He asked fellow referee Darin Putthoff, "So, what do you think this is really about? I mean, how do you explain this?"
The GMA host even seemed to think that this event might somehow damage the school's students. He ominously queried, "Now, Michelle, you're a grown-up... But let's talk about the kids involved here, the message it sends to these young men. You worried about that?"
Cuomo did note that the principal of the school declined to appear on GMA or offer a statement. Even so, the ABC anchor's questions were decidedly one-sided. After repeating that the school thinks that men should train men and women should instruct other females, he asked, "Does that make any difference or sense to you to you, Michelle?"
Expressing complete bafflement at religious institutions that may do things differently is not new for the morning shows. In March of 2006, then-"Today" host Katie Couric looked horrified as she interviewed the creators of a town that would be founded around conservative Catholic values. She lectured, "I think people will see this community as eschewing diversity and promoting intolerance."
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 8:07am on February 18, follows:
CHRIS CUOMO: Now we have a GMA exclusive for you. Just minutes before she was scheduled to referee a varsity basketball game at a private religious boy's school in Kansas, Michelle Campbell was told she would not be refereeing simply because she is a woman. St. Mary's Academy has a policy that women cannot have authority over men because it's contrary to their religious beliefs. Here's the story. For the high school referee Michelle Campbell ensuring that everyone plays by the rules on her court is all in a day's work. But on the night of February 2nd, it was Michelle who found herself unknowingly breaking a surprising rule on the court of St. Mary's Academy, a private religious school outside of Topeka. Just minutes before tip off, she was told she couldn't referee the boys basketball game because she was a woman.
GARY MUSSELMAN (executive director, KSHSAA): The policy of the school was that they do not permit female officials to officiate the boys' athlete contests at their school.
CUOMO: The reason? Putting a women in authority over boys is contrary to beliefs at St. Mary's. And it turns out, this was not the first incident.
MUSSELMAN: Three or four years ago, they were scheduled to play an association members school in a football contest. That particular school had a young lady who was on the football team, and St. Mary's Academy did not elect to play the game at that time and simply chose to forfeit the contest.
CUOMO: St. Mary's Academy is a religious school that follows older Roman Catholic laws but many argue that religious belief does not give the school the right to discriminate.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It's a little unbelievable for this day and age.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I just thought we was done with that kind of crap.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE #2: If it's a private school, they have the choice. I just don't think they made the right choice.
CUOMO: A couple of opinions there. We reached out to St. Mary's and were told that the principal, Father Vincente Griego was not available and would not be making any statements. Joining us live now to talk about this controversy is referee are referee Michelle Campbell and fellow referee Darin Putthoff from Topeka, Kansas. Thank you both of us for joining us this morning. Let me tell you what they say at the Society of St. Pius X, which is what this school subscribes to, they say that this is about men training men and women training women. That a woman ref shouldn't be around because it takes men to train these boys how to be men. Does that make any difference or sense to you to you, Michelle?
MICHELLE CAMPBELL (basketball referee): I would say for myself, no, because when I put that shirt on, I don't see a gender. I'm an official. And my responsibility there is to make sure that there is-- that I make all the right calls and that it's a fair game so that the athletes will play and have a great game. That's my main purpose.
CUOMO: Gender discrimination is not something new. We know about it. But were you surprised that something this obvious still confronted you today, after all of your work as a veteran police officer? Now, you're refereeing, you deal with this. Were you surprised?
CAMPBELL: I guess on that day, I was surprised or more dumbfounded when my partner gave me the news that I wasn't going to be allowed to officiate.
CUOMO: That was the surprise for you?
CAMPBELL: Right. Didn't expect it.
CUOMO: I'm sure you didn't. Darin, did you expect it? I mean, when they called you over and started talking about this? The school, so everybody knows, does have a little bit of history and controversy, has been a little controversy with the athletic conference before. But were you surprised when they told you this?
DARIN PUTTHOFF (Dir. Of Basketball, Topeka Officials Assoc): Yeah. I just immediately asked them why. And the response that I got was the response about women having authority over men. And I just came back with a simple question. You know, "So you're telling me you that don't have any female teachers here at the school?" And he responded to me, "No, we do, we do have." And I said, "Well, what's the difference?" And he said, he didn't really know.
CUOMO: And certainly, they are a Catholic organization. But obviously, you have nuns who taught generations of kids. Myself included. And you said, that's right, they have female teacher there. So, what do you think this is really about? I mean, how do you explain this?
PUTTHOFF: What I really think it's about, was the administrator didn't have a full understanding about the policy. So, the information that he offered to us that day was really -- was wrong information. And the authority over, over men was not really the issue. It was more of a gender issue. And they prefer, I think, at their institution, that men referee men and women referee women. And I don't think he really had a full understanding of the policy. I mean, that's what's caused all the controversy, is inaccurate information.
CUOMO: Now, Michelle, you're a grown-up. You'll be able to handle this. You don't seem like you're rattled by it. But let's talk about the kids involved here, the message it sends to these young men. You worried about that? And, also how they may be punished by not being able to play. I mean, how do you deal with that part of this?
CAMPBELL: Well, I'm not sure how they're going to deal with it. I can just speak from the games that I have called and I have called at other schools, public schools, in which I've officiated both boys and girls and I would call them young men and women, and there never seemed to be a problem with that. Because, again, I think, what it is, once I put that shirt on, I'm, I'm just an official out there that's to enforce the rules of the game. And those young athletes recognize that and see it. And how it's going to impact these individuals at St. Mary's Academy, I have no idea. I'm not sure how it will be once they're older and they are out there in society. I wouldn't be able to tell you how that's going to affect them.
CUOMO: So, good point. I appreciate you both coming here. If they changed the rule and women can referee, will you referee at that school?
CAMPBELL: If they change the rule and allow me to owe officiate their young men?
CUOMO: Yes.
CAMPBELL: Sure. Because like I said, I'm an official first. And, so, if the rules are changed, and they want me to come out to officiate, certainly, I'd go out there--
CUOMO: Then you'll do it.
CAMPBELL: --because it is about the kids.
CUOMO: Michelle Campbell, thank you very much. Darin Putthoff, thank you for being here this morning. And to all of you, what do you think. Please go to ABCNews.com and let us know if you agree or disagree and why.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
→ Cuomo Hates Muslims
February 18, 2008 - 14:14 ET by Cool ArrowIs Chris Cuomo referring to Muslims as bigots?
Am I missing something here? How could Chris be so insensitive to the "Religion or Peace"?
What a hatemonger.
♣ a seal
What about....
February 18, 2008 - 14:27 ET by Indiana Joe... the "United Negro College Fund?" Don't they fund schools dedicated to racial segregation?
... all the recent talk about "girl only" schools? Hasn't there been some proposal that "girls learn better" in a same-sex environment? I believe these plans included public schools, didn't they? Are any operating?
... aren't Vassar and Radcliffe still all-female schools?
Seems there may be more important discriminatory practices going on out there than a basketball referee conflict in a private school. If the customers (read: "parents") of the school have a problem with it, they can vote with their checkbooks. That would let that evil "free-market" work, though, wouldn't it?
I'm pro-choice... pro-school choice, pro-gun choice, pro-church choice, just to name a few.
Michelle Campbell looks more manly than Cuomo
February 18, 2008 - 14:40 ET by Lame CherryI know it has nothing to do with the story, but maybe if you think about it .......it does.
What kind of environment would produce a Katherine Hepburn, Maggie Thatcher or Lynn Cheney type woman who honestly looks more manly than Chris Cuomo?
Perhaps it is exposure to God or rules is what makes a leader as it gives discipline..........and when one has nutty liberalism failure one gets, Chris Cuomo.
Maybe Newsbusters could give Cuomo a referee shirt and he could go run around with the girls for awhile and he might develope some more manly qualities.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Libs
February 18, 2008 - 14:43 ET by iveseenitall"Liberals" have caused so much anger and resentment among the sexes and the races in America. Affirmative Action doesn't work; it is descriminatory; it is bunk.
P.S. I lived much of my life with this guy's daddy Mario as governor in New York. Talk about your liars, crooks, and hypocrites...
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
The ABC host offered almost
February 18, 2008 - 14:44 ET by motherbeltThe ABC host offered almost no consideration to the argument, made by
St. Mary's Academy, that men are best equipped to guide boys and
prepare them for future life endeavors.
Um, isn't that the same argument that blacks have made, for having black men mentor and guide black youth? And even, at times, for educating black adolescent males in an all-male atmosphere?
Excellent point
February 18, 2008 - 15:11 ET by iveseenitallExcellent point, motherbelt. You are a clear, logical thinker. Are you a conservative?
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
double standard
February 18, 2008 - 19:08 ET by dronetekYou need to understand that empowering white males is a bad thing to these people, because they see us all as racist war mongers from birth. A recent segment on CNN had a white woman who claimed "all white people are born racist".
Empowering everyone other than white males is the agenda of most left leaning folks. They think it redeems them for past wrongs.
"ABC's Cuomo Frets Over
February 18, 2008 - 14:45 ET by Chris Norman"ABC's Cuomo Frets Over 'Gender Discrimination' in Private School"
A Liberal's whole life is devoted to fretting...
Just to be clear
February 18, 2008 - 14:49 ET by KC Mulville"I mean, that's what's caused all the controversy, is inaccurate information." - You ain't kidding it's inaccurate!!
The school is not a Catholic school, at least as that description normally applies. In the 1960s, the Catholic Church convened Vatican II, which was a worldwide council where the church tried to update itself into the modern age. Vatican II tried to drop the rules and regulations that were strictly cultural remnants, and weren't truly based in religious doctrine. Archbishop Lefebvre rejected that, and insisted that the church stick with the old ways, leading to his confrontation with John Paul II. Therefore, these people are a fringe group. While they have every right to practice their beliefs, they are not associated with the Roman Catholic church. The Roman Catholic Church does not promote the view that women should not be in a position of authority over men.
Cuomo heard what he wanted to hear, and ran with his assumptions. He doesn't know what he's talking about. He doesn't know his own faith.
There are other issues of religious freedom here, but I wanted to point out how self-ridiculing Cuomo is.
Isn't there a distinction
February 18, 2008 - 14:58 ET by Ken ShepherdIsn't there a distinction between women exercising civil/governmental/administrative authority over men and women exercising ecclesiastical/spiritual/pastoral authority over men?
Take it slowly
February 18, 2008 - 15:11 ET by KC MulvilleIn the Catholic church, only a male can be ordained. Therefore, any position that absolutely requires a priest, in turn, requires a male. But those positions are surprisingly few.
Women can serve as deans of theology school, even ones that teach seminarians. Monika Hellwig was a top-tier theologian at Georgetown for many years. Woman can be parish administrators, treasurers, and so on. They can exercise all kinds of authority.
They can certainly referee a basketball game.
If there's any question, all we have to do is ask the local Catholic bishop of Topeka. See if he objects to a woman referee.
Called the Kansas City archdiocese
February 18, 2008 - 15:47 ET by KC MulvilleI'm not a journalist, and I didn't represent myself that way. I called the chancery offices, and they confirmed that the Catholic Archdiocese has nothing to do with that school. They don't have any press release commenting on that, but I'm sure a real journalist can confirm that.
When I read the report, it
February 19, 2008 - 15:16 ET by steviep831When I read the report, it just sounded off. "Women are not allowed to take authority over men..." I remember very well having a woman referee when I played basketball in Catholic elementary school. That was over 20 years ago. My school also had a woman principal and vice principal... Certainly positions of authority... especially over any male teachers. When the story mentioned that it was a Catholic school that followed the old Catholic ways, I knew that this was not an ordinary Catholic school. But while I don't have a problem with a woman refereeing a kids basketball game, ultimately, the school should have final say in who can and can not referee a game. It's their school. Like another poster mentioned, if the parents don't like it they can vote with their dollars and take their kids somewhere else. It's just a silly silly report... to make such a big deal about this. But this is what we can expect from the MSM.
Ken, since the Church
February 18, 2008 - 17:39 ET by motherbeltdelete... KC already answered this. LOL
Many Catholics, along with
February 18, 2008 - 14:53 ET by Ken ShepherdMany Catholics, along with Orthodox and many Reformed and Lutheran traditions hold to a complementarian view of gender roles.
For a good Web site defending this viewpoint (generally from the Reformed perspective):
http://www.cbmw.org/
I personally think the religious argument against female referees for a boy's bball game is specious, but a journalist like Cuomo should look to consider both sides. Besides, I'm sure there are many arguments to be had against female referees for men's bball games that have nothing to do with religion.
Also, just to add another
February 18, 2008 - 15:04 ET by motherbeltAlso, just to add another component, the woman said she was shocked when her "partner" told her she wasn't going to be allowed to coach.
Now unless she has some kind of coaching partner at the school, I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that she's in a same-sex relationship. Apparently the school doesn't have a problem with that....
Some people just don't think that ANY desire they have to do something should ever be thwarted.
Referees
February 18, 2008 - 15:16 ET by KC MulvilleI took her comment to mean her referee partner. Referees work as teams. High school basketball games usually need two referees. Apparently, the school informed the male referee of the decision, and he refused to accept it.
Thanks, KC, I must have
February 18, 2008 - 16:16 ET by motherbeltThanks, KC, I must have missed that. My point was that the school apparently didn't have a problem with it, if it was a same-sex relationship.
No problem, MB
February 18, 2008 - 16:47 ET by KC MulvilleNo surprise there are a lot of confusions here. I went a-googling for some more information about this story, and I was astonished (at first) at how poorly the media reported this. Then I remembered that we were dealing with the media, and the confusion suddenly made sense.
Old man Cuomo must be steaming right now. His own son couldn't wait to embarrass the church that Mario worships. (In all fairness, I doubt Mario would have made this mistake. He knows better.)
Well, KC, that's no
February 18, 2008 - 17:52 ET by motherbeltWell, KC, that's no surprise. The modus operandi for the MSM is to get the story out there; if you have to backtrack later, so be it. And seeing as how this had a "Catholic" discriminatory angle, I imagine they were all salivating over it.
This is what happens when journalists not familiar with something go off half-cocked, taking their source's word for everything. Not long ago, there was a story about the Church ordaining a married woman as a priest; the media played right into their hands. It was another instance of a "rebel" arm of the Church calling itself "Catholic" when it had no business doing so.
But make no mistake about it; a lot of liberals would love to see the Catholic Church forced, by law, to tolerate many things antithetical to its teachings.
Liberals do not like private education, period.
February 18, 2008 - 14:54 ET by R D HelmExcept, of course, for the lilly-white private schools that well-heeled libs send their children to.
I believe there are many lefties in this country that would like to see private schools done away with. After all, it is much more diffucult to indoctrinate the young and highly impressionble if they cannot get their claws on them early. Remember, many leftists view children as the property of the state, not their parents.
The charges of discrimination are just a ruse, and are being used to get the half-thinkers among us on their side.
Ophra
February 18, 2008 - 15:28 ET by iveseenitallBetter not let Ophra hear about this controversy. Her "all girls" school shuts out the boys. Oh, but that's ok; she's a "liberal" ( and rich too), so zip it.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Right, isia, discrimintion
February 18, 2008 - 18:49 ET by motherbeltRight, isia, discrimintion or segregation is the arguement that liberals used to object to single-sex education. Until a couple of black educators came up with the idea of an all-black male school, taught by black male teachers, as a way to improve the social and educational status of black boys. Then suddenly, it's not discrimination any more.
A five year lawsuit recently
February 18, 2008 - 18:00 ET by NortoA five year lawsuit recently was settled and the school in CALIFORNIA was cleared of charges that it discriminated against two students by not letting them get their erudition there-they claimed to be lesbians.
Notice the current definition of "discrimination." In my Apple widget, the current favorite(unjust treatment of those who are different) is the first choice. You have to scroll down to encounter the original meaning which is "good judgement or taste, the ability to discern what is of high quality." During the attempt to give homosexuals special rights in Maine, the favorite bumper sticker was "No on #! Maine won't Discriminate!" Imagine what it says, Maine won't use good judgement! The referendum was defeated and then Baldacci rammed through the special rights with the help of a legislature that has controlled the destiny of our state for over 40 years. That was a sad day.
If this ref decides to sue, the school should counter-sue to recover the cost of their defense. The other cheek will be turned, though and the ACLU will continue to file frivolous lawsuits that are bankrupting the system.
Any private institution is allowed to discriminate as it wishes
February 18, 2008 - 18:39 ET by c5thenIt is only the Government that is not allowed to discriminate.
Why is it that liberals are OK with religious beliefs as long as they are not followed or put into practice?
Just as this school is perfectly allowed to discriminate as they wish, so is the sports conference that they belong to. It may be that they are not able to find anyone willing to play against them as long as they maintain these policies. I wonder if the MSM would fing that discrimination so distasteful or would they applaud it?
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Morgan Kelley was right
February 18, 2008 - 18:40 ET by sarcasmoNone of you know of him, but Mr. Kelley was my history teacher in 7th grade. An ancient WW2 Vet from the Merchant Marine, he was fantastic in going beyond the history book. Anyway, he warned us (and this is duh-file stupid) that if we got the genders together there'd be scholastic issues. Nobody listened to him, the school merged with a girl's school later that year, but I was sure as hell distracted!! ;)
I recall Mr. Kelley also had very-prescient warnings (in the '70s, so they would seem to apply for the Russians in the '80s & today for us!) about the tribal areas of Afghanistan & Pakistan and the difficulties of trying to fight there.
Along with History, Mr. Kelley was also a Geography teacher, and he expected you to learn. One exam day students found a magic marker on their desks and a helium-filled balloon taped to the desk. On the chalkboard: "Draw The World."
Hmm. Before I got distracted talking about Mr. Kelley, the point via him was that girls are distracting. Even to this day...
JMR
If this is winning, I think I'd rather lose...
the argument, made by St.
February 19, 2008 - 13:00 ET by balboathe argument, made by St. Mary's Academy, that men are best equipped to guide boys and prepare them for future life endeavors.
And they think a female basketball ref is somehow going to thwart that mission? Really?
Kinda insulting to female teachers, too.