On Tuesday’s "Good Morning America," ABC anchors and reporters spun the editing of Sally Field’s profanity laced anti-war rant at Sunday’s Emmys as an example of political censorship by Fox, a right-wing network. Reporter Dan Harris ominously observed, "Some say the Fox network, owned by well known conservative Rupert Murdoch, was engaged in political censorship."
However, during the ceremony, "Sopranos" creator David Chase, extolled the values of gangsters. In a halting speech, he asserted, "And hell, let’s face it, if the world and this nation was run by gangsters-- [Pause] Maybe it is." Mr. Chase’s political statement was not censored, nor were any of the numerous anti-Bush and Republican-slamming jokes that aired on the awards show. But rather than accept the explanation that Field’s comments were cut because she used an expletive, Harris claimed, "...It’s the Sally Field case that is provoking the real cries of political censorship because Fox cut off not only her expletive but also her entire thought." The argument is somewhat self defeating because, as Harris noted, Fox also censored comedian Ray Romano’s off-color joke. In fact, the ACLU is attacking the edit on the grounds of vulgarity, not politics.
Additionally, GMA anchor Diane Sawyer teased the segment by touting the superiority of Canadians. At the top of the 7am hour, she queried the audience, "...How do you really feel about TV censorship? Emmy viewers in Canada heard everything Sally Field said about war." The ABC host then wondered if Americans prefer to be out of touch. She asked, "Do Americans want the reality?" In a 7:30am tease, Sawyer worried about her fellow citizens and inquired, "Do Americans want to be censored as much as they were censored?"
Finally, following the Dan Harris piece, conservative radio host Glenn Beck appeared with co-anchor Robin Roberts to discuss the issue. He raised the point that the Fox standards executives had to make a split second decision and that they should be given the benefit of the doubt. He also expanded on the subject and scolded Hollywood with vigor rarely seen on network television:
Glenn Beck: "Now, for Hollywood to then say to me, ‘Well, you're not going to movies now. Why aren't people going to movies? It might be global warming. No, it's that you're lecturing me about global warming. It’s that you're lecturing every time– Sally Field said it best. ‘Oh, well, I'll say it again.’ Well, that's great. I like Sally Field. I really like you! And why is it these people assault 50 percent of the movie-going audience? Please. I want to watch you perform character roles. But then when you're on TV, I see you, the anti-war, or the global warming activist and I can't separate it anymore. So now, instead of, ‘I'm the king of the world,’ I see ‘And we should all be driving Priuses.’ That's what I see."
A transcript of the Dan Harris segment, which aired at 8:06am, follows:
7am tease
Diane Sawyer: "And how do you really feel about TV censorship? Emmy viewers in Canada heard everything Sally Field said about war. In the U.S., we heard this:"
Sally Field: "If the mothers ruled the war, there would be no G–"
Sawyer: "Do Americans want the reality?"
7:30am tease
Robin Roberts: "And the controversy surrounding the Emmys."
Sawyer: "Oh, yes. What about that? How do we really feel, as we said, about the fact that the Canadians heard everything? They heard Sally Field say what she said in her acceptance speech about war. Do Americans want to be censored as much as they were censored? We’re going to take a look and let you weigh in. You be the judge. You let us know what you think."
8:06am
Robin Roberts: "And now a look at what you did not see and hear at the Emmy awards. Producers cut away from best actress winner Sally Field during her acceptance speech. It was not the night's only bleep, as you know. Lately, the FCC has been cracking down on what it deems is inappropriate behavior on television. Yes, from Janet Jackson's infamous wardrobe malfunction to Bono at the Golden Globes. Censorship appears to be on the rise. But are we going too far here? Well, here’s ABC's Dan Harris."
ABC Graphic: "Sally silenced: Do Censors Go to Far?"
Sally Field: "Surely this belongs to all the mothers of the world."
Dan Harris: "It happened as Sally Field was accepting the Emmy for outstanding actress for her role as a mother in the ABC show ‘Brothers and Sisters.’"
Sally Field: "Especially the mothers who stand with an open heart and wait, wait for their children to come home from danger, from harm's way and from war. If the mothers ruled the world, there would be no G–"
Harris: "The producers killed her mic and cut to shots of the audience. But on Canadian TV, they aired the whole thing.
Field: "If the mothers ruled the war, there would be no [bleep] wars in the first place."
Harris: "Backstage, Field didn’t seem too worked up about it."
Field: "If they bleeped it, oh well. I'll just say it someplace else."
Harris: "Some say the Fox network, owned by well known conservative Rupert Murdoch, was engaged in political censorship. Fox said the comments might be considered inappropriate by some viewers. During the same show, the network also cut Ray Romano."
Ray Romano: "From what I hear, Fraiser–"
Harris: "And Katherine Heigl."
Kathy Griffin: "A lot of people come up here and they thank Jesus for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus."
Harris: "Kathy Griffin's comments at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards, which aired the night before the Emmys, were edited because she made some off-color remarks about Jesus."
Griffin: "So, all I can say is–"
Harris: "On ‘Larry King Live’ last night, Griffin appeared to be enjoying the publicity."
Griffin: "I love it. Larry, I've had the best week of my life."
Harris: "But it’s the Sally Field case that is provoking the real cries of political censorship because Fox cut off not only her expletive but also her entire thought."
Howard Kurtz (Columnist, Washington Post): "This was a live news event. Fox was supposed to cover it as a news event and not sanitize it or censor it or package it in such a way that we couldn't find out what she was saying."
Harris: "For ‘Good Morning America,’ Dan Harris, ABC News."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Listen ... Being an avid
September 18, 2007 - 16:27 ET by drillanwrListen ... Being an avid hockey fan for the last two decades I can most confidently say CANADIANS HAVE HEARD WAAAAY WORSE ... eh!?!?
Thou protest too
September 18, 2007 - 16:50 ET by USA4freedomThou protest too much.
“If” you wanted to put out an anti war speech all you had to do is.. NOT USED CUSS WORDS. I know, it’s sooooooo hard to speak with out them..
Then if Fox cut you then.. only then you can scream censorship!!!
It’s like the idiot that got tazed at the Kerry speech. He wanted a show. His face is all over the news now. Until yesterday who ever heard of this idiot.
Ohh what are you doing? Ohh don’t hurt me. Ohh what did I do? Ohhh the police are going to kill me! Bro, don’t taz me!
Ohh what did I say?? Some how, we see the video from two or three directions..
The left is so predictable, just like when Mr..er Mrs. Edwards called Chris Matthews. Same game.
Just make a scene!
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
USA4freedom, I just heard that Tazer-boy
September 18, 2007 - 16:57 ET by RJ....is known for practical jokes. The source is a local talk-show host, so I can't verify or even know if that has anything to do with the incident. But you're right, he certainly did get his 15 minutes and more....
shutting up a "free speech liberal" 101
September 18, 2007 - 17:06 ET by TruthMongerhttp://www.tldm.org/news6/SchoolPrayer.htm
cen·sor·ship [ sénssər shìp ]
Definition:
1. suppression of published or broadcast material: the suppression of all or part of a play, movie, letter, or publication considered offensive or a threat to security
2. suppression of something objectionable: the suppression or attempted suppression of something regarded as objectionable
3. ancient Roman office: the office, authority, or term of an ancient Roman censor
4. psychiatry suppression of memories: the suppression of potentially harmful memories, ideas, or desires
Sorry, TM, I have no clue what point you're trying to make.
September 18, 2007 - 17:11 ET by RJ...either with your "censorship" definition or your link.
RJ, when I find out I'll let you know...
September 18, 2007 - 17:18 ET by TruthMonger...but the link goes to school prayer censorship - this is real live censorship, by a US gov agency, no less - and completely forever ignored by the Sally Field lovers on this issue...
And it's not my censorship definition - don't really have a point other than Sally may have been censored - but so what? Private organizations can do that. The US government can't...or shouldn't be able to - but does...
How hysterical considering Canada banned Fox News
September 18, 2007 - 16:45 ET by Dee BunkHow hysterical considering Canada banned Fox News for a long time and might even still in many areas.
What is being missed here
September 18, 2007 - 16:49 ET by xfastWhat is being missed here is not that she assaulted Republicans, but rather her slam on men.
There would be no wars if mothers ran the country? Great, maybe we could get an Andrea Yates in office to drown all the kids...
I thought Fox was just
September 18, 2007 - 16:51 ET by MightyMouthI thought Fox was just trying to avoid a fine by the FCC. If the "lovely" Ms Field would not have cursed it wouldn't have been bleeped. Is that so difficult to understand ABC?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Why didn't the MSM report
September 18, 2007 - 17:15 ET by winston smithWhy didn't the MSM report on the censorship of the Kos convention last August when that Iraq war vet was quickly thrown out for disagreeing with the leftists on the panel?
Didn't FOX News air a liberaly biased and one-sided news special on Global Warming hosted by RFK Jr.? Yet I noticed the dead silence from the usual parade of FOX critics who regularly bash the network for not being fair and balanced. Would CNN or MS-LSD even briefly consider airing a Global Warming report that only gave the conservative/skeptic position?
I've yet to hear or see any reporting by the MSM concerning the 18,000 scientists who have have signed a petition declaring that there is no convincing scientific evidence for man-made global warming. Isn't that censorship too? I could go on. The MSM should be the last to point fingers at censorship when they do it themselves on a routine basis.
...all I can tell you is
September 18, 2007 - 17:25 ET by TruthMonger...all I can tell you is that it's obviously just an innocent mistake - but thank you for bringing this anti-liberal matter to the liberal MSM's attention
If only...
September 18, 2007 - 17:11 ET by c5thenIf only the liberals could form a cogent argument that is devoid of any expletives or atacks on the character of those they disagree with, they wouldn't get bleeped so much.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Fred08.com
I wonder if normal people
September 18, 2007 - 17:29 ET by JasonCI wonder if normal people could care less about this "controversy," or if it's just knee-jerk liberals who want to cry censorship", knee-jerk conservatives who are irreparably offended by Field's silly and innocuous remark, and media outlets that want to exploit the simple, herd-like minds of the aforementioned groups.
"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18
normal people thats where
September 18, 2007 - 17:33 ET by TruthMongernormal people
thats where ya lost it:(
OK, rather than "normal
September 18, 2007 - 18:00 ET by JasonCOK, rather than "normal people" how about "people who don't freak out about minor instances of cynical political grandstanding"?
"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18
silly us
September 18, 2007 - 18:38 ET by TruthMonger...it was minor all right - only a few million people saw it...
But why should I expect major entertainment media awards to bring Americans together any way? They are obviously much better as a divisive tool. We can learn much from the peace-loving crowd on this, I think...
Sally is really reducing one of the major causes of war here with her healing message:)...
bravo
That sounds like a
September 18, 2007 - 18:05 ET by balboaThat sounds like a statement you could make about the people now attacking Sally.
I can't believe this is getting this much attention.
Agreed, both sides of the
September 18, 2007 - 18:08 ET by JasonCAgreed, both sides of the ideological spectrum are being ridiculous about this one. And the media (and anti-media, as it were) pander to them.
"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18
I know its impossible for
September 18, 2007 - 18:32 ET by TruthMongerI know its impossible for libs to just be the ridiculous party:)...
Must try to drag conservatives in - when their beaten...
First of all, liberalism is
September 18, 2007 - 18:40 ET by JasonCFirst of all, liberalism is not a "party".
Second, judging by the number of histrionic posts about Field's remark on this site alone, it's safe to say that conservatives have entered into it on their own accord and needed no dragging whatsoever.
"If their sins were as scarlet, they are now white as snow" Isaiah 1:18
(sigh) party defined...
September 18, 2007 - 18:55 ET by TruthMongerReally digging in the dictionary today. I really wish public "education" would do some education just once in a while, anyways...
party
1.
a. A social gathering especially for pleasure or amusement: a cocktail party.
b. A group of people who have gathered to participate in an activity. See Synonyms at band2.
2. An established political group organized to promote and support its principles and candidates for public office.
3.
a. A person or group involved in an enterprise; a participant or an accessory: I refuse to be a party to your silly scheme.
b. Law A person or group involved in a legal proceeding as a litigant.
4.
a. A subscriber to a telephone party line.
b. A person using a telephone.
5. A person: "And though Grainger was a spry old party, such steps couldn't be his" Anthony Hyde.
6. A selected group of soldiers: a raiding party.
7. Slang
a. An act of sexual intercourse.
b. An orgy.
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or participating in an established political organization: party members; party politics.
2. Suitable for use at a social gathering: party dresses; a party hat.
3. Characteristic of a pleasurable social gathering: a party atmosphere.
intr.v. par·tied, par·ty·ing, par·ties
To celebrate or carouse at or as if at a party: That night we partied until dawn.
It's the libs that are publicizing this my friends - not conservatives...
This statement ("cogent
September 18, 2007 - 19:53 ET by balboaThis statement ("cogent argument that is devoid of any expletives or atacks on the character of those they disagree with") could easily be applied to people's reaction to Field's comment. I'm not beaten; just pointing it out.
Dan Harris needs to swear
September 18, 2007 - 17:37 ET by ThisnThatInstead of commenting on Fox News' actions, Dan, why don't you take the opportunity tomorrow morning to start swearing up a storm on Good Morning America? That way you get to put your opinions to the test -- directly.
Can't do it, can you Dan? You know why, don't you? You'd get your ass fired (OOPS -- did I just say a$$?), and you wouldn't win your case in any public or private forum. So, you are actually executing self-discipline and conforming to a show's standards, aren't you?
If you're not willing to take it to the limit in your own professional circumstances, lay off the bitching. We don't buy it. You're an open book, Dan, so obvious and so, so elite for your own good.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Dan Harris alleges: "Some
September 18, 2007 - 17:44 ET by TEDan Harris alleges: "Some say the Fox network, owned by well known conservative Rupert Murdoch, was engaged in political censorship." "Some say"? Translation: A few militant leftists, like well known militant leftist Dan Harris, say the Fox network was engaged in political censorship.
Dan Harris also asserts: "But it’s the Sally Field case that is provoking the real cries of political censorship because Fox cut off not only her expletive but also her entire thought." "[H]er entire thought"? Hahahahaha. Field has never had a "thought".
Sally should thank Fox for
September 18, 2007 - 17:58 ET by TruthMongerSally should thank Fox for trying to help to save her career - but no...
some say is Kouric's line...
some say you know! Are they liberal? No? then never mind...
Damned if you do. Damned if you don't.
September 18, 2007 - 17:53 ET by rbchaffeSo, when they bleep profanities, the ACLU sues them for free speech infringement.
But, if they don't bleep profanities, the FCC fines them for indecent language.
Only the lawyers win. What a wonderful country is the USA!
Flying None
September 18, 2007 - 18:33 ET by NoMoreClintonsIt might be my Catholic upbringing . . . but I don't think a nun should cuss like that - especially a Flying Nun.
but she's still hot
September 18, 2007 - 22:25 ET by third eyeI concur NMC, the standards we hold Flying Nuns to have declined as of late.
Sure, she's hot...if
September 18, 2007 - 22:28 ET by fitzfongSure, she's hot...if excessive botox and collagen is your thing.
The tense is wrong
September 18, 2007 - 22:41 ET by UnsaneShe WAS hot...
There, that's better.
And she IS not very bright.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
so shes alittle crazy
September 18, 2007 - 22:47 ET by third eyewait a minute my friend, I believe you have her confused with Rita Cosby
http://www.tvbloggin.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/rita.jpg
I don't think a nun should
September 18, 2007 - 22:29 ET by botgI don't think a nun should cuss like that and neither should Gidget.
Left Wing Censorship
September 18, 2007 - 22:07 ET by Cool ArrowSeems to me the Networks got skittish when Sharpton marched on NBC. I don't remember Sharpton being a member of any vast Right Wing conspiracy. He's always been the David Duke of the Left Coast.
buzzword
September 18, 2007 - 22:53 ET by tenthreeleaderAh, yes .... the ever-popular "some say".
"Some say the Fox network, owned by well known conservative Rupert Murdoch, was engaged in political censorship."
Which really means, "I'm going to tell you the DNC's talking points and disguise it as journalism."
These people are so transparent it's sickening. And if they really think Rupert Murdoch is so conservative, how do they explain some of the dreck Fox programs in prime time?
Calling it thought is a bit
September 19, 2007 - 00:28 ET by webdrCalling it thought is a bit of a stretch for Sally Field isn't it? I don't think she's capable of actual thought!
Stretch? Be careful, one
September 19, 2007 - 00:32 ET by fitzfongStretch? Be careful, one might think you're referring to her godawful facelift.
}}---> Sally's observation
September 19, 2007 - 00:36 ET by Cool ArrowSally was just parroting words we've heard all our lives. I think there's some truth to them.
I don't remember Golda Mair laundhing a war until Israel was attacked.
Margaret Thatcher didn't launch the low speed chase to the Falklands until they were already claimed by a foreign power.
So Sally is left with saying a word that is outlawed in advance and it got censored.
No story here. Why the uproar?
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
So, for you Sally Field
September 19, 2007 - 07:42 ET by USA4freedomSo, for you Sally Field next year, lets practice.
See Sally talk, Talk Sally talk.
Now you try it.
G__d D__m it, Sally talk..
No not quite, try again..
Sally talk G__d D__m it, &*$%$@**!!!
Look can you read? Just read a card..ok?
That way the government of “W”will not censure you.
Your message has to get out. You have to save the world from...men.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
First post... long time reader...
September 19, 2007 - 11:28 ET by american-americanquote: Harris: "On ‘Larry King Live’ last night, Griffin appeared to be enjoying the publicity."
Griffin: "I love it. Larry, I've had the best week of my life." end quote
I knew when I saw the story of Kathy's comment that it was a publicity stunt on her part. People gave her the press she wanted. She won.
quote: Howard Kurtz (Columnist, Washington Post): "This was a live news event. Fox was supposed to cover it as a news event and not sanitize it or censor it or package it in such a way that we couldn't find out what she was saying." end quote
Live news event? I thought it was an awards ceremony. News event? The fact that "Hollywood" has gone off the deep-end is not news to me.
PS : I am apologizing ahead of time for not knowing how to properly highlight quotes on this site.. Please forgive me until I have had time to learn the ropes...
King also asked Griffin if she planned her comment
September 19, 2007 - 12:31 ET by RJ....she said "of course I did."
P.S. Hi American. Don't worry too much about "proper" form. Just jump in. ;^>
AA
September 19, 2007 - 20:37 ET by botgi would say check your PM (personal message) but you do not have that feature enabled
to highlight quotes (or whatever) simply hold the left click down while you pick the text you wish to emphasize then left click the B or I at the bottom of the comment box