Hillary's Outburst of Emotion Will Boost Dem, ABC Reporter Claims

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday's "Good Morning America," reporter Claire Shipman appeared touched by Hillary Clinton's emotional display at a New Hampshire diner on Monday. She exhibited no skepticism about the outpouring, describing it as "unexpected, spontaneous emotion." Not surprisingly, Shipman also speculated that Clinton could benefit in the polls from the event.

Video (:54): Windows Media (1.70 MB) or MP3 audio (267kB).

The ABC reporter rhapsodized, "From this woman in particular, who remains stoic publicly even as her emotional world caved in, who has cultivated such an image of strength and invulnerability, it was a surprise that just might pay off." Much of the segment related to crying in politics and whether it's now thought to be acceptable. However, Shipman clearly appeared to be fascinated with the New York senator's display of emotion in response to a question from a voter. She added, "And it's so fascinating when you are the first woman to make a serious stab at the presidency, every move, every emotion is fraught and scrutinized."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Shipman has been one of the more egregious offenders when it comes to gushing over Hillary Clinton. In January of 2007, she wondered how Barack Obama's "fluid poetry" would stand up to the '08 contender's "hot factor."

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:45am on January 8, follows:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Tears on the campaign trail. That's what everyone was talking about yesterday.

DIANE SAWYER: True. And Claire Shipman is going to take a look back and ask you the question how do you really feel?

SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: Some people think elections are a game --

CLAIRE SHIPMAN: Unexpected, spontaneous emotion. Breaking through the normally rehearsed public facade.

CLINTON: You know, this is very personal for me. It's not just political. It's not just public. I see what's happening. And we have to reverse it.

SHIPMAN: Most of us have been there. Losing control in public when we least expect it. But is there a no-cry zone for politicians, for female politicians, especially for Hillary Clinton? 20 years later. Pat Schroeder still gets letters about her weepy concession speech.

PAT SCHROEDER: I thank you Denver. It's good to be back.

SHIPMAN: 35 years ago, here in New Hampshire, Ed Muskie watched his presidential campaign slide in oblivion because of what the media said were tears -- and what he always maintained was dripping snow on his face. But, of course, times have changed. Considerably.

MARGARET THATCHER: Ladies and Gentlemen--

SHIPMAN: Even the original Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher, got choked up as she left office. And now, men welling up seems part of being human.

MITT ROMNEY: And literally wept. Even at this day it's emotional.

SHIPMAN: Indeed it seems no end to male politicians who will show some softer side. But how much soft does our public want from a would-be female commander in chief? That's still to be determined, but the answer might follow along gender lines.

JANINE DRIVER (Body language expert): The men seeing this, they might be, like, she's running for president, she's supposed to be calling the shots. It really makes people feel a little uncomfortable and uneasy. However, I'm sure you're going to get a lot of women that are going to say now, that's the real Hillary, that's who I have been looking for.

CLINTON: I have so many opportunities for this country. I just don't want to see us fall backwards.

SHIPMAN: From this woman in particular, who remains stoic publicly even as her emotional world caved in, who has cultivated such an image of strength and invulnerability, it was a surprise that just might pay off. And people are still talking about it this morning. We're here at a polling station. And it's so fascinating when you are the first woman to make a serious stab at the presidency, every move, every emotion is fraught and scrutinized. But, just for the record George and Diane. Hillary's team thinks it played pretty well. In fact, one of them joked maybe she should have been showing that sort of emotion a little bit earlier.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Shipman apparently does not boink married men for husbands

The only liberal women who are conned by the Hillatear are women who are not out breaking up homes sleeping with liberal jerks cheating on their wives they will never leave.

Liberal women like Dowd have seen and heard all those tears.......usually in phone calls screaming at them for taking "my Bill".

There is nothing fascinating about a bawling female or male. There is only the terrorists and communist thug seeing it and saying, "There is another weakling to exploit when they are elected".

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

I hope she's wrong. Being

I hope she's wrong. Being the follower that he is, the sight of John McCain holding that microphone in the patented "dildo death grip" way that he has, and crying his eyes out, just makes me want to hurl.

Yep! Thats what we

Yep! Thats what we Americans want, now. A sissy for a president. Dont get your way, tear up and bawl!!

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

It probably will help her. 

It probably will help her.  That's how devoid of substance the Left is.  The only thing I can't tell for sure is if people like Shipman are operatives or just idiots.  With some of them you can tell, but others are more difficult to figure...

Oh, Please!!

 

Nothing is more indicative of the sorry state of journalism than the twaddle being passed for news and the endless analysis of this drivel by people unfit to tie their own shoelaces.

So an MSM member (and Clinton Sycophant) notices that Hillary generated a well planned tear when required. Does the media seriously think that the public is too dense to understand something as trivial as a teardrop or two when convention delegates are at stake?  Or, is it a hell of a lot easier for liberals to expound at length over a false emotion than to deal with the serious issues that the next president is going to have to face. Oops, guess I answered my own question.

   

 

That sounds about right. The

That sounds about right. The party of feelings probably loves a public display of emotion - however phony and contrived.

Cry baby

Like the mean kid in "A Christmas Story":

"Cry, baby! Cry! Cry!" 

tears as president?

Getting teary-eyed over the story of one of our brave soldiers in Iraq like President Bush can do is one thing, crying over the stress of campaigning is quite another. If she can't take the heat of the campaign, there's no way she can handle the pressure of the White House when she's in the hot seat.

What a wimp.

You're right.  This one's

You're right.  This one's totally going to backfire on her.  It's over.  If she wasn't faking it. . .then it's an easy attack ad for the GOP.  She's practically giving it away to Obama at this point.

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

Faking emotions wins votes?

What an interesting theory, Shipman. If you fake emotions that make you look  stressed out than you'll win votes for the toughest office on the planet.   Boy, dem voters must be pretty simple...

Gawd! You people are sooo predictable!

EARTH TO THE FOOLISH MSM!

NOBODY is buying what Hillary was selling yesterday!

So, don't act so puzzled by the morning-after slamfest at her today.