ABC's George Stephanopoulos highlighted adversarial quotes and characterizations for an interview with 2008 Republican candidate Mike Huckabee on Tuesday's "Good Morning America." The former Clinton operative quoted conservative Phyllis Schlafly as saying, "[Huckabee] destroyed the conservative movement in Arkansas" and Betsy Hagen of the Eagle Forum who compared the GOP contender to Bill Clinton and labeled him a liberal. In a previous piece, ABC reporter Jake Tapper highlighted an American Spectator article that derided Huckabee as "a guy with a thin skin, a nasty vindictive streak and a long history of imbroglios about questionable ethics."
Now, one could argue that Stephanopoulos's critique hit Huckabee from the right and, by quoting Schlafly, questioned whether the former governor is conservative enough to be the GOP nominee. However, just two weeks ago ABC medical expert Dr. Tim Johnson conducted a fawning interview with Hillary Clinton over her health care plan. He lauded the Democrat for knowing "health care better, I think, than any other candidate" and gushed over how impressed he was with the New York senator's "knowledge base." She certainly didn't face any adversarial quotes about temperament and "questionable ethics."
To be fair, Stephanopoulos did offer some neutral questions and even this softball: "I know you had a big concert on Saturday night...Who's the one rock star you would just love to jam with before the end of this campaign?" And, certainly, hitting a GOP candidate on the issue of being conservative enough is valuable for Republican primary voters. But if Mike Huckabee is going to have to respond to such stinging critiques, it would be nice if Hillary Clinton faced reporters who do more than coo about her "knowledge base."
A transcript of the Stephanopoulos segment, which aired at 7:16am on October 30, follows:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And that is where I began with Governor Huckabee, earlier this morning. Good morning, Huckabee. Boy, the better you do, the bigger the target you've become. Some of your old adversaries in Arkansas are stepping out now. Betsy Hagan of the Eagle Forum saying about you, 'He was pro-life and pro-gun, but otherwise a liberal. Just like Bill Clinton, he will charm you, but don't be surprised if he takes a completely different turn in office.' Phyllis Schlafly, 'He destroyed the conservative movement in Arkansas and left the Republican Party a shambles.' What do you say to that?
MIKE HUCKABEE: There are probably over a hundred Republican elected officials and appointed officials who are ready to counter that argument. So, sure, you can always find somebody that I made mad. You know, George, when you're governor 10 and a half years, as I used to say, you got to wake up every day and make ten new friends because you're going to lose seven by something you said or did.
STEPHANOPOULOS: How about more generally? It seems like the conservative Christian movement this year is having a hard time finding a candidate. And I was struck by the fact that right now, at least, Mayor Giuliani is the most popular candidate among white evangelicals and he's got a plurality of the Christian conservative vote. How do you explain that given his pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions? He's had three marriages. How do you explain that and what do you do about it?
HUCKABEE: Well, I don't know that I can explain it, except that there's a lot of anxiety about the prospect of Hillary becoming president. But what they sometimes forget is that nobody knows her better than me and nobody has successfully run against the Clinton political machine in Arkansas as I did not once, twice, three times, but four times and won.
STEPHANOPOULOS: What's the one-line case against Hillary?
HUCKABEE: Well, I think that people know that if Hillary is president, there's going to be a different focus on more taxes, more government, more intrusion into the lives of people in terms of government having more control than the private sector and that brings some anxiety. There's also the concern she's not going to be that strong on the Islamofascist movement we face as an enemy and I think there's just that sense of anxiety.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You look among white evangelicals. Last year, 80 percent said they would vote for President Bush. This time, only 60 percent say they're open to a Republican. Same thing for white Catholics, white main line Protestants. What is going on inside the Christian movement? You're a former minister.
HUCKABEE: Well, some of it, George is there's a maturing and seasoning within the evangelical world. Many of us, including me, believe that we've also got to address the issues that affect the poor. We can't just be-- We're for sanctity of life and we're for traditional of marriage. We also have to be conservationists and be good stewards of the Earth. We have to deal with issues like poverty and AIDS. And if we don't deal with those issues, we're really not being true to our own Christian calling. I think that's part of what's kind of what's happening in the movement.
STEPHANOPOULOS: How do you take it to the next step? How do you close the deal with Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani?
HUCKABEE: Well, obviously, I'm doing something right. And I think it shows that people are beginning to pay attention to the message. And in the last six days, we've raised more money online than we've raised in the first three months of the entire campaign. So, it's beginning to catch just at the right time as I had hoped and prayed it would.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I know you had a big concert on Saturday night. Who's the one -- Who's the one rock star you would just love to jam with before the end of this campaign?
HUCKABEE: You know, at some point, I want to be on stage with Keith Richards and just, you know, turn it loose. I think it would be pretty incredible to be on stage with somebody who has lasted, you know, longer than the entire rock era. I think that would be pretty slick.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, I don't know if it would help your campaign, but it sounds like it would be a lot of fun. Governor, thanks very much for joining us this morning.
HUCKABEE: My pleasure, George.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Keith Richards at the inaugural ball? But you know, what he's hoping for, the breakout moment in Iowa like so many other candidates.
HUCKABEE: Keith Richards, Mike Huckabee what kind of spectrum is that? We'll be back.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
What Huck should have said:
October 30, 2007 - 12:05 ET by mattm"George, shouldn't you recuse youself from covering the campaign, seeing as how your former boss is in the race? I mean, doesn't that compromise whatever standards of objectivity you might have?"
No Republican should dignify Stephi by even speaking with him, unless establishing his Clintonista status and bias.
matt, who are you
October 30, 2007 - 12:15 ET by motherbeltmatt, who are you kidding?????? Media heads will ask Steffie if his former connection with the Clintons affects his objectivity, and he will say "Of course not, I'm a professional." And they will say, "Oh, OK then."
"George, shouldn't you recuse youself from covering the campaign, seeing as how your former boss is in the race?
What I wouldn't give to have every Republican facing him ask that question, right up front.
Heck, I wish just ONE would. At least Bob Dole had the guts to say something similar to Katie Couric.
Conflict of Interest, mattm
October 30, 2007 - 12:38 ET by Six String SpiffOh, but mattm, you forgot one thing; He isn't a Republican and is thereby dismissed of any potential and past problems.
"I don't give DAMN what you think you're entitled too."
Duct tape alert!!
October 30, 2007 - 12:09 ET by motherbeltThis posting should have a "duct tape alert."
This is just infuriating! Every time a Republican gets interviewed, they get clobbered with every negative thing anyone has said about them. When it's a Democrat, they get the soft-shoe dance and the kiss-kiss routine.
Welcome to the 2008 election cycle, courtesy of McCain-Feingold. And 60 days before the election, the MSM's campaigning for Democrats will be ALL that we are allowed to hear, because everything else will be illegal.
I mean, how do you beat this?????
Excuse me...I have to go get my duct tape.
How do you beat this?
October 30, 2007 - 12:23 ET by mattmYou tell the MSM pundit off from the beginning. You challenge the source of the questions. You nail them on the bias issue right off the bat and humiliate the hell out of them. You question their political agenda. You demand proof that they ask the same type of questions of Democrats.
Then you run ads during the 60 days, and if you have to go to court - fine. McC-F should be challenged as a violation of the 1st Amendment...it may take civil disobedience to do it. And in Stephi's case, you point out his obvious affilliation to Clinton with a jab like "Well well George, still working for the Clintons, I see...."
One of the major reasons the GOP has so much trouble in the media is that they don't challenge them. They have this old-school notion that if you attack the media you will be seen as deflecting. This is a bogus excuse for the simple reason that that charge can easily be refuted by answering the question, but only AFTER establishing the fact that the interviewer is a Democrat hack.
They don't think they have to fight back.
October 30, 2007 - 12:58 ET by motherbeltmatt, I think they lose because they overestimate the intelligence of the American voter. When they get demonized, like they did with the school lunch program, they don't fight back because they think people are too smart to fall for "a reduction in the rate of increase is a CUT". News flash, GOP, a lot of them are not.
They got it right on the S-CHIP program...they got out there and said look, They're talking about people earning 4 times the poverty rate, and kids up to 25 years old (although at the lower income I wouldn't have a problem with that if the kids were full-time college students...most insurances allow that.) But they won't learn from their success. They'll go right back to their "kick me again" mentality.
And they should go after the media. Bob Dole took a lot of heat for snapping back at Couric, but you know what? He was right. There should be more of it.
"Well well George, still working for the Clintons, I see...."
THAT is priceless!! I think I would pay cash money to see Giuliani, or Romney, or Thompson...any one of them... say that.
He is absolutely the worst of the bunch. How he got a job as a supposedly "objective" journalist is beyond me. And anyone who doesn't believe he will move heaven and earth for HRC has grapes for brains.
anyone who doesn't believe he will move heaven and earth for HRC
October 30, 2007 - 13:24 ET by vrwc13....probably already has his office in the Whitehouse (think she'll paint so it can be called the Pinkhouse?) picked out.
v
“legislative fix” (communism),"it takes a village" (socialism), pro-choice (baby killing), experienced (carpetbagging senator), "i'll take that money" (anti-capitalism), empty pantsuit running on on someone's coattails - "quotes" by HRC
Culture of Clinton
October 30, 2007 - 12:24 ET by acumen"...it would be nice if Hillary Clinton faced reporters who do more than coo about her "knowledge base."
Speaking of Clinton's "knowledge base" or lack of as the case may be, this would be a good starting point if only we had a dem-biased free media:
Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign has returned nearly $1.3 million to hundreds of donors since July 1, including more than $800,000 tied to disgraced one-time fugitive Norman Hsu. The total figure is more than triple the returned donations for the rest of the Democratic field combined.
Don't hold your breath
October 30, 2007 - 15:06 ET by motherbeltDon't hold your breath waiting for the "investigative journalism" on that one. Mrs. "Knowledge base" shows an appalling lack of knowledge about, and interest in, where her money is coming from. How about the portion of Hsu's money, that instead of giving back, they gave to charity? What's up with that? Why didn't the money go back where it came from? Doese she think those people just wanted to unload some money and don't care where it went? Or does she know better where it came from?
For the smartest woman in the world, she certainly has been ignorant of a lot of stuff going on around her. She takes "plausible deniability" to heights never seen before.
Speaking of which: have you seen the Peter Paul video where she's on the phone? She asks him: "Whatever you're doing; is it OK that I thank you?" Now if that's not a "is it OK that I'm in on this, or is it illegal and should I pretend I don't know anything about it?" then I don't know what it is.
And yet the MSM completely lacks interest in any of this.
Nothing to see here...move along.....
Hillary = anxiety...by george I think he's got it!
October 30, 2007 - 12:58 ET by vrwc13HUCKABEE: Well, I don't know that I can explain it, except that there's a lot of anxiety about the prospect of Hillary becoming president. But what they sometimes forget is that nobody knows her better than me and nobody has successfully run against the Clinton political machine in Arkansas as I did not once, twice, three times, but four times and won.
STEPHANOPOULOS: What's the one-line case against Hillary?
HUCKABEE: Well, I think that people know that if Hillary is president, there's going to be a different focus on more taxes, more government, more intrusion into the lives of people in terms of government having more control than the private sector and that brings some anxiety. There's also the concern she's not going to be that strong on the Islamofascist movement we face as an enemy and I think there's just that sense of anxiety.
v
“legislative fix” (communism)"it takes a village" (socialism), pro-choice (baby killing), experienced (carpetbagging senator), "i'll take that money" (anti-capitalism), (the empty pantsuit running on on someone's coattails) - HRC
STEPHANOPOULOS: What's the
October 30, 2007 - 13:01 ET by motherbeltSTEPHANOPOULOS: What's the one-line case against Hillary?
Knowing Steffie, that was a reconnaissance mission...drawing out the competition to see what their line of attack would be, so that HRC can be prepared to strike back immediately.
I know I'm being cynical, but.......
OK, what?
October 30, 2007 - 14:21 ET by okiehawk44What does the Clinton slime machine (is that redundant?) have on Johnson? Photos, tapes, tapes w/photos, something with an animal? OK, what?
Confront Stephi! Why hold
October 30, 2007 - 13:22 ET by ConservativeRexConfront Stephi! Why hold back? He's not going to. Huckabee had better grow a pair if he's going into the lion's den. Hit these liberals every single time. Make them show themselves who they truly are. Any conservative is not going to get a fair shake from these Neo-Stalinist, so don't expect one.
Elect me!
October 30, 2007 - 18:21 ET by SlicksterUnlike Hillary, my knowledge base includes not only,"I can't recall, and I don't remember saying that" but also "it's the other guys fault,"" I don't know" and it wasn't me".
I think there is a silver lining in this cloud
October 30, 2007 - 22:10 ET by timotheThe more I watch, the more I'm sure that the one-sidedness of the MSM during the primary is only going to hurt the Dems in the general election. Just like in 2004.
If Kerry's military record had been questioned during the primary season, the Dems may have offered up a better candidate to beat Bush. But instead, Kerry got knocked around by the Swift Boat Ads at a critical time in the campaign.
The MSM and the left wing thinks that the American public is stupid and can't see the wheat from the chaff. In the end, they are usually proved wrong.
He lauded the Democrat
October 31, 2007 - 02:46 ET by USA4freedomHe lauded the Democrat for knowing "health care better,
I think, than any other candidate" and gushed over how impressed he was
with the New York senator's "knowledge base."
That is like saying a 6th grader knows history
more then the 4th graders. That does not make either group expert enough,
to take somewhere around a 7th of our economy away from the private
sector.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day