After Near Total Silence, ABC Finally Investigates Obama Land Deal

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

After completely ignoring the story, ABC investigative correspondent Brian Ross finally featured a segment on a questionable real estate deal by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. On Thursday's "Good Morning America," the reporter looked at the Illinois senator's relationship with Tony Rezko, a political operator who raised cash for candidates. Rezko, who will go on trial in February for charges related to bribes and extortion, played a role in a house purchase by Obama.

Although local Illinois media outlets, such as the Chicago Sun Times, have been covering the story for much of 2006 and 2007, a Nexis search finds only one mention on ABC, prior to the Ross report on Thursday. (On May 13, 2007, "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos briefly quizzed Obama on the subject.) Ross's investigations of Republicans often include a sneering, sarcastic tone that was lacking in his segment on Obama. In October of '07, he claimed that after listening to 1973 Watergate tapes of '08 Republican candidate Fred Thompson, a "much different, less valiant picture of Thompson emerges."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

In December of 2007, while filing a report on GOP contender Mike Huckabee and the his record on crime, Ross leveled charges of hypocrisy. (For a recap of these charges, see my December 5, 2007 NewsBusters posting.)

The ABC reporter introduced his investigation of the Illinois senator this way: "Senator Obama says no lobbyist would be permitted to work in his White House...All of which makes his relationship with an accused Illinois political fixer and influence peddler all the more unusual." But his report lacked the usual snarky tone. The case relates to the role that Rezko role played in helping Obama secure the purchase of a new home in Chicago. Ross explained the details this way:

BRIAN ROSS: ...It emerged that Rezko had quietly played a role in Obama's purchase of a new home. Obama bought the house on Chicago's south side in June, 2005, after he had been elected to the U.S. Senate. According to Obama, the owner wanted to sell the house together with a next door vacant lot which Obama apparently did not want. Instead, Rezko's wife bought the empty lot for full price. 625,000. And according to Obama, he bought the house paying $1.65 million, for $300,000 under the asking price, all on the same day. Obama says the price was dropped because the house had been on the market for some time.

In contrast, during another piece on Thompson, Ross looked into the criminal past of an advisor to the Republican candidate. He complained that "Thompson has been traveling in style." These types of verbal swipes were noticeably missing from the discussion of Obama and Rezko.

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:13am on January 10, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: And we're going to turn now to a question facing Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama this morning. The Illinois senator has said that he regards it as one of his mistakes that he had a relationship on the purchase of his home with a political operative who is facing multiple counts of wire and mail fraud, among other charges. Well, this week, a judge vaulted the name of that operative into the news and ABC's chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross decided to look into it. Brian?

ABC GRAPHIC: Investigating Senator Obama: What's His Relationship With Indicted Man?

BRIAN ROSS: Good morning, Diane. Senator Obama says no lobbyist would be permitted to work in his White House. And as a state senator in Illinois, and now in Washington, he has pushed new ethics reforms laws. All of which makes his relationship with an accused Illinois political fixer and influence peddler all the more unusual. His name is Tony Rezko, known in Illinois politics as a back-room operator who did favors and raised campaign money for politicians and benefited in return. Rezko will go on trial next month to face charges growing out of a three-year long undercover FBI investigation involving bribes, kickbacks and extortion.

PATRICK FITZGERALD (U.S. Attorney): Today, we unsealed two indictments against Anton Tony Rezko, both involves efforts to illegally obtain millions of dollars.

ROSS: There was no mention of Senator Obama in Rezko's indictment. But as he sought to post bail, it emerged that Rezko had quietly played a role in Obama's purchase of a new home. Obama bought the house on Chicago's south side in June, 2005, after he had been elected to the U.S. Senate. According to Obama, the owner wanted to sell the house together with a next door vacant lot which Obama apparently did not want. Instead, Rezko's wife bought the empty lot for full price. 625,000. And according to Obama, he bought the house paying $1.65 million, for $300,000 under the asking price, all on the same day. Obama says the price was dropped because the house had been on the market for some time. But even civics groups that praise Obama's record on ethics were troubled by his involvement with a man of Rezko's reputation.

CYNTHIA CANARY (Illinois Campaign for Political Reform): Our only concern has been the timing and our wish that the senator had been a little bit more sensitive to the emerging dark cloud over Mr. Rezko's head.

ROSS: For his part, Obama has given a series of various explanations about the deal. First, he told the Chicago Tribune that he didn't recall what his conversations were with Rezko. Four days later, he told the Chicago Sun Times that he did recall telling Rezko about the property. Last May, as a candidate for president, Obama acknowledged to George Stephanopoulos that Rezko could become an issue, even though everything had been above board and legal.

SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: But, it raised the possibility that here was somebody who is a friend of mine who is doing me a favor. And I said, it was a bone-headed mistake.

ROSS: Senator Obama told one paper that he knew Rezko was under investigation at the time. But the Washington Post says Obama told them he had no idea of Rezko's brewing trouble. The first answer was more accurate. We found more than a hundred stories in the Illinois papers in the preceding five months, detailing allegations that Rezko was a corrupting influence in Illinois politics, including a Sunday editorial in the Chicago Tribune, ten days before the house purchase, focusing on Rezko and his behind the scenes connection to the Illinois governor. By our count, Rezko and people in his circle have given Obama more than $120,000 for his U.S. and state senate campaigns. A spokesman for Obama says the Senator has donated the 44,000 of that to charity since the indictments in Chicago. And the senator insists no favors were asked of him by Rezko and none was granted.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm sure ABC will note

I'm sure ABC will note Obama's "soaring", "eloquent", and "inspirational" explanation of all this...

Lame Stream Media

just can't get enough of lying to the American public. They're so lacking in mental capacity they still hype the 'America hates Bush' line when in fact the American public elected him POTUS not once , but twice. They may say a word or two about Osama Obama's criminal past but mostly they will hype him as the second coming of Jesus.

If this was the

If this was the reverse...  oh say Romney, he and his family, friends, pet parrot would of all been covered endlessly with all the insinuations the leftists would put out there before the guy had a chance...he would of been run out of the running already and wearing stripes of black and white if they had their way.

This will not be made much of, it should of long ago, now it is too late IMO...unless of course the Clinton machine uses any venue they can to get the msm to do their bidding for them...which may be what abc is doing now.

If I was the msm they ought to be investing the fraud in the voting for Hillary...now that is a real story worth digging into at this time, after-all the leftist msm knows exactly how it works, they have been hand-in-hand with them for years with their overt protection and enabling.

Illegal aliens voting, plus no proof of who you are and where you live when going to vote early and often like the dems do, no picture ID....it goes on and on and on....

bt just look at the

bt just look at the difference in reporting. Thompson's behavior in Watergate was by no means anywhere near illegal, but Ross calls him "less valiant" whereas with a possibility of illegality by Obama, Ross calls the situation "unusual."

Anyway, I think you are right on the time thing; the statute of limitiations on scandal has expired, it is now "old news."

And I'm sure Steffie did his usual stubborn questioning: Anything there, Senator? Obama: No. Steffie: Oh, OK.

Ahhhhh.......

The Clintonista personal destruction team is back to work.  No tears, just plain old political backstabbing.  Things seem normal in the world now. 

Faciem durum cacantis habes

I'm still waiting

For ANY MSM network to cover the decade of fund raising and election fraud done by Chinese nationals on behalf of the Clintons...

Anybody see any windmills hiding around here?

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

More telling than that

This is not the Clinton hatchet team doing this and I predicted here this week to watch EXACTLY how the cartel reacted to Obama.
IF, they said nothing and let him fly it meant he had sold his soul and was on board, but IF they come after him it means "no black at the big house table again massah".

I do not say the above lightly, but in complete context of how the cartel and their proxies from Hillary to Letterman view blacks. The reason they always are so worried about race is they hate blacks and would no sooner served under a black than Nathan Bedford Forrest.

Patrick Fitzgerald is a coup plotter who works for the Rockefeller cartel who sent him to "impeach" Bush, but Alberto Gonzales was too smart for them.

Right now this is still a herding action to blackmail Obama to get on board, but IF Obama picks up too much steam one can grant Rezko's memory will all of a sudden include Obama snorting coke and sexing white teenage prostitutes at meetings they had.
(Honesty does not matter as one remembers Cap Weinberger to Scooter Libby all got nailed on bogus charges.)

This is all going to predicted script. All the candidates are being weakened so a new candidate will come on scene who the cartel really desire in the White House.

I would not voter for Obama, but the above attack proves he is still not on the Rockefeller payroll and was only a deluded dupe raised from the plantation on million dollar book deals to make blacks believe they have a seat at the table.

Amazing to me that minorities never figure out that Reagan Conservatives offer them the places of power if they would just earn it by proving they are real Conservatives.

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

ABC producer Bill Clinton

After completely ignoring the story, ABC investigative correspondent Brian Ross finally featured a segment on a questionable real estate deal by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama....

Following a suggestion by freelance ABC producer, former President Bill Clinton.

Oh, I'm sorry. I seem to have made up that last sentence. Or did I?

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

Brian Ross still does not

Brian Ross still does not report completely on BO-Rezko dealings.

  1. BO met Rezko while BO was in Harvard Law School.  Rezko was interested in bringing in BO as a "developer".

  2. Rezko is a Syrian national who moved to Chicago after high school. 

  3. He became wealthy from fast food restaurants and real estate deals, where he earned the moniker slumlord.  Eleven of his slum buildings were in BO's district and continued undeterred despite BO's political propaganda about being for the people.  BO denies doing any favors for Rezko.

  4. BO has a long history of assistance to Rezko despite stating the contrary.  BO's early work with a law firm that was responsible for securing more than $43 million in government funding for Rezko.  The law firm's partners were friends of Rezko's too.  BO denies doing any favors for Rezko.

  5. BO also hired an intern whose father donated $10K to BO and was a long time friend and business associate of Rezko.  The intern was one of 350 applicants.  BO denies doing any favors for Rezko.

  6. Rezko has been one of if not the largest fundraiser for BO during his pre-presidential campaigning political career.  After Rezko was indicted, though not immediately, BO donated $11K, representing money directly donated by Rezko to BO, to charities.

  7. The home and double lot property deal central to Brian Ross' story has further twists.  BO liked the property but did not want/could not purchase both lots so he went to his friend Rezko who quickly agreed to buying the companion empty lot.  Interestingly, Rezko was under investigation at the time by the US Attorney's office.  BO has yet to explain why he went to Rezko while knowing about the investigations and allegations towards Rezko.

  8. BO purchases 1/6 of Rezko's adjoining property for 1/6 the original price - a nice deal considering the value of the property had surely risen.

All this was found in 0.38 seconds using Google.  What took Brian Ross so long and why is his report so incomplete?

I'll bet there is more we could find in a couple of minutes on the internet. 

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

living in the chicagoland

living in the chicagoland area this is not new.  

my buddy says  it's  a "known" fact that repub's are crooked, and when I point out what the  dem's are doing and getting caught doing , I get the answer

"well all politicians are crooks"

I bring up the fact that no news outlet had brought up and stories about rep's just dem's

and he says "rebuplicans are better at hiding it"

 people who lean left seem to think the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence

 

"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin

ABC

Always the ace-up-the-sleeve for the Clintons ... (See: "The Path To 9-11")

Timing is everything...

In politics, timing is everything. Had there been any serious inquiries earlier on there would have been all kinds of spin. But now is a better time to suddenly expose all the underbelly, leaking out the details painstakingly so as to get the most mileage and effect. Feigning shock and surprise at every new detail and nuance. Its an ugly business and a small wonder most of us want nothing to do with it.

Oh I see...NOW it's news.

I've been sending this story to everyone I know for some time now. Suddenly it's news. Wotta crock!

Happy Trails...