Time magazine's managing editor hinted on Monday's "Today" show that Al Gore would be a "superb choice" for recipient of the publication's 2007 Person of the Year award. Richard Stengel agreed with co-host Meredith Vieira that the former vice president was on the "short list" and extolled, "He's had an extraordinary year. He's had an extraordinary influence. There was a real tipping point this year in terms of people being conscious of the environment. So, he would be a superb choice."
On Time's website, the magazine is currently ranking the potential of the seven "short list" candidates. Each person receives a pro and con as to why that individual might or might not win. And while General David Petraeus's "con" is that he can be seen as "excessively protective" of President Bush, Gore's negative is simply that much of his "green works" was completed in 2006. However, the "pro" touted impact: "The Nobel Prize ensures that a generation of children will envision his face while being scolded for leaving a room without turning off the lights." The winner of Time's "Person of the Year" will be announced live on Wednesday's "Today."
Stengel, it should be noted is a former advisor and speechwriter to Democratic presidential candidate Bill Bradley. The MRC has documented his bias throughout the years. In June of 1999, he famously derided the communist-exposing Whittaker Chambers as a "nasty piece of work" and wrote that "nobody likes a snitch."
Co-host Vieira did mention that General David Petraeus is in the running and that the "controversial troop surge in Iraq may actually be working." But she also hyped the fact that "a lot of people think Al Gore is going to be the choice."
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:44am on December 17, follows:
MEREDITH VIEIRA: It is one of the most anticipated announcements of the year. Since 1927, Time magazine has selected a man, woman, group, place or even idea to honor as person of the year. The criteria for the choice, someone that, quote, "for better or for worse, has done the most to influence the events of the year." And this year, the field is wide open. There have been presidents, dictators, and leaders in the world of business. Even you have made the cut. So who might grace the cover this year? Could it be author J.K. Rowling, who after seven installments of the wildly popular Harry Potter books, had her final Potter chapter? Or Steve Jobs, chairman and CEO of Apple, which continues to dominate new realms of technology with inventions like the iPhone. Or General David Petraeus, whose controversial troop surge in Iraq may actually be working? Other choices, former Vice President Al Gore, who won the Nobel Peace prize this year for his lifelong dedication to the environment. Or could it be one of the many world leaders who made headlines this year, like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Russian President Vladimir Putin, who tightened his grip on power? How about Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, trying to broker a Middle East peace? Or Chinese President Hu Jintao, who is transforming his country into a 21st century superpower. So who or what will it be this year? We'll find out later this week. And the answer lies in the brain of this man, Richard Stengel, Time's managing editor. Richard, good morning.
RICHARD STENGEL: That's a scary concept
VIEIRA: Well, ultimately, it's you who picks the person of the year. But explain the process to us a little bit.
STENGEL: Well, we consult with all our correspondents around the world, domestic and, and internationally. We poll otherwise men and women and former persons of the year, for example, Henry Kissinger. And then we kind of get a brain trust together to talk about it. But, you know, it's not a scientific choice. There's no mathematical equation. It's about making a judgment about who did have the most influence and the most importance.
DAVID GREGORY: Rick, you went with this idea of the concept last year, the user-generated media. Do you feel more of an inclination now to go back to an individual?
STENGEL: Yes, I do. And it will be an individual this year.
VIEIRA: Did it backfire? Picking "you" last year.
STENGEL: No, and it was a wonderful choice, very popular among readers. I think you heard more about person of the year last year than any time in history but I want to get back to that, kind of, core idea of choosing one individual who makes a difference. And that is what Time has talked about for years and years, how individuals change history.
VIEIRA: Core rhymes with Gore. And a lot of people think Al Gore is going to be the choice.
STENGEL: He's had an extraordinary year. He's had an extraordinary influence. There was a real tipping point this year in terms of people being conscious of the environment. So, he would be a superb choice.
VIEIRA: He's on the short list?
STENGEL: He's on the short list.
GREGORY: It is interesting to look at some of these foreign leaders and how they drive international behavior. So Ahmadinejad and the pall he's casting in the Middle East or Hu Jintao and the rise of China, how have you discussed all of this?
STENGEL: Well, when you look at, for example, Hu Jintao and Vladimir Putin of Russia, these are giants on the world stage. Their countries are enormously important. I mean, Russia is influencing the way everything is going on in the world. China has the Olympics this year. I mean, they both would be very, very strong choices.
GREGORY: And Vladimir could be, you know, could be in the future because he's apparently not leaving power.
STENGEL: That's right. He's succeeding himself.
VIEIRA: Well, isn't that one of the rules about this, it's not just who made a difference this year for better or worse but the possible impacts in the following year as well?
STENGEL: Well, I think so. I don't want it to be retrospective. Anybody who gets chosen is somebody who will continue to have influence in the future. It's not just about what you did in the past year.
VIEIRA: And should I be offended that we're not on the short list?
STENGEL: Well, it won't be you guys again this year.
VIEIRA: Richard Stengel, thank you so much. If you'd like to vote for your top choice from the short list, you can do it on our website Todayshow.com. And on Wednesday Richard Stengel will be back to reveal this year's winner for Person of the Year.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.





RICHARD STENGEL: That's a scary concept














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
the seven "short list" candidates.
December 17, 2007 - 13:28 ET by RackieDoc
Happy
Grumpy
Sleepy
Bashful
Sneezy
Dopey
rackie... ROFL... By
December 17, 2007 - 13:36 ET by bigtimerrackie...
ROFL...
By the way any of them would be much better than algore....
Anyday!
Too many choices here...
December 17, 2007 - 13:57 ET by ThisnThat...and I'm not talking about Man of the Year honors. This person, Vieiera, is an absolute idiot. "controversial troop surge in Iraq may actually be working" -- so the surge is controversial, but Al Gore's lies aren't? "Or could it be one of the many world leaders who made headlines this year, like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Russian President Vladimir Putin"?Ahmadinejad is a world leader?
Too many choices to decide which statement is the stupidest. Where do they get people like this woman?
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
It falls short...
December 17, 2007 - 14:21 ET by Chris NormanI don't think "Person of the Year" quite covers the media's adulation of Al Gore. Now, maybe "God of the Year" would approach the correct level...
Al Gore and Climate Change
December 17, 2007 - 14:19 ET by LionKingWell, thanks to Al Gore, a major diplomat at the UN Climate Change conference in Bali suffered a major crying tantrum.
In related news, major winter storm is paralyzing the Great Lakes and Northeastern United States.
[So much for Al Bore the Prophet]
Hi LK.... I read about
December 17, 2007 - 14:24 ET by bigtimerHi LK....
I read about the Bali crying fit...plus Rush mentioned it too today.
Don't ya just love it....
Btw...the NW is getting pounded too.
I call it winter time....lol!!
A White Christmas indeed!
King of the world's idiots
December 17, 2007 - 14:25 ET by ckc1227King of the world's idiots is a shoe-in. Seriously, is there any doubt? If they were undecided before, Gore's blaming the U.S. in Bali fixed that problem.
Right
December 17, 2007 - 14:52 ET by iveseenitallI agree. Algore is now running for president of the Blame America First club. And he'll win. Now that's truly a Person of the Year. GO ALGORE and all your "liberal" friends-----to Hell!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
As last year's Person of
December 17, 2007 - 14:52 ET by wiwfAs last year's Person of the Year, I am wholeheartedly opposed to Al Gore receiving Person of the Year two years in a row.
At that, I'm more eco-friendly that Al Gore: I don't own a private jet...
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Run Algore, run.
December 17, 2007 - 14:55 ET by moonjohnRun Algore, run.
Person of the Year
December 17, 2007 - 15:23 ET by fosstenLimbaugh!
Duh.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
The wrath of Gore
December 17, 2007 - 20:47 ET by danboAccording to todays ClimateAudut. While in Bali Gore threatened Canada.
" Al Gore warned: if Canada did not immediately change its ways, it would be hit with more winter storms."
An update...
"A winter storm dumped more than 30 centimetres of snow on the Toronto area yesterday, with some parts of southern Ontario receiving as many as 50 centimetres of snow. Toronto usually receives approximately 30 cm of snow during the entire month of December. Yesterday’s snowfall likely trumped the previous record of 28 cm set on Dec. 11, 1944."
Is this the wrath of Gore?
Of course, Gore also said...that climate models showed that global warming would lead to more Canadian snowfall or less snowfall or about the same amount of snowfall or all three and that the need for change was urgent.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
The Short list is Al Gore
December 18, 2007 - 08:56 ET by PopularTech1. Al Gore
2. Al Gore
3. Al Gore
4. Al Gore
5. Al Gore
Al Gore: "The Goracle"
"I decided I just had to call because you've printed a picture of the Earth upside down" - Al Gore, Wasington Times, 1998
Al Gore only has a B.A. in Government (no higher degree achieved, no science degrees)
The Education of Al Gore (The Washington Times)
"Mr. Gore's high school performance on the college board achievement tests in physics (488 out of 800 "terrible," St. Albans retired teacher and assistant headmaster John Davis told The Post) and chemistry (519 out of 800 "He didn't do too well in chemistry," Mr. Davis observed) suggests that Mr. Gore would have trouble with science for the rest of his life. At Harvard and Vanderbilt, Mr. Gore continued bumbling along.
As a Harvard sophomore, scholar Al "earned" a D in Natural Sciences 6 in a course presciently named "Man's Place in Nature." That was the year he evidently spent more time smoking cannabis than studying its place among other plants within the ecosystem. His senior year, Mr. Gore received a C+ in Natural Sciences 118.
At Vanderbilt divinity school, Mr. Gore took a course in theology and natural science. The assigned readings included the apocalyptic, and widely discredited "Limits to Growth," which formed much of the foundation for "Earth in the Balance." It is said that Mr. Gore failed to hand in his book report on time. Thus, his incomplete grade turned into an F, one of five Fs Mr. Gore received at divinity school, which may well be a worldwide record."
Gore Deserves Nobel Prize for Propaganda (CNSNews)
Gore's guru disagreed (Financial Post, Canada)
The Gore Lies (National Review Online)
The Science of Gore's Nobel (The Wall Street Journal)
"What a pompous jerk. ...it's time for Al Gore to get over himself." - Jack Cafferty, CNN, 2007
Hypocrite:
Al Gore and Global Warming - Is He a Hypocrite? (Video) (10min)
Al Gore's Gulfstream (Video) (7min)
Al Gore, Environmentalist and Zinc Miner (The Wall Street Journal)
- Environmentalist Gore allowed zinc mine (USA Today)
Al Gore's Inconvenient Toxic Waste Dump (NewsMax)
Al Gore, polluter? (WorldNetDaily)
Al Gore Refuses to Take Personal Energy Ethics Pledge (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)
Al Gore: The Other Oil Candidate (CorpWatch)
Bush's Ranch House 'Far More Eco-Friendly' Than Gore's (CNSNews)
- George W. Bush's eco-friendly ranch compared to Al Gore's energy-expending mansion = True (Snopes)
Eco-warrior Al Gore serves up endangered fish at daughter's party (Daily Mail, UK)
Gore home's energy use: 20 times average (WorldNetDaily)
- Al Gore's residence uses considerably more energy than the average American home = True (Snopes)
Gore isn't quite as green as he's led the world to believe (USA Today)
Hypocrite Gore Should Practice What He Preaches (The Tech, MIT)
Integrity in the Balance: Al Gore's Record On the Environment (CorpWatch)
Meet the real Al Gore (WorldNetDaily)
Occidental Petroleum Corporation Connections (The Wall Street Journal)
Old-Growth Timber used to Rebuild the Veranda of the Vice Presidential Mansion (Newsweek)
Whose Ox Is Gored? The Former Vice President's Environmental Exaggerations and Hypocrisy (The Wall Street Journal)
Al Gore Pushes 'Pollution Tax' (NewsMax)
Profiteering:
Al Gore Gets Rich ($100 Million) After White House (ABC News)
Al Gore is criticised for lining his own pockets after £3,300 ($6,757) per-minute green speech (Daily Mail, UK)
Gore's 'carbon offsets' paid to firm he owns (WorldNetDaily)
Gore Cashing in on $6 Trillion Energy Business (NewsMax)
Global Warming, Inc. (The Wall Street Journal)
The Money and Connections Behind Al Gore’s Carbon Crusade (Human Events)
Will Not Debate:
Dennis T. Avery Challenges Al Gore to a Debate (The Heartland Institute)
Lord Christopher Monckton Challenges Al Gore to a Debate (Center for Science and Public Policy)
Ivy League Professor Bets Al Gore $10,000 He’s Wrong About Global Warming (NewsBusters)
Why Won’t Al Gore Debate? (The Heartland Institute)
Will Al Gore Melt? If not, why did he chicken out on an interview? (The Wall Street Journal)
Sign the Petition: Al Gore, Debate Global Warming (5500+ Signatures)
An Inconvenient Truth:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it [global warming] is..." - Al Gore, 2006
Al Gore's climate change film 'is propaganda' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
UK Court finds 9 Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (The New Party, UK)
- Al Gore's 'nine Inconvenient Untruths' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
- Al Gore told there are nine inconvenient truths in his film (The Times, UK)
- Gore caught lying (WorldNetDaily)
- Gore’s Nine Lies (FrontPage Magazine)
- Judge attacks nine errors in Al Gore's 'alarmist' climate change film (Daily Mail, UK)
Schools must warn of Gore climate film bias (Daily Mail, UK)
- British Schools Ordered to Offer 'Balance' When Showing Al Gore's Global Warming Film (FOXNews)
35 Inconvenient Truths (Science and Public Policy Institute)
25 Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore (The National Review Online)
23 Scientific Errors (Science and Public Policy Institute)
20 More inaccuracies (PDF) (UKPRwire)
16 Errors in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth (Science and Public Policy Institute)
6 Inconvenient Truths Indeed (Robert C. Balling, Ph.D. Geography)
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
Tech. I didn't see an
December 18, 2007 - 10:19 ET by danboTech. I didn't see an interesting issue. Gore's other home.
Gore keeps telling us the seas will rise by 20 feet. Implying it will hppen soon.
Well his new home is in San Francisco. Either Gore believes his own hype and is the world's stupidest investor, or Gore doesn't believe his own hype and is the world's biggest liar.
I think I know the answer.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT