It's probably not surprising to learn that when ABC correspondent Claire Shipman convened a panel of women voters to discuss Bill Clinton defending his candidate wife, the ladies mostly gushed over the political couple. Shipman, who reported on the segment for Tuesday's "Good Morning America," found one voter who lauded, "As a strong woman, like, there's a part of her that appeals to me, even though I don't agree...even though I'm, I'm a Republican." Not one of the females selected by ABC harshly criticized the '08 contender.
Shipman also spun Bill Clinton's comments in the wake of the last presidential debate, in which he accused fellow Democrats of swift boating Hillary, in the most generous terms. The GMA reporter fretted that "[Bill Clinton's] support could muddle her so far successful image of independent strength." Shipman recited the usual talking points that Bill Clinton is "obviously" a "brilliant strategist for her campaign." (The media always ignore pesky facts that would contradict the notion of Bill Clinton's brilliance, such as the fact that he never received 50 percent of the popular vote or that he was impeached.)
Shipman and co-host Diane Sawyer also credulously accepted Clinton spin. Sawyer seriously wondered if Bill and Hillary Clinton weren't coordinating with each other on strategy. Shipman asked if the ex-Commander in Chief coming to the defense of his wife was strategy or "just the chivalry of a former president and spouse who can't help himself?" GMA viewers shouldn't be shocked, however, at Shipman's effusive praise of the Clintons. After all, this is the same correspondent who once raved that one of the New York senator's strong points is her "hot factor."
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:13am on November 13, follows:
DIANE SAWYER: And now, we're going to switch topics and turn to the race to '08. About seven weeks now until the first vote of the primary. Senator Clinton remaining the Democratic front-runner, amid the debate about her fellow candidates pressing the advantage against her and her playing somewhat of a gender card. In fact, her own husband made a statement about Hillary versus "the boys." Is that good strategy? What's the reaction? Who knows better than senior national correspondent Claire Shipman in Washington. Claire?
CLAIRE SHIPMAN: Good morning, Diane. And good strategy or not, it's a great question. It's extraordinary, really, that for so long Bill Clinton kept a low profile in his wife's campaign. But with the vote so close, it was inevitable, really, that the Bill factor would come into play. Is it a new strategy, or just the chivalry of a former president and spouse who can't help himself?
BILL CLINTON: It's a great time to be a Democrat. Even though those boys have been getting kind of tough on her lately, she can handle it.
SHIPMAN: She did poke fun at it on her website.
[Clip: Montage of Democratic opponents saying Senator Clinton's name]
SHIPMAN: But last week, her husband was criticized for comparing that barrage to the swift-boat attack ads on John Kerry.
SWIFT BOAT AD: How can the man who renounced his country's symbols now be trusted?
BILL CLINTON: I had the feeling at the end of the last debate, we were about to get into cutesy land again.
SHIPMAN: Her campaign says the rushes to her defense are welcome but not requested. Privately, some campaign aides think they might backfire. We sat down with a bipartisan group of voters critical to the Clinton campaign, women. Will it work for him to come to her defense or is that a bad move? Does she need him to defend her?
WOMAN #1: No.
WOMAN #2: She doesn't, but Lynne Cheney comes to the defense of Dick Cheney at times.
JULIE JANECKO (REGISTERED VOTER): It depends how you feel about Bill Clinton.
WOMAN #4: Absolutely.
JANECKO: If you have a favorable opinion about him, then you're all about him coming to Hillary's defense. But, if you aren't a Bill Clinton fan, then I think it undermines her campaign.
SHIPMAN: Her husband's support could muddle her so far successful image of independent strength.
SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: I don't think they're piling on because I'm a woman. I think they're piling on because I'm winning.
ABENAA ADDEI: (Registered voter): You have to be strong. She has to -- a man is automatically looked at as strong, so Hillary has to definitely show the whole world how she can be a stronger woman.
HOPE GALLEY (REGISTERED VOTER): As a strong woman, like, there's a part of her that appeals to me, even though I don't agree, you know, even though I'm, I'm a Republican.
SHIPMAN: So help or hurt, our focus group probably got it right, depends on what you think of Bill Clinton. I know the campaign does not think it's helpful for Bill Clinton to suggest that her rivals are not playing fair. But the latest comments were different. They were light, they were playful and suggested Hillary could handle it herself.
SAWYER: You implied in the piece, Claire, they're welcome but not coordinated. Do you mean the two campaigns really don't know what the other's going to do? I mean, her husband and Senator Clinton.
SHIPMAN: Well, look, there's a lot of coordination at the very top obviously between the Clintons. And the Clinton campaign does talk with his office all the time. And obviously, he is a, he's a brilliant strategist for her campaign. But everybody knows that Bill Clinton can't always be scripted. And so I think we may see more of this, Diane.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
I can't wait for the time
November 13, 2007 - 13:29 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltI can't wait for the time when Hillary feels that she's taken Bill's support as far as it will get her and she asks him to back off on the campaign trail and leave it to her...remember how AlGore didn't want Bill campaigning for him due to his high negative numbers at the end of his presidency?
I see sparks flying because she'll want him to shut up and he won't! He CAN'T shut up and the news media will forever be sticking a michrophone in his face.
Especially when the personal values issue comes up. Gonna be great!
This is a media Pre-emptive!
November 13, 2007 - 14:04 ET by FastEdBecause they saw the stumble, the flip and the flop, they have seen a little of "what's behind the curtain", and they're paving the way to pad their backsides, when she falls, they go with her, BUT, it won't hurt so much 'cause it (her campaign) was sabotaged, inadvertantly, by 'I need the attention', bill.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
WRONG QUESTION...
November 13, 2007 - 14:20 ET by danybhoyHere is a better question for ABC & the rest of the MSM...Will the brilliant & talented Bill help the polarizing & untalented Hillary?
In my opinion, Bill is the most talented politician I've seen in a long time. Like him or not, I believe that's true. Hillary is really nothing special, politically speaking. To some extent, Bill seems like he would be fun to hang out with at a BBQ or the golf course. Hillary seems to a nightmare from top to bottom, much like a nagy ex-wife.
I'm not sure Bill can help Hillary with the American voter, maybe with the help of the MSM, AND THEY ARE TRYING TO HELP. I think Hillary is in way over her head, & has little to offer politically, plus since she has NEVER been challenged politically, you see by her stumbling around like a punchdrunk fighter the last 2weeks exposes this fact. Lazio & Pirllo are small time compaired to what it in store.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
Bill is a natural
November 13, 2007 - 15:25 ET by motherbeltBill is a natural politician....he has "the gift." All Hillary can do is practice, practice, practice.
You have to wonder how he would really react to the idea of being second-fiddle in the White House. Would he really be content in a secondary role, and would he be able to resist trying to draw the attention to himself?
As to whether he will help or hinder her, I keep remembering Chris
Matthews' off-the-cuff wondering if Bill really wanted her to win.
That's actually a very interesting question.
DENNIS MILLER...
November 13, 2007 - 17:28 ET by danybhoyTo your last point motherbelt, Dennis Miller said as much in his HBO special "All In". He said that the only man that could stop Hillary was Bill. There may be some truth in that, but she can screw it up on her own as well, & I think she will.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
Come to think of it..
November 13, 2007 - 14:22 ET by KillgraveMaybe it wouldn't be that bad having this broad as President.
BJ would have plenty of time on his hands, since he would only be an unofficial advisor. So he'll be going through those whitehouse interns like a two-for-one day at a lady's shoe store. There's no way that they will be able to keep that bottled.
BJ also won't be able to control his egotism, which demands total attention. So he'll be constantly muscling his way into the spotlight of Rodham's meetings and public appearances.
Mix that with Rodham's famous evil temper.
The White House will end up the next Ground Zero in about 12 months, tops. Forget national health care. Forget any major initiatives that would cripple this country. We'll get a four-year comedy show and be assured that no loony left broad will make it into the White House again anytime soon.
It is not what people think but what Bill is doing
November 13, 2007 - 14:35 ET by Lame CherryShipman once again gets it wrong. (She needs to Mastered by a real Conservative gentleman so she gets her head on straight.)
It does not matter what moronic male or female voters "think" as they are clueless. What matters in this is what is Bill doing for Hillary?
The answer is Bill is making his wife look WEAK time and again. He runs around liberal like saying people are picking on lil Hillary making her look like someone who can't even handle a puff ball like Tim Russert. (I have seen this dude on Jeopardy and this dude is not that bright.)
So why is Bill in subtle serpent up the apple tree fashion poking holes in Hillary's boat? He is sinking her campaign, because he knows next year tons of stories and video are going to come streaming out of Bill putting it to women not his wife. He is trying to protect his legacy by sinking Hillary before she gets the nomination.
The cartel does not want this woman. They purchased Al Gore 2 years ago.
Biden, Dodd, Richardson were enlisted to be cabinet members for Gore 08 and Obama was brought off the plantation to show black folks that they too have power........until Obama is ushered back into the Senate to fade away.
Edwards has been the Gore pawn working with Chris Matthews from the start. He is the chiseler in this to hack at Clinton but be light enough that voters will herd to Gore in the appointed time.
Bill is part of the wrecking crew and it is his little drill bit drilling holes into Hillary's boat adding to the list she flounders around in the deep waters.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The answer is Bill is
November 13, 2007 - 15:24 ET by motherbeltThe answer is Bill is making his wife look WEAK time and again. He runs
around liberal like saying people are picking on lil Hillary making her
look like someone who can't even handle a puff ball like Tim Russert.
LC, see my reply above to danybhoy. Chris Matthews wondered out loud if Bill really wanted his wife to win.
I agree he may be subconsciously trying to sabotage her, but not for the reason you do. I think he can't stand the thought of playing second fiddle.
It's disturbing how Libs,
November 13, 2007 - 17:42 ET by mattmIt's disturbing how Libs, especially those in the MSM, and their brain-washed devotees equate slickness and shrewdness with brilliance.
I've been thinking about this too
November 13, 2007 - 23:25 ET by celatorThe Clinton's "brilliance" has been one of memes hammered into public consciousness for a long time.
I've yet to see evidence of this "brilliance" from either of them. Conniving? Yes, they are. Manipulative? For sure. Disloyal to all who are unfortunate enough to get caught up in the exhaust of the Clinton machine? You bet. Vocally threatening to those who defy their march to power? You better believe it.
But brilliant? There's no evidence. At best, they are intellectually pedestrian. The books they write are unreadable and worthless. There is no there there.