![]()
According to ABC reporter Cokie Roberts, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has "had way too favorable press at this point in the season." Appearing on Friday's "Good Morning America" to discuss whether Clinton is now playing the "gender card" in the '08 race, Roberts asserted that, as a result of this popular coverage, the media is now "going after her."
Video (0:32): Real (893 kB) and Windows (996 kB), plus MP3 audio (248 kB).
Roberts also claimed that the former First Lady, who stayed with Bill Clinton through the Monica Lewinsky scandal, "has been a strong woman and people have seen examples of that certainly in her personal life." While it's not clear how hard the press is now "going after" the New York senator, Cokie Roberts could have been referring to GMA when she mentioned "way too favorable press." After all, this is the show that gave Ms. Clinton an almost 30 minute infomercial during a March "town hall" edition of the program. And in January, Claire Shipman reported on "Good Morning America" that Barack Obama would have to contend with Hillary's "hot factor."
An August study by the Media Research Center found that the senator, along with the other Democratic candidates, received more favorable coverage and more air time overall. From January through July 31 2007, Hillary Clinton garnered 61 stories, more than any other 2008 candidate.
To be fair, Roberts did mention the New York senator's waffling on the issue of giving drivers licenses to illegals and how it "plays into all of the perceptions of the Clintons, both Clintons, of talking both for and against a lot of issues." Interestingly, while Roberts and co-host Diane Sawyer discussed whether Clinton was playing the gender card at debate, and the subject of drivers licenses, they did it without mentioning Clinton's much-panned complaining that debate host Tim Russert engaged in a "gotcha" question by even bringing the subject up.
A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:10am on November 2, follow:
DIANE SAWYER: Well, now we turn to the race to '08 and what happened yesterday when the Democratic front-runner returned to her roots? This is Hillary Rodham in 1969 when she was giving the graduation speech at Wellesley College. And this was Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, yesterday, uttering the sentence that had everybody talking this morning.
SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: In so many ways this all women's college prepared me to compete in the all boys club of presidential politics.
SAWYER: So her rivals have been saying is she playing the gender card? Well, who better to weigh in on all this than ABC's Cokie Roberts, joining us now from Washington. Cokie, good morning to you. 58 percent of Democratic primary voters are women. Is this a strategy we see emerging?
COKIE ROBERTS: Certainly it is, Diane, but it's not new. It's not a new strategy. And you and I should point out in full disclosure that you and I both went to Wellesley College.
SAWYER: And wore glasses. I did.
ROBERTS: The-- And-- What she said there was just a statement of fact, that women's college did prepare her for the life that she has led and presidential politics has been an all-boys club. But, sure, she's been playing the gender card all along. Women are her big base of support. Lately she's been way up in the polls among all groups. But earlier on, her lead was almost entirely among women.
SAWYER: Yes, but something else. Se has on her website now a montage, as we call it in the TV business. And it's called the politics of piling on in which all the candidates, who happen to be men, are using her name. Let's listen a little.
[Montage of all the Democratic rivals saying "Senator Clinton" or "Hillary"]
SAWYER: Okay. And at the end of this, she says, you know, there's got to be a reason they're doing this. But, Fred Thompson, Republican candidate Fred Thompson, has said, "The Clinton campaign goes so far in relying upon her being a strong, strong woman. And then on a dime, they can switch to say, 'Oh, my goodness, the men are ganging up on her."
ROBERTS: Again, they're both true. The fact is that she has been a strong woman and people have seen examples of that certainly in her personal life. But the fact is that the men are ganging up. But they gang up against any front-runner. So the question is, how do voters react to the fact that it's men ganging up on a woman? We were going to hit this point, Diane. She's running way too far ahead in the polls. And so she's, she's a front-runner. And the candidates are beating up on her. The press is going after her. She's had way too favorable press at this point in the season. And so there she is. But the question is how do voters react? Do they say, "Gee, don't like seeing all those guys beating up on that woman?" Or do they say, "She really can't do this?"
SAWYER: All right. A quick final question here about a real issue. Governor Spitzer of New York has talked about issuing driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. And there is something that Senator Clinton said in the debate that got all of her challengers really, really jumping on her. This was her analysis of whether she was for or against that.
CLINTON: It makes a lot of sense. What is the governor supposed to do? He is dealing with a serious problem. We have failed. And George Bush has failed. Do I think this is the best thing for any governor to? No. But do I understand the sense of real desperation, trying to get a handle on this? Remember, in New York, we want to know who's in New York. We want people to come out of shadows. He's making an honest effort to do it. We should have passed immigration reform.
SAWYER: And then there was the reaction.
FORMER SENATOR JOHN EDWARDS: Unless I missed something, Senator Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes.
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: I can't tell whether she was for it or against.
SAWYER: Is that a turning point of some kind, Cokie?
ROBERTS: No, but it plays into all of the perceptions of the Clintons, both Clintons, of talking both for and against a lot of issues. She has to be careful with that. That's a real weakness with her campaign.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Ugly Sister Rule
November 2, 2007 - 11:56 ET by kdoliverI have been wondering since the other Dems are going after her now and on some of the same issues/practices that the Republicans have for years, does that make it ok for the media to follow up? I have been thinking it is the ugly sister rule between the media and the Dems.
What I hope comes out of this is that when the Dems point out the same flaws that us rational people see in her, the less than knowledgeable voter pays attention.
http://thelazytriathlete.blogspot.com/
Turning point..."the King (Queen) has no clothes!"
November 2, 2007 - 12:41 ET by vrwc13ROBERTS: "...had way too favorable press at this point in the season."
then later...
SAWYER: Is that a turning point of some kind, Cokie?
ROBERTS: No, but it plays into all of the perceptions of the Clintons, both Clintons, of talking both for and against a lot of issues. She has to be careful with that. That's a real weakness with her campaign.
FORMER SENATOR JOHN EDWARDS: Unless I missed something, Senator Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes.
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA: I can't tell whether she was for it or against.
Me thinks Roberts said "no" to it being a "turning point", but her answer seems to say yes...kind of like Hillary herself...
v
face pile of trials with smiles...
Going After????
November 2, 2007 - 12:15 ET by mattmThis is what's so frustrating; it's not about "going after" people, it's about telling the truth about people...which the MSM never does...
All they'd have to do is expose Hillary's megalomania, her marxism, her criminal behavior, her amoralism, her pretentiousness and her complete lack of qualifications, and her campaign would be as dead as Vince Foster.
All they'd have to do is expose Hillary's...
November 2, 2007 - 12:22 ET by vrwc13Mattm, just give it time. Once the dems get through with her, if she still is their candidate (which I doubt by then)...the Republicans get their shot....
Gore/Dobb vs Huckabee/(Bush/Perry/Hunter/Thompson)
v
face piles of trials with smiles...
I must admit
November 2, 2007 - 12:31 ET by cvgbuckeyeI must admit, with a bit of caution, (no one here has ever heard of me anyway), that I am relatively acquainted with several former US Senators and Congressmen.
They lay claim that the RNC is hiding like a lamb, in grand anticipation of the day that Ms. Clinton has officially sewed up the democrat nomination. Then, the lamb morphs into a raging lion with an unbelievable cache of the most damaging revelations ever to confront a candidate for national office.
At that time, it will be totally irrelevant whether Ms. & Mr. Clinton release any information in the archives or not; irrelevant.
The Clintonian mafia is already cognizant of the oncoming storm, BUT, people like Paul Begala and his ilk, have an extremely low regard for the intelligence and morality of the American People (based upon it's tolerance of Slick Willy 10 years ago) and they are convinced that they can weather the storm. James Carville has a tendency to disagree.
I pray to God Almighty that the Begalas are wrong and the Carvilles are right.
The really irritating thing
November 2, 2007 - 13:49 ET by motherbeltThe really irritating thing to me is this:
The other day in a thread I said this "gang-up" thing was a ploy to keep people from talking about the answers she didn't give, and the waffling on the answers she did give. Yesteraday a couple of the political shows, and today too, are saying the same thing. Rush talked about it too.
So the knowledge of what she is doing is definitely out there. But what are they talking about? The fact that this is a ploy to keep attention off her non-answers and waffling!
STILL no real "going after her" on the ISSUES even though they ADMIT that she is playing this to keep attention off those issues!
So it's working!
It reminds me of her husband's years when they would "spin" stories, and the media, instead of unravelling the yarn, would make the story about the "spin," sometimes even marvelling at their skill. Either way, the attention was off the messy details that they didn't want examined too closely.
It's just infuriating!
"ROBERTS: No, but it plays
November 2, 2007 - 12:31 ET by MightyMouth"ROBERTS: No, but it plays into all of the perceptions of the Clintons,
both Clintons, of talking both for and against a lot of issues. She has
to be careful with that. That's a real weakness with her campaign"
Those few sentences sum up the problem with the Clintons. They are and always have put politics above what's good for the country. This is a big problem with both parties but the Clintons excel in this area. Now I don't agree with everything Dubya has done but I really believe he puts America's best interests ahead of politics.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Too Little Too Late
November 2, 2007 - 12:36 ET by deerjerkydaveIf big media is going to go after Hillary, the first thing they should do is investigate her fundraising problems. Where did Arthur Hsu get his money? Where did poor Chinese families in New York get the money to donate tens of thousands of dollars to her? And now we have Peter Paul and his fundraising problems with Hillary. Not to mention Hillary is utilizing the services of Sandy Burgler. Why does Hillary surround herself with criminals?
...birds of a feather...
November 2, 2007 - 12:39 ET by vrwc13...birds of a feather...
v
One of my liberal female
November 2, 2007 - 12:40 ET by msh1973One of my liberal female co-workers told me that she is so disgusted with the Dems that she will most likely not vote next year, for the first time in her adult life. I asked her why she wasn't backing Hillary, she told me she couldn't "stomach her". Interesting.
She Even Turns Off Liberals
November 2, 2007 - 16:13 ET by NoMoreClintonsMy brother and his wife, both big libs in Florida (supported Kerry in '04), can't stand Hellary and say they won't vote for her. For what it's worth . . .
Dear
November 2, 2007 - 12:55 ET by Roger the ShrubberDear Newsbusters,
Please refrain from posting images of my movies. The caption photo in this thread was taken from my 1981 classic "Escape From New York" Please desist, or you will hear from my lawyers.
Sincerely, John Carpenter
P.S. the "Halloween" remake sucked!
lol
November 2, 2007 - 12:59 ET by deerjerkydavelol! That's awesome!
Holy Cokie!
November 2, 2007 - 16:16 ET by NoMoreClintonsThat's great. It's too good.
I heard Chris Cilizza this
November 2, 2007 - 13:20 ET by bigtimerI heard Chris Cilizza this morning on msnbc spin a good one for Hillary about her defeat in the debate Tues. night....
She weathered all of the debate pretty well until they got to the last two minutes....then she had to have had mental stress/strain after doing such a good job....
OH Puhleeeeeeze Chris....spin this tripe elsewhere....it is absolutely laughable.
She pulled out herself for all the world to see, now she has that foot stuck up her arse and she will not ever get it all pulled out...ever!
I call it her Howard Dean moment....just think, there is more to come yet....lol.
Strong Women
November 2, 2007 - 14:57 ET by pocomocoRoberts also claimed that the former First Lady, who stayed with Bill Clinton through the Monica Lewinsky scandal, "has been a strong woman and people have seen examples of that certainly in her personal life.”
This statement is truly laughable, because any other ‘strong woman’ would have left her husband under such circumstances or, at worst, set fire to him while he was sleeping.
poco... You got that
November 2, 2007 - 15:02 ET by bigtimerpoco...
You got that right!
Birds of a Feather...
November 2, 2007 - 16:09 ET by Del DolemonteCokie and Hill went to the same college, namely Wellesley. So did Diane Sawyer, Lynn Sherr, and NPR's Linda Wertheimer.
Any wonder why ABC stands for "Always Believe Clinton"?