![]()
On Wednesday’s "Good Morning America," co-host Robin Roberts, for the second day in a row, intimated that Clarence Thomas was guilty of sexually harassing Anita Hill. Interviewing Anucha Brown-Sanders about her successful harassment lawsuit against New York Knicks coach Isiah Thomas, Roberts gratuitously segued, "Yesterday, sitting where you are right now, Anita Hill, who was here to talk about what happened 16 years ago when she was brought before the Judiciary Committee, with Clarence Thomas being a nominee for the Supreme Court..." Roberts then asked Browne-Sanders, "Do you think your decision in your court case can have a similar impact?"
Implicit in this question is the idea that Hill’s claims against the now-Supreme Court justice are true. Would Roberts use Clinton-accuser Paula Jones as a similar comparison to a modern case? On Tuesday’s GMA, the ABC host employed the same tactic in the interview with Anita Hill. Roberts sympathetically questioned, "Is it better now in the workplace for women?" Again, this leaves the assumption that for things to be "better," Thomas must have been guilty of making them worse for Hill.
A partial transcript of Robert’s interview with Anucha Brown Sanders, which aired at 7:18am on October 3, follows:
Robin Roberts: "Yesterday, sitting where you are right now, Anita Hill, who was here to talk about what happened 16 years ago when she was brought before the Judiciary Committee, with Clarence Thomas being a nominee for the Supreme Court and I asked her about what those 16 years, what they have meant and what they have meant for other people. Take a listen."
Anita Hill: "I've heard from so many people who say those hearings taught me. They allowed me to come forward, they allowed me to reconcile with what happened in my life. And so with hindsight, I can't think that I should have done anything differently."
Roberts: "Do you think your decision in your court case can have a similar impact?"
Anucha Browne Sanders (Won $11.6 million in Sexual harassment case): "I hope it does. I hope it has an impact, particularly for the people that are left there at Madison Square Garden. And for employers across industry to take heed and to pay attention and take responsibility for the workplace and I really believe that it's leadership and an environment is guided by leadership. And I think when leadership decides that this is acceptable, then it's acceptable throughout, and when leadership decides it's unacceptable and we're not going to put up. They begin to– They're the ones who set the standard."
Roberts: "Anucha, thank you very much. Certainly appreciate your time this morning. All the best for you. And Anucha Brown Sanders says she's going to go back to being a mom to her three kids and back to her job as senior associate athletic director for marketing at the University of Buffalo. And she was quick to point out, Diane, they were the only ones who would hire her."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Paula Jones
October 3, 2007 - 12:12 ET by ThisnThatYour comment about Paula Jones is right on, Scott -- good observation. But that's not how the agenda-driven MSM works is it? Nor the so-called "Women's Rights" organizations like NOW. There's no way they are going to do a fair comparision because
They wouldn't like the answer
The acusation is against the wrong person (Clintoon)
Therefore, they go about their daily business of introducing bias, suppressing news and facts, and contributing to the on-going brainwashing of fewer and fewer viewers of their pathetic little shows.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
resistence is not futile -
October 3, 2007 - 12:14 ET by TruthMongerresistence is not futile - just damned annoying and time consuming
ThisnThat, What's most
October 3, 2007 - 13:06 ET by Scott WhitlockThisnThat,
What's most annoying is how clearly the media are just continuing with the template that seems to indicate, "Everybody know's he's guilty." Because if you use Hill as a reference point for women beating back harassment, that's what you're saying.
If there had been any
October 3, 2007 - 12:38 ET by Airforce_5_OIf there had been any serious charges against Justice Thomas then where is the law suit? Where is the guilty verdict against him? The answer; None!
RR has convicted a man how has never been on trial. If she realized this she might be able to show a wonderful thing called common sense. But that will never happen.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Justice Thomas
October 3, 2007 - 12:47 ET by JDWJustice v. spin? What has the party done to fulfill promises to their voters when campaigning for elections?
Who is buying this circus and not questioning the mandates which have yet to be passed?
JDW
Sen Clinton: Founder of Media Matters
JDW It's called the
October 3, 2007 - 13:25 ET by Airforce_5_OJDW
It's called the "Court of Democrat Opinion" I believe.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Lib opinion
October 3, 2007 - 13:32 ET by JDWThey cannot win in the Supreme Court or Congress. The future plan is to assassinate through .orgs, incorporate their leaders to do the same if elected.
JDW
Sen Clinton: Founder of Media Matters
AF50 -
October 3, 2007 - 13:38 ET by drillanwrHave I told you lately that I love your signature?
drillanwr, yes you have.
October 3, 2007 - 14:49 ET by Airforce_5_Odrillanwr, yes you have. Thanks and quit stocking me.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Heh-heh!
October 3, 2007 - 15:41 ET by drillanwrHeh-heh!
If I'm ever wrongly (hell,
October 3, 2007 - 12:43 ET by drillanwrIf I'm ever wrongly (hell, rightly) on trial for anything, PLEASE make sure Robin Roberts doesn't get on the jury.
No Politcal Motivation
October 3, 2007 - 13:44 ET by exLibForget about the fact that with Sanders there was no political motivation for the suit, unless you think she was a Knicks fan.
Just asking
October 3, 2007 - 14:02 ET by mattmWhere does she stand on Juanita Broderick?
On Juanita's neck ...
October 3, 2007 - 14:40 ET by drillanwrOn Juanita's neck ...
I am sure Robin thinks her
October 3, 2007 - 16:39 ET by msh1973I am sure Robin thinks her buddy Bill Clinton was innocent of all the harassment charges that were brought against him. I guess it just depends on if it is conservative or a Democrat. Robin you are a hypocrite.
As ignorant, intellectually
October 3, 2007 - 16:45 ET by fitzfongAs ignorant, intellectually lazy and partisan as journalists are (and I'm including TV morning show dolts in that category), sports journalists are the most ignorant, intellectually lazy and partisan of all. They plucked Robin Roberts from ESPN. Need I say more?
}}---> Off to Walmart
October 4, 2007 - 00:31 ET by Cool ArrowI'll be afk for awhile as I head up to Walmart to purchase Justice Thomas' book.
I've had enough of the tripe written and said about him. Think I'd rather read his own words.
Everybody who never made a suggestive remark to a person of the opposite sex in the workplace can continue to throw stones.
My guess is Anita Hill was receptive to those remarks until it was obvious her pathetic place in life was 15 minutes of complaining to that staunch moral giant, Ted Kennedy.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Helen G. Brown wrote about
October 4, 2007 - 11:49 ET by 4arrowHelen G. Brown wrote about being ever so sad for not being "pantied" by the men in her office. She admitted to standing in the halls to make herself available; no takers.
I and my sisters had to finesse ourselves OUT of such creepy, degrading situations.
I do not know the truth in this particular situation.
Just had to vent.
My faves: 1. He
October 4, 2007 - 17:15 ET by pbanks7My faves:
1. He abandoned his race - he's against the very programs he benefitted from. Affirmative action when he participated meant letting qualified blacks in. Now it means quotas regardless of qualifications. Never mind that people thought he must be stupid because he was an affirmative action graduate.
2. He just votes the same as Scalia. Gee, two conservative constructionists vote similarly, duh.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
1. He abandoned his
October 5, 2007 - 00:25 ET by 4arrow1. He abandoned his race ???????
What if an Anglo Saxon had said that? Someone's kilt would be in a twist,
Get over yourself. You do not represent anyone (race) but the family that raised you.
}}---> 4Arrow
October 5, 2007 - 00:36 ET by Cool ArrowBanks is pointing out the specious arguments the left is currently throwing at Justice Thomas. Arguments that are routinely used to marginalize his voice within America as well as its subsets.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Justice Thomas is what
October 5, 2007 - 02:08 ET by 4arrowJustice Thomas is what Justice Thomas does.
Wait and see, then decide.
}}---> 4Arrow
October 5, 2007 - 02:22 ET by Cool ArrowHe's been on the Supreme Court more than 15 years. We've waited, we've seen, and we've decided he's a great Justice who loves and defends the Constitution.
That jury is in. He has been judged outstanding.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~