MSNBC's Shuster: Waterboarding Equivalent to Shooting Legs Off

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and David Shuster squared off in a heated battle on Tuesday over whether waterboarding constitutes torture. Scarborough appeared exasperated with his left-leaning guest and, at one point, derided, "Are you an expert? When did you decide and when did the liberal media decide and when did all of us in Manhattan, Georgetown and West Hollywood decide that waterboarding was torture?"

Later in the segment, Shuster began wildly comparing waterboarding to violent acts: "If you believe that America should torture, fine! Waterboard them! Drill them in the kneecaps. Shoot, shoot their legs off! Whatever you want to do." Scarborough responded by laughing and, in a nod to "24," announced, "I'm not Jack Bauer."

Video (2:15): Windows Media (4.18 MB) or MP3 audio (1.02 MB).

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Shuster, a regular correspondent for "Hardball" and other MSNBC programs, repeatedly sparred with Scarborough over whether waterboarding, which amounts to simulated drowning, is torture. Showing frustration with both Shuster and his "Morning Joe" co-host Mika Brzezinski, Scarborough wondered, "David, what would you have us do? My God....I am at this point getting very frustrated because you two are in the distinct minority in America. What would you have our CIA agents, what would you have our interrogators do?"

Scarborough's guest also saw nefarious motives to the revelation that videotapes showing CIA interrogations of detainees have been destroyed. He heatedly asked, "Why did somebody feel it was necessary to destroy the tapes?...If it's in such a controlled environment, if it's so successful and if it's something we can all be proud of, let's show the tapes, let's show the American people, here's what we're doing."

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 6:40am on December 11, follows:

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Let's go to Des Moines, Iowa right now and David Shuster. He's an NBC political correspondent. How are you doing, David Shuster?

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hi, David.

DAVID SHUSTER: Hi, good morning. You know, Joe, I didn't realize you were there when Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was being waterboarded. You said, when we were waterboarding him. You were there? That's news to me. You know, Joe, how do you know -- How do you know --

SCARBOROUGH: Hold on, David. David, I wasn't there but you know what? Thank God I was able to read Newsweek magazine in 2002 who described it, who talked about how the United States did waterboard him, and talked how about Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the mastermind of September 11 that killed over 3,000 Americans, started talking like a little pansy and started telling--

SHUSTER: And how did they know, Joe, that the information he was providing was accurate? How did they know, first of all, that it was the waterboarding that caused him to talk?

SCARBOROUGH: Because it-- Because-- Okay.

SHUSTER: Secondly, how do they know the information he was providing was accurate until they checked it out? It is just as likely that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad could have made up some information.

SCARBOROUGH: Well, you know, we--Five years later, we know and the intelligence agencies tell us that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad provided us a treasure-trove of intelligence and gave us a lot of information that actually helped us make more arrests, helped to save more lives, and helped us -- again, it led to other trails. So, and--

SHUSTER: Right and they're not talking about all the people who provided false information and false leads and all the time we wasted chasing down ridiculous information because we were waterboarding people

SCARBOROUGH: David, what would you have us do? My God. I seriously -- I am at this point getting very frustrated because you two are in the distinct minority in America. What would you have our CIA agents, what would you have our interrogators do?

SHUSTER: I think there are plenty of techniques that are out there that are short of torture that are just as effective.

SCARBOROUGH: Are you an expert? When did you decide and when did the liberal media decide and when did all of us in Manhattan, Georgetown and West Hollywood decide that waterboarding was torture? Because, I have got to tell you, I wasn't at that meeting.

SHUSTER: Well, you know, Joe, I have actually seen a tape of waterboarding. I have actually read about the guy from the Justice Department who went over and had himself waterboarded to examine whether it is torture and said without a doubt waterboarding is torture.

SCARBOROUGH: Oh, he didn't say that. No. David --

SHUSTER: He did. And, of course, he was forced out of the Justice Department.

SCARBOROUGH: If you are going to be on my show, David, you have got to provide accurate information. He did not say that waterboarding was torture. When he did say was that he was afraid without the proper guidelines and without the proper techniques applied, the way the Bush administration was administering it, that it could possibly be torture.

BRZEZINSKI: But that's, that's the closest we have gotten to answer as to whether the administration has a stand on whether or not this is torture.

SHUSTER: So, in other words, if they're pouring one gallon of water down a guy's throat as opposed to three gallons of water, that's a distinction and therefore it's possible the Bush administration could misuse it. Come on, Joe! You know better than that.

SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, I do know a lot better than that because I've talked to interrogators that have interrogated some very bad people and what they tell me is that the biggest danger when we start talking about interrogation and harsh interrogation techniques, is that we have happened what happened at Abu Ghraib, where you have a bunch of people that don't have proper training and that haven't been in this business for 15, 20 years and that don't know how far you can push somebody before serious bodily harm or serious mental harm occurs with them. And, yes, you -- you -- the way you apply waterboarding, the way that you apply sleep deprivation and the way that you, you apply sensory overload, all of it has to be in a very measured way or even the top interrogators will say then it does become torture.

SHUSTER: Well, then if it's so measured, why are we so afraid to release the tapes then? Why did somebody feel it was necessary to destroy the tapes? Obviously, they felt something was problematic with it. If it's in such a controlled environment, if it's so successful and if it's something we can all be proud of, let's show the tapes, let's show the American people, here's what we're doing.

SCARBOROUGH: But, David, you are making the suggestion that whatever the United States government does, whatever our army does, whatever interrogators do, that we have a responsibility to release it to the world. Listen, at the end of World War II, after the Germans were already ready to surrender, we firebombed Dresden. We killed tens of thousands of little children and mothers. We didn't have to do that. But we were sending a message to Germany. You brought us into war. We are going to incinerate your town. We are going to burn your little children up. We are going to burn babies up. We are going to burn mothers up. We are going to burn grandmothers up. We are going to burn grandfathers up. Whether it is immoral? Probably so. Did we do it because we were in the middle of an ugly war against Adolf Hitler? Yes. Were we trying to send a signal? Yes. Do I want to see videos-- Do I wish I had seen videos of these people being burned in the streets of Dresden at the end of World War II when we really didn't have to firebomb Dresden? No, I do not.

6:47

SCHUSTER: The point of this is that Americans are better than this, that Americans stand for something better than torturing their enemies. First of all, torture doesn't work. And secondly, American military --

SCARBOROUGH: You define waterboarding as torture. I do not.

SHUSTER: All right. Well, then that's the difference. That's the difference. I think waterboarding is torture. I think anybody who has taken a serious look at this, even Michael Mukasey probably had some doubts which is why he had such a difficult time answering this. But anybody who seriously looked at this understands waterboarding is torture. If you believe that America should torture, fine! Waterboard them! Drill them in the kneecaps. Shoot, shoot their legs off! Whatever you want to do.

SCARBOROUGH [Laughing] You just-- You just-- You just redefined waterboarding as torture and then just said and suggested that I wanted to shoot people in the kneecaps! I'm not Jack Bauer!

SHUSTER: Yeah, why not? Why stop at waterboarding?

SCARBOROUGH: I'm not Jack Bauer. I'm not going to say, "Hey, you know what? I'm going to shoot your wife if you don't tell us where the nuclear weapon is." What I'm saying--

SHUSTER: But Joe, what you're saying is if Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had that information and somebody shot him in the kneecaps and that would have caused him to provide that information, that would be just fine.

SCARBOROUGH: I didn't say that, David, what I said was that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was interrogated by the very best people of the United States government had and the CIA had and intelligence agencies had to interrogate Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. And they did it in a very measured way. And, you know, we keep talking about waterboarding. If you talk to David Ignatius, if you talk to most people that really know how these interrogations go and everybody likes the Jack Bauer scenes and everybody likes to talk about waterboarding, the way they get the most information is from sleep deprivation.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Liberals are so stupid.

Liberals are so stupid.

Waterboarding has saved lives

...and that's the bottom line. 

Today, I heard an interview with an ex-interrogator who flatly stated that waterboarding has prevented numerous attacks.

 Joe gets that, but Shuster and the other whiny leftys don't.   (Congratulations, Joe, on the seeming rediscovery of your cojones.)

 

That IS the bottom line RJ...

Has anyone on the waterboarding side of this debate actually used that challange? It seems rather simple to me:

Waterboard and no one gets hurt.

OR

Don't waterboard and people die!

It's a no brainer to those who actually have a brain!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Shuster on interrogation

It's one thing to object on moral grounds, like McCain. He went through torture for five years, and so I completely respect how he feels. But when David Shuster, as shallow a liberal "journalist" as there is, preaches about the effectiveness of an interrogation technique, that's absurd.

The effective objection to torture, as opposed to any moral objection, is that the target is likely to say anything to relieve the torture. Well, don't you think the interrogators know that? Don't you think they've accounted for that, and know how to respond to it? As several commenters have pointed out, easy objections are easily resolved. For example, in many cases, you associate the end of the interrogation with successful information. If you give us bad information, we'll come right back and resume where we left off. Second, as KSM's interrogator admitted, the information did pay off. Shuster asked how many false leads did we pursue? As opposed to what, having no leads at all?

Shuster is simply repeating a slogan he heard, but he wants to portray the slogan as if it was professional expertise. He's a parrot, repeating what he hears, without understanding it.

Sure Dave...

"If it's in such a controlled environment, if it's so successful and if it's something we can all be proud of, let's show the tapes, let's show the American people, here's what we're doing."

And in the process give away all of the information that was collected during those interrogations.

I am stricken at the stupidity of some people.

SHUSTER...

 Who cares what this guy thinks or says? He is nothing, his audience is nothing, his networks ratings are nothing, & his ability to read political situations is less then zero.

To Shuster, you are a schmuck, you, me, & anyone who reads this is safer as a result of the tourtu...whoops, enhanced interrgations. I almost feel sorry for you, but you are such a pompus @$$, I just laugh at your reports when I do bother to watch them. You do seem to be trying too hard to be noticed, that's sad.

 

 "Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

TODAY Show & Waterboarding Demo!!

Did you see where the DEMO of Waterboarding came from that they used on the TODAY SHOW this morning? None other than "CURRENT TV"!! And pray tell, whom is behind CURRENT TV?? It's the GW guy himself, Al Gore!! If it is a SECRET tactic, how did CURRENT TV get a DEMO of it?

HEY...

Thanks for bringing up Current TV, now I'm getting pissed thinking I get that on my Dish Network lineup, but not FoxBiz or Sentana Sport. Aughhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I did'nt see that, I have not watched the Today Show since The Corrs were on a couple of years ago, around St.Pats Day I think. Maybe Shuster could do a demo by being waterboarded & then tell us what he thinks about it.

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

Didn't Mythbusters do

Didn't Mythbusters do waterboarding on their show once, Adam and the hot red head carrie ( I just think she is SO fine) and Adam actuly fell asleep, and carrie did get messed up.  but they did it by dripping water on their foreheads and adam was just under a dripping tap , and carrie was strapped to a baord and had hr head restratined.

 

and one more thing this shudter guy says he's seen A video about it, could it be the same damn thing we have all seen, why is it the libs try to make it seem they arer on the "inside track" when anyone with a computer can see that stuff

 

"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin

I saw a demo on a Fox News minor-reporter.

I've come close to drowning a couple of times myself (self-inflicted). It's scary, to say the least. I'd be likely to tell my tormentor(s) anything they wanted to hear, regardless of truth or falsehood, if I were subjected to this same treatment. The Fox News guy gave up very-soon, too.

I look to our history of how US intelligence agent guards got info from German POWs in WW2. They played chess/cards with them & talked to their POWs as if they were human beings, despite the fact that they'd been fighting on the other side of a World War. It worked, too.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

One of the major differences

One of the major differences is that most of the German POWs weren't religious fanatics who hated us with every fiber of their being. It's a little easier to talk to someone who isn't imagining sawing your head off... 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

It took time, but...

Our guys got good info even out of very devout Nazis. And many of us would argue they were religious in a way, albeit animists who worshipped the state, at least in effect. I'm not saying to coddle them. Far from it.

What I'm saying is that via waterboarding, you could easily get me to say that my ideal Presidential ticket this year is actually a bipartisan winning-combination: "Hillary/Rudy 08"! Those who've seen me post on NB over the past few months might not consider that to be very reliable information, even if various big-government fans here might secretly-welcome such news...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

While I agree that torture

While I agree that torture will get someone to say whatever you want them to, this isn't the case with waterboarding. If you want someone to confess to a crime, they know what you want and with enough "persuasion", they will most likely give you what they think you want.

German soldiers were just that - soldiers. Most soldiers, especially in that era, were relatively honorable and would have considered standing up to actual torture equally honorable, making torture ineffective.

Terrorists, however, are inherently cowards to begin with. They know that what they do is morally wrong. With the added stress of waterboarding, they spill what they know with little or no deception. They simply don't have a choice. They are already predisposed to cowardice, and so are too afraid to think of lies that will suffice to stop the interrogation. 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Beo: While I agree that

Beo:

While I agree that torture will get someone to say whatever you want them to, this isn't the case with waterboarding. If you want someone to confess to a crime, they know what you want and with enough "persuasion", they will most likely give you what they think you want.

Not quite.  Imagine that you are interogating someone and they tell you something that they wish to mislead you with.  Then imagine that this action is identified by the analysts working the case and is punished by the interrogator.

At the lowest level of punishment (removal of priveleges etc) the person being interogated will have a minor motivation to tell the truth.  Now magnify that with more strenuous punishment...

It is all dependant on the ability to tell when the individual is deveiving the interrogator,  either through analysis or by interrogators ability to detect deception.

That's the whole point of

That's the whole point of "professional" interrogators BD. They are trainied to ask the right questions at the right time to minimize deception. And you're giving the animals being waterboarded a lot of credit, like that they can actually think and reason for themselves.

As I said earlier, terrorists are cowards. Once waterboarding is begun, what little rational thought they had is gone. You have to be able to think in order to deceive. They give up the truth, at least as they know it. This has been proven by the attacks stopped and the terrorists aprehended directly due to the acquisition of said information. And that is the whole point - it works. We're not causing any physical damage, and any psychological damage (if there is any) would be completely submerged by these animal's inherent pathology anyway. Finally, I DON'T CARE IF WE HURT THEM! Does anyone care what THEY do to their captives? Nuff said.

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Sarcasmo: The key to good

Sarcasmo:

The key to good interrogation of ANY form is that data regarding the subject allows the interogator to identify when the individual being interogated is not telling the truth.

In your case, we know from past writings that you have a predeliction for Chess, Hooters, and Ron Paul.  If during interrogation you were to state something different, then we would know you were lyin.

 In my view, that is one of the arguments against John McCain's contention that Torture yeilds poor information.  By itself, torture, without any method of processing the data against accurate all -source databases yields poor data.

The feeling you are about

The feeling you are about to drown is frightening.

I wonder though, did the WW2 guards warn the POWs that if the information they provided was knowingly a lie, that they would return and threaten them with more chess/cards? You are correct that there are different ways to get information. I just think some are more reliable and quicker. But hey, I don't claim to be an expert.

Prisoners should be treated with all due respect and in a humane way. That doesn't necessarily mean hugs and kisses and comfort.

By the way sarcasmo, I hope you meant "un-planed or accidentally self-inflicted" in regards to your near drowning. You don't seem the type to me that would consider "giving up". That's a compliment to the fire in your belly I see at times, even if I don't totally agree with your positions.

Oh, yes...

The near drowning resulted from a SCUBA equipment failure. It was quite unpleasant, and it got worse very-quickly before I figured out what was going on, which was scary...

If I wanted to off myself, I'd want a way that's not nearly as dramatic, like sleeping pills if the world's ending or (preferably) old age & too much sex & booze if it's not. Anyway, the personal experience of almost-drowning makes me think waterboarding-derived info wouldn't be all that reliable. If I'd say "I like Hillary/Rudy 08," that probably means I'd be willing to say anything.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

waterboarding-derived info wouldn't be all that reliable

But many times these "sessions" are used to validate existing intelligence.

And they don't waterboard em and let em go, it's not "catch and release". They verify the info and probably aren't too happy if they have been lied to! :-)

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM, thats when I shoot them

MM, thats when I shoot them in the knee caps. When I am unhappy with them. Of course, the best technique is to tell them that Hillary is going to come in and give them a lap dance while holding her testical lock box...:-) At that point we have to gag them to shut them up.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Sarc: Differing

Sarc:

Differing approaches for differing cases.  Nothing works for all situations regarding all persons.

If an interogator is able to make a subject converse with him, then he has shot at doing the approach you discribe above.  But if the subject refuses to even converse, then the methods you describe are not effective.

You will also note that during WWII the allies maintained a camp for high value Nazi Prisoners such as senior SS officers.  According to recent histories, these prisoners received different treatment than what you describe above.

That's interesting

Were the enemy soldiers waterboarded? McCain, in the link, says that WW2-era waterboarding got Japanese hung when they did it to Americans...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Key word included

"Republican presidential candidate John McCain reminded people Thursday that some Japanese were tried and hanged for torturing American prisoners during World War II with techniques that included waterboarding."

 

 It wasnt for just waterboarding alone.There are plenty of history books out there which tell what happened to pows.I actually met someone who had been a civilian and have had two friends whose dad's were pow's under the Japanese. There was alot more done besides waterboarding.

David Shuster = Keith

David Shuster = Keith Olberman in training.  He and Mika can just have a nice day! 

What is this Obsession with Torture by the Left/Dems ?

Geez, What a broken record this subject has become.   Now I'm being Tortured with Dumass ramblings from Idiots who do not speak the truth.....as Joe says........."If you are going to be on my show, David, you have got to provide accurate information"

Well, Good luck Joe.....you need a better Guest "Truth Filter" than what MSM is willing to use.        

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

But, but, but...the CIA

But, but, but...the CIA (and the concensus intelligence community [whatever the hell that is]) has now "supposedly" said that Iran is not a threat, so they must be doing something right in the eyes of the socialists.

I think the socialists need to come up with new talking points about waterboarding: "torture is terrific if it confirms our belief that Bush/Rove lied and little kids died" or "waterboarding was bad until the NIE came out and supported our cause to unite with Ahmadinejad," etc.,etc.

First off, kudos to Morning

First off, kudos to Morning Joe for FINALLY calling this friggin idiot out on his inanities, misquotes, and liberalism. Now, to the meat...

Hi, good morning. You know, Joe, I didn't realize you were there when Khalid Sheikh Mohammad was being waterboarded. You said, when we were waterboarding him. You were there? That's news to me. You know, Joe, how do you know -- How do you know -- 

Can't the same be said for Shuster? Or was he there, and can therefore refute Scarborough's analysis? 

Well, then that's the difference. That's the difference. I think waterboarding is torture. I think anybody who has taken a serious look at this, even Michael Mukasey probably had some doubts which is why he had such a difficult time answering this.

So, Miss Shuster thinks it's torture? Well, that's good enough for me (NOT!). Since he is obviously an expert in the fields of both torture and interrogation, I don't need to hear another word. And to back up his expertise, look at all the references he provided... uh, never mind...

But anybody who seriously looked at this understands waterboarding is torture. If you believe that America should torture, fine! Waterboard them! Drill them in the kneecaps. Shoot, shoot their legs off! Whatever you want to do. 

Let's waterboard Miss Sheister, then kneecap him, then shoot his legs off. Then he can tell us from firsthand experience what is torture and what is not (I'm extremely surprised no one else made this "suggestion"). 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Conservatives need to back

Conservatives need to back off the claim that waterboarding isn't torture. How is a technique that simulates a near-death experience and induce a high state of panic NOT torture?

But I stop right there. SO F---ing WHAT?!

Number One: We need to send a message to those animals out there that we mean business. That message is also crucial to a new prisoner. If he chooses to be cooperative, he will be comfortable. If not, then things will get very, very, very uncomfortable.

Number Two: The slippery slope argument (you might as well shoot the kneecaps) makes absolutely no sense. If you damage the prisoner too much, he won't be in a state to give you information. You have to walk the fine line between keeping him in good enough health to think straight, but at the same time extremely uncomfortable over an indefinite period of time. Outright brutality is the equivalent of killing the golden goose.

Number Three: We will ALWAYS be different then the terrorists because we don't kill in the name of an insane desert god and we don't proudly broadcast killings of prisoners in order to induce terror.

That being said, we should always use whatever methods are necessary with patience, restraint, dispassion, and most of all, INTELLIGENCE. That mess at Abu Ghraib was unforgivable. It was apparent to me that the adults weren't running the playground over there.

"But Joe, what you're

"But Joe, what you're saying is if Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had that information and somebody shot him in the kneecaps and that would have caused him to provide that information, that would be just fine."

Yes, yes I am. If all other avenues have been tried, if all other techniques have been used. Yes. Shoot him in the kneecap. It is time to stop messing around with theses terrorists.

Theses are people that are willing to die and take their kids with them to hell for their beliefs. I wish we could just treat them as humans and play cards with them and get information that way. But that is not today's reality.

If someone is willing to take their own life and the lives of their loved ones, then we have to up the ante on our side of how to obtain information that they are hiding.

These people see kindness as a weakness and something to be exploited. Kindness will not get you anywhere with Islamofacists. Only strength and the use of that strength.

So, yes, shoot them in the kneecaps. Jack Bauer their ass if that needs to be done. I'd rather be alive than see my family in a hole in the ground.

 

He left out something

 "If you believe that America should torture, fine! Waterboard them! Drill them in the kneecaps. Shoot, shoot their legs off! Make them listen to people like me 24 hours a day....Whatever you want to do." - Shuster

Except the person can get up and walk

On both legs, with no casts or surgeries..Yep Shuster, it's just the same!

If you are going to be on

If you are going to be on my show, David, you have got to provide accurate information.

Well, Joe, you have your answer, don't you?  The Douchester NEVER provides accurate information.  He is a shyster partisan hack with ZERO intelligence and ZERO understanding of the facts.  He is incapable of providing accurate information because he lacks the interest and the integrity to find any.  But, of course, Morning Joke will continue bringing this jackass on because Scarborough has been emasculated by the MSDNC brass.

Mika is an empty-headed bimbo who got the job purely out of nepotism...and MSDNC's obvious love for the Carter Administration (by the way, which is/was a bigger failure, MSDNC or the Carter Administration?).  Oh, and I think "she" might be a drag queen.

What is "torture"?

Part of the problem is that the left has defined-down "torture" to the point that it's a meaningless concept. Some of the things now defined by the left to be torture include;

  • sleep deprivation
  • being subjected to loud music
  • made to stand for extended periods

Add watered-down beer and spliffs and you've got pretty much every concert I ever went to.

It's only a matter of time before making terrorists "feel bad" about themselves will be considered torture.

Terrorists MUST be "rehabilitated"!

What will other terrorists think if we treat the ones we catch harshly?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Terrorists MUST be

Terrorists MUST be "rehabilitated"! Alla can do that, MM. But first the meeting must be arranged. That is where our military comes in.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Torture to me

I got a couple that are torture to me;

Seeing Hillary in a dress.

Having to watch Keith Odorman.

Knowing that somewhere out there Professor Truth is teaching someones child.

Any album by Air Supply.

Having a TV that gets only two channels; NBC and MSNBC.

Cavemen the TV Series.

San Fran Nan.

Sean Penn.

"When you men get home and face an anti-war protester, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend, because she knows she's dating a wussy."
                                    Attributed to General Tommy Franks

It's only a matter of time

It's only a matter of time before making terrorists "feel bad" about themselves will be considered torture.

Don't say that too loud. It's extremely conceivable that that will become the Libs "root cause" of terrorism. I can guarantee they can easily find many "experts" to testify to it already...

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

You gotta earn it. Everyday.

Maybe it's just me but if you're going to be accused of torturing terrorists in secret prisons around the world, you might as well do something to make putting up with all that crap worthwhile.

"Uh... Bin Laden? Um...... he musta got away..... yeah! In Tora Bora. No, we don't know where he is now. Nope....not a clue. Yeah, that's the ticket."

"Add watered-down beer and spliffs and..."

Good one. You're reminding me of why I'm unwilling to pay more than about $50/ticket, even for a classic act like Led Zep...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Those are not selling points....

Hey, I shelled out $120 to see them when they did the UnLedded tour in '95.

It was worth every penny.

Can they still pull it off? I almost don't even want to know the answer to that.

Agreed.

And neither are the resulting idiots. I've managed, by not-going to many concerts and getting good deals, to keep things under the $100 mark so-far. The best have invariably been under $50. Besides, my buddy in Panama has a few Zep-DVD-sets that really rock. I'd be tempted by a FL concert, but those would probably keep me home & scanning YouTube for clips...OTOH if those walking-fossils The Rolling Stones can do it, I think it's entirely-possible Led Zep can pull off a good tour, too.

Of course, as a Stern listener (like it or not, it's a news-show too, especially since 9/11!) I know now of some "interesting" copyright irregularities in songs I'd previously thought to be theirs, so a lucrative tour may make some entertainment lawyers & obscure old black dudes and/or their families a LOT of money...
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

Here's an idea

Let's have David Shuster sit and have cookies and milk with the terrorists and see if he gets any where with them ...

Or would Shuster see the "dunking" of the Oreos in the milk as torture???

Scott,

there is a very special place in Heaven for you and others here who have to suffer through watching this mindless crap everyday ...

I have a question

Water boarding simulates drowning and is not actually drowning, right?

Well, for once, the rich white man is in control. --Montgomery Burns

Yeah

Water boarding simulates drowning and is not actually drowning, right?

That is way more accurate than oral sex is not really sex (nods to Bill Clinton).

"I did not drown that

"I did not drown that 'freedom fighter' "

:p

 

"Are ZZ TOP part of the Taliban?? Think on it, son."

-- Professor TP&C (Talking Points & Cheetos)

I don't agree that waterboarding and shooting the legs off....

I don't agree that waterboarding and shooting a leg off have similar results.

I propose we try both methods on Mr. Shuster to verify which one leaves the leg on. 

 

I further suggest

...pulling the trigger first thereby possibly avoiding the necessity of the waterboarding. That should make Shuster happy.

"No waterboarding for you!"

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

What the U.S needs

.......is our own secret  amusement park. Yeah, that'll do it. Imagine making blind folded terrorist suspects ride a ...rollercoaster......just wondering if that would be considered torture?

Shuster is militantly

Shuster is militantly stupid. He's constantly been on a leftist path that I don't where it can end, except, maybe, strapping on dynamite...

When asked by Joe is he was

When asked by Joe is he was an expert, it would have been perfect if Schuster replied: "Well no, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night".

Or

"Well no. And I'm not really a reporter, but I play one on TV".

LOL

That is about the truth of it.Especially this "Well no. And I'm not really a reporter, but I play one on TV". He doesnt have a clue and Joe nailed him on it.Mika...what can you say.She reminds me of that old commercial.A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

 " This is all actually

 " This is all actually just a big honest mistake that's been blown way out of proportion. We were told these freedom fighter's were to be flown to Hawai given a delicious dinner of Mahi Mahi and then taken surfing."

 "We Were Lied To Again !! " 

 

- Nancy Pelosi

 

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

 I suggest we try Shuster's

 I suggest we try Shuster's theory on..Shuster. To gain the delta of the two. Just to be sure.

I heard all of this leftist

I heard all of this leftist tripe this morning....

To think we protect people like Shuster and Mika and all of their ilk is unbelievable to me a times...they are not just dumb as heck, they are ungrateful as heck...but that doesn't matter they have to really have the capability to know what to be grateful for in the first place.

Selfishness fits all of the leftist. 

Shooting out the knee-caps compared to water-boarding....

Hmmmmm....

They never quit...ever...always something to whine about, I'm ready to just throw green cheese at any leftist anymore.